The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Open accessAbstract
The entanglement of a pure state of a pair of quantum systems is defined as the entropy of either member of the pair. The entanglement of formation of a mixed state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ is the minimum average entanglement of an ensemble of pure states that represents \ensuremath{\rho}. An earlier paper conjectured an explicit formula for the entanglement of formation of a pair of binary quantum objects (qubits) as a function of their density matrix, and proved the formula for special states. The present paper extends the proof to arbitrary states of this system and shows how to construct entanglement-minimizing decompositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The concurrence, entanglement of formation and tangle are measures of the quantum-coherence properties of a mixed quantum state [29].”
From Measurement of qubits (2001) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As for the concurrence, rigorously, its original Wootters' definition [20] is invalid for two-qudit states with d > 2.”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also known [19] that in the case of bipartite states with the dimensionality of the oneparticle Hilbert space d = 2, there is a simple algebraic relation between Wootters' concurrence C [20] and the Schmidt entanglement parameter K , owing to which”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Note that expressions for the concurrence C (equation (5.3) and the last formula of equation (5.4)) can also be derived directly from the original Wootters' definition [20].”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“This entanglement, being that of a 2 × 2 system, can also be distilled [7] into pure singlets and used for teleportation.”
From Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain (2003) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Concurrence (CQ) measures the degree of entanglement in a system, where CQ > 0.5 indicates a partially entangled system [73].”
From Mathematical proof of the Fisher-Escolà Q statistical distribution in quantum consciousness modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“Only for states of smallest possible dimensions, i.e., for bipartite two-level systems, do a few measures exist that can be evaluated algebraically [27,28,29]”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“For these low dimensional systems, the entanglement of a pure state can be expressed as a function of its concurrence, E (Ψ) = E ( c (Ψ)), with [27]”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The infimum of this quantity is known [27] to be given by”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“However, concurrence can also be considered as an independent entanglement measure [27].”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The relation between the present and the original approach to concurrence [27,57] becomes apparent with the observation that the matrix τ defined here coincides with that introduced in Eq. (38)”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The amount of entanglement can also be quantified by concurrence[45], which is directly related to e ij with C ( e ij ) = max { 0 , -1 2 + 3 2 e ij } .”
From Quantum simulation of the wavefunction to probe frustrated Heisenberg spin systems (2011) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 · Cited by 25,904
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Self-citationSakurai, J. J., & Napolitano, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108587280 · Cited by 3,672
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems
Schrödinger, E. (1935) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 · Cited by 3,124
Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.722 · Cited by 2,961
Self-citationEntanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citationVedral, V., Plenio, M. B., Rippin, M. A., & Knight, P. L. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2275 · Cited by 1,967
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,010
Entanglement enhances cooling in microscopic quantum refrigerators
Brunner, N., Huber, M., Linden, N., Popescu, S., Silva, R., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.032115 · Cited by 221
Kuś, M., & Życzkowski, K. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.63.032307 · Cited by 219
Quantum discord and its allies: a review of recent progress
Bera, A., Das, T., Sadhukhan, D., Roy, S. S., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa872f · Cited by 229
Adesso, G., & Illuminati, F. (2006) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/1/015 · Cited by 221
Maximally entangled mixed states under nonlocal unitary operations in two qubits
Ishizaka, S., & Hiroshima, T. (2000) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.62.022310 · Cited by 216
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits
Storz, S., Schär, J., Kulikov, A., Magnard, P., Kurpiers, P., Lütolf, J., Walter, T., Copetudo, A., Reuer, K., Akın, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05885-0 · Cited by 245
Bennett, C. H. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429500459-13 · Cited by 226
Minimal Conditions for Local Pure-State Entanglement Manipulation
Jonathan, D., & Plenio, M. B. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1455 · Cited by 217
Quantum entanglement and Bell inequalities in Heisenberg spin chains
Wang, X., & Zanardi, P. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00885-x · Cited by 227
Quantitative entanglement witnesses
Eisert, J., Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Audenaert, K. M. R. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/046 · Cited by 215
Entanglement witnesses: construction, analysis and classification
Chruściński, D., & Sarbicki, G. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/48/483001 · Cited by 231
Bell-like inequality for the spin-orbit separability of a laser beam
Borges, C. V. S., Hor-Meyll, M. O., Huguenin, J. A. O., & Khoury, A. Z. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.033833 · Cited by 214
Subsystem Purity as an Enforcer of Entanglement
Bose, S., Fuentes, I., Knight, P. L., & Vedral, V. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.050401 · Cited by 209
Non-Markovian Entanglement Dynamics in the Presence of System-Bath Coherence
Dijkstra, A. G., & Tanimura, Y. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.250401 · Cited by 207
Quantum-information analysis of electronic states of different molecular structures
Barcza, G., Legeza, Ö., Marti, K. H., & Reiher, M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012508 · Cited by 217
Kim, J. S., Das, A., & Sanders, B. C. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.012329 · Cited by 208
Entanglement entropy in the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model
Latorre, J. I., Orús, R., Rico, E., & Vidal, J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.064101 · Cited by 213
Entanglement versus Bell Violations and Their Behavior under Local Filtering Operations
Verstraete, F., & Wolf, M. M. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.170401 · Cited by 212
Wide-band quantum interface for visible-to-telecommunication wavelength conversion
Ikuta, R., Kusaka, Y., Kitano, T., Kato, H., Yamamoto, T., Koashi, M., & Imoto, N. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1544 · Cited by 204
Quantifying entanglement resources
Eltschka, C., & Siewert, J. (2014) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424005 · Cited by 227
Decoherence induced by interacting quantum spin baths
Rossini, D., Calarco, T., Giovannetti, V., Montangero, S., & Fazio, R. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032333 · Cited by 205
A comparison of the entanglement measures negativity and concurrence
Verstraete, F., Audenaert, K. M. R., Dehaene, J., & Moor, B. D. (2001) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/47/329 · Cited by 200
Local filtering operations on two qubits
Verstraete, F., Dehaene, J., & DeMoor, B. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.010101 · Cited by 200
Entanglement dynamics and quantum-state transport in spin chains
Subrahmanyam, V. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.034304 · Cited by 201
Effects of reservoir squeezing on quantum systems and work extraction
Huang, X. L., Wang, T., & Yi, X. X. (2012) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.86.051105 · Cited by 195
Proposal for Production and Detection of Entangled Electron-Hole Pairs in a Degenerate Electron Gas
Beenakker, C. W. J., Emary, C., Kindermann, M., & van Velsen, J. L. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.147901 · Cited by 205
Constructing N -qubit entanglement monotones from antilinear operators
Osterloh, A., & Siewert, J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.012337 · Cited by 193
Process Tomography of Ion Trap Quantum Gates
Riebe, M., Kim, K., Schindler, P., Monz, T., Schmidt, P. O., Körber, T., Hänsel, W., Häffner, H., Roos, C. F., & Blatt, R. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.220407 · Cited by 192
Separability properties of three-mode Gaussian states
Giedke, G., Kraus, B., Lewenstein, M., & Cirac, J. I. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052303 · Cited by 199
Pairwise concurrence dynamics: a four-qubit model
Yönaç, M., Yu, T., & Eberly, J. H. (2007) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/40/9/s02 · Cited by 193
An integrated nanophotonic quantum register based on silicon-vacancy spins in diamond
Nguyen, C. T., Сукачев, Д. Д., Bhaskar, M. K., Machielse, B., Levonian, D., Knall, E., Stroganov, P., Chia, C., Burek, M. J., Riedinger, R., et al. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.165428 · Cited by 198
Dissipation-driven generation of two-qubit entanglement mediated by plasmonic waveguides
Martín-Cano, D., González-Tudela, A., Martín-Moreno, L., García-Vidal, F. J., Tejedor, C., & Moreno, E. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.235306 · Cited by 200
Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism
Zadeh-Haghighi, H., & Simon, C. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0325 · Cited by 197
Entanglement as a signature of quantum chaos
Wang, X., Ghose, S., Sanders, B. C., & Hu, B. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.016217 · Cited by 193
Effects of anisotropy on thermal entanglement
Wang, X. (2001) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00123-2 · Cited by 189
A note on invariants and entanglements
Albeverio, S. A., & Fei, S.-M. (2001) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/3/4/305 · Cited by 174
Jevtic, S., Pusey, M. F., Jennings, D. H., & Rudolph, T. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.020402 · Cited by 187
Entangled Three-Qubit States without Concurrence and Three-Tangle
Lohmayer, R., Osterloh, A., Siewert, J., & Uhlmann, A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.260502 · Cited by 187
Phonon decoherence of quantum entanglement: Robust and fragile states
Yu, T., & Eberly, J. H. (2002) · Physical review. B, Condensed matter · doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.193306 · Cited by 186
Concurrence-based entanglement measures for isotropic states
Rungta, P., & Caves, C. M. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012307 · Cited by 206
Gaussian entanglement of formation
Wolf, M. M., Giedke, G., Krüger, O., Werner, R. F., & Cirac, J. I. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052320 · Cited by 194
Optimal Entanglement Criterion for Mixed Quantum States
Breuer, H. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.080501 · Cited by 185
Disentanglement in a two-qubit system subjected to dissipation environments
Ikram, M., Li, F., & Zubairy, M. S. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.062336 · Cited by 181
Quantification of Einstein-Podolski-Rosen steering for two-qubit states
Costa, A. C. S., & Angelo, R. M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.020103 · Cited by 185
Quantum Control and Entanglement in a Chemical Compass
Cai, J., Guerreschi, G. G., & Briegel, H. J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.220502 · Cited by 182
Entanglement witnesses in spin models
Tóth, G. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.010301 · Cited by 184
Experimental Demonstration of Photonic Entanglement Collapse and Revival
Xu, J., Li, C., Gong, M., Zou, X., Shi, C.-H., Chen, G., & Guo, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.100502 · Cited by 185
Braiding Operators are Universal Quantum Gates
Kauffman, L. H., & Lomonaco, S. J. (2004) · Cited by 183
Thermal and ground-state entanglement in Heisenberg XX qubit rings
Wang, X. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.034302 · Cited by 184
Quantum simulation of the wavefunction to probe frustrated Heisenberg spin systems
Ma, X.-S., Dakic, B., Naylor, W., Zeilinger, A., & Walther, P. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1919 · Cited by 179
Convex-roof extended negativity as an entanglement measure for bipartite quantum systems
Lee, S., Chi, D. P., Oh, S. D., & Kim, J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.062304 · Cited by 186
Everything you always wanted to know about LOCC (but were afraid to askPreprint
Chitambar, E., Leung, D., Ozols, M., & Winter, A. (2016) · Cited by 229
Entanglement entropy and the Berry phase in the solid state
Ryu, S., & Hatsugai, Y. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.245115 · Cited by 183
Quantum discord and geometry for a class of two-qubit states
Li, B., Wang, Z., & Fei, S.-M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.022321 · Cited by 181
Joint remote state preparation
An, N. B., & Kim, J. (2008) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/9/095501 · Cited by 181
Coherence depletion in the Grover quantum search algorithm
Shi, H., Liu, S., Wang, X.-H., Yang, W., Yang, Z.-Y., & Fan, H. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032307 · Cited by 182
Variational characterizations of separability and entanglement of formation
Audenaert, K., Verstraete, F., & De Moor, B. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052304 · Cited by 176
Sudden death of entanglement at finite temperature
Al-Qasimi, A., & James, D. F. V. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012117 · Cited by 178
Entanglement tongue and quantum synchronization of disordered oscillators
Lee, T. E., Chan, C.-K., & Wang, S. (2014) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.89.022913 · Cited by 176
Hu, M., & Fan, H. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032338 · Cited by 178
A comparison of entanglement measures
Eisert, J., & Plenio, M. B. (1999) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 176
Thermal entanglement in the two-qubit Heisenberg XY model under a nonuniform external magnetic field
Sun, Y., Chen, Y., & Chen, H. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.044301 · Cited by 175
Reduction criterion for separability
Cerf, N. J., Adami, C., & Gingrich, R. M. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.60.898 · Cited by 173
Diluting quantum information: An analysis of information transfer in system-reservoir interactions
Ziman, M., Štelmachovič, P., Bužek, V., Hillery, M. S., Scarani, V., & Gisin, N. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042105 · Cited by 181
Genuine quantum correlations in quantum many-body systems: a review of recent progress
Chiara, G. D., & Sanpera, A. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aabf61 · Cited by 188
Entanglement harvesting from the electromagnetic vacuum with hydrogenlike atoms
Pozas-Kerstjens, A., & Martín-Martínez, E. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.064074 · Cited by 178
Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC
Afik, Y., & de Nova, J. R. M. (2021) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01902-1 · Cited by 252
Quantum dynamics as a physical resource
Nielsen, M. A., Dawson, C. M., Dodd, J. L., Gilchrist, A., Mortimer, D., Osborne, T. J., Bremner, M. J., Harrow, A. W., & Hines, A. P. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.052301 · Cited by 181
Non-Markovianity of local dephasing channels and time-invariant discord
Haikka, P., Johnson, T. H., & Maniscalco, S. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.010103 · Cited by 172
Entangling two macroscopic mechanical mirrors in a two-cavity optomechanical system
Liao, J., Qin-Qin, W., & Nori, F. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.014302 · Cited by 174
Geometry of entangled states, Bloch spheres and Hopf fibrations
Mosseri, R., & Dandoloff, R. (2001) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/47/324 · Cited by 187
General Monogamy Relation for the Entanglement of Formation in Multiqubit Systems
Bai, Y.-K., Xu, Y.-F., & Wang, Z. D. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.100503 · Cited by 171
Dynamical Casimir Effect Entangles Artificial Atoms
Felicetti, S., Sanz, M., Lamata, L., Romero, G., Johansson, G., Delsing, P., & Solano, E. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.093602 · Cited by 168
Legeza, Ö., & Sólyom, J. (2004) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.205118 · Cited by 167
Direct measurement of finite-time disentanglement induced by a reservoir
Santos, M. F., Milman, P., Davidovich, L., & Zagury, N. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.040305 · Cited by 169
Long-Distance Entanglement in Spin Systems
Venuti, L. C., Boschi, C. D. E., & Roncaglia, M. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.247206 · Cited by 173
Semiconductor devices for entangled photon pair generation: a review
Orieux, A., Versteegh, M. A. M., Jöns, K. D., & Ducci, S. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa6955 · Cited by 178
Cavity-based architecture to preserve quantum coherence and entanglement
Man, Z., Xia, Y., & Franco, R. L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13843 · Cited by 165
Robust concurrent remote entanglement between two superconducting qubits
Narla, A., Shankar, S., Hatridge, M., Leghtas, Z., Sliwa, K. M., Zalys-Geller, E., Mundhada, S. O., Pfaff, W., Frunzio, L., Schoelkopf, R. J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031036 · Cited by 115
Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface
Klco, N., Roggero, A., & A, M. J. S. (2022) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac58a4 · Cited by 209
OPEN QUANTUM DYNAMICS: COMPLETE POSITIVITY AND ENTANGLEMENT
Benatti, F., & Roberto Floreanini, B. (2005) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979205032097 · Cited by 166
Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of Laguerre–Gaussian modes
Krenn, M., Malik, M., Erhard, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0442 · Cited by 171
Finite-size scaling exponents in the Dicke model
Vidal, J., & Dusuel, S. (2006) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/epl/i2006-10041-9 · Cited by 164
Quantum fidelity and quantum phase transitions in matrix product states
Cozzini, M., Ionicioiu, R., & Zanardi, P. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.104420 · Cited by 165
Gap and channeled plasmons in tapered grooves: a review
Smith, C. L. C., Stenger, N., Kristensen, A., Mortensen, N. A., & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. (2015) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c5nr01282a · Cited by 159
Evolution equation for quantum entanglement
Konrad, T., de Melo, F., Tiersch, M., Kasztelan, C., Aragão, A., & Buchleitner, A. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys885 · Cited by 163
Reversing entanglement change by a weak measurement
Sun, Q., Al-Amri, M., Davidovich, L., & Zubairy, M. S. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.052323 · Cited by 164
Studying Quantum Spin Systems through Entanglement Estimators
Roscilde, T., Verrucchi, P., Fubini, A., Haas, S., & Tognetti, V. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.167203 · Cited by 168
Two-Site Entropy and Quantum Phase Transitions in Low-Dimensional Models
Legeza, Ö., & Sólyom, J. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.116401 · Cited by 162
Entanglement generation in uniformly accelerating atoms: Reexamination of the Unruh effect
Benatti, F., & Roberto Floreanini, B. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.012112 · Cited by 169
Entanglement of assistance and multipartite state distillation
Smolin, J. A., Verstraete, F., & Winter, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.052317 · Cited by 150
Extremal properties of the variance and the quantum Fisher information
Tóth, G., & Petz, D. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.032324 · Cited by 157
Genuinely multipartite concurrence of N -qubit X matrices
Rafsanjani, S. M. H., Huber, M., Broadbent, C. J., & Eberly, J. H. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.062303 · Cited by 157
Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and anisotropy effects on the entanglement of the Heisenberg model
Kargarian, M., Jafari, R., & Langari, A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.042319 · Cited by 156
Extracting Entanglement from Identical Particles
Killoran, N., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.150501 · Cited by 152
Monogamy Inequality for Distributed Gaussian Entanglement
Hiroshima, T., Adesso, G., & Illuminati, F. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.050503 · Cited by 157
Optimal Teleportation with a Mixed State of Two Qubits
Verstraete, F., & Verschelde, H. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.097901 · Cited by 154
Entanglement, coherence, and charging process of quantum batteries
Kamin, F. H., Tabesh, F. T., Salimi, S., & Santos, A. C. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.052109 · Cited by 163
Entangled photon-pair sources based on three-wave mixing in bulk crystals
Anwar, A., Perumangatt, C., Steinlechner, F., Jennewein, T., & Ling, A. (2021) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0023103 · Cited by 169
Mediated entanglement and correlations in a star network of interacting spins
Hutton, A., & Bose, S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.042312 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Williams College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wootters, William K.
- ORCID
- Wootters, William K.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-03-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2245-2248
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2011208902
- Cited by
- 8,290
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 320 · 2025: 387 · 2024: 339 · 2023: 340 · 2022: 349 · 2021: 371 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 336 · 2018: 325 · 2017: 301 · 2016: 406 · 2015: 339 · 2014: 381 · 2013: 368 · 2012: 381
- FWCI
- 62.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- entanglement of formation, two-qubit states, mixed states, density matrix, quantum entanglement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
