Cited by 135Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Universal Gate Operations on Nuclear Spin Qubits in an Optical Tweezer Array of Yb 171 Atoms

Open access
Ma, Shuo, Burgers, Alex P., Liu, Genyue, Wilson, Jack, Zhang, Bichen, Thompson, Jeff D.·2022·Physical Review X

Abstract

Neutral atom arrays are a rapidly developing platform for quantum science.Recently, alkaline earth atoms (AEAs) have attracted interest because their unique level structure provides several opportunities for improved performance.In this work, we present the first demonstration of a universal set of quantum gate operations on a nuclear spin qubit in an AEA, using 171 Yb.We implement narrow-line cooling and imaging using a newly discovered magic trapping wavelength at λ ¼ 486.78 nm.We also demonstrate nuclear spin initialization, readout, and single-qubit gates and observe long coherence times [T 1 ≈ 20 s and24ð5Þ s] and a single-qubit operation fidelity F 1Q ¼ 0.99959ð6Þ.We also demonstrate two-qubit entangling gates using the Rydberg blockade, as well as coherent control of these gate operations using light shifts on the Yb þ ion core transition at 369 nm.These results are a significant step toward highly coherent quantum gates in AEA tweezer arrays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevx.12.021028

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schemes for near-deterministic loading of optical tweezers have been realised in research labs, to overcome the stochastic nature of the trap loading and to finally supersede the rearrangement process.

    “schemes for neardeterministic loading of optical tweezers have been realised in research labs [72,73,76], to overcome the stochastic nature of the trap loading and to finally supersede the rearrangement process.”
  • Relatively long coherence times, especially for approaches using nuclear spin qubits such as Strontium or Ytterbium, compensate for the slower gate operations.

    “However, this is compensated by the relatively long coherence times, especially for approaches using nuclear spin qubits such as in Strontium or Ytterbium [72,73].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, S., Burgers, A. P., Liu, G., Wilson, J., Zhang, B., & Thompson, J. D.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
Physical Review X
Published
2022-05-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
ISSN
2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225299264
Cited by
135
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 11
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-18-10215)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-20-1-2426)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-20-10021)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
nuclear spin qubits, ytterbium-171, optical tweezers, neutral atom arrays, alkaline-earth atoms, universal quantum gate set, coherence time, Rydberg blockade, two-qubit entangling gates, light shift

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review