The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel Schemes for Measurement-Based Quantum Computation
Open accessAbstract
We establish a framework which allows one to construct novel schemes for measurement-based quantum computation. The technique develops tools from many-body physics-based on finitely correlated or projected entangled pair states-to go beyond the cluster-state based one-way computer. We identify resource states radically different from the cluster state, in that they exhibit nonvanishing correlations, can be prepared using nonmaximally entangling gates, or have very different local entanglement properties. In the computational models, randomness is compensated in a different manner. It is shown that there exist resource states which are locally arbitrarily close to a pure state. We comment on the possibility of tailoring computational models to specific physical systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The main conclusion of this investigation is that a number of extremal entanglement features (such as e.g. maximal localizable entanglement) exhibited by 2D-cluster states no longer have to be present in universal resources if only classical outputs are considered 19,85 .”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“in 19,85 it is shown how such universal resources for MQC-beyond the 2D-cluster states-can systematically be constructed.”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477
Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly Entangled Quantum Computations
Vidal, G. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 · Cited by 2,368
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655
Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromagnets
Affleck, I. K., Kennedy, T., Lieb, É. H., & Tasaki, H. (1988) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01218021 · Cited by 1,477
Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains
Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., & Werner, R. F. (1992) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099178 · Cited by 1,422
Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization.
Östlund, S., & Rommer, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.3537 · Cited by 1,077
Multiparty entanglement in graph states
Hein, M., Eisert, J., & Briegel, H. J. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062311 · Cited by 915
Self-citationEntanglement of Atoms via Cold Controlled Collisions
Jaksch, D., Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W., & Zoller, P. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1975 · Cited by 795
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Colloquium : Area laws for the entanglement entropy
Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 · Cited by 2,873
Self-citationMeasurement-based quantum computation
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R., & Van den Nest, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1157 · Cited by 1,090
Advances in quantum teleportation
Pirandola, S., Eisert, J., Weedbrook, C., Furusawa, A., & Braunstein, S. L. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 · Cited by 929
Self-citationMatrix product state representations
Pérez-Garcı́a, D., Verstraete, F., Wolf, M. M., & Cirac, J. I. (2007) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic7.5-6-1 · Cited by 1,022
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, D., & Eisert, J.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Eisert, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-05-31
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 220503-220503
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2013793864
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 28.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- measurement-based quantum computation, projected entangled pair states, resource states, cluster states, one-way quantum computation, local entanglement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
