Cited by 5Machine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Accelerating materials discovery via AI-Agent integration of large language models and simulation tools

Open access
Wang, Xian, Zeng, Qun, Xu, Dong-Hui, Zhang, Li, Jiang, Gang, Yang, Mingli·2026·Journal of Materials Informatics

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with materials science is driving a paradigm shift in how functional materials are discovered and designed. In this work, we present an AI-Agent platform that leverages large language model-driven reasoning to assist users in designing and executing computational workflows for materials research. Rather than relying on rigid pipelines, the Agent interprets natural language prompts, dynamically assembles task-specific workflows from existing simulation tools, and executes calculations accordingly. To illustrate its capabilities, we show two representative cases: (i) a goal-driven electronic structure calculation for periodic monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, and (ii) an inverse design of battery electrolyte additives based on user-defined targets for molecular weight and frontier orbital energies. These examples illustrate the Agent’s capacity to translate high-level design intent into coordinated multi-tool operations, thereby streamlining complex workflows and lowering the entry barrier for non-expert users. As AI continues to advance, the Agent is poised to become an increasingly valuable partner in materials research, enhancing efficiency and improving design quality, and enabling broader access to materials discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20517/jmi.2025.69

Cites

69 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Papers such as SmartCIF, DynaMate, VASPilot, Matty, GENIUS, and ToPolyAgent show that a substantial share of the current advance lies not in replacing scientific judgment with text generation, but in making brittle infrastructural steps programmable and recoverable.

    “Papers such as SmartCIF, DynaMate, VASPilot, Matty, GENIUS, and ToPolyAgent show that a substantial share of the current advance lies not in replacing scientific judgment with text generation, but in making these brittle infrastructural steps programmable and recoverable [21,25,37-39,42].”

    From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Materials and Methods section (page unavailable) identifies Matty as an agent that turns materials-design objectives into executable simulation workflows using structured tool interfaces. The Introduction says this can relieve researchers of routine workflow configuration so they can focus on scientific insight and decision-making. The paper reports robust execution, but does not establish that failed infrastructural steps are recoverable; it also cannot substantiate that property for the other named systems. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A third group relied on more compact planner-executor or single-agent loops that repeatedly called tools and updated decisions from the observed outputs.

    “A third group relied on more compact planner-executor or single-agent loops that repeatedly called tools and updated decisions from the observed outputs [24,28,29,32-34,39,40].”
  • Other papers were more demonstrative, emphasizing workflow feasibility, design navigation, or case-based success rather than tightly standardized metrics.

    “Other papers were more demonstrative, emphasizing workflow feasibility, design navigation, or case-based success rather than tightly standardized metrics [17,18,21,22,35,37-39,41].”
  • Some studies are simulator-native: the agent configures or executes atomistic or thermodynamic tools directly.

    “Some studies are simulator-native: the agent configures or executes atomistic or thermodynamic tools directly [21,25,28,29,31,33,36,38-42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Chang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM. Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2024, 15, 1-45. DOI · DOI
  2. Hewitt, C.; Bishop, P.; Steiger, R. A universal modular ACTOR formalism for artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 3rd international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, Stanford, CA, USA, August 20-23, 1973;
  3. Wu, J.; Or, C. K. Position paper: towards open complex Human-AI Agents Collaboration System for problem-solving and knowledge management. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.00018. Available online: h t t p s : / / d o i . o r / . 4 8 5 5 0 / a r X i v . 2 5 0 5 . 0 0 0 1 8 (accessed 23 January 2026). · DOI
  4. Ansari, M.; Watchorn, J.; Brown, C. E.; Brown, J. S. dziner: rational inverse design of materials with AI Agents. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.03963. Available online: h t t p s : / / d o i . o r / 1 0 . 4 8 5 5 0 / a r X i v . 2 4 1 0 . 0 3 9 6 3 (accessed 23 January 2026). · DOI
  5. Hu, B.; Liu, S.; Ye, B.; Hao, Y.; Wen, T. A multi-agent framework for materials laws discovery. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.16416. Available online: h t t p s : / / d o i . o r / 1 0 . 4 8 5 5 0 / a r X i v . 2 4 1 1 . 1 6 4 1 6 (accessed 23 January 2026). · DOI
  6. Yao, S.; Zhao, J.; Yu, D.; et al. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023; OpenReview.net: Alameda, CA, USA, 2023. h t t p s : / / p a r . n s f . g o v / b i b l i o / 1 4 5 1 4 6 7 (accessed 2026-01-23).
  7. Greenspan, J.; Bulger, B. MySQL/PHP database applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. ISBN: 9780130893874. h t t p s : / / d l . a c m . o r g / d o i / a b s / 1 0 . 5 5 5 5 / 5 5 8 0 1 1 (accessed 2026-01-23). · DOI
  8. Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011, 12, 2825-30. h t t p s : / / w w w . e (accessed 2026-01-23).
  9. Balandat, M.; Karrer, B.; Jiang, D. R.; et al. BoTorch: a framework for efficient Monte Carlo Bayesian optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020), Virtual Format, December 6-12, 2020;
  10. Sohn, K.; Lee, H.; Yan, X. Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (NIPS 2015), Montreal, Canada, December 7-12, 2015;
  11. Paszke, A.; Gross, S.; Massa, F.; et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019), Vancouver, Canada, December 8-14, 2019;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Zeng, Q., Xu, D.-H., Zhang, L., Jiang, G., & Yang, M.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Materials Informatics
Published
2026-01-28
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2770-372X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125904047
Cited by
2
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Materials Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
AI agents, large language models, materials discovery, materials design, natural language prompts, workflow automation, simulation software, transition metal dichalcogenides, electronic structure calculations, inverse design, frontier orbital energies, molecular weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review