Cited by 3,512

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimating mutual information

Kraskov, Alexander, Stögbauer, Harald, Grassberger, Peter·2004·Physical Review E

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.69.066138

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. T. M. Cover, 1991, Elements of Information Theory, 10.1002/0471200611 · DOI
  2. A. Renyi, 1971, Probability Theory
  3. 2001, Independent Component Analysis: Principles and Practice
  4. A. Hyvärinen, 2001, Independent Component Analysis, 10.1002/0471221317 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.2318 · DOI
  6. R. Steuer, 2002, Bioinformatics, 18, S231, 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.S231 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1134 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/18.761290 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90193-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00269-3 · DOI
  11. R. L. Dobrushin, 1958, Theor. Probab. Appl., 3, 462
  12. O. Vasicek, 1976, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Methodol., 38, 54, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1976.tb01566.x · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0167-2789(02)00432-3 · DOI
  14. E. S. Dudewicz, 1981, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 76, 967, 10.1080/01621459.1981.10477750 · DOI
  15. B. van Es, 1992, Scand. J. Stat., 19, 61
  16. 10.1016/0167-7152(94)90046-9 · DOI
  17. J. C. Correa, 1995, Commun. Stat: Theory Meth., 24, 2439, 10.1080/03610929508831626 · DOI
  18. A. B. Tsybakov, 1996, Scand. J. Stat., 23, 75
  19. R. Wieczorkowski, 1999, Commun. Stat.-Simul. Comput., 28, 541, 10.1080/03610919908813564 · DOI
  20. L. F. Kozachenko, 1987, Probl. Inf. Transm., 23, 95
  21. 10.1016/0375-9601(85)90724-8 · DOI
  22. R. L. Somorjai, 1986, Methods for Estimating the Intrinsic Dimensionality of High-Dimensional Point Sets, 10.1007/978-3-642-71001-8_17 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.051903 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/18.825848 · DOI
  25. W. H. Press, 1993, Numerical Recipes
  26. 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90577-B · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00020-1 · DOI
  28. G. A. Darbellay, 1999, 3rd IEEE European Workshop on Computer-intensive Methods in Control and Data Processing, Prague, 1998
  29. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00015-5 · DOI
  30. B. W. Silverman, 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, 10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TBME.2002.805480 · DOI
  32. J.-F. Cardoso, 1998, Multidimensional Independent Component Analysis, Proceedings of ICASSP ’98
  33. J.-F. Cardoso, 1993, IEE Proc. F, Radar Signal Process., 140, 362, 10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0054 · DOI
  34. A. Ziehe, 1998, An Efficient Algorithm for Blind Separation Using Time Structure
  35. 10.1109/51.731318 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3096 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H., & Grassberger, P.
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2004-06-23
Volume
69
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1539-3755
  • 1550-2376
Cited by
3,512
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review