The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravity and Large Black Holes in Randall-Sundrum II Braneworlds
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Static braneworld black holes in higher dimensions have been found numerically, and the qualitative argument was shown to have flaws.
“However, static braneworld black holes in higher-dimensions have been found numerically, e.g., [67][68][69][70][71][72], and the qualitative argument was shown to have flaws [69].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
There are several examples of higher-dimensional static braneworld black holes, both analytically and numerically constructed.
“In fact, there are several examples of higher-dimensional static braneworld black holes, both analytically and numerically constructed [67][68][69][70][71][72][201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Some bulk black holes get stuck on the brane and never shrink ('black droplets') and hence are dynamically stable.
“Indeed, while some bulk black holes get stuck on the brane and never shrink ('black droplets') [71] and hence dynamically stable, there are other bulk black solutions that evaporate due to a Gregory-Laflamme instability [72], as originally suggested in [22,34].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00224-8 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.084017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0264-9381/18/16/310 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/18/16/307 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043501 · DOI
- 10.1143/PTPS.148.307 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/01/079 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/09/029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.124007 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/20/6/308 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1143/PTP.110.1059 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.104019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/068 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.104050 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002200100381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/063 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/27/3/035002 · DOI
- 10.2140/gt.2008.12.2009 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry
Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., Maldacena, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)149 · Cited by 898
Black holes as bubble nucleation sites
Gregory, R., Moss, I. G., & Withers, B. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)081 · Cited by 187
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Figueras, P., & Wiseman, T.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2011-08-16
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
