The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit
Open accessAbstract
We show that quantum Fisher information provides a sufficient condition to recognize multiparticle entanglement in an N qubit state. The same criterion gives a necessary and sufficient condition for sub-shot-noise phase sensitivity in the estimation of a collective rotation angle theta. The analysis therefore singles out the class of entangled states which are useful to overcome classical phase sensitivity in metrology and sensors. We finally study the creation of useful entangled states by the nonlinear dynamical evolution of two decoupled Bose-Einstein condensates or trapped ions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is a result that is now firmly established [33, 36] and that comes out in a rather natural fashion within this new framework.”
From Quantum Speed Limits in Open System Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“For pure states, it has been shown (e.g., by Refs. [15, 21, 22]) that equality holds if and only if the initial state is an equally weighted superposition of exactly two eigenstates of H .”
From Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“All three approaches, therefore, have the common lower bound (2).”
From Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Quantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory
(1976) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering/Mathematics in science and engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(08)x6017-5 · Cited by 2,712
Kitagawa, M., & Ueda, M. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.5138 · Cited by 1,770
Atomic Coherent States in Quantum Optics
Arecchi, F. T., Courtens, E., Gilmore, R., & Thomas, H. (1972) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.6.2211 · Cited by 1,491
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162
Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate
Leibfried, D., DeMarco, B., Meyer, V., Lucas, D., Barrett, M., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jelenković, B., Langer, C., Rosenband, T., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01492 · Cited by 1,083
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- C. F. Roos, 2004, Nature (London), 304, 1478
- A. S. Holevo, 1982, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspect of Quantum Theory
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 865
Squeezing and Overcoming the Heisenberg Scaling with Spin-Orbit Coupled Quantum Gases
Gietka, K., & Ritsch, H. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.090802 · Cited by 21
Chen, L., Lu, L., Xia, L., Lu, Y., Zhu, S. N., & Ma, X.-S. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.223601 · Cited by 22
Optimal Protocols for Quantum Metrology with Noisy Measurements
Zhou, S., Michalakis, S., & Gefen, T. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.040305 · Cited by 24
Activation of metrologically useful genuine multipartite entanglement
Trényi, R., Lukács, Á., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R., Vértesi, T., & Tóth, G. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad1e93 · Cited by 22
Dicke State Generation and Extreme Spin Squeezing via Rapid Adiabatic Passage
Carrasco, S. C., Goerz, M. H., Malinovskaya, S., Vuletić, V., Schleich, W. P., & Malinovsky, V. S. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.153603 · Cited by 21
Comparing quantum cloning: A Fisher-information perspective
Song, H., Luo, S., Li, N., & Chang, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042121 · Cited by 21
Rabi Spectroscopy and Sensitivity of a Floquet Engineered Optical Lattice Clock
Yin, M.-J., Wang, T., Lu, X., Li, T., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, W., Smerzi, A., & Chang, H. (2021) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/38/7/073201 · Cited by 22
Self-citationFisher information from stochastic quantum measurements
Müller, M. M., Gherardini, S., Smerzi, A., & Caruso, F. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042322 · Cited by 21
Self-citationOptimal energy storage and collective charging speedup in the central-spin quantum battery
Yang, H.-Y., Zhang, K., Wang, X.-H., & Shi, H. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.085410 · Cited by 20
Lingua, F., Mazzarella, G., & Penna, V. (2016) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/49/20/205005 · Cited by 20
Wasak, T., & Chwedeńczuk, J. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.140406 · Cited by 21
Feedback ansatz for adaptive-feedback quantum metrology training with machine learning
Peng, Y., & Fan, H. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.022107 · Cited by 20
Tian, M., Xiang, Y., Sun, F.-X., Fadel, M., & He, Q. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.024065 · Cited by 20
Quantum parameter estimation of non-Hermitian systems with optimal measurements
Yu, X., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022215 · Cited by 22
Parameter estimation in memory-assisted noisy quantum interferometry
Szańkowski, P., Trippenbach, M., & Chwedeńczuk, J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.063619 · Cited by 20
Sub-shot-noise interferometry from measurements of the one-body density
Chwedeńczuk, J., Hyllus, P., Piazza, F., & Smerzi, A. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093001 · Cited by 20
Self-citationSqueezed Light from Entangled Nonidentical Emitters via Nanophotonic Environments
Haakh, H. R., & Martín-Cano, D. (2015) · ACS Photonics · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00585 · Cited by 20
Progress towards macroscopic spin and mechanical superposition via Rydberg interaction
Khazali, M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.043836 · Cited by 21
Relating spin squeezing to multipartite entanglement criteria for particles and modes
Fadel, M., & Gessner, M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.012412 · Cited by 22
Bound entangled singlet-like states for quantum metrology
Pál, K. F., Tóth, G., Bene, E., & Vértesi, T. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023101 · Cited by 21
Multipath interferometer with ultracold atoms trapped in an optical lattice
Chwedeńczuk, J., Piazza, F., & Smerzi, A. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.033607 · Cited by 20
Self-citationExperimental demonstration of nonlinear quantum metrology with optimal quantum state
Nie, X., Huang, J., Li, Z., Zheng, W., Lee, C., Peng, X., & Du, J. (2018) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2018.03.007 · Cited by 20
Accelerating many-body entanglement generation by dipolar interactions in the Bose-Hubbard model
Dziurawiec, M., Yanes, T. H., Płodzień, M., Gajda, M., Lewenstein, M., & Witkowska, E. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.013311 · Cited by 19
Witnessing light-driven entanglement using time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering
Hales, J., Bajpai, U., Liu, T., Baykusheva, D., Li, M., Mitrano, M., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38540-3 · Cited by 19
Behavior of Quantum Fisher Information of Bell Pairs under Decoherence Channels
Özaydin, F., Altıntaṣ, A. A., Bugu, S., & Yesilyurt, C. (2014) · Acta Physica Polonica A · doi:10.12693/aphyspola.125.606 · Cited by 19
Protecting quantum Fisher information in curved space-time
Huang, Z. (2018) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/i2018-11936-9 · Cited by 19
Cafaro, C., & Alsing, P. M. (2018) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.97.042110 · Cited by 19
Thermally robust spin correlations between two 85Rb atoms in an optical microtrap
Sompet, P., Szigeti, S. S., Schwartz, E., Bradley, A. S., & Andersen, M. F. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09420-6 · Cited by 19
Entanglement distance for arbitrary M -qudit hybrid systems
Cocchiarella, D., Scali, S., Ribisi, S., Nardi, B., Bel-Hadj-Aissa, G., & Franzosi, R. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.042129 · Cited by 19
Improving sum uncertainty relations with the quantum Fisher information
Chiew, S.-H., & Gessner, M. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013076 · Cited by 20
Phase-noise protection in quantum-enhanced differential interferometry
Landini, M., Fattori, M., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113074 · Cited by 19
Self-citationSub-Heisenberg phase uncertainties
Pezzè, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.060101 · Cited by 19
Self-citationGhasemian, E., & Tavassoly, M. K. (2017) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/aa7dcf · Cited by 19
Quantum metrology with a continuous-variable system
Fadel, M., Roux, N., & Gessner, M. (2025) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ae00d8 · Cited by 31
Thermodynamic Principle for Quantum Metrology
Chu, Y., & Cai, J. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.200501 · Cited by 18
Prisoners’ Dilemma in a Spatially Separated System Based on Spin–Photon Interactions
Altıntaṣ, A. A., Özaydin, F., Bayındır, C., & Bayrakci, V. (2022) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics9090617 · Cited by 18
Quantum Fisher information and multipartite entanglement in spin-1 chains
Dell’Anna, F., Pradhan, S., Boschi, C. D. E., & Ercolessi, E. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.144414 · Cited by 18
Complexity in two-point measurement schemes
Gill, A., Pal, K., Pal, K., & Sarkar, T. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.104303 · Cited by 18
Analyzing Quantum Entanglement with the Schmidt Decomposition in Operator Space
Zhang, C., Denker, S., Asadian, A., & Gühne, O. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.040203 · Cited by 22
Measurement- and comparison-based sizes of Schrödinger cat states of light
Volkoff, T. J., & Whaley, K. B. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.012122 · Cited by 18
Huang, Y., Zhong, W., Sun, Z., & Wang, X. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.012320 · Cited by 18
Bogoliubov theory for atom scattering into separate regions
Wasak, T., Szańkowski, P., Bücker, R., Chwedeńczuk, J., & Trippenbach, M. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013041 · Cited by 18
Dynamical quantum Fisher information in the Ising model
Xiong, H.-N., & Wang, X. (2011) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.07.026 · Cited by 18
Precision measurements using squeezed spin states via two-axis countertwisting interactions
Yukawa, E., Milburn, G. J., Holmes, C. A., Ueda, M., & Nemoto, K. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.062132 · Cited by 18
Özaydin, F., Altıntaṣ, A. A., Bugu, S., Yesilyurt, C., & Arık, M. (2014) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-014-2119-4 · Cited by 18
Wu, W., & Xu, J. (2016) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1186-7 · Cited by 19
Optimal conventional measurements for quantum-enhanced interferometry
Zhong, W., Huang, Y., Wang, X., & Zhu, S.-L. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.052304 · Cited by 18
Efficient Generation of Many-Body Entangled States by Multilevel Oscillations
Xu, P., Yi, S., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.073001 · Cited by 18
Multiparticle entanglement dynamics of quantum chaos in a Bose-Einstein condensate
Li, S.-C., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052417 · Cited by 18
Self-citationSuperposition states of ultracold bosons in rotating rings with a realistic potential barrier
Nunnenkamp, A., Rey, A. M., & Burnett, K. R. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.053604 · Cited by 18
Spehner, D., Pawłowski, K., Ferrini, G., & Minguzzi, A. (2014) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2014-50066-8 · Cited by 18
Quantum Fisher Information: Probe to Measure Fractional Evolution
Anouz, K. E., Allati, A. E., Salah, A., & Saif, F. (2020) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-020-04415-2 · Cited by 17
Universal Shot-Noise Limit for Quantum Metrology with Local Hamiltonians
Shi, H., Guan, X.-W., & Yang, J. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.100803 · Cited by 18
Unveiling the geometric meaning of quantum entanglement: Discrete and continuous variable systems
Vesperini, A., Bel-Hadj-Aissa, G., Capra, L., & Franzosi, R. (2024) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.1007/s11467-024-1403-x · Cited by 17
Enhancing quantum state tomography via resource-efficient attention-based neural networks
Palmieri, A. M., Müller-Rigat, G., Srivastava, A. K., Lewenstein, M., Rajchel-Mieldzioć, G., & Płodzień, M. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.033248 · Cited by 17
Quantum Fisher Information of a 3-Qubit State
Yi, X.-J., Huang, G.-Q., & Wang, J. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1230-7 · Cited by 17
Physical resources for optical phase estimation
Sahota, J., Quesada, N., & James, D. F. V. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.033817 · Cited by 17
Quantum-enhanced microscopy with binary-outcome photon counting
Jin, G., Yang, W., & Sun, C. P. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.013835 · Cited by 17
Investigating quantum metrology in noisy channels
Falaye, B. J., Adepoju, A. G., Aliyu, A. S., Melchor, M. M., Liman, M. S., Oluwadare, O. J., Ramírez, M. D. G., & Oyewumi, K. J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16710-w · Cited by 17
Chaos and quantum Fisher information in the quantum kicked top
Wang, X., Ma, J., Zhang, X., & Wang, X. (2011) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/20/5/050510 · Cited by 17
Improving quantum phase estimation via power-law potential systems
Berrada, K. (2014) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1054-660x/24/6/065201 · Cited by 17
Enhancing the precision of phase estimation by weak measurement and quantum measurement reversal
He, Z., & Yao, C. (2014) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/23/11/110601 · Cited by 17
Chen, Y., Zou, J., Long, Z., & Shao, B. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04726-1 · Cited by 18
Gietka, K., Chwedeńczuk, J., Wasak, T., & Piazza, F. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.064303 · Cited by 17
Influence of acceleration on multibody entangled quantum states
Pan, Y., & Zhang, B. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062111 · Cited by 17
Estimation of a parameter encoded in the modal structure of a light beam: a quantum theory
Gessner, M., Treps, N., & Fabre, C. (2023) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.491368 · Cited by 20
Quantum-Enhanced Metrology for Molecular Symmetry Violation Using Decoherence-Free Subspaces
Zhang, C., Yu, P., Jadbabaie, A., & Hutzler, N. R. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.193602 · Cited by 16
Contextuality as a Precondition for Quantum Entanglement
Plávala, M., & Gühne, O. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.100201 · Cited by 16
Two-mode squeezing and SU(1,1) interferometry with trapped ions
Metzner, J., Quinn, A., Brudney, S., Moore, I. D., Burd, S. C., Wineland, D. J., & Allcock, D. T. C. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.022613 · Cited by 16
Persistent atomic spin squeezing at the Heisenberg limit
Wu, L.-N., Tey, M. K., & You, L. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.063610 · Cited by 16
Lambert, J., & Sørensen, E. S. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.045117 · Cited by 17
Geometric Approach to Quantum Statistical Inference
Jarzyna, M., & Kolodynski, J. (2020) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory · doi:10.1109/jsait.2020.3017469 · Cited by 16
Anouz, K. E., Onyenegecha, C. P., Opara, A. I., Salah, A., & Allati, A. E. (2022) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.444823 · Cited by 17
Iterative quantum-phase-estimation protocol for shallow circuits
Smith, J. G., Barnes, C. H. W., & Arvidsson-Shukur, D. R. M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.062615 · Cited by 16
Generalized measure of quantum Fisher information
Sone, A., Cerezo, M., Beckey, J. L., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.062602 · Cited by 18
Optimal extraction of information from two spins
Chang, L., Li, N., Luo, S., & Song, H. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.042110 · Cited by 16
Quantum geometry phenomena in condensed matter systems
Anonymous, Nagaosa, N., Ni, N., & Xu, S. (2026) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/f78t-ky69 · Cited by 65
Progress and perspectives on weak-value amplification
Xu, L., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2024.100518 · Cited by 15
Dynamics of the quantum Fisher information in a spin-boson model
Hao, X., Tong, N.-H., & Zhu, S. (2013) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/35/355302 · Cited by 15
Controlled generation of genuine multipartite entanglement in Floquet Ising spin models
Naik, G. K., Singh, R., & Mishra, S. K. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032321 · Cited by 16
Adiabatic preparation of entangled, magnetically ordered states with cold bosons in optical lattices
Venegas‐Gomez, A., Schachenmayer, J., Buyskikh, A. S., Ketterle, W., Chiofalo, M. L., & Daley, A. J. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abb004 · Cited by 15
Guo, J., Sun, F.-X., Zhu, D., Gessner, M., He, Q., & Fadel, M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012435 · Cited by 15
Dell’Anna, L. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.053608 · Cited by 15
Entanglement detection in a coupled atom-field system via quantum Fisher information
Mirkhalaf, S. S., & Smerzi, A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.022302 · Cited by 16
Self-citationResolution-enhanced entanglement detection
Gessner, M., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032326 · Cited by 15
Self-citationEstimation of temperature in micromaser-type systems
farajollahi, B., Jafarzadeh, M., Jahromi, H. R., & Amniat-Talab, M. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1887-9 · Cited by 15
Quantum Fisher information and spin squeezing in one-axis twisting model
Zhong, W., Liu, J., Ma, J., & Wang, X.-G. (2014) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/23/6/060302 · Cited by 15
Entanglement-enhanced sensor networks
Pezzè, L. (2021) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-020-00755-x · Cited by 15
Self-citationKrylov Shadow Tomography: Efficient Estimation of Quantum Fisher Information
Zhang, D.-J., & Tong, D. M. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.110802 · Cited by 14
Reproducible mesoscopic superpositions of Bose-Einstein condensates and mean-field chaos
Gertjerenken, B., Arlinghaus, S., Teichmann, N., & Weiß, C. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.023620 · Cited by 14
Optimized parameter estimation in the presence of collective phase noise
Altenburg, S., Wölk, S., Tóth, G., & Gühne, O. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052306 · Cited by 14
Many-Body Entanglement in Short-Range Interacting Fermi Gases for Metrology
Lucchesi, L., & Chiofalo, M. L. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.060406 · Cited by 14
Frequentist parameter estimation with supervised learning
Nolan, S. P., Pezzè, L., & Smerzi, A. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0058163 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAn oscillator with position-dependent mass exposed to a thermal bosonic bath
Pourali, B., Lari, B., & HASSANABADI, H. (2021) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126374 · Cited by 14
Beyond one-axis twisting: Simultaneous spin-momentum squeezing
Wilson, J. D., Jäger, S. B., Reilly, J., Shankar, A., Chiofalo, M. L., & Holland, M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.043711 · Cited by 14
Zheng, Q., Yao, Y., & Xu, X. (2015) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/63/3/279 · Cited by 14
Scale-invariant freezing of entanglement
Chanda, T., Das, T., Sadhukhan, D., Pal, A. K., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062324 · Cited by 14
Sensitivity bounds for interferometry with Ising Hamiltonians
Li, Y., Pezzè, L., Li, W., & Smerzi, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022324 · Cited by 14
Self-citationJie, J., Guan, Q., & Blume, D. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.043606 · Cited by 14
Dynamics of coherence: Maximal quantum Fisher information versus Loschmidt echo
Cheraghi, H., & Mahdavifar, S. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.024304 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- ORCID
- Smerzi, Augusto
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-03-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 100401-100401
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2025363053
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 36.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum Fisher information, multipartite entanglement, Heisenberg limit, quantum metrology, nonlinear dynamics, entanglement generation, Bose-Einstein condensate, trapped ions, quantum sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
