The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex
Open accessAbstract
It is proven that logarithmic negativity does not increase on average under a general positive partial transpose preserving operation (a set of operations that incorporate local operations and classical communication as a subset) and, in the process, a further proof is provided that the negativity does not increase on average under the same set of operations. Given that the logarithmic negativity is not a convex function this result is surprising, as it is generally considered that convexity describes the local physical process of losing information. The role of convexity and, in particular, its relation (or lack thereof) to physical processes is discussed and importance of continuity in this context is stressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For the quantum discord, note that the state (140) belongs to the subclass known as 'X-states', for which the optimization problem in equation ( 152) can be efficiently solved [230,245].”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [245]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“D Q A [ρ SA (t)] = Q E (t,0) ,(158)”
From Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection (2014) · cites this paper as [245]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272
Separability Criterion for Density Matrices
Peres, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1413 · Cited by 5,191
Computable measure of entanglement
Vidal, G., & Werner, R. F. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032314 · Cited by 5,006
Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions
Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., & Horodecki, R. (1996) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2 · Cited by 3,649
Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations
Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., & Schumacher, B. W. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.53.2046 · Cited by 3,151
Bhatia, R. (1996) · Cited by 2,847
Bhatia, R. (1997) · Graduate texts in mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0653-8 · Cited by 2,334
(1996) · Cited by 2,280
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Controlling entanglement sudden death in cavity QED by classical driving fields
Zhang, J.-S., Xu, J., & Lin, Q. (2008) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2008-00264-2 · Cited by 27
Thermal entanglement of a two-qutrit XX spin chain with Dzialoshinski–Moriya interaction
MA, X. S. (2007) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2007.09.047 · Cited by 27
Wang, X., & Wilde, M. M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.032416 · Cited by 32
Journeys from quantum optics to quantum technology
Barnett, S., Beige, A., Ekert, A., Garraway, B., Keitel, C., Kendon, V, Lein, M., Milburn, G. J., Moya-Cessa, H., Murao, M., et al. (2017) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 26
Self-citationEntanglement Negativity in Flat Holography
Basu, D., Chandra, A., Parihar, H., & Sengupta, G. (2022) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.2.074 · Cited by 26
Entanglement Spheres and a UV-IR Connection in Effective Field Theories
Klco, N., & A, M. J. S. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.211602 · Cited by 30
Probing the entropic uncertainty bound and quantum correlations in a quantum dot system
Haseli, S., Haddadi, S., & Pourkarimi, M. R. (2021) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/abe236 · Cited by 26
Optomechanical entanglement under pulse drive
Lin, Q., & He, B. (2015) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.23.024497 · Cited by 26
Entanglement branes, modular flow, and extended topological quantum field theory
Donnelly, W., & Wong, G. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2019)016 · Cited by 38
Non-Maximal Tripartite Entanglement Degradation of Dirac and Scalar Fields in Non-Inertial Frames
Khan, S., Khan, N. A., & Khan, M. (2014) · Communications in Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1088/0253-6102/61/3/02 · Cited by 26
Resource theory of entanglement for bipartite quantum channelsPreprint
Bäuml, S., Das, S., Wang, X., & Wilde, M. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.19234.17603 · Cited by 48
Directional quantum-squeezing-enabled nonreciprocal enhancement of entanglement
Lu, T.-X., Li, B., Wang, Y., Wang, D., Xiao, X. M., & Jing, H. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.22.064001 · Cited by 25
Entanglement and classical fluctuations at finite-temperature critical points
Wald, S., Arias, R., & Alba, V. (2020) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab6b19 · Cited by 25
Bipartite entanglement of decohered mixed states generated from maximally entangled cluster states
Mansour, M., & Haddadi, S. (2021) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732321500103 · Cited by 25
Distinguishing between Quantum and Classical Markovian Dephasing Dissipation
Seif, A., Wang, Y.-X., & Clerk, A. A. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.070402 · Cited by 26
Quantum fluctuations and correlations in open quantum Dicke models
Boneberg, M., Lesanovsky, I., & Carollo, F. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012212 · Cited by 26
Tripartite entanglement measure under local operations and classical communication
Ge, X., Liu, L., & Cheng, S. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.032405 · Cited by 27
On Minimal Entanglement Wedge Cross Section for Holographic Entanglement Negativity
Basak, J. K., Malvimat, V., Parihar, H., Paul, B., & Sengupta, G. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10030125 · Cited by 37
Many-Body Physics from a Quantum Information Perspective
Augusiak, R., Cucchietti, F., & Lewenstein, M. (2012) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10449-7_6 · Cited by 26
Entanglement dynamics of two qubits coupled individually to Ohmic baths
Duan, L., Wang, H., Chen, Q.-H., & Zhao, Y. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4816122 · Cited by 25
Hybrid quantum repeater for qudits
Bergmann, M., & van Loock, P. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032349 · Cited by 25
Quantifying non-Gaussianity of quantum-state correlation
Park, J., Lee, J., Ji, S.-W., & Nha, H. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.052324 · Cited by 23
Large distance continuous variable communication with concatenated swaps
Asjad, M., Zippilli, S., Tombesi, P., & Vitali, D. (2015) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/7/074055 · Cited by 24
Room-temperature steady-state optomechanical entanglement on a chip
Zou, C., Zou, X., Sun, F., Han, Z., & Guo, G. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.84.032317 · Cited by 24
Das, T., Prabhu, R., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022319 · Cited by 24
The influence of spacetime curvature on quantum emission in optical analogues to gravity
Jacquet, M. J., & König, F. (2020) · SciPost Physics Core · doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.3.1.005 · Cited by 24
Entanglement transitions as a probe of quasiparticles and quantum thermalization
Lu, T.-C., & Grover, T. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.235110 · Cited by 23
Sbiri, A., Oumennana, M., & Mansour, M. (2022) · Modern Physics Letters B · doi:10.1142/s0217984921506181 · Cited by 24
On the entanglement between interacting scalar field theories
Mozaffar, M. R. M., & Mollabashi, A. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2016)015 · Cited by 22
Gaussification and Entanglement Distillation of Continuous-Variable Systems: A Unifying Picture
Campbell, E. T., & Eisert, J. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.020501 · Cited by 24
Hybrid Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in an atom-optomechanical system
Tan, H., & Sun, L. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.063812 · Cited by 24
Ma, S.-L., Li, X., Xie, J.-K., & Li, F. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.012325 · Cited by 24
Flag additivity in quantum resource theories
Liu, C. L., Yu, X., & Tong, D. M. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.042322 · Cited by 24
Simulation of n-qubit quantum systems. II. Separability and entanglement
Radtke, T., & Fritzsche, S. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.03.006 · Cited by 23
Pseudo-Entanglement Evaluated in Noninertial FramesPreprint
Mehri‐Dehnavi, H., Mirza, B., & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2016) · Cited by 29
Resonance-dominant optomechanical entanglement in open quantum systems
Shang, C., & Li, H. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.044048 · Cited by 27
Quantum nonlocal nonstabilizerness
Qian, D., & Wang, J. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.052443 · Cited by 26
Time evolution of entanglement negativity from black hole interiors
Malvimat, V., Mondal, S., & Sengupta, G. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2019)183 · Cited by 23
Enhanced optomechanical entanglement and cooling via dissipation engineering
Zhang, Y., Yang, C.-S., Shen, Z., Dong, C., Guo, G., Zou, C., & Zou, X. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.063836 · Cited by 23
Asymptotic State Transformations of Continuous Variable Resources
Ferrari, G. M., Lami, L., Theurer, T., & Plenio, M. B. (2022) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04523-6 · Cited by 31
Self-citationLocal quantum uncertainty versus negativity through Gisin states
Sbiri, A., Mansour, M., & Oulouda, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749921500234 · Cited by 23
Rényi entropy and negativity for massless Dirac fermions at conformal interfaces and junctions
Capizzi, L., Murciano, S., & Calabrese, P. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)171 · Cited by 24
Magnon-atom-optical photon entanglement via the microwave photon-mediated Raman interaction
Kong, D., Xu, J., Gong, C., Wang, F., & Hu, X. (2022) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.468400 · Cited by 22
Stationary quantum entanglement and steering between two distant macromagnets
Xie, J.-K., Yuan, H. Y., Ma, S.-L., Gao, S., Li, F., & Duine, R. A. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acd576 · Cited by 23
Yang, J., Zhao, C., Wang, D., Peng, R., & Zhou, L. (2024) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.044056 · Cited by 23
Gaidi, S., Slaoui, A., Mohamed, A. ‐. A., Falaki, M. E., & Laamara, R. A. (2024) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad848d · Cited by 23
Tripartite entanglement of fermionic system in accelerated frames
Khan, S. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.05.022 · Cited by 24
Optimal working points for continuous-variable quantum channels
Khan, I., Wittmann, C., Jain, N., Killoran, N., Lütkenhaus, N., Marquardt, C., & Leuchs, G. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.010302 · Cited by 23
Gour, G. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009560870.014 · Cited by 28
Effect of relativistic acceleration on continuous variable quantum teleportation and dense coding
Grochowski, P. T., Rajchel-Mieldzioć, G., Kiałka, F., & Dragan, A. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.105005 · Cited by 23
Macieszczak, K., Levi, E., Macrì, T., Lesanovsky, I., & Garrahan, J. P. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052354 · Cited by 24
Killing quantum entanglement by acceleration or a black hole
Dai, Y., Shen, Z., & Shi, Y. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)071 · Cited by 23
Evolutions of entanglement and complexity after a thermal quench in massive gravity theory
Zhou, Y., Ghodrati, M., Kuang, X., & Wu, J.-P. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.066003 · Cited by 22
Symplectic circuits, entanglement, and stimulated Hawking radiation in analogue gravity
Brady, A. J., Agulló, I., & Kranas, D. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.105021 · Cited by 26
Dahbi, Z., Oumennana, M., Anouz, K. E., Mansour, M., & Allati, A. E. (2023) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/s00340-022-07963-z · Cited by 22
Holographic study of reflected entropy in anisotropic theories
Vasli, M. J., Mozaffar, M. R. M., Velni, K. B., & Sahraei, M. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.026012 · Cited by 22
Entanglement from superradiance and rotating quantum fluids of light
Delhom, A., Guerrero, K., Cabrera, P. C., Falque, K., Bramati, A., Brady, A. J., Jacquet, M. J., & Agulló, I. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.105024 · Cited by 26
Entanglement dynamics of detectors in an Einstein cylinder
Lin, S.-Y., Chou, C.-H., & Hu, B. L. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2016)047 · Cited by 22
Entanglement of a quantum optical elliptic vortex
Bandyopadhyay, A., Prabhakar, S., & Singh, R. P. (2011) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.03.044 · Cited by 22
Entanglement generation via non-Gaussian transfer over atmospheric fading channels
Hosseinidehaj, N., & Malaney, R. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062336 · Cited by 22
Mirror-field entanglement in a microscopic model for quantum optomechanics
Sinha, K., Lin, S.-Y., & Hu, B. L. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.023852 · Cited by 24
Static and dynamical quantum correlations in phases of an alternating-field XY model
Chanda, T., Das, T., Sadhukhan, D., Pal, A. K., Sen, A., & Sen, U. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042310 · Cited by 23
Pure Gaussian states from quantum harmonic oscillator chains with a single local dissipative process
Ma, S., Woolley, M. J., Petersen, I. R., & Yamamoto, N. (2017) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa5fbe · Cited by 22
Probing spontaneous wave-function collapse with entangled levitating nanospheres
Zhang, J., Zhang, T., & Li, J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.012141 · Cited by 22
Yang, R.-G., Li, N., Zhang, J., Li, J., & Zhang, T.-C. (2017) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aa64c1 · Cited by 22
A formalism for steering with local quantum measurements
Sainz, A. B., Aolita, L., Piani, M., Hoban, M. J., & Skrzypczyk, P. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aad8df · Cited by 23
Entangling two distant non‐interacting microwave modes
Abdi, M., Tombesi, P., & Vitali, D. (2014) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201400100 · Cited by 22
How much quantum noise of amplifiers is detrimental to entanglement
Agarwal, G. S., & Chaturvedi, S. (2009) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2009.10.068 · Cited by 22
Gaussian discriminating strength
Rigovacca, L., Farace, A., Pasquale, A. D., & Giovannetti, V. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042331 · Cited by 21
Practical measurement-device-independent entanglement quantification
Rosset, D., Martin, A., Verbanis, E., Lim, C. C. W., & Thew, R. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052332 · Cited by 21
Alimuddin, M., Guha, T., & Parashar, P. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.012145 · Cited by 21
Rescaling multipartite entanglement measures for mixed states
Viehmann, O., Eltschka, C., & Siewert, J. (2012) · University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) · Cited by 21
Wen, Q., & Zhong, H. (2022) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.13.3.056 · Cited by 21
Collective quantum entanglement in molecular cavity optomechanics
Huang, J., Lei, D., Agarwal, G. S., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.184306 · Cited by 25
Entanglement of nanoelectromechanical oscillators by Cooper-pair tunneling
Walter, S., Budich, J. C., Eisert, J., & Trauzettel, B. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.035441 · Cited by 19
Tensor network models of multiboundary wormholes
Peach, A., & Ross, S. F. (2017) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa6b0f · Cited by 21
Retrieving the lost fermionic entanglement by partial measurement in noninertial frames
Xiao, X., Xie, Y.-M., Yao, Y., Li, Y.-L., & Wang, J. (2018) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.01.006 · Cited by 21
Khedif, Y., & Mohammed Daoud, A. (2021) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732321500747 · Cited by 21
Two-way and three-way negativities of three-qubit entangled states
Sharma, S. S., & Sharma, N. K. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.012326 · Cited by 21
The Separability versus Entanglement Problem
Das, S., Chanda, T., Lewenstein, M., Sanpera, A., De, A. S., & Sen, U. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527805785.ch8 · Cited by 27
Quantum entanglement maintained by virtual excitations in an ultrastrongly-coupled-oscillator system
Zhou, J.-Y., Zhou, Y.-H., Yin, X.-L., Huang, J.-F., & Liao, J.-Q. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68309-3 · Cited by 20
Driven quantum harmonic oscillators: A working medium for thermal machines
Leitch, H., Piccione, N., Bellomo, B., & Chiara, G. D. (2022) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0072067 · Cited by 20
Chirality-induced one-way quantum steering between two waveguide-mediated ferrimagnetic microspheres
Zhan, H., Sun, L., & Tan, H. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.104432 · Cited by 22
Nonlinear pumping induced multipartite entanglement in a hybrid magnon cavity QED system
Zhou, Y., Xie, S. Y., Zhu, C., & Yang, Y. (2022) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.224404 · Cited by 20
Quantum correlations and thermal coherence in a two-superconducting charge qubit system
Benzahra, M., Mansour, M., Oumennana, M., & Elghaayda, S. (2023) · Laser Physics · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/acd4ae · Cited by 20
Entangling a Magnon and an Atomic Ensemble Mediated by an Optical Cavity
Wu, Y., Liu, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, Z., & Wang, J. (2023) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.034043 · Cited by 20
Entangling excitons with microcavity photons
Zuo, X., Fan, Z., Qian, H., & Li, J. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023089 · Cited by 22
Nonclassicality of optomechanical devices in experimentally realistic operating regimes
Vacanti, G., Paternostro, M., Palma, G. M., Kim, M. S., & Vedral, V. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.013851 · Cited by 21
Quantum master equations for entangled qubit environments
Daryanoosh, S., Baragiola, B. Q., Guff, T., & Gilchrist, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062104 · Cited by 20
Entanglement and quantum teleportation via dissipative cavities
Allati, A. E., Amellal, H., METWALLY, N., & Aliloute, S. (2019) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.02.056 · Cited by 20
Quantifying coherence in terms of the pure-state coherence
Yu, D.-H., Zhang, L., & Yu, C. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062114 · Cited by 20
Javerzat, N., & Erik Tonni, C. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)086 · Cited by 20
Studies on the Role of Entanglement in Mixed-state Quantum ComputationPreprint
Datta, A. (2008) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0807.4490 · Cited by 47
Quantum correlations and energy currents across three dissipative oscillators
Valido, A. A., Ruiz, A., & Alonso, D. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.062123 · Cited by 18
Entanglement distance for arbitrary M -qudit hybrid systems
Cocchiarella, D., Scali, S., Ribisi, S., Nardi, B., Bel-Hadj-Aissa, G., & Franzosi, R. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.042129 · Cited by 19
Generating highly entangled states via discrete-time quantum walks with Parrondo sequences
Panda, D. K., Govind, B. V., & Benjamin, C. (2022) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.128256 · Cited by 20
Entanglement of Two Disjoint Intervals in Conformal Field Theory and the 2D Coulomb Gas on a Lattice
Грава, Т., Kels, A. P., & Erik Tonni, C. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.141605 · Cited by 19
Klco, N., howard, B. D., & A, M. J. S. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.012415 · Cited by 27
Entanglement entropies of an interval in the free Schrödinger field theory at finite density
Mintchev, M., Pontello, D., Sartori, A., & Erik Tonni, C. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)120 · Cited by 19
Khalil, E. M., & Abd‐Rabbou, M. Y. (2022) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169703 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Plenio, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Plenio, M. B.
- ORCID
- Plenio, M. B.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2005-08-26
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 090503-090503
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W1979369481
- Semantic Scholar
- 64435b0cfa00fafcfdca6d566eaca7dd6a824169
- Cited by
- 1,530
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 187 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 25.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- logarithmic negativity, entanglement monotones, non-convexity, positive partial transpose, local operations and classical communication, quantum entanglement, information loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
