The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel Schemes for Measurement-Based Quantum Computation
Open accessAbstract
We establish a framework which allows one to construct novel schemes for measurement-based quantum computation. The technique develops tools from many-body physics-based on finitely correlated or projected entangled pair states-to go beyond the cluster-state based one-way computer. We identify resource states radically different from the cluster state, in that they exhibit nonvanishing correlations, can be prepared using nonmaximally entangling gates, or have very different local entanglement properties. In the computational models, randomness is compensated in a different manner. It is shown that there exist resource states which are locally arbitrarily close to a pure state. We comment on the possibility of tailoring computational models to specific physical systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The main conclusion of this investigation is that a number of extremal entanglement features (such as e.g. maximal localizable entanglement) exhibited by 2D-cluster states no longer have to be present in universal resources if only classical outputs are considered 19,85 .”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“in 19,85 it is shown how such universal resources for MQC-beyond the 2D-cluster states-can systematically be constructed.”
From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477
Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly Entangled Quantum Computations
Vidal, G. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.147902 · Cited by 2,368
Persistent Entanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles
Briegel, H. J., & Raussendorf, R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.910 · Cited by 1,950
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655
Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromagnets
Affleck, I. K., Kennedy, T., Lieb, É. H., & Tasaki, H. (1988) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01218021 · Cited by 1,477
Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains
Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., & Werner, R. F. (1992) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099178 · Cited by 1,422
Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization.
Östlund, S., & Rommer, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.3537 · Cited by 1,077
Multiparty entanglement in graph states
Hein, M., Eisert, J., & Briegel, H. J. (2004) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.69.062311 · Cited by 915
Self-citationEntanglement of Atoms via Cold Controlled Collisions
Jaksch, D., Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W., & Zoller, P. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1975 · Cited by 795
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., & Horodecki, K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 · Cited by 10,118
Colloquium : Area laws for the entanglement entropy
Eisert, J., Cramer, M., & Plenio, M. B. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 · Cited by 2,873
Self-citationMeasurement-based quantum computation
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R., & Van den Nest, M. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1157 · Cited by 1,090
Advances in quantum teleportation
Pirandola, S., Eisert, J., Weedbrook, C., Furusawa, A., & Braunstein, S. L. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 · Cited by 929
Self-citationMatrix product state representations
Pérez-Garcı́a, D., Verstraete, F., Wolf, M. M., & Cirac, J. I. (2007) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic7.5-6-1 · Cited by 1,022
Quantum many‐body phenomena in coupled cavity arrays
Hartmann, M. J., Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Plenio, M. B. (2008) · Laser & Photonics Review · doi:10.1002/lpor.200810046 · Cited by 492
Positive Wigner Functions Render Classical Simulation of Quantum Computation Efficient
Mari, A., & Eisert, J. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.230503 · Cited by 457
Self-citationQuantum coherence and entanglement with ultracold atoms in optical lattices
Bloch, I. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07126 · Cited by 389
Quantum computing with continuous-variable clusters
Gu, M., Weedbrook, C., Menicucci, N. C., Ralph, T. C., & van Loock, P. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.79.062318 · Cited by 373
Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing
Rudolph, T. (2017) · APL Photonics · doi:10.1063/1.4976737 · Cited by 350
Interacting quantum observables : categorical algebra and diagrammatics
Coecke, B., & Duncan, R. (2008) · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · Cited by 345
PEPS as ground states: Degeneracy and topology
Schuch, N., Cirac, J. I., & Pérez-García, D. (2010) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.05.008 · Cited by 333
Most Quantum States Are Too Entangled To Be Useful As Computational Resources
Gross, D., Flammia, S. T., & Eisert, J. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.190501 · Cited by 279
Self-citationQuantum Many-Body Phenomena in Coupled Cavity Arrays
Hartmann, M., Brandão, F., & Plenio, M. B. (2008) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · Cited by 274
Simulating Large Quantum Circuits on a Small Quantum Computer
Peng, T., Harrow, A. W., Ozols, M., & Wu, X. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.150504 · Cited by 324
Progress in quantum teleportation
Hu, X., Guo, Y., Liu, B., Li, C., & Guo, G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00588-x · Cited by 293
Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model
Gross, D., Eisert, J., Schuch, N., & Perez-Garcia, D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.052315 · Cited by 236
Self-citationA short review on entanglement in quantum spin systems
Latorre, J. I., & Riera, A. (2009) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504002 · Cited by 235
Verifiable Measurement-Only Blind Quantum Computing with Stabilizer Testing
Hayashi, M., & Morimae, T. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.220502 · Cited by 186
Blind quantum computation protocol in which Alice only makes measurements
Morimae, T., & Fujii, K. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.050301 · Cited by 179
Computational Power of Correlations
Anders, J., & Browne, D. E. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.050502 · Cited by 192
Tensor Network Contractions: Methods and Applications to Quantum Many-Body Systems
Ran, S.-J., Tirrito, E., Peng, C., Chen, X., Tagliacozzo, L., Su, G., & Lewenstein, M. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34489-4 · Cited by 176
Wei, T.-C., Affleck, I. K., & Raussendorf, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.070501 · Cited by 175
Effective Spin Systems in Coupled Microcavities
Hartmann, M. J., Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Plenio, M. B. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.160501 · Cited by 166
Measurement-Based Quantum Computer in the Gapped Ground State of a Two-Body Hamiltonian
Brennen, G. K., & Miyake, A. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.010502 · Cited by 163
PEPS as ground states: Degeneracy and topology
Schuch, N., Pérez García, D., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 150
Indistinguishability of Elementary Systems as a Resource for Quantum Information Processing
Franco, R. L., & Compagno, G. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.240403 · Cited by 150
Encoding of matrix product states into quantum circuits of one- and two-qubit gates
Ran, S.-J. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.101.032310 · Cited by 171
Quantum Computation on the Edge of a Symmetry-Protected Topological Order
Miyake, A. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.040501 · Cited by 127
Identifying Phases of Quantum Many-Body Systems That Are Universal for Quantum Computation
Doherty, A. C., & Bartlett, S. D. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.020506 · Cited by 123
Percolation, Renormalization, and Quantum Computing with Nondeterministic Gates
Kieling, K., Rudolph, T., & Eisert, J. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.130501 · Cited by 121
Self-citationAre Random Pure States Useful for Quantum Computation?
Bremner, M. J., Mora, C. E., & Winter, A. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.190502 · Cited by 121
Quantum computational capability of a 2D valence bond solid phase
Miyake, A. (2011) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2011.03.006 · Cited by 108
Quantum network routing and local complementation
Hahn, F., Pappa, A., & Eisert, J. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0191-6 · Cited by 142
Self-citationArchitectures for Quantum Simulation Showing a Quantum Speedup
Bermejo-Vega, J., Hangleiter, D., Schwarz, M., Raussendorf, R., & Eisert, J. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021010 · Cited by 122
Self-citationFundamentals of universality in one-way quantum computation
Nest, M. V. D., Dür, W., Miyake, A., & Briegel, H. J. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/204 · Cited by 97
Limitations of quantum computing with Gaussian cluster states
Ohliger, M., Kieling, K., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.042336 · Cited by 97
Self-citationHierarchy of universal entanglement in 2D measurement-based quantum computation
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2016) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/npjqi.2016.36 · Cited by 88
Computationally Universal Phase of Quantum Matter
Raussendorf, R., Okay, C., Wang, D., Stephen, D. T., & Nautrup, H. P. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.090501 · Cited by 91
Computational Power of Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases
Stephen, D. T., Wang, D., Prakash, A., Wei, T.-C., & Raussendorf, R. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.010504 · Cited by 86
Developments in the Tensor Network — from Statistical Mechanics to Quantum Entanglement
Okunishi, K., Nishino, T., & Ueda, H. (2022) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.91.062001 · Cited by 94
Verification of Many-Qubit States
Takeuchi, Y., & Morimae, T. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021060 · Cited by 87
Quantum network routing and local complementation
Hahn, F., Pappa, A., & Eisert, J. (2019) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-25518 · Cited by 94
Self-citationSubsystem symmetries, quantum cellular automata, and computational phases of quantum matter
Stephen, D. T., Nautrup, H. P., Bermejo-Vega, J., Eisert, J., & Raussendorf, R. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-05-20-142 · Cited by 82
Self-citationScalable distributed gate-model quantum computers
Gyöngyösi, L., & Imre, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76728-5 · Cited by 86
Optical one-way quantum computing with a simulated valence-bond solid
Kaltenbaek, R., Lavoie, J., Zeng, B., Bartlett, S. D., & Resch, K. J. (2010) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1777 · Cited by 77
Gapped Two-Body Hamiltonian Whose Unique Ground State Is Universal for One-Way Quantum Computation
Chen, X., Zeng, B., Gu, Z., Yoshida, B., & Chuang, I. L. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.220501 · Cited by 77
Ancilla-driven universal quantum computation
Anders, J., Oi, D. K. L., Kashefi, E., Browne, D. E., & Andersson, E. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.020301 · Cited by 76
Universal quantum computation using fractal symmetry-protected cluster phases
Devakul, T., & Williamson, D. J. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022332 · Cited by 82
Ancilla-driven universal blind quantum computation
Sueki, T., Koshiba, T., & Morimae, T. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.87.060301 · Cited by 76
Subsystem symmetries, quantum cellular automata, and computational phases of quantum matter
Stephen, D., Nautrup, H., Bermejo-Vega, J., Eisert, J., & Raussendorf, R. (2019) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 75
Self-citationCharacterizing symmetries in a projected entangled pair state
Pérez-Garcı́a, D., Sanz, M., González-Guillén, C. E., Wolf, M. M., & Cirac, J. I. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025010 · Cited by 75
Skrøvseth, S. O., & Bartlett, S. D. (2009) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.80.022316 · Cited by 75
Universal quantum computer from a quantum magnet
Cai, J., Miyake, A., Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.052309 · Cited by 74
Smith, K. C., Crane, E., Wiebe, N., & Girvin, S. M. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020315 · Cited by 78
Measurement-based quantum computation with the toric code states
Bravyi, S., & Raussendorf, R. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.76.022304 · Cited by 69
Efficient Quantum Circuits for One-Way Quantum Computing
Tanamoto, T., Liu, Y.-X., Hu, X., & Nori, F. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.100501 · Cited by 67
Resource Quality of a Symmetry-Protected Topologically Ordered Phase for Quantum Computation
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.120506 · Cited by 66
Walter, M., Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527805785.ch14 · Cited by 82
Self-citationThe optical frequency comb as a one-way quantum computer
Flammia, S. T., Menicucci, N. C., & Pfister, O. (2009) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/42/11/114009 · Cited by 63
Resource-efficient verification of quantum computing using Serfling’s bound
Takeuchi, Y., Mantri, A., Morimae, T., Mizutani, A., & Fitzsimons, J. F. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0142-2 · Cited by 61
Quantum Computational Renormalization in the Haldane Phase
Bartlett, S. D., Brennen, G. K., Miyake, A., & Renes, J. M. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.110502 · Cited by 63
Verification of hypergraph states
Morimae, T., Takeuchi, Y., & Hayashi, M. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.062321 · Cited by 63
Symmetry protection of measurement-based quantum computation in ground states
Else, D. V., Bartlett, S. D., & Doherty, A. C. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113016 · Cited by 63
Phase transition of computational power in the resource states for one-way quantum computation
Browne, D. E., Elliott, M. B., Flammia, S. T., Merkel, S. T., Miyake, A., & Short, A. J. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023010 · Cited by 55
Quantum Computation by Local Measurement
Raussendorf, R., & Wei, T.-C. (2011) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125041 · Cited by 63
Contracting projected entangled pair states is average-case hard
Haferkamp, J., Hangleiter, D., Eisert, J., & Gluza, M. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.013010 · Cited by 62
Self-citationSymmetry-protected topological phases with uniform computational power in one dimension
Raussendorf, R., Wang, D., Prakash, A., Wei, T.-C., & Stephen, D. T. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012302 · Cited by 53
Constant-Depth Preparation of Matrix Product States with Adaptive Quantum Circuits
Smith, K. C., Khan, A., Clark, B. K., Girvin, S. M., & Wei, T.-C. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.030344 · Cited by 51
Wei, T.-C., Affleck, I. K., & Raussendorf, R. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032328 · Cited by 60
Gross, D., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.040303 · Cited by 51
Self-citationQuantum measurement occurrence is undecidable
Eisert, J., Müller, M. P., & Gogolin, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.260501 · Cited by 50
Self-citationComputational Depth Complexity of Measurement-Based Quantum Computation
Browne, D. E., Kashefi, E., & Perdrix, S. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18073-6_4 · Cited by 49
Port-based teleportation in arbitrary dimension
Studziński, M., Strelchuk, S., Mozrzymas, M., & Horodecki, M. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10051-4 · Cited by 62
Efficient generation of universal two-dimensional cluster states with hybrid systems
Lin, Q., & He, B. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.82.022331 · Cited by 48
Non-adaptive measurement-based quantum computation and multi-party Bell inequalities
Hoban, M. J., Campbell, E. T., Loukopoulos, K., & Browne, D. E. (2011) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/023014 · Cited by 56
Daniel, A. K., Alexander, R. N., & Miyake, A. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-02-10-228 · Cited by 46
Tensor Network Contractions for #SAT
Biamonte, J., Morton, J., & Turner, J. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-015-1276-z · Cited by 54
Graph states as ground states of many-body spin- 1∕2 Hamiltonians
den Nest, M. V., Luttmer, K., Dür, W., & Briegel, H. J. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.012301 · Cited by 44
Quantum teleportation with identical particles
Marzolino, U., & Buchleitner, A. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.032316 · Cited by 43
Contracting projected entangled pair states is average-case hard
Haferkamp, J., Hangleiter, D., Eisert, J., & Gluza, M. (2020) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-30079 · Cited by 44
Self-citationQuantum Computation in Correlation Space and Extremal Entanglement
Cai, J., Dür, W., den Nest, M. V., Miyake, A., & Briegel, H. J. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.050503 · Cited by 44
Gachechiladze, M., Gühne, O., & Miyake, A. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.052304 · Cited by 35
Spectral gaps of Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Hamiltonians using tensor network methods
García-Sáez, A., Murg, V., & Wei, T.-C. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.245118 · Cited by 40
Efficient measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable systems
Ohliger, M., & Eisert, J. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.85.062318 · Cited by 39
Self-citationDelocalized information in quantum networks
Miguel-Ramiro, J., & Dür, W. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab784d · Cited by 38
On photonic controlled phase gates
Kieling, K., O’Brien, J. L., & Eisert, J. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/013003 · Cited by 35
Self-citationFujihala, M., Sugimoto, T., Tohyama, T., Mitsuda, S., Mole, R. A., Yu, D., Yano, S.-I., Inagaki, Y., Morodomi, H., Kawae, T., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.077201 · Cited by 36
Nondestructive discrimination of a new family of highly entangled states in IBM quantum computer
Satyajit, S., Srinivasan, K., Behera, B. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2018) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-018-1976-9 · Cited by 39
Universal measurement-based quantum computation with spin-2 Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki states
Wei, T.-C., & Raussendorf, R. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.012310 · Cited by 38
Noninvertible Symmetry-Protected Topological Order in a Group-Based Cluster State
Fechisin, C., Tantivasadakarn, N., & Albert, V. V. (2025) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.011058 · Cited by 87
Symmetry-protected topologically ordered states for universal quantum computation
Nautrup, H. P., & Wei, T.-C. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.052309 · Cited by 39
Experimental Realization of a One-Way Quantum Computer Algorithm Solving Simon’s Problem
Tame, M., Bell, B. A., Franco, C. D., Wadsworth, W. J., & Rarity, J. G. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.200501 · Cited by 35
No-go theorem for one-way quantum computing on naturally occurring two-level systems
Chen, J., Chen, X., Duan, R., Ji, Z., & Zeng, B. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.050301 · Cited by 39
Qudit quantum computation on matrix product states with global symmetry
Wang, D., Stephen, D. T., & Raussendorf, R. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.032312 · Cited by 33
Vaucher, B., Nunnenkamp, A., & Jaksch, D. (2008) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/2/023005 · Cited by 32
From ground states to local Hamiltonians
Chen, J., Ji, Z., Zeng, B., & Zhou, D. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.022339 · Cited by 31
Generalized Ardehali-Bell inequalities for graph states
Gühne, O., & Cabello, A. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.032108 · Cited by 31
Stephen, D. T., Ho, W. W., Wei, T.-C., Raussendorf, R., & Verresen, R. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.250601 · Cited by 40
Latent Computational Complexity of Symmetry-Protected Topological Order with Fractional Symmetry
Miller, J., & Miyake, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.170503 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, D., & Eisert, J.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- ORCID
- Eisert, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2007-05-31
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 220503-220503
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2013793864
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 28.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- measurement-based quantum computation, projected entangled pair states, resource states, cluster states, one-way quantum computation, local entanglement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
