Cited by 39Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCoding theory and cryptographyQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphing Quantum Codes

Open access

Abstract

We introduce a morphing procedure that can be used to generate new quantum codes from existing quantum codes.In particular, we morph the 15-qubit Reed-Muller code to obtain a [[10,1,2]] code that is the smallest-known stabilizer code with a fault-tolerant logical T gate.In addition, we construct a family of hybrid color-toric codes by morphing the color code.Our code family inherits the fault-tolerant gates of the original color code, implemented via constant-depth local unitaries.As a special case of this construction, we obtain toric codes with fault-tolerant multiqubit control-Z gates.We also provide an efficient decoding algorithm for hybrid color-toric codes in two dimensions and numerically benchmark its performance for phase-flip noise.We expect that morphing may also be a useful technique for modifying other code families such as triorthogonal codes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/prxquantum.3.030319

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small 3D [[8,3,2]] codes encode three logicals per block, feature d = 2 (d = 4) in the Z basis (X basis), implying error-detection (error-correction) capabilities for Z (X) errors, and can realize a transversal CNOT between blocks.

    “We focus on small 3D [[8,3,2]] codes16,17,26,27 (Fig. 5a), which have various appealing features. They encode three logicals per block, feature d = 2 (d = 4) in the Z basis (X basis), implying error-detection (error-correction) capabilities for Z (X) errors and can realize a transversal CNOT between blocks.”

    From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Ball codes section identifies the 3D hyperoctahedron code as [[8,3,2]], and Additional information states that ball codes have Z-distance two. Our copy establishes only that their X-distance is at least two; it does not establish X-distance four or describe a transversal CNOT between [[8,3,2]] blocks. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1137/S0097539799359385 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.279.5349.342 · DOI · Paper page
  3. D. Gottesman, 2014, Quantum Inf. Comput., 14, 1338
  4. 10.22331/q-2019-03-05-128 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020341 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41567-020-0920-y · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41586-020-03079-6 · DOI
  8. 10.26421/QIC13.3-4-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.180501 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.160502 · DOI
  11. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/8/083026 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.012312 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013118 · DOI
  14. 10.1063/1.1499754 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.26421/QIC15.1-2-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1098/rspa.1996.0136 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.052329 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.060501 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.050504 · DOI
  20. 10.26421/QIC18.1-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/18.771249 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.080501 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090505 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.022328 · DOI
  25. 10.22331/q-2019-12-02-205 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.22331/q-2019-04-30-135 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.022316 · DOI
  28. 10.1088/1367-2630/17/8/083002 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.032330 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022312 · DOI
  31. 10.26421/QIC16.15-16 · DOI
  32. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/7/073048 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.012317 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s12532-009-0002-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013303 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41467-017-01418-2 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00019-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.190504 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.26421/QIC10.5-6-6 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032326 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.090501 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047201 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.054425 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.021129 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.230504 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.075103 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.070507 · DOI
  49. H. S. M. Coxeter, 1973, Regular Polytopes
  50. 10.1109/TIT.2016.2555700 · DOI
  51. 10.1088/2058-9565/aa7d3b · DOI
  52. J. E. Humphreys, 1990, Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, 10.1017/CBO9780511623646 · DOI
  53. M. Davis, 2008, The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups
  54. 10.1038/ncomms12302 · DOI
  55. 10.22331/q-2018-10-19-101 · DOI
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.030403 · DOI
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220405 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vasmer, M., & Kubica, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
PRX Quantum
Published
2022-08-08
Volume
3
Issue
3
ISSN
2691-3399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217663389
Cited by
39
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PRX Quantum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Government of Canada
  • Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum error-correcting codes, stabilizer codes, color codes, toric code, decoding algorithms, phase-flip noise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review