The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 6 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise
Open accessAbstract
We introduce a scheme for the quantum simulation of many-body decoherence based on the unitary evolution of a stochastic Hamiltonian. Modulating the strength of the interactions with stochastic processes, we show that the noise-averaged density matrix simulates an effectively open dynamics governed by k-body Lindblad operators. Markovian dynamics can be accessed with white-noise fluctuations; non-Markovian dynamics requires colored noise. The time scale governing the fidelity decay under many-body decoherence is shown to scale as N^{-2k} with the system size N. Our proposal can be readily implemented in a variety of quantum platforms including optical lattices, superconducting circuits, and trapped ions.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes simulating many-body open-system dynamics by adding classical stochastic noise to the coupling constants of a unitary quantum simulator. Averaging over noise realizations produces an effective master equation with many-body Lindblad operators, with white noise giving Markovian dynamics and colored noise enabling non-Markovian dynamics.
Key findings
- The noise-averaged density matrix evolves under a master equation whose dissipator contains many-body Lindblad operators inherited from the stochastic terms in the simulator Hamiltonian.
- For white noise, the dissipator takes diagonal Lindblad form; for real white noise it becomes unital and purity decays monotonically.
- The decoherence time scales as \(N^{-2k}\) for \(N\) particles and \(k\)-body interactions, with the bound \(1/\tau_D \le \binom{N}{k}^2 \sum_\alpha \gamma_\alpha \|L^{(\alpha,k)}\|^2/4 \sim N^{2k}/k!^2 \sum_\alpha \gamma_\alpha \|L^{(\alpha,k)}\|^2/4\).
- In the long-range Ising example, \(\tau_D \sim 1/N^2\) for a product state and \(\tau_D \sim 1/N^4\) for maximally entangled states, where the bound is saturated.
Methods
- Theoretical quantum-simulation proposal: a target many-body Hamiltonian is supplemented by stochastic terms \(\sum_\alpha \lambda_\alpha(t) L_\alpha\), with Gaussian noise fields and coupling strengths \(\lambda_\alpha(t)=\hbar\sqrt{\gamma_\alpha}\,\eta_\alpha(t)\).
- The noise-averaged dynamics is derived using Novikov’s theorem; the Markovian limit is obtained with white noise, while non-Markovian dynamics is treated perturbatively to second order in noise strength using colored noise.
- Two illustrative platforms are discussed: a Bose-Hubbard model in an optical lattice with stochastic on-site interaction, and a long-range transverse-field Ising chain with stochastic spin-spin couplings.
Limitations
- The paper states that solving the non-Markovian master equation requires stochastic unraveling or perturbative schemes, and the explicit non-Markovian treatment is second order in noise strength.
- The scheme assumes Hermitian simulator and target Hamiltonians; implementing non-Hermitian stochastic terms is stated to be outside its scope.
- Evident from the text: the work is a theoretical proposal without experimental demonstration or numerical simulations, and it relies on Gaussian, independent noise processes and permutation-symmetric \(k\)-body Lindblad operators.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
11 No basis given · 10 Own interpretation · 5 Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our scheme shows that its stochastic modulation via a single real white noise, U → U þ 2ℏ ffiffi ffi γ p ηðtÞ, makes the dynamics of the noise-averaged density matrix effectively open.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“The evolution is then dictated by the master equation ( 6) with the dissipator D½ρðtÞ ¼ -γ X i;j ½ ni ð ni -1Þ; ½ nj ð nj -1Þ; ρðtÞ:ð18Þ”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The obtained master equation is exact to all orders in U.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Up to parity effects, the decoherence time scales quadratically with the particle number, τ D ∼ 1=N 2 , for large N for an initial product state.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Modulating the strength of the interactions with stochastic processes, we show that the noise-averaged density matrix simulates an effectively open dynamics governed by k-body Lindblad operators.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“we focus on the addition of noise (understood as a stochastic modulation in time) to the coupling constants of k-body operators in the Hamiltonian, and show that the ensemble-average over noise realizations is described by a density matrix that evolves according to a master equation with many-body Lindblad operators.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“Averaging over the noise realizations yields an effectively open dynamics, which describes a wide variety of master equations characterized by many-body decoherence.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The characteristic time scale of evolution, as estimated from the fidelity decay, exhibits a strong signature of many-body decoherence as a function of the system size.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Markovian dynamics can be accessed with white-noise fluctuations; non-Markovian dynamics requires colored noise.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Markovian dynamics can be accessed modulating the coupling constants with a white noise; non-Markovian dynamics requires colored noise.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Markovian dynamics can be accessed with white-noise fluctuations; non-Markovian dynamics requires colored noise.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Such a general evolution can be obtained using colored noise.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“Non-Markovian effects can be accessed using colored noise.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By adding a white-noise contribution to the interactions, J ij → J ij þ ℏ ffiffi ffi γ p ηðtÞ, our results predict that the noise-averaged density matrix then obeys a master equation ( 6), where the target Hamiltonian is that of the Ising chain (19) and the dissipator takes a many-body nonlocal form given by D½ρðtÞ ¼ -γ X i<j X i 0 <j 0 [σ z i σ z j ; ½σ z i 0 σ z j 0 ; ρðtÞ]:ð20Þ”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The time scale governing the fidelity decay under many-body decoherence is shown to scale as N -2k with the system size N.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“i.e. the decoherence time τ D scales as N -2k where N ≫ k is the number of particles in the quantum simulator and k denotes the range of the interaction terms.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · hedged
“The characteristic time scale of evolution, as estimated from the fidelity decay, exhibits a strong signature of many-body decoherence as a function of the system size.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We introduce a scheme for the quantum simulation of many-body decoherence based on the unitary evolution of a stochastic Hamiltonian.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“In this Letter, we introduce a versatile scheme for the quantum simulation of the open dynamics of a many-body system embedded in an environment to which it couples via many-body interactions.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“To summarize, we have developed a scheme for the quantum simulation of many-body decoherence, where classical noise is a tool used to facilitate the experimental realization of such a simulation.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- It may state two separate claims as one. 7
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 1
In the paper
“where 1 τ D ¼ X α γ α ΔL 2 α ≤ 1 4 X α γ α ∥ Lα ∥ 2 ;ð15Þ”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“The inequality follows from using the seminorm of the Hermitian operator Lα -the difference between its largest and lowest eigenvalue-as an upper bound for the variance [40].”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, for maximally entangled states, the bound ( 16) is saturated and the enhancement scales as τ D ∼ 1=N 4 , a telltale sign of many-body decoherence.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, we recover the linear dynamics for the noise-averaged dynamics under stochastic Hamiltonians such as (2), but with a decoherence time that now reveals a strong signature of many-body decoherence.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“It is found that FðtÞ ¼ 1 -t=τ D þ Oðt 2 Þ”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
In the paper
“Notice that, if the stochastic processes are taken to be real from the beginning (η 00 α ðtÞ ¼ 0), the Lα operators in (2) then fulfill Hermiticity.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“The noise-averaged dynamics thus leads to a monotonic decay of purity [35].”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, the dissipator now only depends on the average density operator hρ st ðtÞi, that we hereafter denote by ρðtÞ to simplify the notation.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“This form corresponds to the diagonal Lindblad form [33,34] of a Markovian dynamics”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“Clearly, our approach is not restricted to optical lattices and can be applied to ultracold atoms and polar molecules, including scenarios governed by three-body interactions [43].”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A specific non-Markovian evolution can thereby be simulated from a specific type of colored noises, which can be designed using a filter function convoluted with a white noise signal, as in signal analysis, or via a Cholesky decomposition as described in [37].”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our proposal can be readily implemented in a variety of quantum platforms including optical lattices, superconducting circuits, and trapped ions.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Our scheme exploits current technologies for digital and analog quantum simulation of unitary dynamics, and can be readily implemented in various experimental platforms such as trapped ions, superconducting circuits, and cold atoms.”
- Also stated in: § P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S · plain
“Further, it can be readily implemented in a variety of platforms, including ultracold atoms in an optical lattice, trapped ions, and superconducting qubits.”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
The authors state this as an assumption.
The initial state is deterministically prepared in a pure state at t = 0.
“Assuming the initial state to be deterministically prepared in a pure state jψð0Þi at t ¼ 0, the fidelity simply reads FðtÞ ¼ hψð0ÞjρðtÞjψð0Þi ¼ cos 2 L½ρð0Þ; ρðtÞ.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, it is worth noting that the quantum speed limit time also sets the time-scale over which decoherence is effective [30,156,157].”
From Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control (2017) · cites this paper as [156]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S
“1 τ D ¼ X α γ α ΔL 2 α ≤ 1 4 X α γ α ∥ Lα ∥ 2 ;ð15Þ”
§ Quantum Simulation of Generic Many-Body Open System Dynamics Using Classical Noise > Abstract
“D½ρðtÞ ¼ - X α γ α [ Lα ; ½ Lα ; ρðtÞ];ð10Þ”
Citations
Cites
On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups
Lindblad, G. (1976) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01608499 · Cited by 7,548
Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes
Dicke, R. H. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 · Cited by 7,445
Theory of open quantum systems
Xu, R., & Yan, Y. (2002) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1474579 · Cited by 6,622
Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms
Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., & Bloch, I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415039a · Cited by 5,935
Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
Zurek, W. H. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.715 · Cited by 4,295
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932
Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems
Viola, L., Knill, E., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417 · Cited by 1,808
Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation
Verstraete, F., Wolf, M. M., & Ignacio Cirac, J. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1342 · Cited by 1,570
Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms
Diehl, S., Micheli, A., Kantian, A., Kraus, B., Büchler, H. P., & Zoller, P. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1073 · Cited by 1,295
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- E. A. Novikov, 1965, JETP, 20, 1290
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–160 of 160
Classical simulation of arbitrary quantum noise
Halataei, S. M. H. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.042338 · Cited by 5
Transport through a quantum critical system: A thermodynamically consistent approach
Wächtler, C. W., & Schaller, G. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023178 · Cited by 5
Quantum algorithms for powering stable Hermitian matrices
González-García, G., Trivedi, R., & Cirac, J. I. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.062420 · Cited by 5
Beau, M. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27100996 · Cited by 5
Self-citationEntanglement generation and scaling from noisy quenches across a quantum critical point
Jafari, R., Naji, J., Langari, A., Karimipour, V., & Johannesson, H. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/km39-472p · Cited by 4
Quantum speed limits of quantum system in colored environments
Zheng, L., & Peng, Y. (2024) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107315 · Cited by 4
Tutorial on the stochastic simulation of dissipative quantum oscillators
(21966221), C. H., (21965201), J. G., (21945560), F. C., & (19928142), J. A. (2025) · Figshare · Cited by 4
Simulating open quantum systems with molecular spin qudits
Roca-Jerat, S., Macaluso, E., Chiesa, A., Santini, P. M., & Carretta, S. (2025) · Materials Horizons · doi:10.1039/d4mh01512f · Cited by 4
Family of attainable geometric quantum speed limits
Mai, Z.-Y., Liu, Z., & Yu, C. (2025) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2025-06-17-1774 · Cited by 4
From stochastic Hamiltonian to quantum simulation: exploring memory effects in exciton dynamics
Gallina, F., Bruschi, M., & Fresch, B. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad6a7b · Cited by 5
Context-dependent time-energy uncertainty relations from projective quantum measurements
Beau, M. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/f9s1-32kz · Cited by 3
Self-citationKheiri, S., Jafari, R., Mahdavifar, S., Oskoee, S. N., & Akbari, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26732-4 · Cited by 4
Fidelity of the Kitaev honeycomb model under a quench
Roberts, W., Vogl, M. R., & Fiete, G. A. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.l220406 · Cited by 6
Probing quantum phase transitions via quantum speed limits
Suman, M. K., Aravinda, S., & Modak, R. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012466 · Cited by 3
Classical-quantum correspondence in noise-based dissipative systems
Zeng, J., Xu, G., Huang, W., & Yao, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.062219 · Cited by 3
Li, D., Shao, X., & Yi, X. X. (2020) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201900399 · Cited by 3
Limits to Perception by Quantum Monitoring with Finite Efficiency
García-Pintos, L. P., & del Campo, A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23111527 · Cited by 5
Kinetically constrained models constructed from dissipative quantum dynamics
Maity, S., & Hamazaki, R. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.014301 · Cited by 3
Memory effects in multipartite systems coupled by nondiagonal dephasing mechanisms
Budini, A. A. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.012205 · Cited by 3
Advances on quantum speed limit
Sun, S., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2020-1430 · Cited by 2
Quantum non-Markovianity induced by classical stochastic noise
Filho, J. I. D. C. (2017) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.76.2017.tde-10102017-155811 · Cited by 3
On the Noisy Road to Open Quantum Dynamics: The Place of Stochastic Hamiltonians
Checchi, P. D., Gallina, F., Fresch, B., & Giusteri, G. G. (2025) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202500482 · Cited by 2
Fluctuating parametric drive of coupled classical oscillators can simulate dissipative qubits
Bernazzani, L., & Burkard, G. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013284 · Cited by 2
Multichromatic Floquet engineering of quantum dissipation
Impens, F., & Guéry-Odelin, D. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.062618 · Cited by 2
Exploring the experimental limit of deep quantum signal processing using a trapped-ion simulator
Bu, J.-T., Zhang, L., Yu, Z., Wang, J.-B., Ding, W.-Q., Yuan, W.-F., Wang, B., Du, H., Chen, W.-J., Chen, L., et al. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.034073 · Cited by 2
Delocalized Excitation Transfer in Open Quantum Systems with Long-Range Interactions
Padilla, D. F., So, V., Menon, A., Zhuravel, R., Pu, H., & Pagano, G. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/bxwl-sbsn · Cited by 5
Counting defects in quantum computers with Graphics Processing Units
Gardas, B., & Ptok, A. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.016 · Cited by 2
Quantum-to-classical transition via single-shot generalized measurements
Xu, Z. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/2md2-nxz3 · Cited by 3
Quantum trajectories and Page-curve entanglement dynamics
Ganguly, K., Gopalakrishnan, P., Naik, A., Agarwalla, B. K., & Kulkarni, M. (2025) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ae1ffa · Cited by 1
Reshaping the Quantum Arrow of Time
García-Pintos, L. P., Liu, Y.-K., & Gorshkov, A. V. (2026) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/l18s-9vmh · Cited by 4
Quantum dynamics in lattices in the presence of bulk dephasing and a localized source
Ray, T., Ganguly, K., Poletti, D., Kulkarni, M., & Agarwalla, B. K. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/6frd-chqr · Cited by 1
Double-bracket master equations: Phase-space representation and classical limit
Shrestha, A. W., Bhattacharjee, B., & del Campo, A. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/snjy-bkvj · Cited by 2
Emulation of Density Matrix Dynamics With Classical Analog Circuits
Cressman, A. J., & Sarpeshkar, R. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2025.3552736 · Cited by 1
Evolution processes of coupled thermal qubits
Chatchawaltheerat, T., Khemmani, S., & Poulter, J. (2019) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2019.125882 · Cited by 1
Work Measurement in OPEN Quantum System
Xu, Y.-Y. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24020180 · Cited by 1
Quantum Speed Limit for Time-Fractional Open SystemsPreprint
Gao, F., Wei, D., Liu, H., Li, Y., Qin, S., & Wen, Q. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4457883 · Cited by 1
Universal dissipators for driven open quantum systems and the correction to linear response
Bernazzani, L., Gulácsi, B., & Burkard, G. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae0827 · Cited by 1
Out-of-Equilibrium Quantum Dynamics
Ashida, Y. (2020) · Springer theses · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2580-3_4
Measuring distance between quantum states on a quantum computerPreprint
Kuzmak, A. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.05301
Topology identification of autonomous quantum dynamical networks
Gherardini, S., van Waarde, H. J., Tesi, P., & Caruso, F. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.052426
Engineering quasi-steady-state correlations in uncorrelated thermal states using stochastic driving
Rahmani, A. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.094309
Quantum Information Concepts in Open Quantum Systems
Vacchini, B., Smirne, A., & Megier, N. (2023) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-0365-6498-2
Report on scipost_202307_00026v2
Bhakuni, D. S., Lezama, T. L. M., & Lev, Y. B. (2023) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.8096
Report on scipost_202307_00026v2
Bhakuni, D. S., Lezama, T. L. M., & Lev, Y. B. (2023) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.8076
Report on scipost_202307_00026v1
Bhakuni, D. S., Lezama, T. L. M., & Lev, Y. B. (2023) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.7771
Report on scipost_202307_00026v1
Bhakuni, D. S., Lezama, T. L. M., & Lev, Y. B. (2023) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipost.report.7719
Quantum Gates with Different Robust Merits
Sun, C., Wang, Y., Wang, G., & Wu, C. (2024) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202400301
Resilience–runtime tradeoff relations for quantum algorithms
García-Pintos, L. P., O’Leary, T., Biswas, T., Bringewatt, J., Cincio, Ł., Brady, L. T., & Liu, Y.-K. (2025) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adac8b · Cited by 2
Hierarchy of degenerate stationary states in a boundary-driven dipole-conserving spin chain
Srivastava, A., & Dutta, S. (2025) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.18.3.111 · Cited by 1
Tight bounds of quantum speed limit for noisy dynamics via maximum rotation angles
Hu, Z., Yuan, H., Zhang, Z., Fung, C. F., & Miao, Z. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4484-9
Quantum dephasing dynamics in the presence of asymmetric random telegraph noise
冯, Y. 言. F., Ren, J., Cai, X.-J., & 彭, Y. 勇. P. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ae0398
Classical Non-Markovian Noise in Symmetry-Preserving Quantum Dynamics
Watkins, W. M., & Quiroz, G. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/t78h-c9s3 · Cited by 1
Geometric quantum control and the random Schrödinger equation
Lawrence, R., Wodecki, A., Aspman, J., Gaggioli, L. B., & Mareček, J. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/y8nw-n1wb
Naik, A., Agarwalla, B. K., & Kulkarni, M. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/bksr-fqn6
Enhancing quantum clocks and sensors with randomization and decoherence
García-Pintos, L. P. (2026) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae5fc8 · Cited by 1
Cai, X., Peng, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2026) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0325248
Azaidaoui, K., Jellal, A., Bahlouli, H., Luhaibi, A. A., & Vogl, M. R. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/49vg-s754
Correlated decoherence in a common environment activated by relative motion
Wang, Y., Sun, Z., Liu, F., Guo, M., Jiang, Y., & Liu, M. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/9jsd-7hj6 · Cited by 1
Dissipative phase transitions in an open quantum Rabi model with two-photon processes
Anonymous, & Pu, H. (2026) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/y58t-gvqy · Cited by 2
Time-reversal probe of spatially nonuniform information loss in open Rydberg atom arrays
Zhou, M., Chen, H.-C., Chang, K.-N., Ding, D.-S., & Wang, L. (2026) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2026.170726
Metadata
- Authors
- Chenu, A., Beau, M., Cao, J., & del Campo, A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-04-05
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 140403-140403
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2604247548
- Semantic Scholar
- 5b1070ecbcf011be31876b5ab576271444ddadf5
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- National Science Foundation (CHE-1112825)
- UMass Boston (P20150000029279)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- quantum simulation, open quantum systems, stochastic Hamiltonian, Lindblad operators, non-Markovian dynamics, colored noise, white noise, fidelity decay, system size scaling, hybrid quantum-classical simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
