Cited by 30Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir EffectCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Finite energy but infinite entropy production from moving mirrors

Open access
Good, Michael R. R., Linder, Eric V.·2019·Physical Review D

Abstract

Accelerating mirrors provide a simple conceptual laboratory for studying particle production and the relation between trajectory and particle, energy, and entropy fluxes. We focus on the relation between energy and entropy, studying some special cases with finite total energy but infinite integrated entropy (though the entropy flux may be finite at any particular moment). We present a new asymptotically static moving mirror trajectory with solvable beta Bogolyubov coefficients, total energy, and fully relativistic particle count. The integrated entropy diverges despite finite global radiative particle and energy emission. By comparing closely related trajectories, we point out some general principles (e.g., the asymptotic time dependence of energy flux and entropy flux for different convergence and divergence behaviors) but also how subtle distinctions can affect the physics and its relation to black hole end states. Another class of models includes exponentially accelerated mirrors in proper time; one of its unexpected behaviors is finite energy emission but divergent entropy. We compare mirrors exponentially accelerated in other coordinates as well, showing their close relation and an interesting duality property.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.99.025009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.562 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0370-1573(75)90051-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1098/rspa.1976.0045 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1098/rspa.1977.0130 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.025016 · DOI
  8. 10.3938/jkps.73.1420 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/JHEP03(2017)013 · DOI
  10. 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/120 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.065010 · DOI
  12. M. R. R. Good, 2017, 2nd LeCosPA Meeting, Taipei, Taiwan, 2015
  13. P. R. Anderson, 2017, Proceedings MG14
  14. M. R. R. Good, 2017, Proceedings MG14
  15. 10.1088/0305-4470/15/9/008 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.025023 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.125010 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.767 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124060 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/JHEP05(2018)140 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.231301 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevD.36.2327 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.065006 · DOI
  24. 10.1142/S0217751X13500085 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/JHEP07(2015)145 · DOI
  26. 10.3390/universe4110122 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.3662 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.041904 · DOI
  29. 10.1143/ptp/91.5.839 · DOI
  30. M. R. R. Good, 2017, Kerson Huang Memorial, 10.1142/9789813207431_0014 · DOI
  31. 10.22323/1.323.0001 · DOI
  32. 10.1088/1402-4896/aaecaa · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Good, M. R. R., & Linder, E. V.
Affiliations
  • Nazarbayev University (KZ)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2019-01-18
Volume
99
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0029
OpenAlex
W2884881157
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Nazarbayev University Repository (Nazarbayev University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Nazarbayev University Repository (Nazarbayev University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BR05236454)
  • Oak Ridge Associated Universities (FY2018-SGP-1-STMM, 090118FD5350)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC-0007867, DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Office of Science
  • Office of High Energy Physics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
moving mirror, particle production, entropy production, energy flux, entropy flow, duality, quantum field theory in curved spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review