The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement, Nonlinear Dynamics, and the Heisenberg Limit
Open accessAbstract
We show that quantum Fisher information provides a sufficient condition to recognize multiparticle entanglement in an N qubit state. The same criterion gives a necessary and sufficient condition for sub-shot-noise phase sensitivity in the estimation of a collective rotation angle theta. The analysis therefore singles out the class of entangled states which are useful to overcome classical phase sensitivity in metrology and sensors. We finally study the creation of useful entangled states by the nonlinear dynamical evolution of two decoupled Bose-Einstein condensates or trapped ions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is a result that is now firmly established [33, 36] and that comes out in a rather natural fashion within this new framework.”
From Quantum Speed Limits in Open System Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“For pure states, it has been shown (e.g., by Refs. [15, 21, 22]) that equality holds if and only if the initial state is an equally weighted superposition of exactly two eigenstates of H .”
From Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“All three approaches, therefore, have the common lower bound (2).”
From Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model
Werner, R. F. (1989) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.40.4277 · Cited by 4,062
Quantum detection and estimation theory
Helstrom, C. W. (1969) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01007479 · Cited by 3,776
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory
(1976) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering/Mathematics in science and engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(08)x6017-5 · Cited by 2,712
Kitagawa, M., & Ueda, M. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.5138 · Cited by 1,770
Atomic Coherent States in Quantum Optics
Arecchi, F. T., Courtens, E., Gilmore, R., & Thomas, H. (1972) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.6.2211 · Cited by 1,491
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162
Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate
Leibfried, D., DeMarco, B., Meyer, V., Lucas, D., Barrett, M., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jelenković, B., Langer, C., Rosenband, T., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01492 · Cited by 1,083
Multiparticle Entanglement of Hot Trapped Ions
Mølmer, K., & Sørensen, A. S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1835 · Cited by 1,024
Many-particle entanglement with Bose–Einstein condensates
Sørensen, A. S., Duan, L.-M., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051038 · Cited by 956
Statistical distance and Hilbert space
Wootters, W. K. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.357 · Cited by 793
Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose–Einstein condensate
Estève, J., Gross, C., Weller, A., Giovanazzi, S., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07332 · Cited by 779
Wigner-Yanase Skew Information and Uncertainty Relations
Luo, S. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.180403 · Cited by 377
Spin squeezing and pairwise entanglement for symmetric multiqubit states
Wang, X., & Sanders, B. C. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.012101 · Cited by 233
Optimal Spin Squeezing Inequalities Detect Bound Entanglement in Spin Models
Tóth, G., Knapp, C., Gühne, O., & Briegel, H. J. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.250405 · Cited by 228
Spin Squeezing Inequalities and Entanglement of N Qubit States
Korbicz, J. K., Cirac, J. I., & Lewenstein, M. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.120502 · Cited by 195
Quantum non-demolition detection of strongly correlated systems
Eckert, K., Romero‐Isart, O., Rodríguez, M., Lewenstein, M., Polzik, E. S., & Sanpera, A. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys776 · Cited by 167
Spin Squeezing of Atomic Ensembles via Nuclear-Electronic Spin Entanglement
Fernholz, T., Krauter, H., Jensen, K., Sherson, J. F., Sørensen, A. S., & Polzik, E. S. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.073601 · Cited by 167
Quantum Control of the Hyperfine Spin of a Cs Atom Ensemble
Chaudhury, S., Merkel, S., Herr, T., Silberfarb, A., Deutsch, I. H., & Jessen, P. S. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.163002 · Cited by 139
Phase Detection at the Quantum Limit with Multiphoton Mach-Zehnder Interferometry
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Khoury, G., Hodelin, J. F., & Bouwmeester, D. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.223602 · Cited by 138
Self-citationSpin squeezing and decoherence limit in Ramsey spectroscopy
Ulam-Orgikh, D., & Kitagawa, M. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052106 · Cited by 130
Local and Global Distinguishability in Quantum Interferometry
Durkin, G. A., & Dowling, J. P. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.070801 · Cited by 96
Operational Interpretation for Global Multipartite Entanglement
Boixo, S., & Monràs, A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.100503 · Cited by 85
Bogoliubov theory of entanglement in a Bose-Einstein condensate
Sørensen, A. S. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.043610 · Cited by 51
Quantum beam splitter for atoms
Poulsen, U. V., & Mølmer, K. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.033613 · Cited by 16
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- C. F. Roos, 2004, Nature (London), 304, 1478
- A. S. Holevo, 1982, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspect of Quantum Theory
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Colloquium : Quantum coherence as a resource
Streltsov, A., Adesso, G., & Plenio, M. B. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.041003 · Cited by 1,878
Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles
Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R., & Treutlein, P. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035005 · Cited by 1,864
Self-citationNonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit
Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E., Estève, J., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08919 · Cited by 932
Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology
Riedel, M. F., Böhi, P., Li, Y., Hänsch, T. W., Sinatra, A., & Treutlein, P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08988 · Cited by 887
Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective
Tóth, G., & Apellaniz, I. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 · Cited by 862
Metadata
- Authors
- Pezzé, L., & Smerzi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- ORCID
- Smerzi, Augusto
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-03-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 100401-100401
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2025363053
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 36.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum Fisher information, multipartite entanglement, Heisenberg limit, quantum metrology, nonlinear dynamics, entanglement generation, Bose-Einstein condensate, trapped ions, quantum sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
