Cited by 238Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systems

Universal Resources for Measurement-Based Quantum Computation

Open access
Van den Nest, Maarten, Miyake, Akimasa, Dür, Wolfgang, Briegel, Hans J.·2006·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We investigate which entanglement resources allow universal measurement-based quantum computation via single-qubit operations. We find that any entanglement feature exhibited by the 2D cluster state must also be present in any other universal resource. We obtain a powerful criterion to assess the universality of graph states by introducing an entanglement measure which necessarily grows unboundedly with the system size for all universal resource states. Furthermore, we prove that graph states associated with 2D lattices such as the hexagonal and triangular lattice are universal, and obtain the first example of a universal nongraph state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.97.150504

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A universal measurement-based quantum computer is identified as a device which allows for universal state preparation by local operations only.

    “Thus, a universal measurement-based quantum computer is then identified as a device which allows for universal state preparation by local operations only 79,80 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Every universal resource must be maximally entangled with respect to all types of entanglement.

    “Using this intuition, it can be shown that every such universal resource must be maximally entangled with respect to all types of entanglement 79,80 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [80]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van den Nest, M., Miyake, A., Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J.
Affiliations
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2006-10-13
Volume
97
Issue
15
Pages
150504-150504
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2125945272
Cited by
238
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
FWCI
23.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
measurement-based quantum computation, universal quantum computation, entanglement resource, cluster states, graph states, entanglement measures, single-qubit operations, hexagonal lattice, triangular lattice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review