The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear evolution off(R)cosmologies. III. Halo statistics
Open accessAbstract
The statistical properties of dark matter halos, the building blocks of cosmological observables associated with structure in the Universe, offer many opportunities to test models for cosmic acceleration, especially those that seek to modify gravitational forces. We study the abundance, bias, and profiles of halos in cosmological simulations for one such model: the modified action $f(R)$ theory. The effects of $f(R)$ modified gravity can be separated into a large- and small-field limit. In the large-field limit, which is accessible to current observations, enhanced gravitational forces raise the abundance of rare massive halos and decrease their bias but leave their (lensing) mass profiles largely unchanged. This regime is well described by scaling relations based on a modification of spherical collapse calculations. In the small-field limit, the enhancement of the gravitational force is suppressed inside halos and the effects on halo properties are substantially reduced for the most massive halos. Nonetheless, the scaling relations still retain limited applicability for the purpose of establishing conservative upper limits on the modification to gravity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Parametrized post-Friedmann framework for modified gravity
Hu, W., & Sawicki, I. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.104043 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Kravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Self-citationCosmological tests of modified gravity
Koyama, K. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902 · Cited by 713
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, F., Lima, M., Oyaizu, H., & Hu, W.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-04-16
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2168347440
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear evolution off(R)cosmologies. III. Halo statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.79.083518
- The paper
- Schmidt, F., Lima, M., Oyaizu, H., & Hu, W. (2009). Nonlinear evolution off(R)cosmologies. III. Halo statistics. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.083518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.