Cited by 110Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum many-body systems

Irreversibility in Asymptotic Manipulations of Entanglement

Open access
Vidal, G., Cirac, J. I.·2001·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We show that the process of entanglement distillation is irreversible by showing that the entanglement cost of a bound entangled state is finite. Such irreversibility remains even if extra pure entanglement is loaned to assist the distillation process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.86.5803

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum correlations do not increase under renormalization group transformations.

    “Furthermore, such a connection can be exploited to unveil a fundamental law for entanglement in spin systems -namely, that quantum correlations do not increase under renormalization group transformations.”

    From Entanglement in Quantum Critical Phenomena (2003) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 , 4260 (2000). This paper shows that for a family of states the process of distillation is irreversible. However, the proof of this statement is based on the results of E. M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 60 , 179 (1999), which were corrected in an erratum (E. M. Rains, Phys. Rev. A 63 , 019902(E), see also K.G. H. Vollbrecht and R.F. Werner, quant-ph/0010095). As a consequence, the arguments leading to the statement that the process of distillation is irreversible are invalid. Thus, this question remains open. · arXiv
  2. V. Thapliyal, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012307 (2001), and will write LOCCc instead of ELOCC.
  3. [12]P. M. Hayden, M. Horodecki, and B. Terhal, quantph/0008134. M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A 61, 064301 (2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vidal, G., & Cirac, J. I.
Affiliations
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2001-06-18
Volume
86
Issue
25
Pages
5803-5806
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2007422996
Cited by
110
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
entanglement distillation, irreversibility, bound entangled states, entanglement cost, quantum entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review