The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Open accessAbstract
The entanglement of a pure state of a pair of quantum systems is defined as the entropy of either member of the pair. The entanglement of formation of a mixed state $\ensuremath{\rho}$ is the minimum average entanglement of an ensemble of pure states that represents \ensuremath{\rho}. An earlier paper conjectured an explicit formula for the entanglement of formation of a pair of binary quantum objects (qubits) as a function of their density matrix, and proved the formula for special states. The present paper extends the proof to arbitrary states of this system and shows how to construct entanglement-minimizing decompositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The concurrence, entanglement of formation and tangle are measures of the quantum-coherence properties of a mixed quantum state [29].”
From Measurement of qubits (2001) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As for the concurrence, rigorously, its original Wootters' definition [20] is invalid for two-qudit states with d > 2.”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is also known [19] that in the case of bipartite states with the dimensionality of the oneparticle Hilbert space d = 2, there is a simple algebraic relation between Wootters' concurrence C [20] and the Schmidt entanglement parameter K , owing to which”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Note that expressions for the concurrence C (equation (5.3) and the last formula of equation (5.4)) can also be derived directly from the original Wootters' definition [20].”
From Entanglement of biphoton states: qutrits and ququarts (2011) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“This entanglement, being that of a 2 × 2 system, can also be distilled [7] into pure singlets and used for teleportation.”
From Quantum Communication through an Unmodulated Spin Chain (2003) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Concurrence (CQ) measures the degree of entanglement in a system, where CQ > 0.5 indicates a partially entangled system [73].”
From Mathematical proof of the Fisher-Escolà Q statistical distribution in quantum consciousness modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
In the citing paper
“Only for states of smallest possible dimensions, i.e., for bipartite two-level systems, do a few measures exist that can be evaluated algebraically [27,28,29]”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“For these low dimensional systems, the entanglement of a pure state can be expressed as a function of its concurrence, E (Ψ) = E ( c (Ψ)), with [27]”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The infimum of this quantity is known [27] to be given by”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“However, concurrence can also be considered as an independent entanglement measure [27].”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The relation between the present and the original approach to concurrence [27,57] becomes apparent with the observation that the matrix τ defined here coincides with that introduced in Eq. (38)”
From Measures and dynamics of entangled states (2005) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The amount of entanglement can also be quantified by concurrence[45], which is directly related to e ij with C ( e ij ) = max { 0 , -1 2 + 3 2 e ij } .”
From Quantum simulation of the wavefunction to probe frustrated Heisenberg spin systems (2011) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810817 · Cited by 25,904
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
Bell, J. S. (1964) · Physics Physique Fizika · doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195 · Cited by 12,252
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Self-citationSakurai, J. J., & Napolitano, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108587280 · Cited by 3,672
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems
Schrödinger, E. (1935) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554 · Cited by 3,124
Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Popescu, S., Schumacher, B., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.722 · Cited by 2,961
Self-citationEntanglement of a pair of quantum bits
Hill, S., & Wootters, W. K. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 · Cited by 2,823
Self-citationVedral, V., Plenio, M. B., Rippin, M. A., & Knight, P. L. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2275 · Cited by 1,967
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,010
Zhao, X., Jing, J., Corn, B., & Yu, T. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032101 · Cited by 72
Unified entropy, entanglement measures and monogamy of multi-party entanglement
Kim, J. S., & Sanders, B. C. (2011) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/29/295303 · Cited by 69
Entanglement in quantum information theoryPreprint
Eisert, J. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0610253 · Cited by 97
Entanglement monogamy of tripartite quantum states
Yu, C., & Song, H. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.032329 · Cited by 67
Entanglement, Bell Inequalities and Decoherence in Particle Physics
Bertlmann, R. A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/11398448_1 · Cited by 80
Robust entanglement preparation against noise by controlling spatial indistinguishability
Nosrati, F., Castellini, A., Compagno, G., & Franco, R. L. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0271-7 · Cited by 71
Enhanced two-photon emission from a dressed biexciton
Muñoz, C. S., Laussy, F. P., Tejedor, C., & del Valle, E. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/12/123021 · Cited by 70
Multiuser-to-multiuser entanglement distribution based on 1550 nm polarization-entangled photons
Cao, D.-Y., Liu, B., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2015) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1007/s11434-015-0801-4 · Cited by 69
Quantum discord with weak measurements
Singh, U., & Pati, A. K. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.02.004 · Cited by 70
Majorana representation of symmetric multiqubit states
Devi, A. R. U., Sudha, & Rajagopal, A. K. (2011) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-011-0280-8 · Cited by 70
Stochastic Resonance Phenomena in Quantum Many-Body Systems
Huelga, S. F., & Plenio, M. B. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.170601 · Cited by 70
Entanglement between charge qubits induced by a common dissipative environment
Contreras-Pulido, L. D., & Aguado, R. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.155420 · Cited by 69
Yang–Baxterizations, Universal Quantum Gates and Hamiltonians
Zhang, Y., Kauffman, L. H., & Ge, M. (2005) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-005-7655-7 · Cited by 75
Quantum router based on ac control of qubit chains
Zueco, D., Galve, F., Kohler, S., & Peter Hänggi, A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.042303 · Cited by 71
Estimation of SU(2) operation and dense coding: An information geometric approach
Fujiwara, A. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.012316 · Cited by 70
Entanglement Routers Using Macroscopic Singlets
Bayat, A., Bose, S., & Sodano, P. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.187204 · Cited by 71
Preventing Multipartite Disentanglement by Local Modulations
Gordon, G., & Kurizki, G. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.110503 · Cited by 69
Disentanglement and decoherence from classical non-Markovian noise: random telegraph noise
Zhou, D., Lang, A., & Joynt, R. (2010) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-010-0165-2 · Cited by 70
Long-range quantum discord in critical spin systems
Maziero, J., Céleri, L. C., Serra, R. M., & Sarandy, M. S. (2012) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.03.029 · Cited by 72
Uhlmann, A. (2010) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e12071799 · Cited by 70
Bidirectional imperfect quantum teleportation with a single Bell state
Kiktenko, E. O., Popov, A. A., & Fedorov, A. K. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.062305 · Cited by 69
Man, Z., Xia, Y., & An, N. B. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.052322 · Cited by 71
Mortezapour, A., Borji, M. A., & Franco, R. L. (2017) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/aa63c5 · Cited by 71
Optimal Entanglement Enhancement for Mixed States
Kent, A., Linden, N., & Massar, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.2656 · Cited by 70
Short-pulse or strong-field breakup processes: a route to study entangled wave packets
Fedorov, M. V., Efremov, M. A., Volkov, P. A., & Eberly, J. H. (2006) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/39/13/s20 · Cited by 70
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, P. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1799 · Cited by 67
Entanglement in the second quantization formalism
Vedral, V. (2003) · Open Physics · doi:10.2478/bf02476298 · Cited by 106
Noise-assisted preparation of entangled atoms
Yi, X. X., Yu, C., Zhou, L., & Song, H. S. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.052304 · Cited by 69
Two-photon entanglement in multiqubit bidirectional-waveguide QED
Mirza, I. M., & Schotland, J. C. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.012309 · Cited by 71
Electron quantum optics as quantum signal processing
Roussel, B., Cabart, C., Fève, G., Thibierge, É., & Degiovanni, P. (2017) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.201600621 · Cited by 73
Schmidt modes and entanglement
Fedorov, M. V., & Miklin, N. (2014) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107514.2013.878554 · Cited by 71
Thermodynamics of creating correlations: Limitations and optimal protocols
Bruschi, D. E., Perarnau-Llobet, M., Friis, N., Hovhannisyan, K. V., & Huber, M. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.032118 · Cited by 69
Quantum chaos, delocalization, and entanglement in disordered Heisenberg models
Brown, W., dos Santos, L. F., Starling, D. J., & Viola, L. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.021106 · Cited by 70
Existence of dimerized phases in frustrated spin ladder models
Liu, G., Wang, H., & Tian, G.-S. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.214418 · Cited by 69
Quantum entanglement and fixed-point bifurcations
Hines, A. P., McKenzie, R. H., & Milburn, G. J. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.042303 · Cited by 67
Entanglement and collective flavor oscillations in a dense neutrino gas
Cervia, M. J., Patwardhan, A. V., Balantekin, A. B., Coppersmith, S. N., & Johnson, C. W. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.083001 · Cited by 69
Two-qubit entanglement dynamics in a symmetry-broken environment
Lucamarini, M., Paganelli, S., & Mancini, S. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062308 · Cited by 67
Visualizing operators of coupled spin systems
Garon, A., Zeier, R., & Glaser, S. J. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.042122 · Cited by 71
Criticality and factorization in the Heisenberg chain with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
Yi, T.-C., You, W., Wu, N., & Oleś, A. M. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.024423 · Cited by 68
Direct measurement of nonlocal interactions in the many-body localized phase
Chiaro, B., Neill, C., Bohrdt, A., Filippone, M., Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013148 · Cited by 87
Computable and Operationally Meaningful Multipartite Entanglement Measures
Beckey, J. L., Gigena, N., Coles, P. J., & Cerezo, M. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.140501 · Cited by 75
Shi, Y., Yang, R.-Q., Xiang, Z., Ge, Z.-Y., Li, H., Wang, Y.-Y., Huang, K., Tian, Y., Song, X., Zheng, D., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39064-6 · Cited by 82
Yang, W. L., An, J., Zhang, C., Feng, M., & Oh, C. H. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.022312 · Cited by 66
Kato, A., & Tanimura, Y. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4928192 · Cited by 68
Li, D.-C., Wang, X., & Cao, Z. (2008) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/32/325229 · Cited by 68
Quantum Otto heat engine based on a multiferroic chain working substance
Azimi, M., Chotorlishvili, L., Mishra, S. K., Vekua, T., Hübner, W., & Berakdar, J. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063018 · Cited by 71
Miranowicz, A., & Leoński, W. (2006) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/39/7/011 · Cited by 68
Measuring polynomial invariants of multiparty quantum states
Leifer, M., Linden, N., & Winter, A. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.052304 · Cited by 68
Harvesting entanglement with detectors freely falling into a black hole
Gallock‐Yoshimura, K., Tjoa, E., & Mann, R. B. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.025001 · Cited by 67
Engineering Nonlinear Optic Sources of Photonic Entanglement
Torres, J. P., Banaszek, K., & Walmsley, I. A. (2011) · Progress in optics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53886-4.00005-8 · Cited by 67
Separability and correlations in composite states based on entropy methods
Rajagopal, A. K., & Rendell, R. W. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.022104 · Cited by 67
Quantum Bose-Hubbard model with an evolving graph as a toy model for emergent spacetime
Hamma, A., Markopoulou, F., Lloyd, S., Caravelli, F., Simone Severini, B., & Markström, K. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.104032 · Cited by 68
Detection of nonlocal atomic entanglement assisted by single photons
Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.024301 · Cited by 67
Local Vs. Joint Measurements For The Entanglement Of Assistance
Laustsen, T., Verstraete, F., & van Enk, S. J. (2001) · Cited by 67
Cinelli, C., Nepi, G. D., Martini, F. D., Barbieri, M., & Mataloni, P. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.022321 · Cited by 66
Entanglement generation between distant atoms by Lyapunov control
Wang, X., & Schirmer, S. G. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.042305 · Cited by 66
Characterizing entanglement in qubits created with spatially correlated twin photons
Neves, L., Lima, G., Fonseca, E. J. S., et al. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.032314 · Cited by 66
Liquid Ground State, Gap, and Excited States of a Strongly Correlated Spin Chain
Lesanovsky, I. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.105301 · Cited by 66
Entanglement of identical particles and the detection process
Tichy, M. C., de Melo, F., Kuś, M., Mintert, F., & Buchleitner, A. (2012) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201200079 · Cited by 71
Quantum Scissors – Finite-Dimensional States Engineering
Leoński, W., & Kowalewska-Kudłaszyk, A. (2011) · Progress in optics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53886-4.00003-4 · Cited by 66
Coherence Constraints and the Last Hidden Optical Coherence
Qian, X., Malhotra, T., Vamivakas, A. N., & Eberly, J. H. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.153901 · Cited by 66
Experimental preparation of the Werner state via spontaneous parametric down-conversion
Zhang, Y.-S., Huang, Y., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.66.062315 · Cited by 64
Entanglement in SU(2)-invariant quantum spin systems
Schliemann, J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.012309 · Cited by 63
Nature of the randomness-induced quantum spin liquids in two dimensions
Kawamura, H., & Uematsu, K. (2019) · Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab400c · Cited by 65
Operational entanglement of symmetry-protected topological edge states
Monkman, K., & Sirker, J. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043191 · Cited by 68
Quantum Dynamics of Exciton Transport and Dissociation in Multichromophoric Systems
Popp, W., Brey, D., Binder, R., & Burghardt, I. (2021) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-090419-040306 · Cited by 65
Quantum transport and localization in 1d and 2d tight-binding lattices
Karamlou, A. H., Braumüller, J., Yanay, Y., Paolo, A. D., Harrington, P. M., Kannan, B., Kim, D. K., Kjærgaard, M., Melville, A. J., Muschinske, S. E., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00528-0 · Cited by 72
Three-level Dicke quantum battery
Yang, D., Yang, F.-M., & Dou, F.-Q. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.235432 · Cited by 72
Revealing Hidden Coherence in Partially Coherent Light
Svozilík, J., Vallés, A., Peřina, J., & Torres, J. P. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.220501 · Cited by 64
Multiparticle entanglement with quantum logic networks: Application to cold trapped ions
Šašura, M., & Bužek, V. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.012305 · Cited by 65
The fully entangled fraction as an inclusive measure of entanglement applications
Grondalski, J., Etlinger, D. M., & James, D. F. V. (2002) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00884-8 · Cited by 62
Nonperturbative Treatment of Double Compton Backscattering in Intense Laser Fields
Lötstedt, E., & Jentschura, U. D. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.110404 · Cited by 65
Hu, M. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0371-1 · Cited by 68
Entanglement of the Heisenberg chain with the next-nearest-neighbor interaction
Gu, S.-J., Li, H., Li, Y., & Lin, H.-Q. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.70.052302 · Cited by 67
Entanglement in fermion systems
Gigena, N., & Rossignoli, R. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042326 · Cited by 63
Entropic Analysis of Quantum Phase Transitions from Uniform to Spatially Inhomogeneous Phases
Legeza, Ö., Sólyom, J., Tincani, L., & Noack, R. M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.087203 · Cited by 64
Operator monotones, the reduction criterion and the relative entropy
Plenio, M. B., Virmani, S., & Papadopoulos, P. (2000) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/22/101 · Cited by 65
Unified theory of consequences of spontaneous emission in a Λ system
Economou, S. E., Liu, R., Sham, L. J., & Steel, D. G. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.195327 · Cited by 65
Remarks on Additivity of the Holevo Channel Capacity and of the Entanglement of Formation
Matsumoto, K., Shimono, T., & Winter, A. (2004) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0919-0 · Cited by 65
The Generalized Partial Transposition Criterion for Separability of Multipartite Quantum States
Chen, K., & Wu, L. A. (2002) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 65
Walter, M., Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527805785.ch14 · Cited by 82
Entanglement dynamics in superconducting qubits affected by local bistable impurities
Franco, R. L., D’Arrigo, A., Falci, G., et al. (2012) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2012/t147/014019 · Cited by 64
Quantum steering and entanglement in three-mode triangle Bose–Hubbard system
Kalaga, J. K., Leoński, W., & Szczȩśniak, R. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1717-5 · Cited by 63
Symmetry from entanglement suppression
Low, I., & Mehen, T. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.074014 · Cited by 64
Semidefinite programming relaxations for quantum correlations
Tavakoli, A., Pozas-Kerstjens, A., Brown, P. J., & Araújo, M. (2024) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.96.045006 · Cited by 98
Entanglement redistribution in the Schwarzschild spacetime
Wang, J., Pan, Q., & Jing, J. (2010) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.07.035 · Cited by 64
Factorization and Criticality in the Anisotropic XY Chain via Correlations
Çakmak, B., Karpat, G., & Fanchini, F. F. (2015) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e17020790 · Cited by 64
Entanglement of two, three, or four plasmonically coupled quantum dots
Otten, M., Shah, R. A., Scherer, N. F., Min, M., Pelton, M. A., & Gray, S. K. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.125432 · Cited by 63
Monogamy of entanglement without inequalities
Gour, G., & Guo, Y. J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-13-81 · Cited by 64
Entanglement in The Second Quantization Formalism
Vedral, V. (2003) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 64
Violation of Bell inequality and entanglement of decaying Werner states
Miranowicz, A. (2004) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2004.05.001 · Cited by 68
Quantum Correlations Beyond Entanglement
Streltsov, A. (2014) · SpringerBriefs in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09656-8 · Cited by 78
Quantifying Tripartite Entanglement of Three-Qubit Generalized Werner States
Siewert, J., & Eltschka, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.230502 · Cited by 60
Wang, D., Huang, A.-J., Ming, F., Sun, W., Lu, H., Liu, C., & Liu, Y. (2017) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/aa6f85 · Cited by 63
Mathew, G., da Silva, S. L. L., Jain, A., Mohan, A., Adroja, D. T., Sakai, V. G., Tomy, C. V., Banerjee, A., Rajendar, G., N., A. V., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043329 · Cited by 63
Entanglement dynamics in one-dimensional quantum cellular automata
Brennen, G. K., & Williams, J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.042311 · Cited by 63
Generalized reduction criterion for separability of quantum states
Albeverio, S. A., Chen, K., & Fei, S.-M. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.062313 · Cited by 63
Role of single-qubit decoherence time in adiabatic quantum computation
Amin, M. H. S., Truncik, C. J. S., & Averin, D. V. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022303 · Cited by 67
Hastening, delaying, or averting sudden death of quantum entanglement
Rau, A. R. P., Ali, M., & Alber, G. (2008) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/82/40002 · Cited by 63
All-optical non-Markovian stroboscopic quantum simulator
Jin, J., Giovannetti, V., Fazio, R., Sciarrino, F., Mataloni, P., Crespi, A., & Osellame, R. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.012122 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Wootters, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Williams College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wootters, William K.
- ORCID
- Wootters, William K.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-03-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2245-2248
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2011208902
- Cited by
- 8,290
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 320 · 2025: 387 · 2024: 339 · 2023: 340 · 2022: 349 · 2021: 371 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 336 · 2018: 325 · 2017: 301 · 2016: 406 · 2015: 339 · 2014: 381 · 2013: 368 · 2012: 381
- FWCI
- 62.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- entanglement of formation, two-qubit states, mixed states, density matrix, quantum entanglement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
