Cited by 2,828Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for an Accurate and Interpretable Prediction of Material Properties

Open access
Xie, Tian, Grossman, Jeffrey C.·2018·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The use of machine learning methods for accelerating the design of crystalline materials usually requires manually constructed feature vectors or complex transformation of atom coordinates to input the crystal structure, which either constrains the model to certain crystal types or makes it difficult to provide chemical insights. Here, we develop a crystal graph convolutional neural networks framework to directly learn material properties from the connection of atoms in the crystal, providing a universal and interpretable representation of crystalline materials. Our method provides a highly accurate prediction of density functional theory calculated properties for eight different properties of crystals with various structure types and compositions after being trained with 10^{4} data points. Further, our framework is interpretable because one can extract the contributions from local chemical environments to global properties. Using an example of perovskites, we show how this information can be utilized to discover empirical rules for materials design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.120.145301

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low-cost, topological, three-dimensional, one-hot chemical encoding, and geometric descriptors are often employed for this purpose in transition-metal chemistry.

    “Low-cost, topological (5, 7, 32, 92-94), three-dimensional (95-100), one-hot chemical encoding (92, 101), and geometric (e.g., for MOF pores) (102-104) descriptors are often employed for this purpose in transition-metal chemistry.”

    From Machine Learning for the Discovery, Design, and Engineering of Materials. (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

    The paper’s main text (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) describes a crystal graph built from atom connections, with feature vectors encoding atomic properties. That supports the topological-representation part of the citation, but the copy does not identify its encoding as one-hot or establish that these descriptor types are often used specifically in transition-metal chemistry. The sentence’s three-dimensional and MOF-pore examples are attached to other citations, not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ML can be a valuable tool for improving AM processes.

    “ML can be a valuable tool for improving AM processes [859].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [859]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/ supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 for further details, which includes Refs. [4,13-21].
  2. N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929 (2014).
  3. D. K. Duvenaud, D. Maclaurin, J. Iparraguirre, R. Bombarell, T. Hirzel, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and R. P. Adams, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2015), pp. 2224-2232.
  4. J. Gilmer, S. S. Schoenholz, P. F. Riley, O. Vinyals, and G. E. Dahl, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017, http://proceedings.mlr.press/ v70/gilmer17a.html.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, T., & Grossman, J. C.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2018-04-06
Volume
120
Issue
14
Pages
145301-145301
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2766856748
Cited by
2,828
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 576 · 2025: 557 · 2024: 479 · 2023: 360 · 2022: 308 · 2021: 282 · 2020: 173 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 19
FWCI
51.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Toyota Research Institute
  • National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (ACI-1053575)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
crystal graph convolutional neural network, crystal structure representation, materials property prediction, model interpretability, perovskite, materials design, crystal structure types

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review