The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex
Open accessAbstract
It is proven that logarithmic negativity does not increase on average under a general positive partial transpose preserving operation (a set of operations that incorporate local operations and classical communication as a subset) and, in the process, a further proof is provided that the negativity does not increase on average under the same set of operations. Given that the logarithmic negativity is not a convex function this result is surprising, as it is generally considered that convexity describes the local physical process of losing information. The role of convexity and, in particular, its relation (or lack thereof) to physical processes is discussed and importance of continuity in this context is stressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For the quantum discord, note that the state (140) belongs to the subclass known as 'X-states', for which the optimization problem in equation ( 152) can be efficiently solved [230,245].”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [245]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“D Q A [ρ SA (t)] = Q E (t,0) ,(158)”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [245]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Computable measure of entanglement
Vidal, G., & Werner, R. F. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032314 · Cited by 5,006
Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2 · Cited by 3,649
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Bhatia, R. (1996) · Cited by 2,847
Bhatia, R. (1997) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0653-8 · Cited by 2,334
(1996) · Cited by 2,280
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
Noise effects on purity and quantum entanglement in terms of physical implementability
Guo, Y., & Yang, S. (2023) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00680-1 · Cited by 19
Observation of entanglement transition of pseudo-random mixed states
Liu, T., Liu, S., Li, H., Li, H., Huang, K., Xiang, Z., Song, X., Xu, K., Zheng, D., & Fan, H. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37511-y · Cited by 14
Robust two-qubit gates using pulsed dynamical decoupling
Barthel, P., Huber, P. H., Casanova, J., Arrazola, Í., Niroomand, D., Sriarunothai, T., Plenio, M. B., & Wunderlich, C. (2023) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acd4db · Cited by 14
Self-citationEntanglement negativity in T T ¯ -deformed CFT 2 s
Basu, D., Chawla, L., & Paul, B. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.126026 · Cited by 14
Entanglement entropy of the proton in coordinate space
Dumitru, A., Kovner, A., & Skokov, V. V. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.014014 · Cited by 14
Defect extremal surfaces for entanglement negativity
Basu, D., Parihar, H., Raj, V., & Sengupta, G. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.106005 · Cited by 23
Sidler, D., Ruggenthaler, M., & Rubio, Á. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00092 · Cited by 15
Optimal Quantum Circuit Cuts with Application to Clustered Hamiltonian Simulation
Harrow, A. W., & Lowe, A. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.010316 · Cited by 14
Zaw, L. H. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.050201 · Cited by 14
Reflected entropy in a BCFT on a black hole background
Basu, D., Chourasiya, H., Raj, V., & Sengupta, G. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)054 · Cited by 14
Long-distance entanglement sharing using hybrid states of discrete and continuous variables
Bose, S., Singh, J., Cabello, A., & Jeong, H. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.064013 · Cited by 17
Reji, H. M., Hegde, H. S., & Prabhu, R. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.032403 · Cited by 14
Krylov complexity and gluon cascades in the high energy limit
Caputa, P., & Kutak, K. M. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.085011 · Cited by 14
Entanglement Rényi negativity of interacting fermions from quantum Monte Carlo simulations
Wang, F.-H., & Xu, X. Y. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57971-8 · Cited by 14
Bansal, N., Mok, W., Bharti, K., Koh, D. E., & Haug, T. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.020322 · Cited by 18
Entanglement monotones for W -type states
Chitambar, E., Cui, W., & Lo, H. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.062316 · Cited by 14
Quantum Fisher Information of a 3 × 3 Bound Entangled State and its Relation with Geometric Discord
Özaydin, F. (2015) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-015-2570-x · Cited by 13
Dimerized ground states in spin−S frustrated systems
Lamas, C. A., & Matera, J. M. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.115111 · Cited by 14
Robust entanglement with a thermal mechanical oscillator
Rakhubovsky, A. A., & Filip, R. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.062317 · Cited by 14
Generation of macroscopic entangled cat states in a longitudinally coupled cavity-QED model
Jian, H., Liu, Y.-H., Huang, J., & Liao, J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.043841 · Cited by 14
Cost and routing of continuous-variable quantum networks
Centrone, F., Grosshans, F., & Parigi, V. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.042615 · Cited by 16
Reflected entropy and entanglement negativity for holographic moving mirrors
Basak, J. K., Basu, D., Malvimat, V., Parihar, H., & Sengupta, G. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2022)089 · Cited by 18
Quantum benchmarking with realistic states of light
Killoran, N., Hosseini, M., Buchler, B. C., Lam, P. K., & Lütkenhaus, N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.022331 · Cited by 14
Scale-invariant freezing of entanglement
Chanda, T., Das, T., Sadhukhan, D., Pal, A. K., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062324 · Cited by 14
Locally distinguishing quantum states with limited classical communication
Halder, S., & Srivastava, C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.052313 · Cited by 14
Negativity of random pure states
Datta, A. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.052312 · Cited by 14
Entanglement Distillation; A Discourse on Bound Entanglement in Quantum Information TheoryPreprint
Clarisse, L. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0612072 · Cited by 23
Simulating symmetric time evolution with local operations
Toloui, B., & Gour, G. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/123026 · Cited by 13
Erol, V., Bugu, S., Özaydin, F., & Altıntaṣ, A. A. (2014) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · doi:10.1109/siu.2014.6830229 · Cited by 12
Distilling topological entropy from a single measurement of entanglement on projected systems
Castelnovo, C. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.042333 · Cited by 13
Monogamy of Quantum Entanglement
Zong, X.-L., Yin, H.-H., Song, W., & Cao, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.880560 · Cited by 13
Oumennana, M., Chaouki, E., & Mansour, M. (2022) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-022-05255-y · Cited by 13
Elghaayda, S., Abd‐Rabbou, M. Y., & Mansour, M. (2023) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732323500578 · Cited by 13
High-efficiency entanglement of microwave fields in cavity opto-magnomechanical systems
Di, K., Tan, S., Wang, L., Cheng, A., Wang, X., Liu, Y., & Du, J. (2023) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.495656 · Cited by 13
Bouafia, Z., & Mansour, M. (2023) · Laser Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/1612-202x/ad069f · Cited by 13
Entanglement in Resonance Fluorescence
Carreño, J. C. L., Feijoo, S. B., & Stobińska, M. (2024) · npj Nanophotonics · doi:10.1038/s44310-023-00001-6 · Cited by 14
Nonreciprocal microwave–optical entanglement in Kerr-modified cavity optomagnomechanics
Liu, M., Gong, Y., Chen, J., Wang, Y., & Xiong, W. (2025) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/adb735 · Cited by 14
Excessive distribution of quantum entanglement
Zuppardo, M., Krisnanda, T., Paterek, T., Bandyopadhyay, S., Banerjee, A., Deb, P., Halder, S., Modi, K. K., & Paternostro, M. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.93.012305 · Cited by 14
Practical Entanglement Estimation for Spin-System Quantum Simulators
Marty, O., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.105301 · Cited by 15
Self-citationTetrapartite entanglement of fermionic systems in noninertial frames
Li, Y., Liu, C., Wang, Q., Zhang, H., & Hu, L. (2016) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.07.069 · Cited by 13
Dodonov, A. V., Napoli, A., & Militello, B. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.033823 · Cited by 14
Background magnetic field and quantum correlations in the Schwinger effect
Bhattacharya, S., Chakrabortty, S., Hoshino, H., & Kaushal, S. (2020) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135875 · Cited by 16
Teleporting quantum Fisher information under Davies-Markovian dynamics
Anouz, K. E., & Allati, A. E. (2022) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.127133 · Cited by 13
Wang, N., Yang, Z., Li, S., Tong, Y.-L., & Zhu, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02651-5 · Cited by 13
Quantum Information Scrambling in Non-Markovian Open Quantum System
Han, L.-P., Zou, J., Li, H., & Shao, B. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24111532 · Cited by 13
Entanglement negativity in a nonequilibrium steady state
Eisler, V. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.075157 · Cited by 13
Sadhukhan, D., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2016) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.93.032115 · Cited by 12
Synthesis of Linear Coherent Quantum Control Systems Using A Differential Evolution Algorithm
Harno, H. G., & Petersen, I. R. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2014.2329382 · Cited by 14
Statistical mechanics of entanglement mediated by a thermal reservoir
Kajari, E., Wolf, A., Lutz, E., & Morigi, G. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.042318 · Cited by 15
Quantum reservoirs with ion chains
Taketani, B. G., Fogarty, T., Kajari, E., Busch, T., & Morigi, G. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.012312 · Cited by 14
Input–output Gaussian channels: theory and application
Tufarelli, T., Retzker, A., Plenio, M. B., & Serafini, A. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/9/093046 · Cited by 13
Self-citationHama, Y., Yukawa, E., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052133 · Cited by 13
Wang, X., & Wilde, M. M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.012429 · Cited by 27
Salamon, T., & Roszak, K. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.032333 · Cited by 13
Manipulating quantum information by propagation
Perales, A., & Plenio, M. B. (2005) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 13
Self-citationMcConnell, P., Houhou, O., Brunelli, M., & Ferraro, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.033508 · Cited by 12
Converting Long-Range Entanglement into Mixture: Tensor-Network Approach to Local Equilibration
Frías-Pérez, M., Tagliacozzo, L., & Bañuls, M. C. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.100402 · Cited by 12
Anomalous transport in long-ranged open quantum systems
Dhawan, A., Ganguly, K., Kulkarni, M., & Agarwalla, B. K. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.l081403 · Cited by 13
Optoacoustic Entanglement in a Continuous Brillouin-Active Solid State System
Zhu, C., Genes, C., & Stiller, B. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.203602 · Cited by 15
Distillable entanglement under dually non-entangling operations
Lami, L., & Regula, B. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54201-5 · Cited by 13
Electrically controlled entanglement of cavity photons with electromagnons
Toklikishvili, Z. Z., Chotorlishvili, L., Хомерики, Р., Jandieri, V. G., & Berakdar, J. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.115126 · Cited by 15
Complex quantum network models from spin clusters
Chepuri, R., & Kovács, I. A. (2023) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-023-01394-8 · Cited by 13
Two-fermion negativity and confinement in the Schwinger model
Florio, A. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.l071501 · Cited by 19
Remote macroscopic entanglement on a photonic crystal architecture
Flayac, H., Minkov, M., & Savona, V. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.043812 · Cited by 12
Alsing, P. M. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/075010 · Cited by 12
Concentrating Tripartite Quantum Information
Streltsov, A., Lee, S., & Adesso, G. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.030505 · Cited by 12
“Hot entanglement”? – A nonequilibrium quantum field theory scrutiny
Hsiang, J.-T., & Hu, B. L. (2015) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.047 · Cited by 12
Epsilon-measures of entanglement
Mora, C.-E., Piani, M., & Briegel, H.-J. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/8/083027 · Cited by 10
Entanglement propagation of a quantum optical vortex state
Banerji, A., Singh, R. P., Banerjee, D., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2016) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2016.06.025 · Cited by 12
Optimal entangling capacity of dynamical processes
Campbell, E. T. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042314 · Cited by 12
Erol, V., Özaydin, F., & Altıntaṣ, A. A. (2015) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · doi:10.1109/siu.2015.7129800 · Cited by 10
Proposal for the distribution of multiphoton entanglement with optimal rate-distance scaling
Mycroft, M. E., McDermott, T. C., Buraczewski, A., & Stobińska, M. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.012607 · Cited by 14
Wu, S.-X., Bai, C., Li, G., Yu, C., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.495520 · Cited by 11
Entanglement generation between distant spins via quasilocal reservoir engineering
Dias, J., Wächtler, C. W., Nemoto, K., & Munro, W. J. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043295 · Cited by 11
Entanglement in an expanding toroidal Bose-Einstein condensate
Bhardwaj, A., Agulló, I., Kranas, D., Wilson, J. H., & Sheehy, D. E. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.013305 · Cited by 16
Macroscopic entanglement between ferrimagnetic magnons and atoms via crossed optical cavities
Di, K., Wang, X., Xia, H., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Cheng, A., & Du, J. (2024) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.520039 · Cited by 11
Optimal control of linear Gaussian quantum systems via quantum learning control
Liu, Y.-H., Zeng, Y., Tan, Q.-S., Dong, D., Nori, F., & Liao, J. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.063508 · Cited by 11
Nonreciprocal entanglement in a molecular optomechanical system
Berinyuy, E. K., Peng, J., Sohail, A., Djorwé, P., Abdel‐Aty, A., Alessa, N., Nisar, K. S., & Engo, S. G. N. (2025) · Physica B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2025.417313 · Cited by 11
Multiwavefunction overlap and multientropy for topological ground states in ( 2 + 1 ) dimensions
Liu, B., Zhang, J., Ohyama, S., Kusuki, Y., & Ryu, S. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/tjcf-yryh · Cited by 17
Open quantum entanglement: a study of two atomic system in static patch of de Sitter space
Akhtar, S., Choudhury, S., Chowdhury, S., Goswami, D., Panda, S., & Swain, A. (2020) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 11
Resource conversion between operational coherence and multipartite entanglement in many-body systems
Ren, L.-H., Gao, M., Ren, J., Wang, Z. D., & Bai, Y.-K. (2021) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abd9e6 · Cited by 11
Quench Dynamics of Rényi Negativities and the Quasiparticle Picture
Murciano, S., Alba, V., & Calabrese, P. (2022) · Quantum science and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-03998-0_14 · Cited by 20
Dynamics of charge imbalance resolved negativity after a global quench in free scalar field theory
Chen, H.-H. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)146 · Cited by 11
Quantum information spreading in random spin chains
Ruggiero, P., & Turkeshi, X. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.134205 · Cited by 11
Entanglement dynamics and ergodicity breaking in a quantum cellular automaton
Sellapillay, K., Verga, A., & Molfetta, G. D. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.104309 · Cited by 11
Rényi entropy and negativity for massless complex boson at conformal interfaces and junctions
Capizzi, L., Murciano, S., & Calabrese, P. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)105 · Cited by 14
Yin, X., Yang, Z., Huang, Y., Wan, Q., Yang, R., & Liu, H. (2023) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202200603 · Cited by 11
Performance of quantum registers in diamond in the presence of spin impurities
Maile, D., & Ankerhold, J. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.035407 · Cited by 15
Two-dimensional characterization of spatially entangled photon pairs
Ostermeyer, M. R., Korn, D., Puhlmann, D., Henkel, C., & Eisert, J. (2009) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340903359962 · Cited by 11
Quantum filtering of a thermal master equation with a purified reservoir
Genoni, M. G., Mancini, S., Wiseman, H. M., & Serafini, A. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.063826 · Cited by 11
Invariant measures on multimode quantum Gaussian states
Lupo, C., Mancini, S., Pasquale, A. D., Paolo Facchi, A., Florio, G., & Pascazio, S. (2012) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4768712 · Cited by 11
Dynamics of entangled states in a correlated reservoir
Aloufi, K. S., Bougouffa, S. B., & Ficek, Z. (2015) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/7/074020 · Cited by 14
Steady-state preparation of long-lived nuclear spin singlet pairs at room temperature
Chen, Q., Schwarz, I., & Plenio, M. B. (2017) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.224105 · Cited by 11
Self-citationNonlocal Entanglement of 1D Thermal States Induced by Fermion Exchange Statistics
Park, Y., Shim, J., Lee, S. B., & Sim, H.-S. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.210501 · Cited by 11
Minimum resources for versatile continuous-variable entanglement in integrated nonlinear waveguides
Barral, D., Bencheikh, K., D’Auria, V., Tanzilli, S., Belabas, N., & Levenson, J. A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.023857 · Cited by 11
Engineering fidelity of the generalized Pauli channels via legitimate memory kernels
Siudzińska, K., & Chruściński, D. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.012303 · Cited by 11
Strict entanglement monotonicity under local operations and classical communication
Guo, Y. J. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.022338 · Cited by 10
Measure of qubit-environment entanglement for pure dephasing evolutions
Roszak, K. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043062 · Cited by 13
Optomechanical entanglement at room temperature: A simulation study with realistic conditions
Dixon, K., Cohen, L., Bhusal, N., Wipf, C. C., Dowling, J. P., & Corbitt, T. R. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.063518 · Cited by 11
Entanglement rate for Gaussian continuous variable beams
Deng, Z. J., Habraken, S., & Marquardt, F. (2016) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Plenio, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Plenio, M. B.
- ORCID
- Plenio, M. B.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-08-26
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 090503-090503
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1979369481
- Semantic Scholar
- 64435b0cfa00fafcfdca6d566eaca7dd6a824169
- Cited by
- 1,530
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 187 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- logarithmic negativity, entanglement monotones, non-convexity, positive partial transpose, local operations and classical communication, quantum entanglement, information loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
