The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraints on scalar-tensor models of dark energy from observational and local gravity tests
Open accessAbstract
We construct a family of viable scalar-tensor models of dark energy (DE) which possess a phase of late-time acceleration preceded by a standard matter era, while at the same time satisfying the local gravity constraints (LGC). The coupling $Q$ between the scalar field and the nonrelativistic matter in the Einstein frame is assumed to be constant in our scenario, which is a generalization of $f(R)$ gravity theories corresponding to the coupling $Q=\ensuremath{-}1/\sqrt{6}$. We find that these models can be made compatible with local gravity constraints even when $|Q|$ is of the order of unity through a chameleon mechanism, if the scalar-field potential is chosen to have a sufficiently large mass in the high-curvature regions. We show that these models generally lead to the divergence of the equation of state of DE, which occurs at smaller redshifts as the deviation from the $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ model becomes more significant. We also study the evolution of matter density perturbations and employ them to place bounds on the coupling $|Q|$ as well as model parameters of the field potential from observations of the matter power spectrum and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. We find that, as long as $|Q|$ is smaller than the order of unity, there exist allowed parameter regions that are consistent with both observational and local gravity constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310
THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERM
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2000) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 · Cited by 2,767
Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations
Bardeen, J. M. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 · Cited by 2,393
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions
Copeland, E. J., Liddle, A. R., & Wands, D. (1998) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.4686 · Cited by 1,468
Cosmological scaling solutions of nonminimally coupled scalar fields
Uzan, J.-P. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123510 · Cited by 468
Submillimeter tests of the gravitational inverse-square law
Hoyle, C. D., Kapner, D. J., Heckel, B. R., Adelberger, E. G., Gundlach, J. H., Schmidt, U., & Swanson, H. E. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.042004 · Cited by 459
Cosmological observations in scalar-tensor quintessence
Riazuelo, A., & Uzan, J.-P. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.023525 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Avgoustidis, A., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., et al. (2018) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3 · Cited by 1,009
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
Cai, Y.-F., Saridakis, E. N., Setare, M. R., & Xia, J.-Q. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 · Cited by 868
Modified Gravity Models of Dark Energy
Tsujikawa, S. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10598-2_3 · Cited by 285
Self-citationConstraining chameleon models with cosmology
Lombriser, L. (2014) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201400058 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsujikawa, S., Uddin, K., Mizuno, S., Tavakol, R., & Yokoyama, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-05-21
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2154678216
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraints on scalar-tensor models of dark energy from observational and local gravity tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.77.103009
- The paper
- Tsujikawa, S., Uddin, K., Mizuno, S., Tavakol, R., & Yokoyama, J. (2008). Constraints on scalar-tensor models of dark energy from observational and local gravity tests. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.77.103009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.