The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gravitational Collapse on the Brane: A No-Go Theorem
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since the bulk geometry is simply vacuum AdS, it evades the no-go theorem of [66].
“Since the bulk geometry is simply vacuum AdS, it evades the no-go theorem of[66].”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
There is a no-go theorem which alleges the exterior geometry on the brane in d ≥ 4 cannot be static.
“In fact, there is a no-go theorem [66] which alleges the exterior geometry on the brane in d ≥ 4 cannot be static.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
A no-go theorem states that the exterior geometry of the dust cloud cannot be static.
“In fact, whilst searching for examples of Oppenheimer-Synder gravitational collapse of braneworld black holes, a no-go theorem was posed [66]: the exterior geometry of the dust cloud cannot be static.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- H. Stephani, 1990, General Relativity
- L. Randall, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4690, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 · DOI · Paper page
- T. Shiromizu, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 024012, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024012 · DOI
- M. Sasaki, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 024008, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024008 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Garriga, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2778, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2778 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Csaki, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B581, 309, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00271-6 · DOI · Paper page
- S. B. Giddings, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 03, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/03/023 · DOI
- I. Ya. Araf'eva, 2000, Nucl. Phys., B590, 273, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00515-0 · DOI
- Z. Kakushadze, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 497, 125, 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01348-4 · DOI
- I. Giannakis, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 63, 024001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.024001 · DOI
- N. Deruelle, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 64, 103506, 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.103506 · DOI
- N. Dadhich, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 487, 1, 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00798-X · DOI · Paper page
- A. Chamblin, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 61, 065007, 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.065007 · DOI · Paper page
- T. Shiromizu, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 127502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.127502 · DOI
- A. Chamblin, 2001, Phys. Rev. D, 63, 064015, 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.064015 · DOI
- R. Maartens, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 084023, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.084023 · DOI
- S. Mukohyama, 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 024028, 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.024028 · DOI
- P. Bowcock, 2000, Classical Quantum Gravity, 17, 4745, 10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/313 · DOI · Paper page
- P. Binetruy, 2000, Phys. Lett. B, 477, 285, 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00204-5 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruni, M., Germani, C., & Maartens, R.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-11-13
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 23
- ISSN
- 0031-9007
- 1079-7114
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
