Cited by 28Urban Design and Spatial AnalysisTheoretical and Computational PhysicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

How complexity emerges in urban systems: Theory of urban morphology

Goh, Segun, Choi, M. Y., Lee, Keumsook, Kim, Kyung-min·2016·Physical Review E

Abstract

Human beings develop the land and transform land use patterns, constructing artificial structures. Among them, the city is a representative system and its morphology has attracted much attention. While most existing studies have been devoted to individual dynamics and focused on the proximity of specific areas of a city, we here pay attention to the city as a complex system, where interactions between individuals give rise to emergent properties. Specifically, analyzing the big data on every building in Seoul City, we specify the relevant interactions among constituents and probe the emergence of complex land use patterns. In particular, based on the empirical observations, we illustrate that interactions between land uses are frustrated, which serves as a basic postulate of the theory of urban morphology. We examine this conjecture with the help of a layered Ising-type model and disclose that the actual land use pattern emerges at the criticality of the system in the presence of heterogeneously distributed fields. It is also remarked that our model, allowing quantitative predictions, can easily be applied to other cities around the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.93.052309

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A neural network model of brain regions underlying spatial schemas, consisting of an HPC-supported indexing stream and a neocortex-dominant representation stream, replicates early experiments in rodents.

    “A neural network model of brain regions underlying spatial schemas, consisting of an HPC-supported indexing stream and a neocortex-dominant representation stream 201 , replicates early experiments in rodents 53,54 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [201]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goh, S., Choi, M. Y., Lee, K., & Kim, K.-M.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Sungshin Women's University (KR)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
052309-052309
ISSN
  • 2470-0045 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-0053
OpenAlex
W2398777875
Cited by
28
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. E (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2013S1A5A2A01017764)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
urban morphology, urban complexity, emergent properties, land use patterns, frustrated interactions, criticality, building data, Seoul, complex systems, urban land use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review