Cited by 448Acoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchTopological Materials and PhenomenaQuantum and electron transport phenomena

Valley Vortex States in Sonic Crystals

Open access
Lu, Jiuyang, Qiu, Chunyin, Ke, Manzhu, Liu, Zhengyou·2016·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

Valleytronics is quickly emerging as an exciting field in fundamental and applied research. In this Letter, we study the acoustic version of valley states in sonic crystals and reveal a vortex nature of such states. In addition to the selection rules established for exciting valley polarized states, a mimicked valley Hall effect of sound is proposed further. The extraordinary chirality of valley vortex states, detectable in experiments, may open a new possibility in sound manipulations. This is appealing to scalar acoustics that lacks a spin degree of freedom inherently. In addition, the valley selection enables a handy way to create vortex matter in acoustics, in which the vortex chirality can be controlled flexibly. Potential applications can be anticipated with the exotic interaction of acoustic vortices with matter, such as to trigger the rotation of the trapped microparticles without contact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.116.093901

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fields at the K′ valley could be obtained by the time-reversal operation, which reverses the direction of the energy flux and hence the circular polarization of the state.

    “The fields at the K′ valley could be obtained by the time-reversal operation, which reverses the direction of the energy flux and hence the circular polarization of the state16,49.”

    From Direct observation of valley-polarized topological edge states in designer surface plasmon crystals (2017) · cites this paper as [49]

    The passage labelled Abstract (page unavailable) says the K′ valley states follow from time-reversal symmetry and have reversed vortex chirality; the Fig. 2 discussion identifies the associated Poynting vectors. It does not describe this as a reversal of circular polarization, and elsewhere says the longitudinal acoustic system lacks intrinsic spin polarizations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Breaking the ΓK-mirror symmetry of the unit cell by making R1 and R2 unequal lifts the degeneracy between the first and second bands at the valleys and opens a full bandgap.

    “We then introduce a perturbation to break the ΓK-mirror symmetry of the unit cell, which will lift the degeneracy at the valleys and hence open a bandgap20,49.”

    From Direct observation of valley-polarized topological edge states in designer surface plasmon crystals (2017) · cites this paper as [49]

    The indexed passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says that breaking spatial inversion symmetry produces an omnidirectional band gap separating lower- and higher-frequency valley states. It does not describe breaking ΓK-mirror symmetry by making R1 and R2 unequal, or explicitly identify the separated states as the first and second bands. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. [1]1. X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Nat. Phys. 10, 343 (2014).
  2. [2]2. A. Rycerz, J. Tworzydlo, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Nat. Phys. 3, 172 (2007).
  3. [3]3. D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007).
  4. [4]4. W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B 77, 235406 (2008).
  5. [5]5. Z. Wu, F. Zhai, F. M. Peeters, H. Xu, and K. Chang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 176802 (2011).
  6. [6]6. J. L. Garcia-Pomar, A. Cortija, and M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 236801 (2008).
  7. [7]7. D. Xiao, G. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012).
  8. [8]8. K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, Science 344, 1489 (2014).
  9. [9]9. O. Gunawan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 186404 (2006);
  10. [10]10. K. Takashina, Y. Ono, A. Fujiwara, Y. Takahashi, and Y. Hirayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 236801 (2006).
  11. [11]11. Y. P. Shkolnikov, E. P. De Poortere, E. Tutuc, and M. Shayegan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 226805 (2002);
  12. [12]12. N. C. Bishop et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 266404 (2007);
  13. [13]13. Z. Zhu, A. Collaudin, B.Fauque, W. Kang, and K. Behnia, Nat. Phys. 8, 89 (2012);
  14. [14]14. D. MacNeill et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 037401 (2015).
  15. [15]15. K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494 (2012);
  16. [16]16. H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and X. Cui, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490 (2012);
  17. [17]17. T. Cao et al., Nat. Commun. 3, 887 (2012).
  18. [18]18. J. Lu, C. Qiu, S. Xu, Y. Ye, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 89, 134302 (2014).
  19. [19]19. X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 113903 (2008);
  20. [20]20. Q. Liang, Y. Yan, and J. Dong, Opt. Lett. 36, 2513 (2011).
  21. [21]21. R. A. Sepkhanov, J. Nilsson, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045122 (2008);
  22. [22]22. X. Zhang, and Z. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 264303 (2008);
  23. [23]23. S. R. Zandbergen and M. J. A. de Dood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 043903 (2010);
  24. [24]24. S. Bittner, B. Dietz, M. Miski-Oglu, P. Oria Iriarte, A. Richter, and F. Schafer, Phys. Rev. B 82, 014301 (2010).
  25. [25]25. R. A. Sepkhanov, A. Ossipov, and C. W. J. Beenakker, EPL 85, 14005 (2009);
  26. [26]26. G. Weick, C. Woollacott, W. L. Barnes, O. Hess, and E. Mariani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 106801 (2013).
  27. [27]27. F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008);
  28. [28]28. Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013905 (2008);
  29. [29]29. Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Nature 461, 772 (2009);
  30. [30]30. Y. Poo, R. Wu, Z. Lin, Y. Yang, and C. T. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 093903 (2011);
  31. [31]31. M. C. Rechtsman et al., Nature 496, 196 (2013);
  32. [32]32. A. B. Khanikaev et al., Nat. Mater. 12, 233 (2013);
  33. [33]33. W. Chen et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 5782 (2014);
  34. [34]34. L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Nat. Photonics 8, 821 (2014);
  35. [35]35. T. Ma, A. B. Khanikaev, S. H. Mousavi, and G. Shvets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 127401 (2015);
  36. [36]36. L. Wu, and X. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 223901 (2015).
  37. [37]37. X. Ni et al., New J. Phys. 17, 053016 (2015);
  38. [38]38. Z. Yang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 114301 (2015).
  39. [39]39. P. Wang, L. Lu, and K. Bertoldi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 104302 (2015);
  40. [40]40. M. Xiao et al., Nat. Phys. 11, 240 (2015);
  41. [41]41. M. Xiao et al., Nat. Phys. In press; V. Peano, C. Brendel, M. Schmidt, and F. Marquardt, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031011 (2015).
  42. [43]43. L. Zhang, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 085503 (2014); ibid. 115, 115502 (2015).
  43. [44]44. J. L. Garcia-Pomar, A. Cortijo, and M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 236801 (2008).
  44. [45]45. M. Onoda, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 083901 (2004);
  45. [46]46. O. Hosten, and P. G. Kwiat, Science 319, 787 (2008);
  46. [47]47. Q. Guo, W. Gao, J. Chen, Y. Liu, and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 067402 (2015).
  47. [48]48. A. A. High et al., Nature 522, 192 (2015).
  48. [49]49. K. Volke-Sepulveda, A. O. Santillan, and R. R. Boullosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 024302 (2008).
  49. [50]50. C. E. M. Demore, Z. Y. Yang, A. Volovick, S. Cochran, M. P. MacDonald, and G. C. Spalding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 194301 (2012).
  50. [51]51. A. Anhauser, R. Wunenburger, and E. Brasselet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 034301 (2012).
  51. [52]52. J. Lekner, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3475 (2006).
  52. [53]53. K. D. Skeldon, C. Wilson, M. Edgar, and M. J. Padgett, New J. Phys. 10, 013018 (2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, J., Qiu, C., Ke, M., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2016-02-29
Volume
116
Issue
9
Pages
093901-093901
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2581606756
Cited by
448
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 5
FWCI
25.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11174225, 11374233, 11534013, 11547310, J1210061)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB755500)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
Keywords
valleytronics, sonic crystals, valley Hall effect, chirality, acoustic vortices, vortex matter, acoustic manipulation, microparticle rotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review