The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Share a Quantum Secret
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the concept of quantum secret sharing. In a $(k,n)$ threshold scheme, a secret quantum state is divided into $n$ shares such that any $k$ of those shares can be used to reconstruct the secret, but any set of $k\ensuremath{-}1$ or fewer shares contains absolutely no information about the secret. We show that the only constraint on the existence of threshold schemes comes from the quantum ``no-cloning theorem,'' which requires that $n<2k$, and we give efficient constructions of all threshold schemes. We also show that, for $k\ensuremath{\le}n<2k\ensuremath{-}1$, then any $(k,n)$ threshold scheme must distribute information that is globally in a mixed state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The unique feature of this specific code is that there exist encoded operators (also referred to as logical operators in the literature) that have support only on two of the three qutrits that constitute the encoded space.Furthermore, it is then possible to identify sets of encoded operators that have the same action on the codespace, but have nontrivial support on different pairs of qutrits.”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The erasure-correcting property of this code ensures that any three-qutrit state within the codespace can be reconstructed even if one of the three qutrits is lost or erased.”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [177]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Secondly, from any two of the qutrits Bob can reconstruct the state.”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First of all for any state | ˜ ψ 〉 , the reduced density matrix on any one of the qutrits is maximally mixed.”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Thus 3 and 15 analyzer settings are respectively required to obtain the single- [28] and two-photon Stokes parameters.”
From Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization (1999) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 2×
“This contradicts the “no-cloning theorem” [11,12].”
BackgroundMixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Safeguarding cryptographic keys
BLAKLEY, G. R. (1979) · 1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK) · doi:10.1109/mark.1979.8817296 · Cited by 3,499
Hillery, M. S., Bužek, V., & Berthiaume, A. (1999) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.59.1829 · Cited by 3,391
Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory
Steane, A. M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.793 · Cited by 2,677
Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., & Mermin, N. D. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.557 · Cited by 2,525
Good quantum error-correcting codes exist
Calderbank, A. R., & Shor, P. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1098 · Cited by 2,516
Theory of quantum error-correcting codes
Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.900 · Cited by 1,593
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- G. Blakely, 1979, Proceedings of the National Computer Conference, New York, 1979
- D. Aharonov, 1998, Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Overcoming erasure errors with multilevel systems
Muralidharan, S., Zou, C.-L., Li, L., Wen, J., & Jiang, L. (2017) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa573a · Cited by 57
Secret sharing of quantum information via entanglement swapping in cavity QED
Zhang, Y.-Q., Xing-Ri, J., & Zhang, S. (2005) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2005.05.020 · Cited by 61
Multiparty secret sharing of quantum information via cavity QED
Zhang, Z. (2005) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2005.11.060 · Cited by 61
Almost all multipartite qubit quantum states have trivial stabilizer
Gour, G., Kraus, B., & Wallach, N. R. (2017) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5003015 · Cited by 60
Multiparty quantum secret sharing with Bell states and Bell measurements
Shi, R., Huang, L., Yang, W., & Zhong, H. (2010) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2010.02.015 · Cited by 60
Secret sharing of a known arbitrary quantum state with noisy environment
Wang, M., Wang, W., Chen, J., & Farouk, A. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1103-0 · Cited by 59
Participant attack on quantum secret sharing based on entanglement swapping
Ting-Ting, S., Zhang, J., Fei, G., Qiao-yan, W., & Zhu, F.-C. (2009) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/18/4/007 · Cited by 60
Implementation of a nonlocal N -qubit conditional phase gate by single-photon interference
Deng, Z. J., Zhang, X., Wei, H., Gao, K., & Feng, M. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.044305 · Cited by 59
Quantum tasks in Minkowski space
Kent, A. (2012) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/22/224013 · Cited by 65
Quantum Codes of Maximal Distance and Highly Entangled Subspaces
Huber, F., & Grassl, M. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-06-18-284 · Cited by 67
Verifiable Quantum (k,n)-threshold Secret Key Sharing
Yang, Y., Teng, Y.-W., Chai, H.-P., & Wen, Q. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0616-7 · Cited by 58
Participant attack on a kind of MQSS schemes based on entanglement swapping
Guo, F.-Z., Qin, S., Gao, F., Lin, S., Wen, Q., & Zhu, F. C. (2009) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2009-00306-3 · Cited by 58
Continuous variable (2, 3) threshold quantum secret sharing schemes
Lance, A. M., Symul, T., Bowen, W. P., Tyc, T., Sanders, B. C., & Lam, P. K. (2003) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/304 · Cited by 58
Zhang, C., Sun, Z., Huang, Y., & Long, D. (2013) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1884-9 · Cited by 58
Hiding and masking quantum information in complex and real quantum mechanics
Zhu, H. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033176 · Cited by 57
Multiparty simultaneous quantum identity authentication with secret sharing
Yang, Y., Wen, Q., & Zhang, X. (2008) · Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-008-0034-5 · Cited by 57
Three-party quantum summation without a trusted third party
Zhang, C., Sun, Z., Huang, X., & Long, D. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749915500112 · Cited by 57
Absolutely Maximally Entangled Qudit Graph StatesPreprint
Helwig, W. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.2879 · Cited by 57
Genuine-multipartite entanglement criteria based on positive maps
Clivaz, F., Huber, M., Lami, L., & Murta, G. (2017) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4998433 · Cited by 56
CONTINUOUS VARIABLE QUANTUM SIGNATURE ALGORITHM
Zeng, G., Lee, M.-H., Guo, Y., & He, G. (2007) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749907003031 · Cited by 56
Multiparty quantum secret sharing with collective eavesdropping-check
Lin, S., Wen, Q., Qin, S., & Zhu, F.-C. (2009) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2009.07.053 · Cited by 56
Tripartite Genuine Non-Gaussian Entanglement in Three-Mode Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion
Agustí, A., Chang, C. W. S., Quijandría, F., Johansson, G., Wilson, C. M., & Sabín, C. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.020502 · Cited by 56
Multipartite entanglement purification with quantum nondemolition detectors
Sheng, Y., Deng, F., Zhao, B., Wang, T. J., & Zhou, H.-Y. (2009) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2009-00237-y · Cited by 55
Multiparty quantum sealed-bid auction using single photons as message carrier
Liu, W., Wang, H., Yuan, G., Xu, Y., Chen, Z., An, X.-X., Ji, F.-G., & Gnitou, G. T. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1202-y · Cited by 55
Proposal for quantum rational secret sharing
Maitra, A., De, S. J., Paul, G., & Pal, A. K. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.022305 · Cited by 55
Liu, J., Li, Y., & Nie, Y.-Y. (2010) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-010-0383-5 · Cited by 55
Member expansion in quantum (t,n) threshold secret sharing schemes
Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Chai, H.-P., Teng, Y.-W., & Zhang, H. (2011) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2011.03.017 · Cited by 55
Efficient Multiparty Quantum Secret Sharing with Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger States
Fu-Guo, D., Zhou, P., Li, X., Li, C., & Zhou, H.-Y. (2006) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/23/5/006 · Cited by 55
Erratum: Graph states for quantum secret sharing [Phys. Rev. A78, 042309 (2008)]
Markham, D., & Sanders, B. C. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.019901 · Cited by 55
Semi-quantum information splitting using GHZ-type states
Nie, Y.-Y., Li, Y., & Wang, Z. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0388-5 · Cited by 54
Verifiable quantum (k, n)-threshold secret sharing
Yang, Y., Jia, X., Wang, H.-Y., & Zhang, H. (2011) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-011-0323-1 · Cited by 54
Security of a kind of quantum secret sharing with single photons
Wang, T., & Wen, Q. (2011) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic11.5-6-5 · Cited by 54
QUANTUM AUTHENTICATION USING ENTANGLED STATES
Li, X., & Barnum, H. (2004) · International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1142/s0129054104002649 · Cited by 54
Sheng, Y., Liu, J., Zhao, S.-Y., & Zhou, L. (2013) · Chinese Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-013-6019-4 · Cited by 53
Entangled graphs: Bipartite entanglement in multiqubit systems
Plesch, M., & Bužek, V. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.67.012322 · Cited by 53
Quantum secret sharing schemes and reversibility of quantum operations
Ogawa, T., Sasaki, A., Iwamoto, M., & Yamamoto, H. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.032318 · Cited by 53
Approximate Quantum Error-Correcting Codes and Secret Sharing Schemes
Crépeau, C., Gottesman, D., & Smith, A. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11426639_17 · Cited by 63
Self-citationGenuinely accessible and inaccessible entanglement in Schwarzschild black hole
Wu, S.-M., Teng, X.-W., Li, J., Li, S.-H., Liu, T., & Wang, J. (2023) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138334 · Cited by 60
Threshold quantum secret sharing between multi-party and multi-party
Yang, Y., & Wen, Q. (2008) · Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-008-0114-6 · Cited by 52
Experimental circular quantum secret sharing over telecom fiber network
Wei, K., Ma, H., & Yang, J.-H. (2013) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.21.016663 · Cited by 52
Wang, T.-J., Zhou, H.-Y., & Deng, F. (2008) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.03.030 · Cited by 52
Threshold proxy quantum signature scheme with threshold shared verification
Yang, Y., & Wen, Q. (2008) · Science in China. Series G, Physics, mechanics & astronomy/Science in China. Series G, Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-008-0062-1 · Cited by 52
A solid state source of photon triplets based on quantum dot molecules
Khoshnegar, M., Huber, T., Predojević, A., Dalacu, D., Prilmüller, M., Lapointe, J., Wu, X., Tamarat, P., Lounis, B., Poole, P., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15716 · Cited by 52
Masking quantum information in multipartite scenario
Li, M.-S., & Wang, Y.-L. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062306 · Cited by 52
Absolutely Maximally Entangled States: Existence and ApplicationsPreprint
Helwig, W., & Cui, W. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.2536 · Cited by 52
Quantum Secure Direct Communication by Using Three-Dimensional Hyperentanglement
Shi, J., Gong, Y.-X., Xu, P., Zhu, S. N., & Zhan, Y.-B. (2011) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/5/08 · Cited by 51
Huang, W., Wen, Q., Liu, B., Gao, F., & Sun, Y. (2013) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-013-5224-0 · Cited by 51
Protocols for Packet Quantum Network Intercommunication
Yu, N., Lai, C., & Zhou, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2021.3112594 · Cited by 54
Remote preparation of multipartite pure state
Huang, Y., & Zhan, M. (2004) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2004.05.044 · Cited by 51
A verifiable (k, n)-threshold dynamic quantum secret sharing scheme
Li, F., Hu, H., Zhu, S., Yan, J., & Ding, J. (2022) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-022-03617-3 · Cited by 50
Effects of noises on joint remote state preparation via a GHZ-class channel
Liang, H.-Q., Liu, J., Shang-Shen, F., Chen, J.-G., & Xu, X. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1078-x · Cited by 50
Zhang, L., Sun, H.-W., Zhang, K., & Jia, H.-Y. (2017) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-017-1531-0 · Cited by 50
Optimal quantum error correcting codes from absolutely maximally entangled states
Raissi, Z., Gogolin, C., Riera, A., & Acín, A. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aaa151 · Cited by 59
Multiparty data hiding of quantum information
Hayden, P. M., Leung, D., & Smith, G. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.062339 · Cited by 50
Experimentally feasible security check for n -qubit quantum secret sharing
Schauer, S., Huber, M., & Hiesmayr, B. C. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.062311 · Cited by 50
Vallone, G., Donati, G., Ceccarelli, R., & Mataloni, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.052301 · Cited by 51
A novel dynamic quantum secret sharing in high-dimensional quantum system
Hu, W., Zhou, R., Li, X., Fan, P., & Tan, C. (2021) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03103-2 · Cited by 49
Nonthreshold quantum secret-sharing schemes in the graph-state formalism
Sarvepalli, P. K. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.042303 · Cited by 49
High-dimension multiparty quantum secret sharing scheme with Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen pairs
Pan, C., Fu-Guo, D., & Gui-Lu, L. (2006) · Chinese Physics · doi:10.1088/1009-1963/15/10/007 · Cited by 49
Efficient W-state entanglement concentration using quantum-dot and optical microcavities
Sheng, Y., & Zhou, L. (2013) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.30.000678 · Cited by 49
Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Chen, X., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Shi, W. (2021) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1692-5 · Cited by 49
Quantum optical systems for the implementation of quantum information processing
Ralph, T. C. (2006) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/4/r01 · Cited by 49
Feng-Li, Y., Ting, G., & Li, Y. (2008) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/25/4/007 · Cited by 48
Efficient and economic five-party quantum state sharing of an arbitrary m-qubit state
Sheng, Y., Deng, F., & Zhou, H.-Y. (2008) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2008-00075-5 · Cited by 48
Sharing a quantum secret without a trusted party
Li, Q., Long, D., Chan, W. H., & Qiu, D. (2010) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-010-0180-3 · Cited by 48
Wu, H., Zha, X.-W., & Yang, Y.-Q. (2017) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-017-3537-x · Cited by 48
Multi-dimensional quantum state sharing based on quantum Fourier transform
Qin, H., Tso, R., & Dai, Y. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1827-8 · Cited by 48
Entanglement criterion for multipartite systems based on quantum Fisher information
Akbari-Kourbolagh, Y., & Azhdargalam, M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012304 · Cited by 48
Measurement-device-independent quantum secret sharing with hyper-encoding
Ju, X.-X., Zhong, W., Sheng, Y., & Zhou, L. (2022) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac70bb · Cited by 47
Quantum secret sharing between multiparty and multiparty with Bell states and Bell measurements
Shi, R., Huang, L., Yang, W., & Zhong, H. (2010) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-010-4181-0 · Cited by 47
Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., & Man, Z. (2005) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/6102/44/5/847 · Cited by 47
Divincenzo, D. P., Hayden, P. M., & Terhal, B. M. (2003) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1023/a:1026013201376 · Cited by 47
Hao, L., Wang, C. X., & Long, G. L. (2011) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2011.03.039 · Cited by 47
Multipartite electronic entanglement purification with charge detection
Sheng, Y., Deng, F., & Long, G. (2010) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2010.11.018 · Cited by 46
Device-independent quantum secret sharing with advanced random key generation basis
Zhang, Q., Ying, J., Zhong-jian, W., Zhong, W., Du, M., Shen, S.-T., Li, X., Zhang, A.-L., Gu, S., Wang, X.-F., et al. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012603 · Cited by 46
Zheng, A., Li, J., Yu, R., Lü, X., & Wu, Y. (2012) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.20.016902 · Cited by 46
Secure quantum secret sharing without signal disturbance monitoring
Gu, J., Xie, Y.-M., Liu, W., Fu, Y., Yin, H., & Chen, Z. (2021) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.440365 · Cited by 46
Quantum circuits for maximally entangled states
Cervera-Lierta, A., Latorre, J. I., & Goyeneche, D. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022342 · Cited by 46
Device-independent quantum secret sharing with noise preprocessing and postselection
Zhang, Q., Zhong, W., Du, M., Shen, S.-T., Li, X., Zhang, A.-L., Zhou, L., & Sheng, Y. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.042403 · Cited by 45
Single-Photon Multiparty Quantum Cryptographic Protocols With Collective Detection
Liu, B., Gao, F., & Wen, Q. (2011) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jqe.2011.2167743 · Cited by 45
Circular Semi-Quantum Secret Sharing Using Single Particles*
Ye, C., & Ye, T.-Y. (2018) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/70/6/661 · Cited by 45
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44
“The first example is provided the 3-qutrit code [173], defined by the span of the following three qutrit (3-dimensional) quantum states.”
BackgroundToy models of holographic duality between local Hamiltonians
Kohler, T., & Cubitt, T. S. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2019)017 · Cited by 44
Lü, X., Si, L.-G., Hao, X., & Yang, X. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.052330 · Cited by 44
Cryptanalysis of secret sharing with a single d-level quantum system
Chen, X., Tang, X., Xu, G., Dou, Z., Chen, Y., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1988-5 · Cited by 43
Breaking the rate-distance limitation of measurement-device-independent quantum secret sharing
Li, C.-L., Fu, Y., Liu, W., Xie, Y.-M., Li, B.-H., Zhou, M.-G., Yin, H., & Chen, Z. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.033077 · Cited by 43
Sharing classical secrets with Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes
Sarvepalli, P. K., & Klappenecker, A. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022321 · Cited by 43
Multiparty hierarchical quantum-information splitting
Wang, X.-W., Zhang, D.-Y., Tang, S.-Q., & Xie, L.-J. (2011) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/3/035505 · Cited by 43
Towards the quantum-enabled technologies for development of drugs or delivery systems
Hassanzadeh, P. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.04.050 · Cited by 42
A novel protocol for multiparty quantum key management
Xu, G., Chen, X., Dou, Z., Yang, Y., & Li, Z. (2015) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-015-1021-1 · Cited by 41
An Efficient and Secure Arbitrary N-Party Quantum Key Agreement Protocol Using Bell States
Liu, W., Xu, Y., Yang, C., Gao, P., & Yu, W.-B. (2017) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-017-3553-x · Cited by 41
Threshold quantum cryptography
Tokunaga, Y., Okamoto, T., & Imoto, N. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.012314 · Cited by 41
Secure multiparty quantum secret sharing with the collective eavesdropping-check character
Gao, G. (2012) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-011-0351-x · Cited by 41
Quantum state sharing using linear optical elements
Xia, Y., Song, J., & Song, H. (2008) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2008.06.028 · Cited by 41
Multiparty semiquantum secret sharing based on rearranging orders of qubits
Gao, G., Wang, Y., & Wang, D. (2016) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s021798491650130x · Cited by 41
Multi-party quantum private comparison of size relation with d-level single-particle states
Ye, C., & Ye, T.-Y. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-2021-8 · Cited by 41
Hierarchical Quantum Secret Sharing Based On Special High-Dimensional Entangled State
Qin, H., Tang, K. S., & Tso, R. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2020.2975600 · Cited by 41
Theory of Communication Efficient Quantum Secret Sharing
Senthoor, K., & Sarvepalli, P. K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2021.3139839 · Cited by 40
Asymmetric multi-party quantum state sharing of an arbitrary m-qubit state
Shi, R., Huang, L., Yang, W., & Zhong, H. (2010) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-010-0176-z · Cited by 40
Reducing the Quantum Communication Cost of Quantum Secret Sharing
Fortescue, B., & Gour, G. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2012.2205895 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
- Hewlett-Packard (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-07-19
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 648-651
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2083019346
- Cited by
- 1,373
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum secret sharing, threshold schemes, no-cloning theorem, quantum information, secret reconstruction, mixed states, quantum cryptography, information distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
