Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Interference of Independent Photons

Kaltenbaek, Rainer, Blauensteiner, Bibiane, Żukowski, Marek, Aspelmeyer, Markus, Zeilinger, Anton·2006·Physical Review Letters

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.96.240502

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher Bell state discrimination success rates can be achieved with nonlinear optics, entanglement in auxiliary modes, or feed-forward techniques.

    “Higher success rates can be achieved with nonlinear optics [73], entanglement in auxiliary modes [74,75], or feed-forward techniques [76].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Abstract reports interference between photons from independent sources, and the experimental description reports interference visibility, not Bell-state discrimination success rates. Searches for nonlinear optics, auxiliary-mode entanglement, and feed-forward techniques found no passage in our copy linking them to higher discrimination success rates. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Universal quantum computation can be achieved with linear optics, post-selection, single photon sources and detectors, and feed-forward, as proposed by the KLM protocol.

    “Universal quantum computation can be achieved with linear optics, post-selection, single photon sources and detectors, and feed-forward, as was proposed by the KLM protocol [76].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

  • The KLM linear optical implementation of the CNOT quantum gate plays the key role for achieving quantum state joining.

    “The Knill-Laflamme-Milburn (KLM) linear optical implementation of the CNOT quantum gate, which will be discussed in detail in Sec.VI A, plays the key role for achieving quantum state joining.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

  • A CZ gate can be constructed using two 50:50 beam splitters and two nonlinear sign (NS) gates.

    “It was found that a CZ gate can be constructed using two 50:50 BS and two so-called nonlinear sign (NS) gates [76], see Fig. 5a).”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

  • The NS gate is probabilistic, with a success probability of p_NS = 1/4 for an arbitrary input state without feedforward.

    “This post-selection process renders the NS gate to be probabilistic, with a success probability of p NS = 1/4 for an arbitrary input state without feedforward.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. R. H. Dicke, 1964, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Quantum Electronics
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.28.929 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.209 · DOI · Paper page
  4. D. Bouwmeester, 2000, The Physics of Quantum Information, 10.1007/978-3-662-04209-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. M. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Theory
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110501 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/1781046a0 · DOI
  8. A. Javan, 1962, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 52, 96, 10.1364/JOSA.52.000096 · DOI
  9. G. Magyar, 1963, Nature (London), 198, 255, 10.1038/198255a0 · DOI
  10. P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics
  11. 10.1103/PhysRev.159.1084 · DOI
  12. W. Radloff, 1971, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 26, 178, 10.1002/andp.19714810210 · DOI
  13. J. G. Rarity, 1996, Quantum Interferometry
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1349 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00388-0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022301 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1364/OL.29.000629 · DOI
  18. 10.1364/OL.30.002161 · DOI
  19. M. Żukowski, 1995, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 755, 91, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38959.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1251 · DOI
  21. P. Horowitz, 1989, The Art of Electronics, 10.1119/1.16385 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kaltenbaek, R., Blauensteiner, B., Żukowski, M., Aspelmeyer, M., & Zeilinger, A.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2006-06-21
Volume
96
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
Cited by
192
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review