Cited by 811Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCoding theory and cryptographyQuantum Information and Cryptography

Quantum Error Correction and Orthogonal Geometry

Open access
Calderbank, A. R., Rains, E. M., Shor, P. W., Sloane, N. J. A.·1997·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

A group theoretic framework is introduced that simplifies the description of known quantum error-correcting codes and greatly facilitates the construction of new examples. Codes are given which map 3 qubits to 8 qubits correcting 1 error, 4 to 10 qubits correcting 1 error, 1 to 13 qubits correcting 2 errors, and 1 to 29 qubits correcting 5 errors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.78.405

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The required algorithm-specific non-universal quantum resource to run the remainder of a quantum algorithm on the QC_C is a graph state.

    “The required algorithm-specific non-universal quantum resource to run the remainder of the quantum algorithm on the QC C is then a graph state [9].”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states (2003) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calderbank, A. R., Rains, E. M., Shor, P. W., & Sloane, N. J. A.
Affiliations
  • AT&T (United States) (US)
  • Institute For Defense Analyses (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1997-01-20
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
405-408
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2091331782
Cited by
811
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 21
FWCI
40.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum error correction, quantum error-correcting codes, group theory, code construction, orthogonal geometry, code rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review