The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we examine the extent to which black hole quasinormal modes (QNMs) could be used to test the no-hair theorem with future ground- and space-based gravitational-wave detectors. We model departures from general relativity (GR) by introducing extra parameters which change the mode frequencies or decay times from their values in GR. With the aid of Bayesian model selection, we assess the extent to which the presence of such a parameter could be inferred, and its value estimated. We find that it is harder to measure the departure of the mode decay times from their GR values than it is with the mode frequencies. The Einstein Telescope (ET, a third generation ground-based detector) could detect departures of as little as 8% in the frequency of the dominant QNM mode of a $500{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ black hole, out to a maximum range of $\ensuremath{\simeq}6\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{Gpc}$ ($z\ensuremath{\simeq}0.91$). The New Gravitational Observatory (NGO, an ESA space mission to detect gravitational waves) can detect departures of $\ensuremath{\sim}0.6%$ in a ${10}^{8}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ black hole to a luminosity distance of 50 Gpc ($z\ensuremath{\simeq}5.1$), and departures of $\ensuremath{\sim}10%$ in a ${10}^{6}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ black hole to a luminosity distance of $\ensuremath{\simeq}6\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{Gpc}$. In this exploratory work we have made a specific choice of source position (overhead), orientation (inclination angle of $\ensuremath{\pi}/3$) and mass ratio of progenitor binary (${m}_{1}/{m}_{2}=2$). A more exhaustive Monte Carlo simulation that incorporates progenitor black hole spins and a hierarchical model for the growth of massive black holes is needed to evaluate a more realistic picture of the possibility of ET and NGO to carry out such tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Cited by
Tests of General Relativity with GW150914
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.221101 · Cited by 1,773
Self-citationIs the Gravitational-Wave Ringdown a Probe of the Event Horizon?
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., & Pani, P. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.171101 · Cited by 819
Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, A., Adams, C., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.122002 · Cited by 755
Self-citationBlack holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap
Askar, A., Belczynski, C., Bertone, G., Bon, E., Blas, D., Brito, R., Bulik, T., Burrage, C., Byrnes, C. T., Caprini, C., et al. (2019) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab0587 · Cited by 744
Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar-Timing Arrays
Yunes, N., & Siemens, X. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-9 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Gossan, S., Veitch, J., & Sathyaprakash, B. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-06-26
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2023746249
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.85.124056
- The paper
- Gossan, S., Veitch, J., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. (2012). Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.85.124056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.