The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Share a Quantum Secret
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the concept of quantum secret sharing. In a $(k,n)$ threshold scheme, a secret quantum state is divided into $n$ shares such that any $k$ of those shares can be used to reconstruct the secret, but any set of $k\ensuremath{-}1$ or fewer shares contains absolutely no information about the secret. We show that the only constraint on the existence of threshold schemes comes from the quantum ``no-cloning theorem,'' which requires that $n<2k$, and we give efficient constructions of all threshold schemes. We also show that, for $k\ensuremath{\le}n<2k\ensuremath{-}1$, then any $(k,n)$ threshold scheme must distribute information that is globally in a mixed state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The unique feature of this specific code is that there exist encoded operators (also referred to as logical operators in the literature) that have support only on two of the three qutrits that constitute the encoded space.Furthermore, it is then possible to identify sets of encoded operators that have the same action on the codespace, but have nontrivial support on different pairs of qutrits.”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The erasure-correcting property of this code ensures that any three-qutrit state within the codespace can be reconstructed even if one of the three qutrits is lost or erased.”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Secondly, from any two of the qutrits Bob can reconstruct the state.”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First of all for any state | ˜ ψ 〉 , the reduced density matrix on any one of the qutrits is maximally mixed.”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Thus 3 and 15 analyzer settings are respectively required to obtain the single- [28] and two-photon Stokes parameters.”
From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 2×
“This contradicts the “no-cloning theorem” [11,12].”
BackgroundMixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Safeguarding cryptographic keys
BLAKLEY, G. R. (1979) · 1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK) · doi:10.1109/mark.1979.8817296 · Cited by 3,499
Hillery, M. S., Bužek, V., & Berthiaume, A. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1829 · Cited by 3,391
Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.793 · Cited by 2,677
Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., & Mermin, N. D. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.557 · Cited by 2,525
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516
Theory of quantum error-correcting codes
Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.900 · Cited by 1,593
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- G. Blakely, 1979, Proceedings of the National Computer Conference, New York, 1979
- D. Aharonov, 1998, Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Conditional generation of arbitrary multimode entangled states of light with linear optics
Fiurášek, J., Massar, S., & Cerf, N. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.042325 · Cited by 21
Bibliographic guide to the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum informationPreprint
Cabello, A. (2000) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0012089 · Cited by 33
Cryptanalysis of a Quantum Proxy Weak Blind Signature Scheme
Zhang, K., & Jia, H.-Y. (2014) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-014-2250-2 · Cited by 20
Cryptanalysis on the improved multiparty quantum secret sharing protocol based on the GHZ state
Chen, X., Yang, S., Su, Y., & Yang, Y. (2012) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/86/05/055002 · Cited by 20
Lin, J.-Y., He, J.-G., Gao, Y.-C., Li, X., & Zhou, P. (2017) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-016-3250-1 · Cited by 20
Private algebras in quantum information and infinite-dimensional complementarity
Crann, J., Kribs, D. W., Levene, R. H., & Todorov, I. G. (2015) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4935399 · Cited by 20
Optimal entanglement concentration for three-photon W states with parity check measurement
Zhou, L., Sheng, Y., & Zhao, S. (2013) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/22/2/020307 · Cited by 20
Distinguishing two-qubit states using local measurements and restricted classical communication
Hillery, M. S., & Mimih, J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.042304 · Cited by 20
Controlled teleportation via photonic Faraday rotations in low-Q cavities
Bastos, W. P., Cardoso, W. B., Avelar, A. T., de Almeida, N. G., & Baseia, B. (2011) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-011-0339-6 · Cited by 20
Quantum state secure transmission in network communications
Chen, X., Su, Y., Xu, G., Sun, Y., & Yang, Y. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.034 · Cited by 20
Quantum Error Suppression with Commuting Hamiltonians: Two Local is Too Local
Marvian, I., & Lidar, D. A. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.260504 · Cited by 20
Multi-party Quantum Key Agreement without Entanglement
Cai, B., Guo, G., & Lin, S. (2016) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-016-3246-x · Cited by 20
Quantum secret sharing for general access structures based on multiparticle entanglements
Wang, M., Chen, X., & Yang, Y. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0660-3 · Cited by 20
Multi-party d-Level Quantum Secret Sharing Scheme
Xiao, H., & Gao, J. (2013) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1481-3 · Cited by 20
Quantum data hiding with spontaneous parameter down-conversion
Guo, G., & Guo, G. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.044303 · Cited by 20
Wang, J., & Shu, L. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979215501222 · Cited by 20
Unconditionally Secure Quantum Coin TossingPreprint
Mayers, D., Salvail, L., & Chiba-Kohno, Y. (1999) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9904078 · Cited by 20
Multi-party Quantum ComputationPreprint
Smith, A. (2001) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0111030 · Cited by 23
Quantum secret sharing for a class of special hypergraph access structures
Bai, C., Zhang, S., & Liu, L. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03425-9 · Cited by 19
Zhang, T., Zhou, L., Zhong, W., & Sheng, Y. (2023) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/acb04f · Cited by 19
Distribution of genuine high-dimensional entanglement over 10.2 km of noisy metropolitan atmosphere
Bulla, L., Hjorth, K., Kohout, O., Lang, J., Ecker, S., Neumann, S. P., Bittermann, J., Kindler, R., Huber, M., Bohmann, M., et al. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.l050402 · Cited by 23
Quantum Secret Sharing of Secure Direct Communication Using One-Time Pad
Du, R., Sun, Z., Wang, B.-H., & Long, D. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1147-1 · Cited by 19
High-Capacity Three-Party Quantum Secret Sharing With Hyperentanglement
Gu, B., Xu, F., Ding, L. K., & Zhang, Y.-N. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1242-3 · Cited by 19
Local indistinguishability and possibility of hiding cbits in activable bound entangled states
Chattopadhyay, I., & Sarkar, D. (2007) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.01.030 · Cited by 19
Unitary reconstruction of secret for stabilizer-based quantum secret sharing
Matsumoto, R. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1656-1 · Cited by 19
Computing on quantum shared secrets
Ouyang, Y., Tan, S.-H., Zhao, L., & Fitzsimons, J. F. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.052333 · Cited by 19
Entanglement classification of four-partite states under the SLOCC
Zangi, S. M., Li, J., & Qiao, C. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa7a2d · Cited by 19
Verifiable Threshold Quantum State Sharing Scheme
Cao, H., & Ma, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2805724 · Cited by 19
Deterministic joint remote state preparation of four-qubit cluster type with tripartite involvement
Du, Z., & Li, X. (2019) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2535-8 · Cited by 19
k -Uniform States in Heterogeneous Systems
Shi, F., Shen, Y., Chen, L., & Zhang, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2022.3147810 · Cited by 19
Superiority of photon subtraction to addition for entanglement in a multimode squeezed vacuum
Das, T., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.052313 · Cited by 20
Local complementation rule for continuous-variable four-mode unweighted graph states
Zhang, J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.034301 · Cited by 19
Controlled quantum secret sharing
Cheung, C.-Y. (2006) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/74/4/009 · Cited by 19
Demonstration of a programmable source of two-photon multiqubit entangled states
Cialdi, S., Brivio, D., & Paris, M. G. A. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.042322 · Cited by 19
Dynamic Group Multi-party Quantum Key Agreement
Chou, Y., Zeng, G.-J., Chang, Z.-H., & Kuo, S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21658-6 · Cited by 19
Propagation of generalized Pauli errors in qudit Clifford circuits
Miller, D., Holz, T., Kampermann, H., & Bruß, D. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052316 · Cited by 20
Detection and characterization of multipartite entanglement in optical lattices
Palmer, R. N., Alves, C., & Jaksch, D. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.042335 · Cited by 20
Zuo, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Yin, X., & Zhang, Z. (2008) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749908004419 · Cited by 19
Quantum dense coding using a peculiar tripartite entangled state
Wei-Wen, C., Yan-Xia, H., Liu, T.-K., & Li, H. (2006) · Chinese Physics · doi:10.1088/1009-1963/16/1/006 · Cited by 19
Liu, Y., Cai, Y., Luo, B., Yan, J., Niu, M., Li, F., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.033704 · Cited by 18
Approximate reconstructability of quantum states and noisy quantum secret sharing schemes
Ouyang, Y., Goswami, K., Romero, J., Sanders, B. C., Hsieh, M.-H., & Tomamichel, M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.012425 · Cited by 19
Experimental coherent-state quantum secret sharing with finite pulses
Wang, Y., Sun, X., Cao, X., Yin, H., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.044018 · Cited by 18
Practical continuous-variable quantum secret sharing using local local oscillator
Liao, Q., Fei, Z., Huang, L., & Fu, X. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02061-w · Cited by 18
New Protocols and Lower Bounds for Quantum Secret Sharing with Graph States
Javelle, J., Mhalla, M., & Perdrix, S. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35656-8_1 · Cited by 18
High-efficiency multipartite entanglement purification of electron-spin states with charge detection
Li, T., Ren, B.-C., Wei, H.-R., Hua, M., & Deng, F.-G. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0427-2 · Cited by 18
Quantum Sharing an Unknown Multi-Particle State via POVM
Jia-yin, P., & Mo, Z. (2012) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-012-1369-2 · Cited by 18
GENERALIZED THREE-PARTY QUBIT OPERATION SHARING
Liu, D., Liu, Y., Yin, X., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749913500111 · Cited by 18
Universal Three-Party Quantum Secret Sharing Against Collective Noise
Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Teng, Y.-W., & Wen, Q. (2011) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/55/4/11 · Cited by 18
Revisiting Quantum Authentication Scheme Based on Entanglement Swapping
Naseri, M. (2015) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-015-2880-z · Cited by 18
Gupta, P., Horrom, T., Anderson, B. E., Glasser, R. T., & Lett, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2015.1071891 · Cited by 18
Wang, X., An, L.-X., Yu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2017) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2017.08.032 · Cited by 18
Rates of Multipartite Entanglement Transformations
Streltsov, A., Meignant, C., & Eisert, J. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.080502 · Cited by 21
Protection of quantum dialogue affected by quantum field
Huang, Z., & Situ, H. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2152-y · Cited by 18
Quantum Identity Authentication in the Counterfactual Quantum Key Distribution Protocol
Liu, B., Gao, Z., Xiao, D., Huang, W., Zhang, Z., & Xu, B. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21050518 · Cited by 18
A quantum secret sharing scheme with verifiable function
Liu, L.-J., Li, Z.-H., Han, Z.-W., & Zhi, D.-L. (2020) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-10010-3 · Cited by 18
MULTIPARTY QUANTUM SECRET SHARING SCHEME OF CLASSICAL MESSAGES BY SWAPPING QUDIT-STATE ENTANGLEMENT
Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Fang, M., & Wang, D. (2007) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s0129183107011807 · Cited by 18
Splitting four ensembles of two-qubit quantum information via three Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs
Zhang, W., Liu, Y. M., Yin, X.-F., & Zhang, Z. J. (2009) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2009-00180-y · Cited by 18
REVISITING NASERI'S SECURE QUANTUM SEALED-BID AUCTION
Liu, Y., Wang, D., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749909005808 · Cited by 18
Efficient Simulation for Quantum Message Authentication
Wainewright, E. (2016) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-171 · Cited by 18
Experimental Efficient Source-Independent Quantum Secret Sharing against Coherent Attacks
Xiao, Y.-R., Yin, H., Hua, W.-J., Cao, X., & Chen, Z.-B. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/7wrk-p6gl · Cited by 20
Efficient multi-party quantum state sharing of an arbitrary two-qubit state
Shi, R., Huang, L., Yang, W., & Zhong, H. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.02.048 · Cited by 17
The Security Problems in Some Novel Arbitrated Quantum Signature Protocols
Zhang, L., Sun, H.-W., Zhang, K., Wang, Q.-L., & Cai, X. (2017) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-017-3394-7 · Cited by 17
Fair quantum secret sharing based on symmetric bivariate polynomial
Bai, C., Zhang, S., & Liu, L. (2021) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126673 · Cited by 17
Quantum secret sharing based on quantum information masking
Bai, C., Zhang, S., & Liu, L. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03723-2 · Cited by 17
Li, F., Luo, M., Zhu, H., Zhu, S., & Pang, B. (2023) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.128494 · Cited by 17
Distinguishability-based genuine nonlocality with genuine multipartite entanglement
Xiong, Z.-X., Li, M.-S., Zheng, Z., & Li, L. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022405 · Cited by 20
Improved quantum “Ping-pong” protocol based on GHZ state and classical XOR operation
Li, J., Jin, H., & Jing, B. (2011) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-011-4448-0 · Cited by 17
Efficient Symmetric Five-Party Quantum State Sharing of an Arbitrary m-Qubit State
Shi, R., Huang, L., Yang, W., & Zhong, H. (2011) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-011-0836-5 · Cited by 17
Multiparty Quantum Secret Sharing of Quantum States with Quantum Registers
Ying, G., Gui-Hua, Z., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/24/4/005 · Cited by 17
Distilling single-photon entanglement from photon loss and decoherence
Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2013) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.30.002737 · Cited by 17
Quantum protocols within Spekkens' toy model
Disilvestro, L., & Markham, D. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.052324 · Cited by 17
Relativistic (2,3)-threshold quantum secret sharing
Ahmadi, M., Wu, Y., & Sanders, B. C. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.065018 · Cited by 17
Spectral norm of a symmetric tensor and its computation
Friedland, S., & Wang, L. (2020) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/mcom/3525 · Cited by 17
QMA-hardness of Consistency of Local Density Matrices with Applications to Quantum Zero-Knowledge
Broadbent, A., & Grilo, A. B. (2020) · Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/focs46700.2020.00027 · Cited by 20
Hierarchical Quantum Teleportation of Arbitrary Single-Qubit State by Using Four-Qubit Cluster State
Li, D., Zheng, Y., Liu, X., & Liu, M. (2021) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-021-04810-3 · Cited by 17
Quantum network coding — How can network coding be applied to quantum information?
Nishimura, H. (2013) · International Symposium on Network Coding (NetCod) · doi:10.1109/netcod.2013.6570840 · Cited by 17
Quantum Secret Sharing with Two-Particle Entangled States
Wei-Tao, L., Liang, L.-M., Li, C.-Z., & Jian-Min, Y. (2006) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/23/12/007 · Cited by 17
Quantum Authentication Protocol Using Bell State
Li, X., & Chen, L. (2007) · International Symposium on Data, Privacy, and E-Commerce · doi:10.1109/isdpe.2007.19 · Cited by 17
Entanglement criteria for the three-qubit states
Akbari-Kourbolagh, Y. (2017) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749917500496 · Cited by 17
Sequential Quantum Secret Sharing Using a Single Qudit*
Bai, C., Li, Z., & Li, Y. (2018) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/69/5/513 · Cited by 17
High-dimensional deterministic multiparty quantum secret sharing without unitary operations
Liu, Z., Chen, H., Xu, J., Liu, W., & Li, Z. (2011) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-011-0333-z · Cited by 17
Cryptography in a Quantum WorldPreprint
Wehner, S. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0806.3483 · Cited by 20
Secure assisted quantum computation
Childs, A. M. (2005) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic5.6 · Cited by 17
Zero-Knowledge for QMA from Locally Simulatable Proofs.Preprint
Broadbent, A., & Grilo, A. B. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 17
Improved Deterministic N-To-One Joint Remote Preparation of an Arbitrary Qubit via EPR Pairs
Liu, W., Chen, Z., Liu, C., & Zheng, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-014-2241-3 · Cited by 16
Multi-party Quantum Key Agreement Protocol with Authentication
Wu, Y., Chang, H., Guo, G., & Lin, S. (2021) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-021-04954-2 · Cited by 16
The connected wedge theorem and its consequences
May, A., Sorce, J., & Yoshida, B. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)153 · Cited by 20
Xiao, Y.-X., Zhou, L., Zhong, W., Du, M., & Sheng, Y. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-023-04097-9 · Cited by 16
Hybrid classical-quantum communication networks
Lukens, J. M., Peters, N. A., & Qi, B. (2025) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2025.100586 · Cited by 21
Quantum secret sharing with continuous variable graph state
Wu, Y., Cai, R., He, G., & Zhang, J. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0713-7 · Cited by 16
Efficient quantum secret sharing scheme with two-particle entangled states
Zhu, Z., Zhang, Y., & Fu, A. (2011) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/20/4/040306 · Cited by 16
A kind of universal quantum secret sharing protocol
Chen, X., Dou, Z., Xu, G., He, X., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39845 · Cited by 16
Quantum private comparison based on quantum dense coding
Wang, F., Luo, M., Li, H.-R., Qu, Z., & Wang, X. (2016) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-015-0616-9 · Cited by 16
A New Improving Quantum Secret Sharing Scheme
Xu, T.-T., Li, Z., Bai, C., & Min, M. (2017) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-016-3272-8 · Cited by 16
Wu, N., & Jiang, M. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2098-0 · Cited by 16
A Secret Sharing Scheme for Quantum Gray and Color Images Based on Encryption
Wang, H., Song, X., Chen, L., & Xie, W. (2019) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-019-04057-z · Cited by 16
Entanglement detection under coherent noise: Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-like states
Zhou, Y. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012301 · Cited by 17
Xu, G., Shan, R.-T., Chen, X., Dong, M., & Chen, Y. (2021) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2021.017968 · Cited by 16
Cid, M. I. G., Martín, L. O., & Ayuso, V. M. (2021) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3465481.3470056 · Cited by 16
Quantum anonymous notification for network-based applications
Khan, A., Rehman, J. U., & Shin, H. (2021) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03339-y · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- Hewlett-Packard (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-07-19
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 648-651
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2083019346
- Cited by
- 1,373
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum secret sharing, threshold schemes, no-cloning theorem, quantum information, secret reconstruction, mixed states, quantum cryptography, information distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
