Parametrized post-Friedmann framework for modified gravity
Open accessAbstract
We develop a parametrized post-Friedmann (PPF) framework which describes three regimes of modified gravity models that accelerate the expansion without dark energy. On large scales, the evolution of scalar metric and density perturbations must be compatible with the expansion history defined by distance measures. On intermediate scales in the linear regime, they form a scalar-tensor theory with a modified Poisson equation. On small scales in dark matter halos such as our own galaxy, modifications must be suppressed in order to satisfy stringent local tests of general relativity. We describe these regimes with three free functions and two parameters: the relationship between the two metric fluctuations, the large and intermediate scale relationships to density fluctuations, and the two scales of the transitions between the regimes. We also clarify the formal equivalence of modified gravity and generalized dark energy. The PPF description of linear fluctuation in $f(R)$ modified action and the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld models show excellent agreement with explicit calculations. Lacking cosmological simulations of these models, our nonlinear halo-model description remains an ansatz but one that enables well-motivated consistency tests of general relativity. The required suppression of modifications within dark matter halos suggests that the linear and weakly nonlinear regimes are better suited for making a complementary test of general relativity than the deeply nonlinear regime.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expansion history H and the metric ratio g define completely super-horizon scalar metric fluctuations for adiabatic perturbations.
“The expansion history H and the metric ratio g define completely super-horizon scalar metric fluctuations for adiabatic perturbations.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)
For modified gravity models affecting cosmic evolution after matter-radiation equality, the three functions governing metric, density and velocity relations plus the usual transfer functions specify fully the linear observables of the model.
“For MG models affecting cosmic evolution after matter radiation equality, these 3 functions governing the relations for the metric, the density and the velocity, plus the usual transfer functions specify fully the linear observables of the model.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)
The exact form of the function expressing the super-horizon relationship between the metric and density is rarely important for observable quantities such as galaxy redshift surveys and gravitational lensing.
“As noted there, the exact form of is rarely important for observable quantities. That is the case, for example, for the galaxy redshift surveys and gravitational lensing.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)
Hu and Sawicki found that the PPF function rescales the effective Newton constant and that the quasi-static transition happens near the horizon scale.
“Last, they find that is the function that rescales the effective Newton constant and the quasi-static transition happens near the horizon scale.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)
The PPF formalism of Hu and Sawicki (2007b) was proposed with a prescription to derive the nonlinear matter power spectrum in modified gravity theories that should in principle capture the screening mechanism.
“Third, the PPF formalism of Hu and Sawicki (2007b) was proposed with a prescription on how to derive the nonlinear matter power spectrum in modified gravity theories that should in principle capture the screening mechanism as well.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)
Hu and Sawicki (2007b) constructed a PPF formalism for linear perturbations in modified gravity models that joins the super-horizon regime and the sub-horizon quasi-static regime.
“They construct a PPF formalism for linear perturbations in MG models that joins the super-horizon regime and the sub-horizon quasi-static regime.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)
Cites
Ishak, M., Upadhye, A., & Spergel, D. N. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.043513 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Knox, L., Song, Y.-S., & Tyson, J. A. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.023512 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE</i>OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786 · see citing works
The effective field theory of dark energy
Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F., & Vernizzi, F. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity
Joyce, A., Lombriser, L., & Schmidt, F. (2016) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Current constraints on the cosmic growth history
Bean, R., & Tangmatitham, M. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.083534 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
The tensor-vector-scalar theory and its cosmology
Skordis, C. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/14/143001 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Nonlocal Models of Cosmic Acceleration
Woodard, R. P. (2014) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9780-6 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Pogosian, L., & Silvestri, A. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.104014 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Review of Hubble tension solutions with new SH0ES and SPT-3G data
Khalife, A. R., Zanjani, M. B., Galli, S., Günther, S., Lesgourgues, J., & Benabed, K. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/059 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Linear and non-linear Modified Gravity forecasts with future surveys
Casas, S., Kunz, M., Martinelli, M., & Pettorino, V. (2017) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2017.09.009 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Dossett, J. N., Ishak, M., Parkinson, D., & Davis, T. M. (2015) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.023003 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Galaxy peculiar velocities from large-scale supernova surveys as a dark energy probe
Bhattacharya, S., Kosowsky, A., Newman, J. A., & Zentner, A. R. (2011) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.043004 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hu, W., & Sawicki, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-11-27
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2124028531
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 19.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- modified gravity, scalar-tensor gravity, modified Poisson equation, dark matter halos, tests of general relativity, f(R) gravity, scalar metric perturbations, density perturbations, halo model, nonlinear structure formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review