The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Open accessAbstract
The entanglement of a pure state of a pair of quantum systems is defined as the entropy of either member of the pair. The entanglement of formation of a mixed state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ is the minimum average entanglement of an ensemble of pure states that represents \ensuremath{\rho}. An earlier paper conjectured an explicit formula for the entanglement of formation of a pair of binary quantum objects (qubits) as a function of their density matrix, and proved the formula for special states. The present paper extends the proof to arbitrary states of this system and shows how to construct entanglement-minimizing decompositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The concurrence, entanglement of formation and tangle are measures of the quantum-coherence properties of a mixed quantum state [29].”
From Measurement of qubits (2001) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As for the concurrence, rigorously, its original Wootters' definition [20] is invalid for two-qudit states with d > 2.”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also known [19] that in the case of bipartite states with the dimensionality of the oneparticle Hilbert space d = 2, there is a simple algebraic relation between Wootters' concurrence C [20] and the Schmidt entanglement parameter K , owing to which”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Note that expressions for the concurrence C (equation (5.3) and the last formula of equation (5.4)) can also be derived directly from the original Wootters' definition [20].”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“This entanglement, being that of a 2 × 2 system, can also be distilled [7] into pure singlets and used for teleportation.”
From Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain (2003) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Concurrence (CQ) measures the degree of entanglement in a system, where CQ > 0.5 indicates a partially entangled system [73].”
From Mathematical proof of the Fisher-Escolà Q statistical distribution in quantum consciousness modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“Only for states of smallest possible dimensions, i.e., for bipartite two-level systems, do a few measures exist that can be evaluated algebraically [27,28,29]”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“For these low dimensional systems, the entanglement of a pure state can be expressed as a function of its concurrence, E (Ψ) = E ( c (Ψ)), with [27]”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The infimum of this quantity is known [27] to be given by”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“However, concurrence can also be considered as an independent entanglement measure [27].”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The relation between the present and the original approach to concurrence [27,57] becomes apparent with the observation that the matrix τ defined here coincides with that introduced in Eq. (38)”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The amount of entanglement can also be quantified by concurrence[45], which is directly related to e ij with C ( e ij ) = max { 0 , -1 2 + 3 2 e ij } .”
From Quantum simulation of the wavefunction to probe frustrated Heisenberg spin systems (2011) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 · Cited by 25,904
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Self-citationSakurai, J. J., & Napolitano, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108587280 · Cited by 3,672
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems
Schrödinger, E. (1935) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 · Cited by 3,124
Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.722 · Cited by 2,961
Self-citationEntanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citationVedral, V., Plenio, M. B., Rippin, M. A., & Knight, P. L. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2275 · Cited by 1,967
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,010
Bell-state generation for spin qubits via dissipative coupling
Zou, J., Zhang, S., & Tserkovnyak, Y. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.l180406 · Cited by 61
Hashem, M., Mohamed, A. A., Haddadi, S., Khedif, Y., Pourkarimi, M. R., & Mohammed Daoud, A. (2022) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/s00340-022-07802-1 · Cited by 56
Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi-leptonic top decays
Han, T., Low, M., & Wu, T. A. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)192 · Cited by 91
Heat flux and quantum correlations in dissipative cascaded systems
Lorenzo, S., Farace, A., Ciccarello, F., Palma, G. M., & Giovannetti, V. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022121 · Cited by 57
Erol, V., Özaydin, F., & Altıntaṣ, A. A. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05422 · Cited by 55
Relativistic invariant quantum entanglement between the spins of moving bodies
Li, H., & Du, J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022108 · Cited by 57
del Valle, E. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/2/025019 · Cited by 59
Özdemir, Ş. K., Bartkiewicz, K., Liu, Y.-X., & Miranowicz, A. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042325 · Cited by 56
Li, D. C., & Cao, Z. L. (2008) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2008-00208-x · Cited by 57
Entanglement evolution of twisted photons in strong atmospheric turbulence
Roux, F. S., Wellens, T., & Shatokhin, V. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012326 · Cited by 57
Concurrence versus purity: Influence of local channels on Bell states of two qubits
Ziman, M., & Bužek, V. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052325 · Cited by 57
Strings, black holes, the tripartite entanglement of seven qubits, and the Fano plane
Lévay, P. (2007) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.024024 · Cited by 57
Lower bound on entanglement of formation for the qubit-qudit system
Gerjuoy, E. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.052308 · Cited by 57
Thermal entanglement properties of small spin clusters
Bose, I., & Tribedi, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022314 · Cited by 57
Tserkis, S., Onoe, S., & Ralph, T. C. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052337 · Cited by 54
Farías, O. J., Aguilar, G. H., Valdés-Hernández, A., Ribeiro, P. H. S., Davidovich, L., & Walborn, S. P. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.150403 · Cited by 54
Jha, A. K., & Boyd, R. W. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.013828 · Cited by 55
Entanglement and electron correlation in quantum chemistry calculations
Huang, Z., Wang, H., & Kais, S. (2006) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340600955674 · Cited by 56
Experimental Test of Two-Way Quantum Key Distribution in the Presence of Controlled Noise
Ceré, A., Lucamarini, M., Giuseppe, G. D., & Tombesi, P. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.200501 · Cited by 56
Off-resonant entanglement generation in a lossy cavity
Francica, F., Maniscalco, S., Piilo, J., Plastina, F., & Suominen, K. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.032310 · Cited by 54
Two-resonator circuit quantum electrodynamics: Dissipative theory
Reuther, G. M., Zueco, D., Deppe, F., Hoffmann, E., Menzel, E. P., Weißl, T., Mariantoni, M., Kohler, S., Marx, A., Solano, E., et al. (2010) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.144510 · Cited by 56
Generalized criterion for a maximally multi-qubit entangled state
Zha, X.-W., Yuan, C., & Zhang, Y. (2013) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-2011/10/4/045201 · Cited by 56
Quantification of complementarity in multiqubit systems
Peng, X., Zhu, X., Suter, D., Du, J., Liu, M., & Gao, K. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052109 · Cited by 56
Robust entanglement in antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chains by single-spin optimal control
Wang, X., Bayat, A., Schirmer, S. G., & Bose, S. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.032312 · Cited by 56
Costa, A. C. S., Beims, M. W., & Angelo, R. M. (2016) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.05.068 · Cited by 59
Quantum coherence of planar spin models with Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interaction
Radhakrishnan, C., Ermakov, I., & Byrnes, T. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012341 · Cited by 56
Quantum Temporal Superposition: The Case of Quantum Field Theory
Henderson, L. J., Belenchia, A., Castro-Ruiz, E., Budroni, C., Zych, M., Brukner, Č., & Mann, R. B. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.131602 · Cited by 56
Symmetries, Group Actions, and Entanglement
Grabowski, J., Kuś, M., & Marmo, G. (2006) · Open Systems & Information Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11080-006-9013-3 · Cited by 54
Spatial correlations of one-dimensional driven-dissipative systems of Rydberg atoms
Hu, A., Lee, T. E., & Clark, C. W. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.053627 · Cited by 55
Quantum key distribution via tripartite coherent states
Allati, A. E., Baz, M. E., & Hassouni, Y. (2010) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-010-0213-y · Cited by 55
Yamamoto, T., Hayashi, K., Özdemir, Ş. K., Koashi, M., & Imoto, N. (2008) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2008.130 · Cited by 53
Liu, J., Li, Y., & Nie, Y.-Y. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0383-5 · Cited by 55
Entangled graphs: Bipartite entanglement in multiqubit systems
Plesch, M., & Bužek, V. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012322 · Cited by 53
Quantum correlations as precursors of entanglement
Auyuanet, A., & Davidovich, L. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.032112 · Cited by 54
Baghshahi, H. R., & Tavassoly, M. K. (2014) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/89/7/075101 · Cited by 55
Lee, S. M., Kim, H., Cha, M., & Moon, H. S. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.002941 · Cited by 55
Efficient superdense coding in the presence of non-Markovian noise
Liu, B., Hu, X., Huang, Y., Li, C., Guo, G., Karlsson, A., Laine, E.-M., Maniscalco, S., Macchiavello, C., & Piilo, J. (2016) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/114/10005 · Cited by 57
Quantifying quantum discord and entanglement of formation via unified purifications
Cen, L.-X., Li, X.-Q., Shao, J., & Yan, Y. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.054101 · Cited by 55
Probing resonating valence bond states in artificial quantum magnets
Yang, K., Phark, S., Bae, Y., Esat, T., Willke, P., Ardavan, A., Heinrich, A. J., & Lutz, C. P. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21274-5 · Cited by 54
Chen, P.-X., & Li, C.-Z. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.022306 · Cited by 55
Measuring the entanglement of bipartite pure states
Sancho, J. M. G., & Huelga, S. F. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.61.042303 · Cited by 54
Monogamy Equalities for Qubit Entanglement from Lorentz Invariance
Eltschka, C., & Siewert, J. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.140402 · Cited by 54
Nonlocal advantage of quantum coherence in a dephasing channel with memory*
Hu, M., Zhang, Y., & Fan, H. (2020) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abcf4a · Cited by 54
Quantum simulation of parity–time symmetry breaking with a superconducting quantum processor
Dogra, S., Melnikov, A. A., & Paraoanu, G. S. (2021) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00534-2 · Cited by 54
Ge, R.-C., & Hughes, S. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.205420 · Cited by 53
Quantum entanglement and quantum discord in magnetoactive materials (Review Article)
Aldoshin, S. M., Fel’dman, E. B., & Yurishchev, M. A. (2014) · Low Temperature Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4862469 · Cited by 53
Necessary and sufficient conditions for local manipulation of multipartite pure quantum states
Gour, G., & Wallach, N. R. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073013 · Cited by 53
Geometry of the three-qubit state, entanglement and division algebras
Bernevig, B. A., & Chen, H.-D. (2003) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/30/309 · Cited by 57
Measures and implications of electronic coherence in photosynthetic light-harvesting
Smyth, C., Fassioli, F., & Scholes, G. D. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0420 · Cited by 55
Steady-state entanglement between hybrid light-matter qubits
Angelakis, D. G., Bose, S., & Mancini, S. (2009) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/85/20007 · Cited by 54
Evolution equation for geometric quantum correlation measures
Hu, M., & Fan, H. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.052311 · Cited by 55
Evolution of coherence and non-classicality under global environmental interaction
Bhattacharya, S., Banerjee, S., & Pati, A. K. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1989-4 · Cited by 54
Quantum and nonlinear effects in light transmitted through planar atomic arrays
Bettles, R. J., Lee, M. D., Gardiner, S. A., & Ruostekoski, J. (2020) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-020-00404-3 · Cited by 64
Vectorial nonlinear optics: Type-II second-harmonic generation driven by spin-orbit-coupled fields
Wu, H., Yang, H.-R., Rosales‐Guzmán, C., Gao, W., Shi, B., & Zhu, Z. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.053840 · Cited by 55
Qian, X.-F., Konthasinghe, K., Manikandan, S. K., Spiecker, D., Vamivakas, A. N., & Eberly, J. H. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.012016 · Cited by 54
Information-transferring ability of the different phases of a finiteXXZspin chain
Bayat, A., & Bose, S. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.012304 · Cited by 54
Local aspects of disentanglement induced by spontaneous emission
Jamróz, A. (2006) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/24/009 · Cited by 52
Creation and protection of entanglement in systems out of thermal equilibrium
Bellomo, B., & Antezza, M. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113052 · Cited by 51
Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e−→τ+τ− at Belle II
Ehatäht, K., Fabbrichesi, M. E., Marzola, L., & Veelken, C. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.032005 · Cited by 85
Genuine multipartite entanglement from a thermodynamic perspective
Sun, W., Jin, Y., & Lü, G. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042422 · Cited by 53
Quantum entanglement of electromagnetic field in non-inertial reference frames
Ling, Y., He, S. L., Qiu, W., et al. (2007) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/30/024 · Cited by 53
Barz, S. (2015) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/48/8/083001 · Cited by 56
Demonstration of Local Expansion Toward Large-Scale Entangled Webs
Tashima, T., Kitano, T., Özdemir, Ş. K., Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M., & Imoto, N. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.210503 · Cited by 52
Geometric quantum discord with Bures distance: the qubit case
Spehner, D., & Orszag, M. (2013) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/3/035302 · Cited by 53
Preservation of Bipartite Pseudoentanglement in Solids Using Dynamical Decoupling
Wang, Y., Rong, X., Feng, P., Xu, W., Chong, B., Su, J., Gong, J., & Du, J. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.040501 · Cited by 53
Generation and propagation of entanglement in driven coupled-qubit systems
Li, J., & Paraoanu, G. S. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/11/113020 · Cited by 53
Tomography is Necessary for Universal Entanglement Detection with Single-Copy Observables
Lu, D., Xin, T., Yu, N., Ji, Z., Chen, J., Long, G., Baugh, J., Peng, X., Zeng, B., & Laflamme, R. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.230501 · Cited by 53
Robust quantum entanglement generation and generation-plus-storage protocols with spin chains
Estarellas, M. P., D’Amico, I., & Spiller, T. P. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042335 · Cited by 54
Local vs. joint measurements for the entanglement of assistance
Laustsen, T., Verstraete, F., & van Enk, S. J. (2003) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic3.1-6 · Cited by 53
Quantum correlations in B and K meson systems
Banerjee, S., Alok, A. K., & MacKenzie, R. (2016) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/i2016-16129-0 · Cited by 62
Li, H., Zou, J., Yu, W.-L., Xu, B.-M., Li, J., & Shao, B. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.052132 · Cited by 53
Quantum learning with noise and decoherence: a robust quantum neural network
Nguyen, N. H., Behrman, E., & Steck, J. E. (2020) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00013-x · Cited by 59
Optimal Spin-Entangled Electron-Hole Pair Pump
Beenakker, C. W. J., Titov, M., & Trauzettel, B. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.186804 · Cited by 53
Entanglement, Bell violation, and phase decoherence of two atoms inside an optical cavity
Li, S., & Xu, J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.022332 · Cited by 53
Dissipation and entanglement dynamics for two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs
Scala, M., Migliore, R., & Messina, A. (2008) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/43/435304 · Cited by 53
Bounds on entanglement in qudit subsystems
Kendon, V. M., Życzkowski, K., & Munro, W. J. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.062310 · Cited by 50
Local entanglement and quantum phase transition in spin models
Gu, S.-J., Tian, G.-S., & Lin, H.-Q. (2006) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/4/061 · Cited by 55
Entanglement flow in multipartite systems
Cubitt, T. S., Verstraete, F., & Cirac, J. I. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.052308 · Cited by 60
Geometry of two-qubit states with negative conditional entropy
Friis, N., Bulusu, S., & Bertlmann, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5dfd · Cited by 53
Cavity-Mediated Entanglement Generation Via Landau-Zener Interferometry
Quintana, C., Petersson, K. D., McFaul, L. W., Srinivasan, S. J., Houck, A., & Petta, J. R. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.173603 · Cited by 54
Quantum phase transitions in fully connected spin models: An entanglement perspective
Filippone, M., Dusuel, S., & Vidal, J. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.022327 · Cited by 51
Nonlocality of a single photon: Paths to an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-steering experiment
Jones, S. J., & Wiseman, H. M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.012110 · Cited by 50
Berry phase and quantum criticality in Yang–Baxter systems
Chen, J., Xue, K., & Ge, M. (2008) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.06.003 · Cited by 51
Entangling polaritons via dynamical Casimir effect in circuit quantum electrodynamics
Rossatto, D. Z., Felicetti, S., Eneriz, H., Rico, E., Sanz, M., & Solano, E. (2016) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.094514 · Cited by 49
Nourmandipour, A., Tavassoly, M. K., & Rafiee, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.022327 · Cited by 51
Parity Deformed Jaynes-Cummings Model: “Robust Maximally Entangled States”
Dehghani, A., Mojaveri, B., Shirin, S., & Faseghandis, S. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38069 · Cited by 53
Entanglement cost and quantum channel simulation
Wilde, M. M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.042338 · Cited by 53
Li, Y., Nemilentsau, A. M., & Argyropoulos, C. (2019) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c9nr05083c · Cited by 54
Multipartite entanglement measure and complete monogamy relation
Guo, Y. J., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032301 · Cited by 51
Detecting two-party quantum correlations in quantum-key-distribution protocols
Curty, M., Gühne, O., Lewenstein, M., & Lütkenhaus, N. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022306 · Cited by 52
Electrical current noise of a beamsplitter as a test of spin entanglement
Samuelsson, P., Sukhorukov, E. V., & Büttiker, Μ. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.115330 · Cited by 52
Generation of maximum spin entanglement induced by a cavity field in quantum-dot systems
Miranowicz, A., Özdemir, Ş. K., Liu, Y.-X., Koashi, M., Imoto, N., & Hirayama, Y. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.062321 · Cited by 51
Entanglement amplification between superposed detectors in flat and curved spacetimes
Foo, J., Mann, R. B., & Zych, M. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.065013 · Cited by 52
Quantum properties and dynamics ofXstates
Quesada, N., Al-Qasimi, A., & James, D. F. V. (2012) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2012.713130 · Cited by 56
Entanglement and Bell’s inequality violation above room temperature in metal carboxylates
Souza, A. M., Soares-Pinto, D. O., Sarthour, R. S., et al. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.054408 · Cited by 51
Complementarity and Correlations
Maccone, L., Bruß, D., & Macchiavello, C. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.130401 · Cited by 51
Genuine multipartite entanglement in the XY model
Giampaolo, S. M., & Hiesmayr, B. C. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.052305 · Cited by 51
Experimental Entanglement Redistribution under Decoherence Channels
Aguilar, G. H., Valdés-Hernández, A., Davidovich, L., Walborn, S. P., & Ribeiro, P. H. S. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.240501 · Cited by 51
Multipartite quantum correlation and entanglement in four-qubit pure states
Bai, Y.-K., Yang, D., & Wang, Z. D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.022336 · Cited by 50
Quantum metrology and estimation of Unruh effect
Wang, J., Tian, Z., Jing, J., & Fan, H. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07195 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Williams College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wootters, William K.
- ORCID
- Wootters, William K.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-03-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2245-2248
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2011208902
- Cited by
- 8,290
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 320 · 2025: 387 · 2024: 339 · 2023: 340 · 2022: 349 · 2021: 371 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 336 · 2018: 325 · 2017: 301 · 2016: 406 · 2015: 339 · 2014: 381 · 2013: 368 · 2012: 381
- FWCI
- 62.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- entanglement of formation, two-qubit states, mixed states, density matrix, quantum entanglement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
