CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 104Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Constraining chameleon models with cosmology

Open access
Lombriser, Lucas·2014·Annalen der Physik
DOI 10.1002/andp.201400058
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Chameleon fields may modify gravity on cluster scales while recovering general relativity locally. This article reviews signatures of chameleon modifications in the nonlinear cosmological structure, comparing different techniques to model them, summarising the current state of observational constraints, and concluding with an outlook on prospective constraints from future observations and applications of the analytic tools developed in the process to more general scalar‐tensor theories. Particular focus is given to the Hu‐Sawicki and designer models of gravity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/andp.201400058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lombriser et al. (2014) and Lombriser (2014) combined the spherical collapse model, halo model, linear perturbation theory, quasi-nonlinear interpolation and one-loop perturbations to derive a description of the nonlinear matter power spectrum of f(R) gravity with chameleon screening up to k=0.1 h/Mpc.

    “Lombriser et al. (2014) and Lombriser (2014) combined the spherical collapse model, the halo model, linear perturbation theory, quasi-nonlinear interpolation motivated by the above and one-loop perturbations in order to derive a description of nonlinear the nonlinear matter power spectrum of f(R) gravity with chameleon screening on scales of up to h/Mpc.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Lombriser (2014)

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 161 · Cited by 104

Research works printed but not linked: 163

  1. 10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171104 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Khoury J., 2004, Phys. Rev., 69, 044026
  4. Brax P., 2004, Phys. Rev., 70, 123518
  5. Cembranos J., 2006, Phys. Rev., 73, 064029
  6. Mota D. F., 2007, Phys. Rev., 75, 063501
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.241301 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hu W., 2007, Phys. Rev., 76, 064004
  9. Song Y. S., 2007, Phys. Rev., 75, 044004
  10. 10.1093/mnras/150.1.1 · DOI
  11. Starobinsky A. A., 1979, JETP Lett., 30, 682
  12. Capozziello S., 2003, Recent Res. Dev. Astron. Astrophys., 1, 625
  13. Carroll S. M., 2004, Phys. Rev., 70, 043528
  14. Nojiri S., 2003, Phys. Rev., 68, 123512
  15. 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.033 · DOI
  16. Zhang P., 2006, Phys. Rev., 73, 123504
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.131302 · DOI
  18. 10.1142/S0218271807010936 · DOI
  19. Amendola L., 2007, Phys. Rev., 75, 083504
  20. Li B., 2007, Phys. Rev., 75, 084010
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.141302 · DOI
  22. Song Y. S., 2007, Phys. Rev., 76, 063517
  23. Jain B., 2008, Phys. Rev., 78, 063503
  24. Brax P., 2008, Phys. Rev., 78, 104021
  25. Zhao G. B., 2009, Phys. Rev., 79, 083513
  26. Hui L., 2009, Phys. Rev., 80, 104002
  27. Schmidt F., 2009, Phys. Rev., 80, 083505
  28. 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/04/030 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/nature08857 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lombriser L., 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 124038
  31. Yamamoto K., 2010, Phys. Rev., 81, 103517
  32. 10.1016/j.aop.2010.04.002 · DOI
  33. 10.1143/PTP.124.541 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.022 · DOI
  35. 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/48 · DOI
  36. Ferraro S., 2011, Phys. Rev., 83, 063503
  37. 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/036 · DOI
  38. Davis A. C., 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 123006
  39. 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/10/032 · DOI
  40. 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/08/005 · DOI
  41. Zhao G. B., 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 123546
  42. 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/11/019 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nature10445 · DOI
  44. Lombriser L., 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 102001
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.051301 · DOI
  46. Terukina A., 2012, Phys. Rev., 86, 103503
  47. Di Valentino E., 2012, Phys. Rev., 86, 063517
  48. 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/39 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1093/mnras/sts443 · DOI
  50. He J. h., 2012, Phys. Rev., 86, 103505
  51. Hu B., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 024012
  52. Okada H., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 103002, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.043427 · DOI
  53. Hall A., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 064026
  54. 10.1093/mnras/sts493 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/009 · DOI
  56. Lombriser L., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 104019
  57. P.Brax A. C.Davis andJ.Sakstein (2013). · DOI
  58. Marchini A., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 083527
  59. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/020 · DOI
  60. Abebe A., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 044050
  61. Lam T. Y., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 023012
  62. 10.1093/mnras/stt1430 · DOI
  63. Marchini A., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 027502
  64. 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.103523 · DOI
  65. Hu B., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 123514
  66. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/019 · DOI
  67. Sakstein J., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 124013
  68. Cai Y. C., 2014, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.
  69. M.Baldi F.Villaescusa‐Navarro M.Viel E.Puchwein V.Springelet al. (2013). · DOI
  70. Christian A., 2013, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 440, 833
  71. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/021 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/018 · DOI
  73. W. A.Hellwing A.Barreira C. S.Frenk B.Li andS.Cole (2014). · DOI
  74. A. C.Davis R.Gregory R.Jha andJ.Muir (2014). · DOI
  75. D.Munshi B.Hu A.Renzi A.Heavens andP.Coles (2014). · DOI
  76. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.171101 · DOI
  77. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.041301 · DOI
  78. Oyaizu H., 2008, Phys. Rev., 78, 123523
  79. Oyaizu H., 2008, Phys. Rev., 78, 123524
  80. Li B., 2009, Phys. Rev., 80, 044027
  81. 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/109 · DOI
  82. Zhao G. B., 2011, Phys. Rev., 83, 044007
  83. 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/01/051 · DOI
  84. 10.1093/mnras/stt1575 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Hu W., 2007, Phys. Rev., 76, 104043
  86. Zhao G. B., 2010, Phys. Rev., 81, 103510
  87. Li Y., 2011, Phys. Rev., 84, 084033
  88. Schmidt F., 2010, Phys. Rev., 81, 103002
  89. 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/12/005 · DOI
  90. Lombriser L., 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 124054
  91. Schmidt F., 2009, Phys. Rev., 79, 083518
  92. Borisov A., 2012, Phys. Rev., 85, 063518, 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.134410 · DOI
  93. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20404.x · DOI
  94. 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123511 · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21592.x · DOI
  96. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21746.x · DOI
  97. Kopp M., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 084015
  98. Koyama K., 2009, Phys. Rev., 79, 123512
  99. Brax P., 2013, Phys. Rev., 88, 023527
  100. 10.1007/BF01807638 · DOI · Paper page
  101. Deffayet C., 2011, Phys. Rev., 84, 064039
  102. Nicolis A., 2009, Phys. Rev., 79, 064036
  103. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.231301 · DOI · Paper page
  104. Upadhye A., 2012, Phys. Rev., 86, 102003
  105. Pogosian L., 2008, Phys. Rev., 77, 023503
  106. Nojiri S., 2006, Phys. Rev., 74, 086005
  107. 10.1088/1742-6596/66/1/012005 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.physrep.2011.04.001 · DOI
  109. Esposito‐Farese G., 2001, Phys. Rev., 63, 063504
  110. Tsujikawa S., 2008, Phys. Rev., 77, 103009, 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.054413 · DOI
  111. Hojjati A., 2012, Phys. Rev., 86, 123503
  112. 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.043521 · DOI
  113. Noller J., 2014, Phys. Rev., 89, 023521
  114. Lombriser L., 2011, Phys. Rev., 83, 063519
  115. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04532.x · DOI
  116. 10.1093/mnras/sts072 · DOI
  117. Teyssier R., 2002, Astron. Astrophys., 385, 337, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011817 · DOI
  118. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · DOI · Paper page
  119. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.161101 · DOI
  120. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21567.x · DOI · Paper page
  121. 10.1093/mnras/stt1763 · DOI
  122. 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/033 · DOI
  123. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20573.x · DOI
  124. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13038.x · DOI
  125. 10.1086/152650 · DOI
  126. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02692.x · DOI
  127. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04006.x · DOI
  128. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.04950.x · DOI
  129. Hui L., 2008, Phys. Rev., 77, 043527
  130. Martino M. C., 2009, Phys. Rev., 79, 084013
  131. Parfrey K., 2011, Phys. Rev., 83, 063511
  132. 10.1086/177173 · DOI · Paper page
  133. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x · DOI
  134. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x · DOI
  135. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03715.x · DOI
  136. 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00276-4 · DOI
  137. 10.1086/305424 · DOI
  138. 10.1086/306640 · DOI
  139. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x · DOI · Paper page
  140. Valageas P., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 083522
  141. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.151104 · DOI
  142. Bolton A. S., 2006, Phys. Rev., 74, 061501
  143. 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/28 · DOI
  144. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.071303 · DOI
  145. 10.1093/mnras/stt219 · DOI
  146. 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.028 · DOI
  147. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/056 · DOI
  148. A.Barreira B.Li W. A.Hellwing L.Lombriser C. M.Baughet al. (2014). · DOI
  149. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/027 · DOI
  150. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/012 · DOI
  151. Schmidt F., 2010, Phys. Rev., 81, 063005
  152. 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00669-9 · DOI · Paper page
  153. Schmidt F., 2009, Phys. Rev., 80, 123003
  154. Fang W., 2008, Phys. Rev., 78, 103509
  155. Lombriser L., 2009, Phys. Rev., 80, 063536
  156. 10.1093/mnras/stt1517 · DOI
  157. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/048 · DOI
  158. 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/026 · DOI
  159. Barreira A., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 103511
  160. 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/010 · DOI · Paper page
  161. Baker T., 2013, Phys. Rev., 87, 024015
  162. C.de Rham (2014). · DOI
  163. 10.1002/andp.19163540702 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Lombriser, L.
Affiliations
Royal Observatory (GB)
Corresponding author
Lombriser, Lucas
ORCID
Lombriser, Lucas
Venue
Annalen der Physik
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-16
Volume
526
Issue
7-8
Pages
259-282
ISSN
  • 0003-3804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3889
DOI
10.1002/andp.201400058
OpenAlex
W2949258779
Cited by
104
References
161
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Annalen der Physik (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
chameleon mechanism, modified gravity, scalar-tensor gravity, Hu-Sawicki model, structure formation, nonlinear structures, observational constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review