Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,699

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter

Open access
Hui, Lam, Ostriker, Jeremiah P., Tremaine, Scott, Witten, Edward·2017·Physical Review D

Abstract

Many aspects of the large-scale structure of the Universe can be described successfully using cosmological models in which $27\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1%$ of the critical mass-energy density consists of cold dark matter (CDM). However, few---if any---of the predictions of CDM models have been successful on scales of $\ensuremath{\sim}10\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{kpc}$ or less. This lack of success is usually explained by the difficulty of modeling baryonic physics (star formation, supernova and black-hole feedback, etc.). An intriguing alternative to CDM is that the dark matter is an extremely light ($m\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$) boson having a de Broglie wavelength $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\sim}1\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{kpc}$, often called fuzzy dark matter (FDM). We describe the arguments from particle physics that motivate FDM, review previous work on its astrophysical signatures, and analyze several unexplored aspects of its behavior. In particular, (i) FDM halos or subhalos smaller than about $1{0}^{7}(m/{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}{)}^{\ensuremath{-}3/2}$ ${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ do not form, and the abundance of halos smaller than a few times $1{0}^{10}(m/{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}{)}^{\ensuremath{-}4/3}$ ${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ is substantially smaller in FDM than in CDM. (ii) FDM halos are comprised of a central core that is a stationary, minimum-energy solution of the Schr\"odinger-Poisson equation, sometimes called a ``soliton,'' surrounded by an envelope that resembles a CDM halo. The soliton can produce a distinct signature in the rotation curves of FDM-dominated systems. (iii) The transition between soliton and envelope is determined by a relaxation process analogous to two-body relaxation in gravitating N-body systems, which proceeds as if the halo were composed of particles with mass $\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{\rho}{\ensuremath{\lambda}}^{3}$ where $\ensuremath{\rho}$ is the halo density. (iv) Relaxation may have substantial effects on the stellar disk and bulge in the inner parts of disk galaxies, but has negligible effect on disk thickening or globular cluster disruption near the solar radius. (v) Relaxation can produce FDM disks but a FDM disk in the solar neighborhood must have a half-thickness of at least $\ensuremath{\sim}300(m/{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}{)}^{\ensuremath{-}2/3}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{pc}$ and a midplane density less than $0.2(m/{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}{)}^{2/3}$ times the baryonic disk density. (vi) Solitonic FDM subhalos evaporate by tunneling through the tidal radius and this limits the minimum subhalo mass inside $\ensuremath{\sim}30\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{kpc}$ of the Milky Way to a few times $1{0}^{8}(m/{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}{)}^{\ensuremath{-}3/2}$ ${M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$. (vii) If the dark matter in the Fornax dwarf galaxy is composed of CDM, most of the globular clusters observed in that galaxy should have long ago spiraled to its center, and this problem is resolved if the dark matter is FDM. (viii) FDM delays galaxy formation relative to CDM but its galaxy-formation history is consistent with current observations of high-redshift galaxies and the late reionization observed by Planck. If the dark matter is composed of FDM, most observations favor a particle mass $\ensuremath{\gtrsim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ and the most significant observational consequences occur if the mass is in the range $1--10\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. There is tension with observations of the Lyman-$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest, which favor $m\ensuremath{\gtrsim}10--20\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}22}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$ and we discuss whether more sophisticated models of reionization may resolve this tension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.95.043541

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,699

Metadata

Authors
Hui, L., Ostriker, J. P., Tremaine, S., & Witten, E.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
95
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2594838509
Cited by
1,699
References
5
FWCI
81.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.95.043541
The paper
Hui, L., Ostriker, J. P., Tremaine, S., & Witten, E. (2017). Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.95.043541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.