The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex
Open accessAbstract
It is proven that logarithmic negativity does not increase on average under a general positive partial transpose preserving operation (a set of operations that incorporate local operations and classical communication as a subset) and, in the process, a further proof is provided that the negativity does not increase on average under the same set of operations. Given that the logarithmic negativity is not a convex function this result is surprising, as it is generally considered that convexity describes the local physical process of losing information. The role of convexity and, in particular, its relation (or lack thereof) to physical processes is discussed and importance of continuity in this context is stressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For the quantum discord, note that the state (140) belongs to the subclass known as 'X-states', for which the optimization problem in equation ( 152) can be efficiently solved [230,245].”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [245]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“D Q A [ρ SA (t)] = Q E (t,0) ,(158)”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [245]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Computable measure of entanglement
Vidal, G., & Werner, R. F. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032314 · Cited by 5,006
Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2 · Cited by 3,649
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Bhatia, R. (1996) · Cited by 2,847
Bhatia, R. (1997) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0653-8 · Cited by 2,334
(1996) · Cited by 2,280
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Generation of stable entanglement between two cavity mirrors by squeezed-reservoir engineering
Yang, C.-J., An, J., Yang, W., & Li, Y. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062311 · Cited by 58
Singularity in entanglement negativity across finite-temperature phase transitions
Lu, T.-C., & Grover, T. (2019) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.075157 · Cited by 59
Notes on entanglement wedge cross sections
Jokela, N., & Pönni, A. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)087 · Cited by 57
Entanglement Hamiltonians in 1D free lattice models after a global quantum quench
Giulio, G. D., Arias, R., & Erik Tonni, C. (2019) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab4e8f · Cited by 78
Fractality and macroscopic entanglement in two-component Bose-Einstein condensates
Byrnes, T. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.023609 · Cited by 55
Universal scaling of the logarithmic negativity in massive quantum field theory
Blondeau-Fournier, O., Castro-Alvaredo, O. A., & Doyon, B. (2016) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/12/125401 · Cited by 63
Branch point twist field correlators in the massive free Boson theory
Bianchini, D., & Castro-Alvaredo, O. A. (2016) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.10.016 · Cited by 56
Cost of Quantum Entanglement Simplified
Wang, X., & Wilde, M. M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.040502 · Cited by 63
The negativity contour: a quasi-local measure of entanglement for mixed states
Kudler-Flam, J., Shapourian, H., & Ryu, S. (2020) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.8.4.063 · Cited by 56
Fiber-based photon-pair generation: tutorial
Garay-Palmett, K., Kim, D. B., Zhang, Y., Domínguez-Serna, F. A., Lorenz, V. O., & U’Ren, A. B. (2023) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.478008 · Cited by 54
High-dimensional quantum state transfer through a quantum spin chain
Qin, W., Wang, C., & Long, G. L. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.012339 · Cited by 55
Directly comparing entanglement-enhancing non-Gaussian operations
Bartley, T. J., & Walmsley, I. A. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023038 · Cited by 54
Partial transpose of two disjoint blocks in XY spin chains
Coser, A., Erik Tonni, C., & Calabrese, P. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2015/08/p08005 · Cited by 54
Observing quantum synchronization blockade in circuit quantum electrodynamics
Nigg, S. E. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.013811 · Cited by 54
Gaussian interferometric power
Adesso, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022321 · Cited by 57
Lai, D.-G., Qin, W., Hou, B., Miranowicz, A., & Nori, F. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.043521 · Cited by 56
Geometry of two-qubit states with negative conditional entropy
Friis, N., Bulusu, S., & Bertlmann, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5dfd · Cited by 53
Separability Transitions in Topological States Induced by Local Decoherence
Chen, Y.-H., & Grover, T. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.170602 · Cited by 52
Increasing Entanglement Monotones by Separable Operations
Chitambar, E., Cui, W., & Lo, H. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.240504 · Cited by 52
Mesoscopic entanglement through central–potential interactions
Qvarfort, S., Bose, S., & Serafini, A. (2020) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/abbe8d · Cited by 60
Enhanced dynamical entanglement transfer with multiple qubits
Serafini, A., Paternostro, M., Kim, M. S., & Bose, S. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.022312 · Cited by 50
Entanglement Negativity Spectrum of Random Mixed States: A Diagrammatic Approach
Shapourian, H., Liu, S., Kudler-Flam, J., & Vishwanath, A. (2021) · University of Chicago · doi:10.6082/w43qs-stw91 · Cited by 61
Minoguchi, Y., Rabl, P., & Buchhold, M. (2022) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.1.009 · Cited by 67
Multipartite entanglement measure and complete monogamy relation
Guo, Y. J., & Zhang, L. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032301 · Cited by 51
Yang, Z., Liu, J., Zhu, A., Liu, H., & Yang, R. (2020) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202000196 · Cited by 51
Fully connected network of superconducting qubits in a cavity
Tsomokos, D. I., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/11/113020 · Cited by 49
Local Gaussian operations can enhance continuous-variable entanglement distillation
Zhang, S., & van Loock, P. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.062309 · Cited by 51
Refined weak-coupling limit: Coherence, entanglement, and non-Markovianity
Rivas, ́. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042104 · Cited by 50
Journeys from quantum optics to quantum technology
Barnett, S. M., Beige, A., EKERT, A. K., Garraway, B. M., Keitel, C. H., Kendon, V. M., Lein, M., Milburn, G. J., Moya-Cessa, H. M., Murao, M., et al. (2017) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2017.07.002 · Cited by 54
Self-citationA Brief Overview of Bipartite and Multipartite Entanglement Measures
Haddadi, S., & Bohloul, M. (2018) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-018-3903-3 · Cited by 53
Stationary entangled radiation from micromechanical motion
Barzanjeh, S., Redchenko, E. S., Peruzzo, M., Wulf, M., Lewis, D. P., Arnold, G., & Fink, J. M. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 49
Enhanced force sensitivity and entanglement in periodically driven optomechanics
Cosco, F., Pedernales, J. S., & Plenio, M. B. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.l061501 · Cited by 52
Self-citationMultipartite quantum entanglement evolution in photosynthetic complexes
Zhu, J., Kais, S., Aspuru‐Guzik, A., Rodriques, S., Brock, B. L., & Love, P. J. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4742333 · Cited by 49
Axiomatic and operational connections between the l1 -norm of coherence and negativity
Zhu, H., Hayashi, M., & Chen, L. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.022342 · Cited by 49
Holographic entanglement negativity conjecture for adjacent intervals in AdS3/CFT2
Jain, P., Malvimat, V., Mondal, S., & Sengupta, G. (2019) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.04.037 · Cited by 51
Optimal Continuous Variable Quantum Teleportation with Limited Resources
Liuzzo-Scorpo, P., Mari, A., Giovannetti, V., & Adesso, G. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.120503 · Cited by 46
Improved semidefinite programming upper bound on distillable entanglement
Wang, X., & Duan, R. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.050301 · Cited by 50
Bertini, B., Klobas, K., & Lu, T.-C. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.140503 · Cited by 51
Nonreciprocal magnon-photon-phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics
Chakraborty, S., & Das, C. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.063704 · Cited by 47
Bai, C., Wang, D.-Y., Wang, H., Zhu, A., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02779-w · Cited by 46
Non-Markovianity in the collision model with environmental block
Jin, J., & Yu, C.-S. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aac0cb · Cited by 48
Split spin-squeezed Bose–Einstein condensates
Jing, Y., Fadel, M., Ivannikov, V., & Byrnes, T. (2019) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab3fcf · Cited by 49
Entanglement of Purification in Many Body Systems and Symmetry Breaking
Bhattacharyya, A., Jahn, A., Takayanagi, T., & Umemoto, K. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.201601 · Cited by 47
Entanglement optimization of filtered output fields in cavity optomechanics
Yan, X.-B., Deng, Z.-J., Tian, X.-D., & Wu, J. (2019) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.27.024393 · Cited by 47
Out-of-equilibrium protocol for Rényi entropies via the Jarzynski equality
Alba, V. (2017) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.95.062132 · Cited by 46
Tree-level entanglement in quantum electrodynamics
Fedida, S., & Serafini, A. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.116007 · Cited by 52
Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation in $$H\rightarrow ZZ$$ with anomalous coupling
Bernal, A., Caban, P., & Rembieliński, J. (2023) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12216-0 · Cited by 62
Hilbert space fragmentation in open quantum systems
Li, Y., Sala, P., & Pollmann, F. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043239 · Cited by 55
Logarithmic coherence: Operational interpretation of ℓ1 -norm coherence
Rana, S., Parashar, P., Winter, A., & Lewenstein, M. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.052336 · Cited by 47
Detecting and quantifying entanglement on near-term quantum devices
Wang, K., Song, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, X. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00556-w · Cited by 50
No second law of entanglement manipulation after all
Lami, L., & Regula, B. (2023) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01873-9 · Cited by 58
Steady-entangled-state generation via the cross-Kerr effect in a ferrimagnetic crystal
Yang, Z., Wu, W.-J., Li, J., Wang, Y., & You, J. Q. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012419 · Cited by 49
Holographic entanglement negativity for disjoint intervals in $$AdS_3/CFT_2$$ A d S 3 / C F T 2
Malvimat, V., Mondal, S., Paul, B., & Sengupta, G. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6693-8 · Cited by 44
Quantifying entanglement with covariance matrices
Gittsovich, O., & Gühne, O. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.032333 · Cited by 46
Experimental Unconditional Preparation and Detection of a Continuous Bound Entangled State of Light
DiGuglielmo, J., Samblowski, A., Hage, B., Pineda, C., Eisert, J., & Schnabel, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.240503 · Cited by 45
Arrays of waveguide-coupled optical cavities that interact strongly with atoms
Lepert, G., Trupke, M., Hartmann, M. J., Plenio, M. B., & Hinds, E. A. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113002 · Cited by 45
Self-citationGeneralized geometric measure of entanglement for multiparty mixed states
Das, T., Roy, S. S., Bagchi, S., Misra, A., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.022336 · Cited by 46
Entangling Two Macroscopic Mechanical Resonators at High Temperature
Lin, Q., He, B., & Xiao, M. (2020) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.13.034030 · Cited by 44
Entanglement of assistance is not a bipartite measure nor a tripartite monotone
Gour, G., & Spekkens, R. W. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.062331 · Cited by 44
Quantum Mpemba effect in free-fermionic mixed states
Ares, F., Vitale, V., & Murciano, S. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.104312 · Cited by 43
Estimation for entanglement negativity of free fermions
Herzog, C. P., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/07/073102 · Cited by 43
Feedback control of two-mode output entanglement and steering in cavity optomechanics
Asjad, M., Tombesi, P., & Vitali, D. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052312 · Cited by 43
Covariant holographic entanglement negativity
Chaturvedi, P., Malvimat, V., & Sengupta, G. (2018) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6259-1 · Cited by 43
Revealing nonclassicality beyond Gaussian states via a single marginal distribution
Park, J., Lu, Y., Lee, J., Shen, Y., Zhang, K., Zhang, S., Zubairy, M. S., Kim, K., & Nha, H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1617621114 · Cited by 45
Holographic entanglement negativity for adjacent subsystems in AdSd+1/CFTd
Jain, P., Malvimat, V., Mondal, S., & Sengupta, G. (2018) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/i2018-12113-0 · Cited by 42
Reservoir-engineered entanglement in a hybrid modulated three-mode optomechanical system
Liao, C.-G., Chen, R., Xie, H., & Lin, X. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.042314 · Cited by 43
Symmetric inseparability and number entanglement in charge-conserving mixed states
Ma, Z., Han, C., Meir, Y., & Sela, E. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.042416 · Cited by 43
Localization properties of the disordered XY spin chain
Abdul‐Rahman, H., Nachtergaele, B., Sims, R., & Stolz, G. (2017) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201600280 · Cited by 40
Entanglement negativity in the multiverse
Kanno, S., Shock, J. P., & Soda, J. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/03/015 · Cited by 40
Negativity spectrum in 1D gapped phases of matter
Mbeng, G. B., Alba, V., & Calabrese, P. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6734 · Cited by 42
Genuine multipartite entanglement measure
Guo, Y. J., Jia, Y., Li, X., & Huang, L. (2022) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac5649 · Cited by 41
Transfer of d -level quantum states through spin chains by random swapping
Bayat, A., & Karimipour, V. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.022321 · Cited by 39
Role of environmental correlations in the non-Markovian dynamics of a spin system
Lorenzo, S., Plastina, F., & Paternostro, M. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032124 · Cited by 43
Arkhipov, I. I., Barasiński, A., & Svozilík, J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35330-6 · Cited by 41
Local passivity and entanglement in shared quantum batteries
Sen, K., & Sen, U. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.104.l030402 · Cited by 41
Negativity Hamiltonian: An Operator Characterization of Mixed-State Entanglement
Murciano, S., Vitale, V., Dalmonte, M., & Calabrese, P. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.140502 · Cited by 46
Scaling of Tripartite Entanglement at Impurity Quantum Phase Transitions
Bayat, A. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.036102 · Cited by 43
Quantum Architecture Search via Deep Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Kuo, E.-J., Fang, Y.-L. L., & Chen, S. Y.-C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.07715 · Cited by 123
Distant entanglement via photon hopping in a coupled cavity magnomechanical system
Sohail, A., Peng, J., Hidki, A., Khalid, M., & Singh, S. K. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-48825-8 · Cited by 41
Non-Gaussian entangled states and quantum teleportation of Schrödinger-cat states
Seshadreesan, K. P., Dowling, J. P., & Agarwal, G. S. (2015) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/7/074029 · Cited by 42
Macroscopic Quantum Entanglement of a Kondo Cloud at Finite Temperature
Lee, S. B., Park, J., & Sim, H.-S. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.057203 · Cited by 38
Structure of quantum entanglement at a finite temperature critical point
Lu, T.-C., & Grover, T. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043345 · Cited by 44
Stationary optomechanical entanglement between a mechanical oscillator and its measurement apparatus
Gut, C., Winkler, K., Hoelscher-Obermaier, J., Hofer, S. G., Nia, R. M., Walk, N., Steffens, A., Eisert, J., Wieczorek, W., Slater, J. A., et al. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033244 · Cited by 41
Kudler-Flam, J., Kusuki, Y., & Ryu, S. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)146 · Cited by 45
Microwave quantum illumination via cavity magnonics
Cai, Q., Liao, J., Shen, B., Guo, G., & Zhou, Q. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052419 · Cited by 40
Non-Hermitian Hamiltonian deformations in quantum mechanics
Matsoukas-Roubeas, A. S., Roccati, F., Cornelius, J., Xu, Z., Chenu, A., & del Campo, A. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)060 · Cited by 43
Serafini, A., Retzker, A., & Plenio, M. B. (2009) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023007 · Cited by 40
Self-citationCentral Charges and the Sign of Entanglement in 4D Conformal Field Theories
Perlmutter, E., Rangamani, M., & Rota, M. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.171601 · Cited by 39
Entangling the motion of two optically trapped objects via time-modulated driving fields
Abdi, M., & Hartmann, M. J. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013056 · Cited by 39
Speeding up entanglement degradation
Mann, R. B., & Villalba, V. M. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022305 · Cited by 38
Nonclassicality Invariant of General Two-Mode Gaussian States
Arkhipov, I. I., Peřina, J., Svozilík, J., & Miranowicz, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26523 · Cited by 38
Haddadi, S., Pourkarimi, M. R., Akhound, A., & Ghominejad, M. (2019) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/ab2cc7 · Cited by 38
TT¯ , the entanglement wedge cross section, and the breakdown of the split property
Asrat, M., & Kudler-Flam, J. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.045009 · Cited by 39
Entropy, Divergence, and Majorization in Classical and Quantum Thermodynamics
Sagawa, T. (2022) · SpringerBriefs in mathematical physics · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6644-5 · Cited by 54
Thermal-noise-resistant optomechanical entanglement via general dark-mode control
Jian, H., Lai, D.-G., & Liao, J. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.063506 · Cited by 39
Optimal feedback control of linear quantum systems in the presence of thermal noise
Genoni, M. G., Mancini, S., & Serafini, A. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.042333 · Cited by 38
More nonlocality with less entanglement in a tripartite atom‐optomechanical system
Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Xuereb, A., Vitali, D., & Li, J. (2014) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201400107 · Cited by 37
Covariant holographic entanglement negativity for disjoint intervals in $$AdS_3/CFT_2$$
Malvimat, V., Mondal, S., Paul, B., & Sengupta, G. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7032-9 · Cited by 36
Castro-Alvaredo, O. A., Fazio, C. D., Doyon, B., & Szécsényi, I. M. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2019)058 · Cited by 37
Decoherence in Conformal Field Theory
del Campo, A., & Takayanagi, T. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)170 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Plenio, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Plenio, M. B.
- ORCID
- Plenio, M. B.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-08-26
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 090503-090503
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1979369481
- Semantic Scholar
- 64435b0cfa00fafcfdca6d566eaca7dd6a824169
- Cited by
- 1,530
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 187 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- logarithmic negativity, entanglement monotones, non-convexity, positive partial transpose, local operations and classical communication, quantum entanglement, information loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
