Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Entanglement Swapping between Discrete and Continuous Variables

Takeda, Shuntaro, Fuwa, Maria, van Loock, Peter, Furusawa, Akira·2015·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.114.100501

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication and decoherence-free subspaces, or employing quantum repeaters.

    “Notwithstanding, two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication [43,96,105,348,350,351,393-399] and decoherencefree subspaces [42,116,385,386,[388][389][390][391], or employing quantum repeaters.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [393]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.024309 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.050302 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.2752 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.010302 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.250503 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220502 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.822 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/35106500 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.130502 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/1521-3978(200212)50:12<1177::AID-PROP1177>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042336 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.012319 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.1 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.35 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1126/science.282.5389.706 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature12366 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2095 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.042327 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.070402 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.180504 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.043803 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.193601 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/014 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041028 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takeda, S., Fuwa, M., van Loock, P., & Furusawa, A.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
114
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
116
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • SCOPE
  • CSTP
  • ALPS
  • HIPERCOM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review