Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Black Holes as Holograms in AdS Braneworlds

Emparan, Roberto, Fabbri, Alessandro, Kaloper, Nemanja·2002·Journal of High Energy Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/043

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three-dimensional quantum black holes arise via holographic braneworlds and are exact solutions to an induced higher-derivative theory of gravity consistently coupled to a large-c quantum field theory with an ultraviolet cutoff, accounting for all orders of semi-classical backreaction.

    “We review constructions of three-dimensional 'quantum' black holes.Such spacetimes arise via holographic braneworlds and are exact solutions to an induced higher-derivative theory of gravity consistently coupled to a large-c quantum field theory with an ultraviolet cutoff, accounting for all orders of semi-classical backreaction.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Conjecture: Classical black holes which localize on a brane in AdS_{d+1} exactly map to d-dimensional quantum-corrected black holes including all orders of backreaction.

    “Conjecture: Classical black holes which localize on a brane in AdS d+1 exactly map to d-dimensional quantum-corrected black holes including all orders of backreaction.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

  • The conjecture that classical bulk black holes correspond to quantum-corrected black holes on the brane, in principle, holds in arbitrary spacetime dimensions.

    “Indeed, while we focus on three-dimensional quantum black holes, the conjecture [22,34] that classical bulk black holes correspond to quantum-corrected black holes on the brane, in principle, holds in arbitrary spacetime dimensions.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

  • For d ≥ 4, it was qualitatively argued the obstruction to having static quantum black holes can be understood as a consequence of backreaction due to Hawking effects, such that any black hole that localizes on the brane must evaporate.

    “In [22,34], for d ≥ 4, it was qualitatively argued the obstruction to having static quantum black holes can be understood as a consequence of backreaction due to Hawking effects, such that any black hole that localizes on the brane must evaporate.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Classical AdS d+1 black holes which localize on the ETW brane are conjectured to precisely map to black holes in d-dimensions, including all orders of quantum backreaction.

    “In particular, classical AdS d+1 black holes which localize on the ETW brane are conjectured to precisely map to black holes in d-dimensions, including all orders of quantum backreaction [22], i.e., 'quantum' black holes.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
  2. A.R. Steif, 1994, Phys. Rev., 49, 585, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.R585 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1929 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.5286 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.231302 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.084010 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.084040 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.124007 · DOI
  10. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  11. R. Emparan, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
  12. J.M. Maldacena, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. O. Aharony, 2000, Phys. Rep., 323, 183, 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00224-8 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.084017 · DOI · Paper page
  16. S.B. Giddings, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/03/023 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2052 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1063/1.1377036 · DOI
  19. N. Arkani-Hamed, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 2001, 017, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/08/017 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.586 · DOI
  21. S. Deser, 1984, Ann. Phys. (NY), 152, 220, 10.1016/0003-4916(84)90085-X · DOI · Paper page
  22. S. Giddings, 1984, Gen. Rel. Grav., 16, 751, 10.1007/BF00762914 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0550-3213(96)00619-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1849 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.1506 · DOI · Paper page
  26. H.H. Soleng, 1993, Phys. Scripta, 48, 649, 10.1088/0031-8949/48/6/002 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.1616 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.123506 · DOI
  29. A. Karch, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 2001, 008, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/05/008 · DOI · Paper page
  30. R. Bousso, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 057, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/057 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.044015 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00424-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01057-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01996-2 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0375-9601(75)90030-4 · DOI
  36. M. Henningson, 1998, J. High Energy Phys., 1998, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/07/023 · DOI · Paper page
  37. S. de Haro, 2001, Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 3171, 10.1088/0264-9381/18/16/307 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.044015 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024012 · DOI
  40. I.R. Klebanov, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 052, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/08/052 · DOI
  41. P. Kraus, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 011, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/12/011 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043501 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00286-3 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.499 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.121702 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2778 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Emparan, R., Fabbri, A., & Kaloper, N.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2002-08-27
Volume
2002
Issue
08
Pages
043-043
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
198
References
6

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review