Cited by 414Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Parametrized post-Friedmann framework for modified gravity

Open access
Hu, Wayne, Sawicki, Ignacy·2007·Physical Review D

Abstract

We develop a parametrized post-Friedmann (PPF) framework which describes three regimes of modified gravity models that accelerate the expansion without dark energy. On large scales, the evolution of scalar metric and density perturbations must be compatible with the expansion history defined by distance measures. On intermediate scales in the linear regime, they form a scalar-tensor theory with a modified Poisson equation. On small scales in dark matter halos such as our own galaxy, modifications must be suppressed in order to satisfy stringent local tests of general relativity. We describe these regimes with three free functions and two parameters: the relationship between the two metric fluctuations, the large and intermediate scale relationships to density fluctuations, and the two scales of the transitions between the regimes. We also clarify the formal equivalence of modified gravity and generalized dark energy. The PPF description of linear fluctuation in $f(R)$ modified action and the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld models show excellent agreement with explicit calculations. Lacking cosmological simulations of these models, our nonlinear halo-model description remains an ansatz but one that enables well-motivated consistency tests of general relativity. The required suppression of modifications within dark matter halos suggests that the linear and weakly nonlinear regimes are better suited for making a complementary test of general relativity than the deeply nonlinear regime.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.76.104043

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The expansion history H and the metric ratio g define completely super-horizon scalar metric fluctuations for adiabatic perturbations.

    “The expansion history H and the metric ratio g define completely super-horizon scalar metric fluctuations for adiabatic perturbations.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)

  • For modified gravity models affecting cosmic evolution after matter-radiation equality, the three functions governing metric, density and velocity relations plus the usual transfer functions specify fully the linear observables of the model.

    “For MG models affecting cosmic evolution after matter radiation equality, these 3 functions governing the relations for the metric, the density and the velocity, plus the usual transfer functions specify fully the linear observables of the model.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)

  • The exact form of the function expressing the super-horizon relationship between the metric and density is rarely important for observable quantities such as galaxy redshift surveys and gravitational lensing.

    “As noted there, the exact form of is rarely important for observable quantities. That is the case, for example, for the galaxy redshift surveys and gravitational lensing.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)

  • Hu and Sawicki found that the PPF function rescales the effective Newton constant and that the quasi-static transition happens near the horizon scale.

    “Last, they find that is the function that rescales the effective Newton constant and the quasi-static transition happens near the horizon scale.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)

  • The PPF formalism of Hu and Sawicki (2007b) was proposed with a prescription to derive the nonlinear matter power spectrum in modified gravity theories that should in principle capture the screening mechanism.

    “Third, the PPF formalism of Hu and Sawicki (2007b) was proposed with a prescription on how to derive the nonlinear matter power spectrum in modified gravity theories that should in principle capture the screening mechanism as well.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Hu and Sawicki (2007b)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, W., & Sawicki, I.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
76
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2124028531
Cited by
414
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 28
FWCI
19.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
modified gravity, scalar-tensor gravity, modified Poisson equation, dark matter halos, tests of general relativity, f(R) gravity, scalar metric perturbations, density perturbations, halo model, nonlinear structure formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review