Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting dark matter annihilation with CMB polarization: Signatures and experimental prospects

Open access
Padmanabhan, Nikhil, Finkbeiner, Douglas P.·2005·Physical Review D

Abstract

Dark matter (DM) annihilation during hydrogen recombination ($z\ensuremath{\sim}1000$) will alter the recombination history of the Universe, and affect the observed CMB temperature and polarization fluctuations. Unlike other astrophysical probes of DM, this is free of the significant uncertainties in modelling galactic physics, and provides a method to detect and constrain the cosmological abundances of these particles. We parametrize the effect of DM annihilation as an injection of ionizing energy at a rate ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{DM}}$, and argue that this simple ``on the spot'' modification is a good approximation to the complicated interaction of the annihilation products with the photon-electron plasma. Generic models of DM do not change the redshift of recombination, but change the residual ionization after recombination. This broadens the surface of last scattering, suppressing the temperature fluctuations and enhancing the polarization fluctuations. We use the temperature and polarization angular power spectra to measure these deviations from the standard recombination history, and therefore, indirectly probe DM annihilation. The modifications to the temperature power spectrum are nearly degenerate with the primordial scalar spectral index and amplitude; current CMB data are therefore unable to put any constraints on the annihilation power. This degeneracy is broken by polarization; Planck will have the sensitivity to measure annihilation power ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{DM}}(z=1000)>{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}/\mathrm{s}/\mathrm{\text{proton}}$, while high sensitivity experiments (e.g. NASA's CMBpol) could improve that constraint to ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{DM}}(z=1000)>4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}/\mathrm{s}/\mathrm{\text{proton}}$, assuming a fractional detector sensitivity of $\ensuremath{\Delta}T/T\ensuremath{\sim}1\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{K}$ and a beam of ${3}^{\ensuremath{'}}$. These limits translate into a lower bound on the mass of the DM particle, ${M}_{\mathrm{DM}}>10\ensuremath{-}100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$, assuming a single species with a cross section of $⟨{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{A}v⟩\ensuremath{\sim}2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}26}{\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{cm}}^{3}/\mathrm{s}$, and a fraction $f\ensuremath{\sim}0.1\ensuremath{-}1$ of the rest mass energy used for ionization. The bounds for the Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) 4y data are significantly lower, because of its lack of high $S/N$ polarization measurements, but it can strongly constrain $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{MeV})$ particles such as those proposed by Boehm et al. (2004).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.72.023508

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Padmanabhan, N., & Finkbeiner, D. P.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2005-07-12
Volume
72
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2052306133
Cited by
339
References
5
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting dark matter annihilation with CMB polarization: Signatures and experimental prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.72.023508
The paper
Padmanabhan, N., & Finkbeiner, D. P. (2005). Detecting dark matter annihilation with CMB polarization: Signatures and experimental prospects. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.72.023508

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.