The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constrainingf(R)gravity as a scalar-tensor theory
Open accessAbstract
We search for viable $f(R)$ theories of gravity, making use of the equivalence between such theories and scalar-tensor gravity. We find that models can be made consistent with solar system constraints either by giving the scalar a high mass or by exploiting the so-called chameleon effect. However, in both cases, it appears likely that any late-time cosmic acceleration will be observationally indistinguishable from acceleration caused by a cosmological constant. We also explore further observational constraints from, e.g., big bang nucleosynthesis and inflation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Mach's Principle and a Relativistic Theory of Gravitation
Brans, C., & Dicke, R. H. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.925 · Cited by 5,621
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564246 · Cited by 3,632 · cited 1×
“Will (1993), cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr. (1993) 380 p. [16] C. M.”
A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis
Milgrom, M. (1983) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161130 · Cited by 3,316
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dynamics paradigm
Bekenstein, J. D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083509 · Cited by 1,487
Cited by
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Harko, T., Lobo, F. S. N., Nojiri, S., & Odintsov, S. D. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.024020 · Cited by 2,772
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Class of viable modifiedf(R)gravities describing inflation and the onset of accelerated expansion
Cognola, G., Elizalde, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., Sebastiani, L., & Zerbini, S. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.046009 · Cited by 871
Metadata
- Authors
- Faulkner, T., Tegmark, M., Bunn, E. F., & Mao, Y.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-09-13
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2007479791
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 19.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constrainingf(R)gravity as a scalar-tensor theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.76.063505
- The paper
- Faulkner, T., Tegmark, M., Bunn, E. F., & Mao, Y. (2007). Constrainingf(R)gravity as a scalar-tensor theory. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.76.063505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
