The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection-Loophole-Free Test of Quantum Nonlocality, and Applications
Open accessAbstract
We present a source of entangled photons that violates a Bell inequality free of the "fair-sampling" assumption, by over 7 standard deviations. This violation is the first reported experiment with photons to close the detection loophole, and we demonstrate enough "efficiency" overhead to eventually perform a fully loophole-free test of local realism. The entanglement quality is verified by maximally violating additional Bell tests, testing the upper limit of quantum correlations. Finally, we use the source to generate "device-independent" private quantum random numbers at rates over 4 orders of magnitude beyond previous experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As the CHSH inequality is minimally violated in an optically realised system, 64,65 the randomness output is also very small (with min-entropy of H min =7.2 × 10 -5 in each run), and the randomness generation rate is 0.4 bits per s.”
From Quantum random number generation (2016) · cites this paper as [65]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.23.880 · Cited by 7,573
Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers
Aspect, A., Dalibard, J., & Roger, G. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.1804 · Cited by 3,942
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
Self-citationExperimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories
Freedman, S. J., & Clauser, J. F. (1972) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.28.938 · Cited by 1,999
Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., & Zeilinger, A. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5039 · Cited by 1,643
Quantum nonlocality as an axiom
Popescu, S., & Rohrlich, D. (1994) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02058098 · Cited by 1,562
Experimental consequences of objective local theories
Clauser, J. F., & Horne, M. A. (1974) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.526 · Cited by 1,537
Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., de la Giroday, A. B., Matsukevich, D. N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T. A., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09008 · Cited by 1,420
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres
Hensen, B., Bernien, H., Dréau, A. E., Reiserer, A., Kalb, N., Blok, M. S., Ruitenberg, J., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15759 · Cited by 2,852
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., & Wehner, S. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.419 · Cited by 2,688
Self-citationSignificant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons
Giustina, M., Versteegh, M. A. M., Wengerowsky, S., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Phelan, K., Steinlechner, F., Kofler, J., Larsson, J.-Å., Abellán, C., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250401 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationStrong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism
Shalm, L. K., Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B. G., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M. A., Stevens, M. J., Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Hamel, D. R., Allman, M. S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250402 · Cited by 1,402
Self-citationQuantum random number generators
Herrero-Collantes, M., & García-Escartín, J. C. (2017) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.015004 · Cited by 850
Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions
Erhard, M., Fickler, R., Krenn, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Light Science & Applications · doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.146 · Cited by 670
Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet
Azuma, K., Economou, S. E., Elkouss, D., Hilaire, P., Jiang, L., Lo, H., & Tzitrin, I. (2023) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.045006 · Cited by 681
Experimental Ten-Photon Entanglement
Wang, X., Chen, L.-K., Li, W.-Y., Huang, H.-L., Liu, C., Chen, C., Luo, Y.-H., Su, Z.-E., Wu, D., Li, Z.-D., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.210502 · Cited by 562
Fully Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Vazirani, U. V., & Vidick, T. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.140501 · Cited by 519
Quantum random number generation
Ma, X., Yuan, X., Cao, Z., Qi, B., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.21 · Cited by 445
Zhong, H.-S., Li, Y., Li, W., Peng, L.-C., Su, Z.-E., Hu, Y., He, Y.-M., Ding, X., Zhang, W., Li, H., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.250505 · Cited by 432
Security in quantum cryptography
Portmann, C., & Renner, R. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.025008 · Cited by 475
Certified randomness in quantum physics
Acín, A., & Masanes, L. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20119 · Cited by 307
Open-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review
Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/4/042001 · Cited by 328
Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism
Larsson, J.-Å. (2014) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424003 · Cited by 261
Device-independent quantum random-number generation
Liu, Y., Zhao, Q., Li, M., Guan, J.-Y., Zhang, Y., Bai, B., Zhang, W., Liu, W., Wu, C., Yuan, X., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0559-3 · Cited by 268
Self-citationOpen-system dynamics of entanglement:a key issues review
Aolita, L., de Melo, F., & Davidovich, L. (2015) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-20820 · Cited by 258
Quantum cryptography beyond quantum key distribution
Broadbent, A., & Schaffner, C. (2015) · Designs Codes and Cryptography · doi:10.1007/s10623-015-0157-4 · Cited by 263
Walk, N., Hosseini, S., Geng, J., Thearle, O., Haw, J. Y., Armstrong, S., Assad, S. M., Janoušek, J., Ralph, T. C., Symul, T., et al. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.000634 · Cited by 223
Self-Testing Quantum Random Number Generator
Lunghi, T., Brask, J. B., Lim, C. C. W., Lavigne, Q., Bowles, J., Martin, A., Zbinden, H., & Brunner, N. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.150501 · Cited by 206
Self-citationCosmic Bell Test: Measurement Settings from Milky Way Stars
Handsteiner, J., Friedman, A. S., Rauch, D., Gallicchio, J. R., Liu, B., Hosp, H., Kofler, J., Bricher, D., Fink, M., Leung, C., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.060401 · Cited by 211
Atomic Hong–Ou–Mandel experiment
Lopes, R., Imanaliev, A., Aspect, A., Cheneau, M., Boiron, D., & Westbrook, C. I. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14331 · Cited by 195
Closing the Door on Einstein and Bohr’s Quantum Debate
Aspect, A. (2015) · Physics · doi:10.1103/physics.8.123 · Cited by 214
Cosmic Bell Test Using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars
Rauch, D., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Gallicchio, J. R., Friedman, A. S., Leung, C., Liu, B., Bulla, L., Ecker, S., Steinlechner, F., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.080403 · Cited by 201
Harder, G., Bartley, T. J., Lita, A. E., Nam, S. W., Gerrits, T., & Silberhorn, C. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.143601 · Cited by 179
Self-citationAdvances in device-independent quantum key distribution
Zapatero, V., van Leent, T., Arnon-Friedman, R., Liu, W., Zhang, Q., Weinfurter, H., & Curty, M. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00684-x · Cited by 193
Source-Device-Independent Ultrafast Quantum Random Number Generation
Marangon, D. G., Vallone, G., & Villoresi, P. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.060503 · Cited by 161
Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?
Laloë, F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108569361 · Cited by 171
Quantum randomness extraction for various levels of characterization of the devices
Law, Y. Z., Le, T. P., Bancal, J.-D., & Scarani, V. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424028 · Cited by 160
Time-multiplexed heralded single-photon source
Kaneda, F., Christensen, B., Wong, J. J., Park, H. S., McCusker, K. T., & Kwiat, P. G. (2015) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.2.001010 · Cited by 155
Self-citationEntangled photon-pair sources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals
Anwar, A., Perumangatt, C., Steinlechner, F., Jennewein, T., & Ling, A. (2021) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0023103 · Cited by 169
Source-device-independent heterodyne-based quantum random number generator at 17 Gbps
Avesani, M., Marangon, D. G., Vallone, G., & Villoresi, P. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07585-0 · Cited by 158
Source-Independent Quantum Random Number Generation
Cao, Z., Zhou, H., Yuan, X., & Ma, X. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.011020 · Cited by 155
More randomness from the same data
Bancal, J.-D., Sheridan, L., & Scarani, V. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033011 · Cited by 148
High-Speed Device-Independent Quantum Random Number Generation without a Detection Loophole
Liu, Y., Yuan, X., Li, M., Zhang, W., Zhao, Q., Zhong, J., Cao, Y. W., Li, Y.-H., Chen, L.-K., Li, H., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.010503 · Cited by 143
Maximization of Extractable Randomness in a Quantum Random-Number Generator
Haw, J. Y., Assad, S. M., Lance, A. M., Ng, N. H. Y., Sharma, V., Lam, P. K., & Symul, T. (2015) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.3.054004 · Cited by 142
Toward a Photonic Demonstration of Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution
Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Zhen, Y.-Z., Li, M.-H., Liu, Y., Fan, J., Xu, F., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.050502 · Cited by 162
Self-citationRobust and Versatile Black-Box Certification of Quantum Devices
Yang, T. H., Vértesi, T., Bancal, J.-D., Scarani, V., & Navascués, M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.040401 · Cited by 128
Using complete measurement statistics for optimal device-independent randomness evaluation
Nieto-Silleras, O., Pironio, S., & Silman, J. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/013035 · Cited by 132
Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions
Erven, C., Meyer-Scott, E., Bonsma-Fisher, K., Lavoie, J., Higgins, B. L., Yan, Z., Pugh, C. J., Bourgoin, J.-P., Prevedel, R., Shalm, L. K., et al. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.50 · Cited by 127
Self-citationUnifying Framework for Relaxations of the Causal Assumptions in Bell’s Theorem
Chaves, R., Kueng, R., Brask, J. B., & Gross, D. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.140403 · Cited by 125
Physical characterization of quantum devices from nonlocal correlations
Bancal, J.-D., Navascués, M., Scarani, V., Vértesi, T., & Yang, T. H. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022115 · Cited by 126
The ultimate physical limits of privacy
EKERT, A. K., & Renner, R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13132 · Cited by 127
Brask, J. B., Martin, A., Esposito, W., Houlmann, R., Bowles, J., Zbinden, H., & Brunner, N. (2017) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.7.054018 · Cited by 127
Self-citationGeneration of Fresh and Pure Random Numbers for Loophole-Free Bell Tests
Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Mitrani, D., Pruneri, V., & Mitchell, M. W. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250403 · Cited by 115
Kaneda, F., Garay-Palmett, K., U’Ren, A. B., & Kwiat, P. G. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.010733 · Cited by 117
Self-citationRandomness in quantum mechanics: philosophy, physics and technology
Bera, M. N., Acín, A., Kuś, M., Mitchell, M. W., & Lewenstein, M. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa8731 · Cited by 122
Scalable Spatial Superresolution Using Entangled Photons
Rozema, L. A., Bateman, J. D., Mahler, D. H., Okamoto, R., Feizpour, A., Hayat, A., & Steinberg, A. M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.223602 · Cited by 107
Design and analysis of communication protocols for quantum repeater networks
Jones, C., Kim, D., Rakher, M. T., Kwiat, P. G., & Ladd, T. D. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083015 · Cited by 118
Self-citationHybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell’s inequality using two different atomic isotopes
Ballance, C. J., Schäfer, V. M., Home, J., Szwer, D. J., Webster, S. C., Allcock, D. T. C., Linke, N. M., Harty, T. P., Craik, D. P. L. A., Stacey, D. N., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16184 · Cited by 100
Belenchia, A., Carlesso, M., Bayraktar, Ö., Dequal, D., Derkach, I. D., Gasbarri, G., Herr, W., Li, Y. L., Rademacher, M., Sidhu, J. S., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.11.004 · Cited by 109
Testing Bell’s Inequality with Cosmic Photons: Closing the Setting-Independence Loophole
Gallicchio, J., Friedman, A. S., & Kaiser, D. I. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.110405 · Cited by 99
Testing foundations of quantum mechanics with photons
Shadbolt, P., Mathews, J. C. F., Laing, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2931 · Cited by 100
Loss-tolerant measurement-device-independent quantum random number generation
Cao, Z., Zhou, H., & Ma, X. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/125011 · Cited by 98
Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis
Hensen, B., Kalb, N., Blok, M., Dréau, A., Reiserer, A., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Schouten, R. N., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Goodenough, K., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30289 · Cited by 100
Statistics, Causality and Bell’s Theorem
Gill, R. D. (2014) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/14-sts490 · Cited by 104
Hu, M., Zhou, Z., Hu, X., Li, C., Guo, G., & Zhang, Y.-S. (2018) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-018-0115-x · Cited by 109
Self-citationTest of Local Realism into the Past without Detection and Locality Loopholes
Li, M., Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Bai, B., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Zhao, Q., Li, H., Wang, Z., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.080404 · Cited by 99
Self-citationSteinlechner, F., Basset, M. G., Jofre, M., Scheidl, T., Torres, J. P., Pruneri, V., & Ursin, R. (2014) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.31.002068 · Cited by 88
Requirements for a loophole-free photonic Bell test using imperfect setting generators
Kofler, J., Giustina, M., Larsson, J.-Å., & Mitchell, M. W. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.032115 · Cited by 93
Quantum Cryptography: Key Distribution and Beyond
Akshata Shenoy, H., Pathak, A., & Radhakrishna, S. (2017) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v6i1.57 · Cited by 86
Family of Bell-like Inequalities as Device-Independent Witnesses for Entanglement Depth
Liang, Y.-C., Rosset, D., Bancal, J.-D., Pütz, G., Barnea, T. J., & Gisin, N. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.190401 · Cited by 83
Self-citationChoudhury, S., Panda, S., & Singh, R. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4553-3 · Cited by 93
Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis
Schwonnek, R., Goh, K. T., Primaatmaja, I. W., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Wolf, R., Scarani, V., & Lim, C. C.-W. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23147-3 · Cited by 98
Self-citationAll-photonic intercity quantum key distribution
Azuma, K., Tamaki, K., & Munro, W. J. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10171 · Cited by 70
Machine Learning Detection of Bell Nonlocality in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Deng, D.-L. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240402 · Cited by 77
Asano, M., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A. Y., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., & Yamato, I. (2015) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9929-y · Cited by 70
Device-independent quantum key distribution with single-photon sources
Kołodyński, J., Máttar, A., Skrzypczyk, P., Woodhead, E., Cavalcanti, D., Banaszek, K., & Acín, A. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-30-260 · Cited by 80
Light for the quantum. Entangled photons and their applications: a very personal perspective
Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/aa736d · Cited by 66
A robust mathematical model for a loophole-free Clauser–Horne experiment
Bierhorst, P. (2015) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/19/195302 · Cited by 69
Meyer-Scott, E., Prasannan, N., Eigner, C., Quiring, V., Donohue, J. M., Barkhofen, S., & Silberhorn, C. (2018) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.26.032475 · Cited by 70
Machine Learning Cryptanalysis of a Quantum Random Number Generator
Truong, N. D., Haw, J. Y., Assad, S. M., Lam, P. K., & Kavehei, O. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2018.2850770 · Cited by 70
Ho, M., Sekatski, P., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., Bancal, J.-D., & Sangouard, N. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.230502 · Cited by 67
Device-independent quantum key distribution with random key basis
Schwonnek, R., Goh, K. T., Primaatmaja, I. W., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Wolf, R., Scarani, V., & Lim, C. C. W. (2021) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000488144 · Cited by 65
Self-citationXu, F., Shapiro, J. H., & Wong, F. N. C. (2016) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.3.001266 · Cited by 61
Field Demonstration of Distributed Quantum Sensing without Post-Selection
Zhao, S.-R., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Guan, J.-Y., Zhang, W., Li, C., Bai, B., Li, M.-H., Liu, Y., You, L., et al. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031009 · Cited by 68
Self-citationCHSH Inequality: Quantum Probabilities as Classical Conditional Probabilities
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2014) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9851-8 · Cited by 64
Jogenfors, J., Hassan, A. M. E., Ahrens, J., Bourennane, M., & Larsson, J.-Å. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500793 · Cited by 61
Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution with Random Postselection
Xu, F., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Pan, J.-W. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.110506 · Cited by 62
Self-citationOpanchuk, B., Arnaud, L., & Reid, M. D. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.062101 · Cited by 60
Real-Time Source-Independent Quantum Random-Number Generator with Squeezed States
Michel, T., Haw, J. Y., Marangon, D. G., Thearle, O., Vallone, G., Villoresi, P., Lam, P. K., & Assad, S. M. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.034017 · Cited by 56
Decoherence of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering
Rosales-Zárate, L., Teh, R. Y., Kiesewetter, S., Brolis, A., Ng, K., & Reid, M. D. (2015) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.32.000a82 · Cited by 58
Heralding efficiency and correlated-mode coupling of near-IR fiber-coupled photon pairs
Dixon, P. B., Rosenberg, D., Stelmakh, V., Grein, M. E., Bennink, R. S., Dauler, E. A., Kerman, A. J., Molnar, R. J., & Wong, F. N. C. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043804 · Cited by 62
Approaching Tsirelson’s Bound in a Photon Pair Experiment
Poh, H. S., Joshi, S. K., Ceré, A., Cabello, A., & Kurtsiefer, C. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.180408 · Cited by 58
Long-distance distribution of genuine energy-time entanglement
Cuevas, Á., Carvacho, G., Saavedra, G., Cariñe, J., Nogueira, W. A. T., Figueroa, M. E., Cabello, A., Mataloni, P., Lima, G., & XAVIER, G. B. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3871 · Cited by 57
Exploring the Limits of Quantum Nonlocality with Entangled Photons
Christensen, B., Liang, Y.-C., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., & Kwiat, P. G. (2015) · Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000111571 · Cited by 57
Self-citationFacets of bipartite nonlocality sharing by multiple observers via sequential measurements
Das, D., Ghosal, A., Sasmal, S., Mal, S., & Majumdar, A. S. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022305 · Cited by 57
Device-Independent Tests of Entropy
Chaves, R., Brask, J. B., & Brunner, N. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.110501 · Cited by 51
Self-citationDeath by experiment for local realism
Wiseman, H. M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15631 · Cited by 56
Directly comparing entanglement-enhancing non-Gaussian operations
Bartley, T. J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023038 · Cited by 54
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution: from idea towards application
Valivarthi, R., Lucio-Martinez, I., Chan, P., Rubenok, A., John, C., Korchinski, D. J., Duffin, C., Marsili, F., Verma, V. B., Shaw, M. D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2015.1021725 · Cited by 54
Self-citationBell-inequality violation with entangled photons, free of the coincidence-time loophole
Larsson, J.-Å., Giustina, M., Kofler, J., Wittmann, B., Ursin, R., & Ramelow, S. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032107 · Cited by 51
Tomography is Necessary for Universal Entanglement Detection with Single-Copy Observables
Lu, D., Xin, T., Yu, N., Ji, Z., Chen, J., Long, G., Baugh, J., Peng, X., Zeng, B., & Laflamme, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.230501 · Cited by 53
Förtsch, M., Schunk, G., Fürst, J. U., Strekalov, D., Gerrits, T., Stevens, M. J., Sedlmeir, F., Schwefel, H. G. L., Nam, S. W., Leuchs, G., et al. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.023812 · Cited by 53
Self-citationSelf-testing quantum random-number generator based on an energy bound
Rusca, D., van Himbeeck, T., Martin, A., Brask, J. B., Shi, W., Pironio, S., Brunner, N., & Zbinden, H. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.062338 · Cited by 52
Self-citationSuperconducting photon detectors
Morozov, D., Casaburi, A., & Hadfield, R. H. (2021) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2022.2043596 · Cited by 54
Towards a realization of device-independent quantum key distribution
Murta, G., van Dam, S. B., Ribeiro, J., Hanson, R., & Wehner, S. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab2819 · Cited by 46
Device-independent quantum key distribution from generalized CHSH inequalities
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Valcarce, X., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., & Sangouard, N. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-26-444 · Cited by 46
Measurement-device–independent randomness from local entangled states
Chaturvedi, A., & Banik, M. (2015) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/112/30003 · Cited by 46
Device-independent quantum key distribution from generalized CHSH inequalities
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Valcarce, X., Tan, E. Y.-Z., Renner, R., & Sangouard, N. (2021) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000493926 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Christensen, B. G., McCusker, K. T., Altepeter, J. B., Calkins, B., Gerrits, T., Lita, A. E., Miller, A., Shalm, L. K., Zhang, Y., Nam, S. W., Brunner, N., Lim, C. C. W., Gisin, N., & Kwiat, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-09-26
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 130406-130406
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2006166792
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 62.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Science
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-CHRI-0007)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J007838/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- quantum nonlocality, Bell inequality violation, detection loophole, fair sampling assumption, entangled photon sources, local realism, quantum correlations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
