The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Share a Quantum Secret
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the concept of quantum secret sharing. In a $(k,n)$ threshold scheme, a secret quantum state is divided into $n$ shares such that any $k$ of those shares can be used to reconstruct the secret, but any set of $k\ensuremath{-}1$ or fewer shares contains absolutely no information about the secret. We show that the only constraint on the existence of threshold schemes comes from the quantum ``no-cloning theorem,'' which requires that $n<2k$, and we give efficient constructions of all threshold schemes. We also show that, for $k\ensuremath{\le}n<2k\ensuremath{-}1$, then any $(k,n)$ threshold scheme must distribute information that is globally in a mixed state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The unique feature of this specific code is that there exist encoded operators (also referred to as logical operators in the literature) that have support only on two of the three qutrits that constitute the encoded space.Furthermore, it is then possible to identify sets of encoded operators that have the same action on the codespace, but have nontrivial support on different pairs of qutrits.”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The erasure-correcting property of this code ensures that any three-qutrit state within the codespace can be reconstructed even if one of the three qutrits is lost or erased.”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Secondly, from any two of the qutrits Bob can reconstruct the state.”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First of all for any state | ˜ ψ 〉 , the reduced density matrix on any one of the qutrits is maximally mixed.”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Thus 3 and 15 analyzer settings are respectively required to obtain the single- [28] and two-photon Stokes parameters.”
From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 2×
“This contradicts the “no-cloning theorem” [11,12].”
BackgroundMixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Safeguarding cryptographic keys
BLAKLEY, G. R. (1979) · 1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK) · doi:10.1109/mark.1979.8817296 · Cited by 3,499
Hillery, M. S., Bužek, V., & Berthiaume, A. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1829 · Cited by 3,391
Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.793 · Cited by 2,677
Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., & Mermin, N. D. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.557 · Cited by 2,525
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516
Theory of quantum error-correcting codes
Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.900 · Cited by 1,593
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- G. Blakely, 1979, Proceedings of the National Computer Conference, New York, 1979
- D. Aharonov, 1998, Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
Experimental quantum secret sharing
Schmid, C., Trojek, P., Gaertner, S., Bourennane, M., Kurtsiefer, C., Żukowski, M., & Weinfurter, H. (2006) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.200610320 · Cited by 16
Detection of genuine tripartite entanglement and steering in hybrid optomechanics
Xiang, Y., Sun, F.-X., Wang, M., Gong, Q., & He, Q. (2015) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.23.030104 · Cited by 16
A Quantum Cipher with Near Optimal Key-Recycling
Damgård, I., Pedersen, T. B., & Salvail, L. (2005) · BRICS Report Series · doi:10.7146/brics.v12i17.21883 · Cited by 16
Quantum secret sharing for a general quantum access structure
Bai, C., Li, Z., Si, M.-M., & Li, Y. (2017) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2017-80286-3 · Cited by 16
Detector-device-independent quantum secret sharing with source flaws
Yang, X., Wei, K., Ma, H., Liu, H., Yin, Z., Cao, Z., & Wu, L.-A. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23876-4 · Cited by 16
Bai, C., Li, Z., Wang, J.-T., Liu, C., & Li, Y. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2080-x · Cited by 16
Uniform decoherence effect on localizable entanglement in random multiqubit pure states
Banerjee, R., Pal, A. K., & Sen, A. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.042339 · Cited by 18
Lian, Y., Xie, C., & Peng, K. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/9/314 · Cited by 16
Secure Multi-party Quantum ComputingPreprint
Crépeau, C., Gottesman, D., & Smith, A. (2002) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0206138 · Cited by 21
Self-citationWang, T.-J., & Deng, F. (2011) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/55/5/12 · Cited by 15
A rational hierarchical (t,n)-threshold quantum secret sharing scheme
Li, F., Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Zhu, S. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04269-1 · Cited by 15
Verifiable dynamic quantum secret sharing based on generalized Hadamard gate
Rathi, D., & Kumar, S. (2024) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-024-04535-2 · Cited by 15
Efficient multi-party quantum secret-sharing protocol
Xin, X., He, F., Shujing, Q., Li, C., & Li, F. (2024) · Chinese Journal of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2024.10.008 · Cited by 15
An Information Theoretical Model for Quantum Secret Sharing
Imai, H., Müller‐Quade, J., Nascimento, A. C. A., Tuyls, P., & Winter, A. (2005) · Explore Bristol Research · Cited by 15
Symmetric and Probabilistic Quantum State Sharing via Positive Operator-valued Measure
Wu, J. (2009) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-009-0205-9 · Cited by 15
Jones index, secret sharing and total quantum dimension
Fiedler, L., Naaijkens, P., & Osborne, T. J. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa5c0c · Cited by 20
Multi-party quantum key agreement with teleportation
Cai, B., Guo, G., & Lin, S. (2017) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s0217984917501020 · Cited by 15
Quantum privacy and Schur product channels
Levick, J., Kribs, D. W., & Pereira, R. (2017) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/s0034-4877(18)30005-3 · Cited by 15
Kato, G., Owari, M., & Hayashi, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3078812 · Cited by 15
Masking Quantum Information Encoded in Pure and Mixed States
Du, Y., Guo, Z., Cao, H., Han, K., & Yang, C. F. (2020) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-020-04542-w · Cited by 15
Yuan, H., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732320503010 · Cited by 15
Survey of the Development of Quantum Cryptography and Its Applications
Alvarez, D., & Kim, Y. (2021) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc51732.2021.9375995 · Cited by 15
(t,n) Threshold Quantum Secret Sharing Using Rotation Operation
Wang, N., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., & Lin, S. (2022) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-022-05121-x · Cited by 15
Wen, Z., Liu, Y., Yin, X., & Zhang, Z. (2009) · Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-009-0176-0 · Cited by 15
Efficient Verifiable Quantum Secret Sharing Schemes via Eight-Quantum-Entangled States
Jiang, S., Liu, Z., Lou, X., Fan, Z., Wang, S., & Shi, J. (2021) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-021-04796-y · Cited by 15
Disorder, electron-electron interactions and the metal-insulator transition in heavily doped Si:P
Löhneysen, H. V. (2000) · Advances in solid state physics · doi:10.1007/bfb0108351 · Cited by 15
Single qubit quantum secret sharing with improved security
He, G. P., & Wang, Z. D. (2010) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic10.1-2-3 · Cited by 15
QUANTUM SECRET SHARING IN DRIVEN CAVITY QED
Shan, C.-J., Man, Z., Xia, Y., & Liu, T.-K. (2007) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749907002876 · Cited by 15
Efficient generation of photonic entanglement and multiparty quantum communication
Trojek, P. (2007) · Electronic Theses of LMU Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) · doi:10.5282/edoc.9142 · Cited by 15
An efficient scheme for multi-party quantum state sharing via non-maximally entangled states
Jiang, M., Huang, X., Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., & Zeng, J. (2012) · Chinese Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-012-5008-3 · Cited by 14
CRYPTANALYSIS OF THE QUANTUM STATE SHARING PROTOCOL USING FOUR SETS OF W-CLASS STATES
Chen, X., Yang, S., Xu, G., Su, Y., & Yang, Y. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974991350010x · Cited by 14
Cryptanalysis of the Quantum Group Signature Protocols
Zhang, K., Sun, Y., Song, T., & Zuo, H.-J. (2013) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1729-6 · Cited by 14
Asymmetric five-party quantum state sharing of an arbitrary m-qubit state
Shi, R., Huang, L., Yang, W., & Zhong, H. (2010) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2010-00054-3 · Cited by 14
Quantum multipartite maskers vs. quantum error-correcting codes
Han, K., Guo, Z., Cao, H., Du, Y., & Yang, C. F. (2020) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/131/30005 · Cited by 14
Quantum one-time tables for unconditionally secure qubit-commitment
Lie, S. H., Kwon, H., Kim, M. S., & Jeong, H. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-10-405 · Cited by 14
Min-entropy as a resource for one-shot private state transfer, quantum masking, and state transition
Lie, S. H., Choi, S., & Jeong, H. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.042421 · Cited by 14
Rational quantum secret sharing scheme based on GHZ state
Zhang, X., Wang, L., Lin, S., Wang, N., & Hong, L. (2023) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03739-8 · Cited by 14
Catalytic and Asymptotic Equivalence for Quantum Entanglement
Ganardi, R., Kondra, T. V., & Streltsov, A. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.250201 · Cited by 16
Multi-qudit state sharing via various high-dimensional Bell channels
Wei, Y., & Jiang, M. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0889-5 · Cited by 14
Lai, H., Xiao, J., Orgun, M. A., Xue, L., & Pieprzyk, J. (2013) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-013-0699-1 · Cited by 14
Fan, L., Xia, Y., & Song, J. (2013) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2013.12.028 · Cited by 14
Scale-invariant freezing of entanglement
Chanda, T., Das, T., Sadhukhan, D., Pal, A. K., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062324 · Cited by 14
Efficient quantum secret sharing based on special multi-dimensional GHZ state
Qin, H., & Tso, R. (2018) · Optical and Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1007/s11082-018-1435-y · Cited by 14
Controlled quantum secret sharing
Cheung, C. Y. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 14
Scheme for splitting quantum information via W states in cavity QED systems
Xi-Mei, Y., Yong-Jian, G., Lizhen, M., & Bang-An, Z. (2008) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/17/2/020 · Cited by 14
Quantum circuits of CNOT gatesPreprint
Bataille, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.13247 · Cited by 14
Controlled Entanglement Source for Quantum Cryptography
Zeng, Q., Wang, H., Yuan, H., Fan, Y., Zhou, L., Gao, Y., Ma, H., & Yuan, Z. L. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.19.054048 · Cited by 13
Source-independent quantum secret sharing with entangled photon pair networks
Xiao, Y.-R., Jia, Z.-Y., Song, Y.-C., Bao, Y., Fu, Y., Yin, H., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.527857 · Cited by 13
Fletcher, A. I., Harney, C., Ghalaii, M., Papanastasiou, P., Mountogiannakis, A., Spedalieri, G., Hajomer, A. A. E., Gehring, T., & Pirandola, S. (2025) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adf4f4 · Cited by 13
Experimental Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Cryptographic Conferencing
Du, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, C., Zheng, X., Zhu, S. N., & Ma, X. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.040802 · Cited by 13
A (t, n) threshold quantum secret sharing with authentication based on single photons
Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Qin, S., & Jin, Z. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04672-2 · Cited by 13
Measurement-device-independent quantum-secret-sharing networks with linear Bell-state analysis
Liu, T., Lai, J., Li, Z., & Li, T. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.034057 · Cited by 13
Authenticable quantum secret sharing based on special entangled state
Bai, C., Shu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95608-4 · Cited by 13
Quantum Information Splitting Based on Current Cavity QED Techniques
Wu, H., Yang, Z., Su, W.-J., Zhi-Rong, Z., & Jian-Min, H. (2008) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/49/5/17 · Cited by 13
Eavesdropping on the improved three-party quantum secret sharing protocol
Gao, G. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.09.086 · Cited by 13
Sagnac secret sharing over telecom fiber networks
Bogdanski, J., Ahrens, J., & Bourennane, M. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.001055 · Cited by 13
Schemes for Splitting Quantum Information with Four-Particle Genuine Entangled States
Zhan, Y.-B., Zhang, Q.-Y., & Yu-wu, W. (2010) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/53/5/11 · Cited by 13
Chen, R., Bao, W., Zhou, C. H., Li, H.-W., Wang, Y., & Bao, H.-Z. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.006594 · Cited by 13
Asymmetric bidirectional quantum state exchange between Alice and Bob through a third party
Choudhury, B. S., & Samanta, S. (2021) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166435 · Cited by 13
Generalized Scheme for Splitting Arbitrary 2-Qubit State with Three 2-Qubit Entangled States
Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Zuo, X., & Zhang, Z. (2009) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-009-0073-3 · Cited by 13
Jochym-O’Connor, T., Kribs, D. W., Laflamme, R., & Plosker, S. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.030502 · Cited by 13
Preparation of polarization-entangled mixed states of two photons
Zhang, C. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.014304 · Cited by 13
Huang, W., Wen, Q., Liu, B., & Gao, F. (2015) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/24/7/070308 · Cited by 13
Entanglement sharing with separable states
Mišta, L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.062326 · Cited by 13
Entanglement criterion for tripartite systems based on local sum uncertainty relations
Akbari-Kourbolagh, Y., & Azhdargalam, M. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042333 · Cited by 13
Mimih, J., & Hillery, M. S. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012329 · Cited by 13
Gao, G., & Wang, L. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0478-z · Cited by 13
Hostens, E., Dehaene, J., & Moor, B. D. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.062318 · Cited by 13
Multiparty Quantum Secret Sharing Using Quantum Fourier Transform
Huang, D., Chen, Z., & Guo, Y. (2009) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/51/2/06 · Cited by 13
TRIPARTITION OF ARBITRARY SINGLE-QUBIT QUANTUM INFORMATION BY USING ASYMMETRIC FOUR-QUBIT W STATE
Liu, Y., Yin, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, Z. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749909004943 · Cited by 13
Mishra, U., Rakshit, D., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083044 · Cited by 14
Analysis of a kind of quantum cryptographic schemes based on secret sharing
Zhang, X., & Ji, D. (2009) · Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-009-0154-6 · Cited by 13
A QUANTUM SPLITTING SCHEME OF ARBITRARY TWO-QUBIT STATE USING FOUR-QUBIT CLUSTER STATE
Pan, G., Liu, Y., Yin, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, Z. (2008) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s021974990800433x · Cited by 13
SOK: An Evaluation of Quantum Authentication Through Systematic Literature ReviewPreprint
Majumdar, R., & Das, S. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3859056 · Cited by 13
Deterministic all-optical quantum state sharing
Chen, Y., Zhu, Q., Wang, X., Lou, Y., Liu, S., & Jing, J. (2023) · Advanced Photonics · doi:10.1117/1.ap.5.2.026006 · Cited by 12
Communication Efficient Quantum Secret Sharing via Extended CSS Codes
Senthoor, K., & Sarvepalli, P. K. (2024) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2024.3380082 · Cited by 12
Symbolic model checking quantum circuits in Maude
Do, C. M., & Ogata, K. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2098 · Cited by 13
Multi-user quantum network system and quantum communication using χ-type entangled states
Hong, C., Heo, J. O., Lim, J. I., & Yang, H.-J. (2012) · Journal of the Korean Physical Society · doi:10.3938/jkps.61.1 · Cited by 12
A Quantum Network System of QSS-QDC Using χ-Type Entangled States
Hong, C., Heo, J. O., Lim, J. I., & Yang, H.-J. (2012) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/29/5/050303 · Cited by 12
Local distinguishability of Dicke states in quantum secret sharing
Wang, J.-T., Xu, G., Chen, X., Sun, X., & Jia, H.-Y. (2017) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2017.01.053 · Cited by 12
Guan, S., Jin, Z., Wu, H.-J., Zhu, A., Wang, H., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1584-0 · Cited by 12
Rational quantum secret sharing
Qin, H., Tang, K. S., & Tso, R. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29051-z · Cited by 12
A Controller-Independent Quantum Dialogue Protocol with Four-Particle States
Zhang, L., Shu, D., Zhang, K., & Sun, H.-W. (2019) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-019-04087-7 · Cited by 12
Random coding for sharing bosonic quantum secrets
Arzani, F., Ferrini, G., Grosshans, F., & Markham, D. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022303 · Cited by 14
A Symmetric Extensible Protocol for Quantum Secret Sharing
Ampatzis, M., & Andronikos, T. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym14081692 · Cited by 12
Number-phase uncertainty relations and bipartite entanglement detection in spin ensembles
Vitagliano, G., Fadel, M., Apellaniz, I., Kleinmann, M., Lücke, B., Klempt, C., & Tóth, G. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-09-914 · Cited by 12
Linear Optical Logical Bell State Measurements with Optimal Loss-Tolerance Threshold
Hilaire, P., Castor, Y., Barnes, E., Economou, S. E., & Grosshans, F. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.040322 · Cited by 14
Quantum steering as a resource for secure tripartite quantum state sharing
Wilkinson, C., Thornton, M., & Korolkova, N. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062401 · Cited by 12
Language Feature Mining for Document Subjectivity Analysis
Cheng, B. H., He, H., & Guo, J. (2007) · International Symposium on Data, Privacy, and E-Commerce · doi:10.1109/isdpe.2007.105 · Cited by 12
Akshata Shenoy, H., & Srikanth, R. (2019) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab0046 · Cited by 12
Catalytic quantum randomness as a correlational resource
Lie, S. H., & Jeong, H. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043089 · Cited by 12
Quantum information and entanglement transfer for qutrits
Delgado, A., Saavedra, C., & Retamal, J. C. (2007) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.05.022 · Cited by 12
Tripartite Splitting Arbitrary 2-Qubit Quantum Information by Using Two Asymmetric W States
Pan, G., Liu, Y., Wang, Z.-Y., & Zhang, Z. (2009) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/51/2/07 · Cited by 12
Realization of quantum state privacy amplification in a nuclear magnetic resonance quantum system
Hao, L., Wang, C. X., & Long, G. L. (2010) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/43/12/125502 · Cited by 12
Multiple independent quantum states sharing under collaboration of agents in quantum networks
Jiang, M., Dong, D., & Wu, R.-B. (2011) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-011-0337-8 · Cited by 12
Entangled state fusion with Rydberg atoms
Ji, Y., Dai, C. M., Shao, X., & Yi, X. X. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1711-y · Cited by 12
Quantum strongly secure ramp secret sharing
Zhang, P., & Matsumoto, R. (2014) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-014-0863-2 · Cited by 12
Quantum memory for individual polarized photons
Guo, G., & Guo, G.-C. (2003) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2003.09.048 · Cited by 12
Entanglement buffering with two quantum memories
Davies, B., Iñesta, Á. G., & Wehner, S. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-09-03-1458 · Cited by 15
Mallick, B., Maity, A. G., Ganguly, N., & Majumdar, A. S. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/nzrc-8yrt · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- Hewlett-Packard (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-07-19
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 648-651
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2083019346
- Cited by
- 1,373
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum secret sharing, threshold schemes, no-cloning theorem, quantum information, secret reconstruction, mixed states, quantum cryptography, information distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
