The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matched filtering and parameter estimation of ringdown waveforms
Open accessAbstract
Using recent results from numerical relativity simulations of nonspinning binary black hole mergers, we revisit the problem of detecting ringdown waveforms and of estimating the source parameters, considering both LISA and Earth-based interferometers. We find that Advanced LIGO and EGO could detect intermediate-mass black holes of mass up to $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{3}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ out to a luminosity distance of a few Gpc. For typical multipolar energy distributions, we show that the single-mode ringdown templates presently used for ringdown searches in the LIGO data stream can produce a significant event loss ($>10%$ for all detectors in a large interval of black hole masses) and very large parameter estimation errors on the black hole's mass and spin. We estimate that more than $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{6}$ templates would be needed for a single-stage multimode search. Therefore, we recommend a ``two-stage'' search to save on computational costs: single-mode templates can be used for detection, but multimode templates or Prony methods should be used to estimate parameters once a detection has been made. We update estimates of the critical signal-to-noise ratio required to test the hypothesis that two or more modes are present in the signal and to resolve their frequencies, showing that second-generation Earth-based detectors and LISA have the potential to perform no-hair tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
Self-citationIs the Gravitational-Wave Ringdown a Probe of the Event Horizon?
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., & Pani, P. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.171101 · Cited by 819
Self-citationBlack holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Self-citationGW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.043015 · Cited by 657
Self-citationCan environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?
Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., & Pani, P. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.104059 · Cited by 605
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Berti, E., Cardoso, J., Cardoso, V., & Cavaglià, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-11-27
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2134997235
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matched filtering and parameter estimation of ringdown waveforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.76.104044
- The paper
- Berti, E., Cardoso, J., Cardoso, V., & Cavaglià, M. (2007). Matched filtering and parameter estimation of ringdown waveforms. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.76.104044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.