The DOI matches its Crossref record; 392 of the 392 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 207 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Quantum sensing
Open accessAbstract
Quantum technologies are increasingly driving the field of precision metrology. While current techniques for sensing and recording time rely on classical devices, quantum sensors exploit quantum systems to reach unprecedented levels of precision. The working part of the sensor contains one or a few qubits, and resources like quantum entanglement are chosen and tailored to maximize sensitivity. This review introduces quantum sensing from the perspective of working experimentalists, with specific sensor implementations, concepts and methods, and recent developments.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review introduces quantum sensing as the use of quantum systems, coherence, or entanglement to measure physical quantities, focusing on qubit-based sensors and practical protocols. It synthesizes definitions, experimental platforms, sensing sequences, sensitivity limits, noise spectroscopy, adaptive methods, and entanglement-enhanced approaches.
Key findings
- Quantum sensing is defined by three uses: a quantum object to measure a quantity, quantum coherence for measurement, and entanglement to improve sensitivity beyond classical limits; a useful quantum sensor needs discrete levels, initialization/readout, coherent manipulation, and coupling to a signal \(V(t)\).
- The basic protocol is initialization, interaction with the signal, readout, and estimation; Ramsey and Rabi measurements illustrate static and resonant detection, while slope detection operates at \(p_0=0.5\) and variance detection at \(p_0=0\) or \(1\). Sensitivity improves with larger coupling \(\gamma\) and longer decoherence/relaxation time \(T_\chi\), with optimum sensing time near \(t \approx T_\chi\).
- Reported sensitivities include atomic vapor magnetometers at \(100\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) approaching \(<10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), SQUIDs down to \(10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), trapped ions at \(4.6\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), NV ensembles currently limited to \(\sim 1\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), and superconducting qubit magnetic sensing at \(3.3\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) at 10 MHz.
- Advanced methods include multipulse AC sensing with CP/PDD sequences, noise spectroscopy via filter functions and relaxometry, adaptive phase estimation achieving dynamic range scaling \(DR \propto T\), and entangled GHZ/N00N/squeezed states that can reach Heisenberg-limited sensitivity but often lose their advantage due to increased decoherence.
Methods
- This is a review article, not a primary experimental or theoretical study; it synthesizes principles, methods, and concepts of quantum sensing from an experimentalist’s viewpoint.
- It surveys implementations including neutral atoms, trapped ions, Rydberg atoms, atomic clocks, solid-state spins, superconducting circuits, elementary particle qubits, single electron transistors, optomechanics, and photons.
- The main analysis uses Hamiltonian formalism, Ramsey/Rabi examples, filter functions, the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, and summary tables of sensor implementations and symbols.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: the review mostly considers qubits, does not cover implementations in specific detail, excludes atomic clocks and photon-based sensors, and treats theory only up to the point needed to introduce key concepts.
- Paper-stated: entanglement-enhanced sensing is limited because GHZ states suffer faster decoherence, and N00N states are fragile and have small dynamic range.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it reports no primary data, and its numerical sensitivities are drawn from cited prior work; many equations appear as “formula-not-decoded” in the supplied text, so exact expressions cannot be verified from this text alone.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 207 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“The focus on two-level systems (1) is not a severe restriction because many properties of more complex quantum systems can be modeled through a qubit sensor (Goldstein et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goldstein et al. , 2010
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Alkali atoms are suitable sensing qubits fulfilling the above definitions (Kitching et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kitching et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Trapped atoms have been employed to detect and image magnetic fields at the microscale, by replicating Larmor precession spectroscopy on a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate (Vengalattore et al. , 2007) and by direct driving of spin-flip transitions by microwave currents (Ockeloen et al. , 2013) or thermal radiofrequency noise in samples (Fortagh et al. , 2002; Jones et al. , 2003).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vengalattore et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Ockeloen et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Fortagh et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most advanced applications employ the quantized motional levels as sensing qubits for electric fields and forces.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Recently, Rydberg states have become accessible in atomic vapour cells (K¨ ubler et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kübler et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Electrical field noise is a severe source of decoherence for ion traps and superconducting quantum processors (Labaziewicz et al. , 2008) and a key limiting factor in ultrasensitive force microscopy (Kuehn et al. , 2006; Tao and Degen, 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuehn et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Tao and Degen, 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Section V, we will see that the sensitivity scales as”
- Also stated in: § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4 · plain
“where γ is the above transduction parameter and T χ is a decoherence or relaxation time that reflects the immunity of the quantum sensor against noise.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4 · plain
In the paper
“This is owing to the surprising fact that relaxation and coherence times of spins in atomic vapors can be pushed to the second to minute range (Balabas et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Balabas et al. , 2010
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their use in practical applications, however, has proven difficult.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the simplest implementation, a thermal vapor of atoms serves as a quantum sensor for magnetic fields (Budker and Romalis, 2007; Kominis et al. , 2003).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Budker and Romalis, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Kominis et al. , 2003
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 91
- Probably not a substantial claim. 101
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Freely falling atoms have enabled the development of atomic gravimeters (Kasevich and Chu, 1992; Peters et al. , 1999) and gyrometers (Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kasevich and Chu, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Peters et al. , 1999
- Not checked yetcites Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These long relaxation and coherence times are achieved by coating cell walls to preserve the atomic spin upon collisions, and by operating in the spin exchange relaxation-free ('SERF') regime of high atomic density and zero magnetic field.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The sensor has a predicted sensitivity of 500 nV / m / √ Hz or 1 yN / √ Hz for the force acting on the ion (Biercuk et al. , 2010; Maiwald et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Biercuk et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Maiwald et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reduced velocity spread of cold atoms enabled sensing with longer interrogation times using spatially confined atoms, freely falling along specific trajectories in vacuum or trapped.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity (Jensen et al. , 2016; Livanov et al. , 1978), which has found use in magnetoencephalography (Xia et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jensen et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Livanov et al. , 1978
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm 3 small volumes (Shah et al. , 2007) and have been used to demonstrate entanglement-enhanced sensing (Fernholz et al. , 2008; Wasilewski et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shah et al. , 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sensing with cold atoms has found application in solid state physics by elucidating current transport in microscopic conductors (Aigner et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aigner et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, operation of ion traps in close proximity to surfaces remains a major challenge.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Rydberg atoms - atoms in highly excited electronic states - are remarkable quantum sensors for electric fields for a similar reason as trapped ions: In a classical picture, the loosely confined electron in a highly excited orbit is easily displaced by electric fields. In a quantum picture, its motional states are coupled by strong electric dipole transitions and experience strong Stark shifts (Her”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al., 1986
- Not checked yetcites Osterwalder and Merkt, 1999
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In order to optimize the sensitivity, γ should be large (for example, by choice of an appropriate physical realization of the sensor) and the decoherence time T χ must be made as long as possible.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Practically all sensing demonstrations have focused on single ions, which, in terms of absolute sensitivity, cannot compete with ensemble sensors such as atomic vapors.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of the earliest quantum sensors have been based on ensembles of nuclear spins.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among all solid state spins, NV centers in diamond have received by far the most attention for sensing purposes.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the above protocol is generic and simple, it is sufficient to describe most sensing experiments.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Variance detection is especially important for detecting ac signals when their synchronization with the sensing protocol is not possible (Section VI.C.4), or when the signal represents a noise source (Section VII).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a technically less demanding application, NV centers in a magnetic field gradient have been employed as spectrum analyzer for high frequency microwave signals (Chipaux et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chipaux et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the most advanced implementation, nuclear spin precession is read out by an atomic magnetometer, which is equally used for compensation of the Zeeman shift (Kornack et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kornack et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, mechanical detection of single paramagnetic defects in silica (Rugar et al. , 2004) and real-time monitoring of few-spin fluctuations (Budakian et al. , 2005) have been demonstrated.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rugar et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Budakian et al., 2005
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a consequence, even the most advanced devices are currently limited to ∼ 1 pT / √ Hz (Wolf et al. , 2015) and operate several orders of magnitude above the theory limit.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wolf et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Optical readout was shown with single organic molecules (Wrachtrup et al. , 1993a,b), optically active quantum dots (Atature et al. , 2007; Kroutvar et al. , 2004; Vamivakas et al. , 2010), and defect centers in crystalline materials including diamond (Gruber et al. , 1997) and silicon carbide (Christle et al. , 2015; Widmann et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wrachtrup et al., 1993a,b
- Not checked yetcites Atature et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Gruber et al., 1997
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More recently, NMR sensor probes have been developed for in-situ and dynamical field mapping in clinical MRI systems (Zanche et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zanche et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Electrical readout has been demonstrated with phosphorus dopants in silicon (Morello et al. , 2010) and electrostatically-defined semiconductor quantum dots (Elzerman et al. , 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Morello et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Elzerman et al., 2004
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although these advantages are partially offset by a reduced coherence time ( T 2 < 1 ms at room temperature, as compared to T 2 > 1 s for vapor cells), the predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT / √ Hz / cm -3 / 2 ) (Taylor et al. , 2008) or gyroscopes (10 -5 rad / s / √ Hz / mm 3 / 2 ) (Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012; Ledbetter et al. , 2012) would be competitive with their”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taylor et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012
- Not checked yetcites Ledbetter et al., 2012
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most prominently, this line of research has enabled imaging of magnetic organelles in magnetotactic bacteria (Le Sage et al. , 2013) and microscopic magnetic inclusions in meteorites (Fu et al. , 2014), as well as contrast-agent-based magnetic resonance microscopy (Steinert et al. , 2013).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Le Sage et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Fu et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Steinert et al., 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, classical continuous-wave absorption and transmission spectroscopy can be considered as an averaged variety of this protocol.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also, the time evolution can be replaced by a spatial evolution to describe a classical interferometer.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Much excitement has recently been sparked by ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers (NV centers) - electronic spin defects in diamond that can be optically initialized and read out.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These experiments reached a sensitivity of 5 · 10 -7 rad / s / √ Hz, which is comparable to compact implementations of atomic interferometers and optical Sagnac interferometers.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kornack et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, efficient fluorescence detection of large NV ensembles is difficult, while absorptive and dispersive schemes are not easily implemented (Clevenson et al. , 2015; Jensen et al. , 2014; Le Sage et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clevenson et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Jensen et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Le Sage et al., 2012
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the sensitivity of these devices (10 pT / √ Hz) (Lenz, 1990) is inferior to their atomic counterparts, they have found broad use in geology, archaeology and space missions thanks to their simplicity and robustness.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lenz, 1990
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Noise spectroscopy relies on the systematic analysis of decoherence and relaxation under different control sequences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We notice that variance detection improves only ∝ T 1 / 4 with the integration time, while slope detection improves ∝ T 1 / 2 .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The decay time T χ , also known as the decoherence time or relaxation time depending on the noise process, is an important figure-of-merit of the qubit, as it sets the maximum possible evolution time t available for sensing.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Often, the multipulse sequence cannot be synchronized with the signal or the phase α cannot be controlled. Then, incoherent averaging leads to phase cancellation, 〈 φ 〉 = 0.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the underlying noise processes may be very complex, χ ( t ) can often be approximated by a simple power law,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For variance detection, where ideally p 0 = 0, the projection noise would in principle be arbitrarily low. In any realistic experiment, however, decoherence will shift the fringe minimum to a finite value of p (see below), where Eq. (25) holds up to a constant factor.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The readout is projective.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because continuous sampling no longer relies on quantum state lifetimes, the Fourier-limited resolution can be extended to arbitrary values and is only limited by total experiment duration T , and ultimately the control hardware.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout, classical readout noise is often the dominating source of error.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, variance detection profits more from a long coherence time T χ than slope detection (but is, in turn, more vulnerable to decoherence).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For large pulse numbers n , the sinc term becomes very peaked and the filter bandwidth ∆ f ≈ 1 / ( nτ ) = 1 /t (full width at half maximum) becomes very narrow.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the amplitude V pk is not fixed, but slowly fluctuating between different measurements, the variance 〈 φ 2 〉 must be integrated over the probability distribution of V pk .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A particularly important situation is a Gaussian amplitude fluctuation with an rms amplitude V rms . In this case, the resonant time response of the transition probability is”
- Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
“where I 0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The multipulse sequence is subdivided into two equal sensing periods of duration t a = t/ 2 that are separated by an incremented free evolution period t 1 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, good knowledge of the noise spectrum can help the adoption of suitable sensing protocols (like dynamical decoupling or quantum error correction schemes) to maximize the sensitivity of the quantum sensor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the pass-band frequency can be selected via the interpulse delay τ , while the filter width can be adjusted via the number of pulses n = t/τ (up to a maximum value of n ≈ T 2 /τ ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For white noise, the dephasing is Markovian and χ ( t ) = Γ t , where Γ is the decay rate. For Lorentzian noise centered at zero frequency the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) 3 . For a generic 1 /f -like decay, where the noise falls of ∝ ω a (with a around unity), the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) a +1 (Cywinski et al. , 2008; Medford et al. , 2012) with a logarithmic correct”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cywinski et al. , 2008
- Not checked yetcites Medford et al. , 2012
- Not checked yetcites Dial et al. , 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An imperfect initialization leads to a similar reduction in the observed probability δp obs as with decoherence,”
- Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
“Contrary to the case of decoherence, this reduction does not depend on the sensing time t .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the scaling of the QCRB with the number of copies, N -1 / 2 , is a consequence of the additivity of the quantum Fisher information for tensor states ρ ⊗ N . This is the well-known standard quantum limit (SQL).”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the number of measurements N is equal to T/ ( t + t m ), where T is the total available measurement time and t m is the extra time needed to initialize, manipulate and readout the sensor.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
“where χ ( t ) is the associated decay function or decoherence function that was already discussed in the context of sensitivity (Section V).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
In the paper
“where C = 1 / √ 1 + R 2 ≈ 1 / √ 1 + 4 κ is an overall readout efficiency parameter (Taylor et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taylor et al., 2008
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resonance order k can also be used to select the pass-band frequency, however, because k = 1 provides the strongest peak transmission, most reported experiments used this resonance.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A suitable basis are Walsh dynamical decoupling sequences (Hayes et al. , 2011), which apply a π pulse every time the corresponding Walsh function (Walsh, 1923) flips its sign.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites Walsh, 1923
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Noise spectroscopy is an important tool in quantum sensing, as it can provide much insight into both external signals and the intrinsic noise of the quantum sensor.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This defines for any multipulse sequence a weighting function W ( f ac , α ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To go beyond the SQL, one then needs to use entangled states (see Section IX) in particular, simply using correlated POVMs is not sufficient.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kotler et al. , 2011, have shown that both quadratures of a signal can be recovered, allowing one to perform lock-in detection of the signal.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kotler et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum sensing, most frequency estimation schemes are based on dynamical decoupling sequences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C ≤ 1 describes the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to an ideal readout ( C = 1), see Fig. 4.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The resolution can be further enhanced by long-lived auxiliary memory qubits (see Section X) and resolution improvements by two-to-three orders of magnitude over dynamical decoupling spectroscopy have been demonstrated (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pfender et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and the peak transmission at f ac = k/ 2 τ is W 2 = 2 / ( kπ ) 2 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, if C is independent of t m - for example, because the sensor is operated in the single-shot regime or because readout resets the sensor t m should be made as short as possible.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quite generally, χ ( t ) can be identified with an rms phase accumulated during time t ,”
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
“according to the expression for variance detection, Eq. (20).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To further specify the SNR, the change in probability δp can be related to the change in signal δV as δp = δV q | ∂ q V p ( t ) | ∝ ( γtδV ) q , with q = 1 for slope detection and q = 2 for variance detection (see Fig. 3).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“where V rms = V pk / √ 2 is the rms amplitude of the signal and W 2 ( f ac ) is the average over α = 0 . . . 2 π of the weighting functions,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Relaxation can also be analyzed in the presence of a resonant drive field. This method is known as 'spin locking' in magnetic resonance (Slichter, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Slichter, 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All three protocols can be considered variations of the phase estimation scheme depicted in Fig. 12(a).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral (Biercuk et al. , 2011; de Sousa, 2009)”
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
“where G V ( t ) is the autocorrelation function of V ( t ) (Eq. 81).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Biercuk et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites de Sousa, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dynamic range is then given by the maximum allowed signal divided by the minimum detectable signal,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The scheme was originally put forward by Shor, 1994, in the seminal proposal of a quantum algorithm for prime factorization and has been interpreted by Kitaev, 1995, as a phase estimation algorithm.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shor, 1994 source
- Not checked yetcites Kitaev, 1995
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is possible because the controlledU gate does not change the eigenvector ψ , so that it can be re-used as often as required.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the frequency domain the decay function can be expressed as”
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
“where | Y ( ω ) | 2 is the so-called fi lter function of y ( t ), defined by the finite-time Fourier transform”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since S V ( ω ) is often dominated by low-frequency noise, S V || (0) is typically much larger than S V ⊥ ( ω 0 ) and the high-frequency contribution can often be neglected.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The joint probability distribution of all measurements is obtained from the product”
- Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
“from which the most likely value of φ is picked as the final result (Nusran et al. , 2012; Waldherr et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nusran et al., 2012
- Not checked yetcites Waldherr et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scaling is sometimes referred to as another instance of the Heisenberg limit, because it can be regarded as a 1 /T scaling of sensitivity at a fixed V max .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While quantum phase estimation based on the QFT can be performed with polynomial time effort, the algorithm requires two-qubit gates, which are difficult to implement experimentally, and the creation of fragile entangled states.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The aim of relaxometry is to connect the spectral density S V ( ω ) of a noise signal V ( t ) to the relaxation rate Γ in first-order kinetics, χ ( t ) = Γ t .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“T ∗ 2 relaxometry probes the transition rate between the superposition states |±〉 = ( | 0 〉 ± e -iω 0 t | 1 〉 ) / √ 2. This corresponds to the free induction decay observed in a Ramsey experiment”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the presence of the resonant field the degeneracy between |±〉 is lifted and the states are separated by the energy ℏ ω 1 , where ω 1 ≪ ω 0 is the Rabi frequency of the drive field.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the filter function is dominated by the first harmonic ( k = 1) the frequency corresponding to a certain τ is 1 / (2 τ ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The QFT is thus replaced by measurement and classical feedback, which can be performed using a single qubit sensor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This problem can be generalized to estimating the phase shift φ imparted by passage through an interferometer or exposure to an external field.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the algorithm scales linearly with the number of applications of ˆ U which in turn is proportional to the total measurement time T .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because T 1 can be very long, very high sensitivities are in principle possible, assuming that the resonance is not skewed by low-frequency noise.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key idea of adaptive phase estimation is to first measure the least significant bit of φ , represented by the lowest qubit in Fig. 12(b). In the measurement of the next significant bit, this value is subtracted from the applied phase.”
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
“This procedure is then repeated in ascending order of the bits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensitivity of the measurement, on the other hand, is proportional to the slope of the Ramsey fringe and reaches its optimum when t ≈ T ∗ 2 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, since dressed state relaxometry does not require sweeping a static control field for adjusting the probe frequency, it is more versatile than standard T 1 relaxometry.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The implementation by Bonato, C. et al. , 2016, for example, scaled the number of resources N m linearly according to”
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
“with typical values of G = 5 and F = 2.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bonato, C. et al., 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The maximum allowed signal is then set by the shortest sensing time, V max = π/ ( γt 0 ), while the smallest detectable signal is determined by the longest sensing time, V min ≈ 2 / ( γC √ t M T ).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because a phase flip does not require energy, the spectral density is probed at zero frequency.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For a very large detuning the effective frequency becomes similar to the detuning ω eff ≈ ∆ ω , and the drive field only enters as a scaling factor for the spectral density.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because T ∝ t M due to the exponentially growing interrogation times, the dynamic range of the improved protocol scales as”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The QFT recovers the phase φ from the Fourier series (109) and places the register in state”
- Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
“A measurement of the register directly yields a digital representation of the phase φ .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum sensing, phase tagging by back-action is replaced by the exposure of each qubit to an external field for a time 2 m t 0 (or passage through an interferometer of length 2 m l 0 ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Quantum phase estimation is the core component of Shor's algorithm, where it is used to compute discrete logarithms with polynomial time effort (Shor, 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shor, 1994 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For large cycle numbers, Y n c ,τ c ( ω ) presents sharp peaks at multiples of the inverse cycle time τ -1 c , and it can be approximated by a series of δ functions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although other scheduling is possible, this choice allows for an intuitive interpretation: subsequent measurements estimate subsequent digits of a binary expansion of the signal.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the filter function plays the role of a transfer function, and the decay of coherence is captured by the overlap with the noise spectrum S V ( ω ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scaling is obvious from an order-of-magnitude estimate: adding an additional measurement step increases both precision and measurement duration t by a factor of two, such that precision scales linearly with total acquisition time T .”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In practical implementations (Higgins et al. , 2007), the measurement of each digit is repeated multiple times or performed on multiple parallel qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Higgins et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adaptive estimation is technically more demanding since real-time feedback is involved, which often requires dedicated hardware (such as field-programmable gate arrays or a central processing unit) for the fast decision making.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They have been used not only for sensing but also for enhanced lithography (Boto et al. , 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boto et al., 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The proposals of Shor (Shor, 1994), Kitaev (Kitaev, 1995) and Griffiths (Griffiths and Niu, 1996) were followed by a decade where research towards Heisenberglimited measurements has focused mostly on the use of entangled states, such as the N00N state (see Section IX).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shor, 1994 source
- Not checked yetcites Kitaev, 1995
- Not checked yetcites Griffiths and Niu, 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, the interrogation time also needs to be reduced by a factor M and no net advantage in sensitivity can be obtained.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One of the most impressive application of squeezed states of light (Ligo Collaboration', 2011; Schnabel et al. , 2010; Walls, 1983) has been the sensitivity enhancement of the LIGO gravitational wave detector (Collaboration, 2013), obtained by injecting vacuum squeezed states in the interferometer.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ligo Collaboration', 2011
- Not checked yetcites Schnabel et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Walls, 1983
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of the above variants of phase estimation achieve a DR ∝ T scaling of the dynamic range.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Shortly after, both variants have been translated into protocols for spin-based quantum sensing (Said et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Said et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, squeezed states (Caves, 1981; Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993; Wineland et al. , 1992) have been proposed early on to achieve the Heisenberg limit and thanks to experimental advances have recently shown exceptional sensitivity (Hosten et al. , 2016a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Caves, 1981
- Not checked yetcites Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993
- Not checked yetcites Wineland et al., 1992
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similar to GHZ states, N00N states have been conceived to improve interferometry (Lee et al. , 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Optimal densities have been calculated both for atomic vapor magnetometers (Budker and Romalis, 2007) and ensembles of NV centers (Taylor et al. , 2008; Wolf et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Budker and Romalis, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Taylor et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Wolf et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This allows using an M -times shorter interrogation time or achieving an improvement of the sensitivity (calculated from the QCRB) by a factor √ M .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, too, acquisition time scales with the significance of the bit measured to achieve the Heisenberg limit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The standard quantum limit can be overcome by using quantum-enhanced sensing strategies to reach a more fundamental limit where the uncertainty σ p (Eq. ( 25)) scales as 1 /M .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensitivity is then expressed per unit volume ( ∝ meters -3 / 2 ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Still, 'N00N' states are very fragile (Bohmann et al. , 2015) and they are afflicted by a small dynamic range.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bohmann et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Experimentally, Bayesian estimation is usually simple to implement because no real-time feedback is needed and the phase estimation can be performed a posteriori .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Squeezed states are promising for quantum-limited sensing as they can reach sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, the √ M advantage in sensitivity is usually compensated by the GHZ state's increased decoherence rate (Huelga et al. , 1997), which is an issue common to most entangled states.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huelga et al., 1997
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The experiment has subsequently been extended to a nonadaptive version (Higgins et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Higgins et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Weak measurements have been more generally proposed to enhance sensing protocols (), but their ultimate usefulness is still under debate ().”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using an M -particle interferometer, one can prepare an entangled Fock state,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Entanglement-enhanced sensing has been pioneered with atomic systems, especially atomic clocks (Giovannetti et al. , 2004; Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giovannetti et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Leibfried et al., 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As a final remark, we note that a similar performance - 1 /T scaling and an increased dynamic range - may be achieved by weak measurement protocols, which continuously track the evolution of the phase over the sensing sequence (Kohlhaas et al. , 2015; Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohlhaas et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Achieving the Heisenberg limit requires reducing the variance of a chosen quantum observable at the expenses of the uncertainty of a conjugated observable.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This limit is also known as the Heisenberg limit .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To understand the benefits that an entangled state can bring to quantum sensing, the simplest example is given by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Squeezed states of light have been introduced by Caves, 1981, as a mean to reduce noise in interferometry experiments.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Caves, 1981
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They differ, however, by a constant offset.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensing scheme is similar to a Ramsey protocol, however, if M qubit probes are available, the preparation and readout pulses are replaced by entangling operations (Fig. 13).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This has led to the quest for different entangled states that could be more resilient to decoherence.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They were first introduced by Yurke, 1986, in the context of neutron Mach-Zender interferometry as the fermionic 'response' to the squeezed states proposed by Caves, 1981, for Heisenberg metrology.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yurke, 1986
- Not checked yetcites Caves, 1981
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In parallel, state squeezing is routinely applied in optical systems, such as optical interferometers (Ligo Collaboration', 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ligo Collaboration', 2011
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quantum phase estimation by the QFT, finally, requires many entangled qubits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Apart from an obvious gain in readout sensitivity, multiple qubits allow for the implementation of second-generation quantum techniques, including entanglement and state squeezing, which provide a true 'quantum' advantage that cannot be realized with classical sensors.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Comparing this result with what obtained in Sec. IV.C, we see that the oscillation frequency of the signal is enhanced by a factor M by preparing a GHZ state, while the shot noise is unchanged, since we still measure only one qubit.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While this is difficult to obtain for large qubit numbers, recent advances show great promise (Hume et al. , 2013; Zhang et al. , 2012) (see also next section on alternative detection methods).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hume et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, imperfections in this measurement limits the sensitivity, since achieving the Heisenberg limit requires single-particle state detection.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Spin squeezing can be also implemented in qubit systems (Auccaise et al. , 2015; Bennett et al. , 2013; Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009; Sinha et al. , 2003) following the original proposal by Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Auccaise et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Bennett et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to dynamical decoupling schemes, qubit protection covers the entire noise spectrum and is not limited to low-frequency noise.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since QEC works independently of noise frequency, distinct operators for the signal and noise interactions are required.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In this scheme, which has recently been implemented with NV centers (Unden et al. , 2016), the qubit sensor detects a signal along one axis ( e.g. , a phase) while being protected against noise along a different axis ( e.g. , against bit flip).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Unden et al. , 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The metrology squeezing parameter, proposed by Wineland et al. , 1992, is then”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wineland et al., 1992
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the code | 0 〉 L = | 000 〉 and | 1 〉 L = | 111 〉 can correct against a single qubit flip error.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, from the commutation relationship for the collective angular momentum, ∆ J α ∆ J β ≥ |〈 J γ 〉| , one can naturally define a squeezing parameter”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Retrieval uses the same two c-NOT gates in reverse order.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, during the free evolution (step 3) an enhanced phase can be acquired, similar to what happens for entangled states.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most common sensing protocols with squeezed states forgo step 4, and directly measure the population difference between the state | 0 〉 and | 1 〉 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To quantify the advantage of squeezed states in sensing, it is advantageous to directly relate squeezing to the improved sensitivity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Early demonstrations of spin squeezing were obtained by entangling trapped ions via their shared motional modes (Meyer et al. , 2001), using repulsive interactions in a Bose-Einstein condensate (Esteve et al. , 2008), or partial projection by measurement (Appel et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Meyer et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Esteve et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Appel et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The degree of spin squeezing can be measured by several parameters.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A first example includes correlation spectroscopy, where two sensing periods are interrupted by a waiting time t 1 (Laraoui and Meriles, 2013; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Laraoui and Meriles, 2013
- Not checked yetcites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A different strategy is to follow more closely the sensing protocol for entangled states, and refocus the squeezing (reintroducing step 4) before readout (Davis et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davis et al., 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These recent results hint at the potential of QEC for sensing which has just about begun to being explored.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Squeezed states are then characterized by a reduced uncertainty in one observable at the expense of another observable.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For the example of an electron-nuclear qubit pair, c-NOT gates have been implemented both by selective pulses (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016) and using coherent rotations (Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pfender et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, quantum error correction suppresses noise according to spatial symmetry, and not according to frequency.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The simplest code is the 3-qubit repetition code, which corrects against one-axis noise with depth one (that is, it can correct up to one error acting on one qubit).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the description of squeezed states is simplified by the use of a single collective angular-momentum variable.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both cases, coupling of the quantum system to the detection apparatus is inefficient, often because strong coupling would destroy the very quantum state used in the metrology task.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this context, a simple quantum sensing scheme, following the procedure in Sec. IV.C, could be constructed by replacing step 2 with the preparation of a squeezed state, so that | ψ 0 〉 is a squeezed state.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Metrology schemes often require single qubit readout or the measurement of complex, many-body observables.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While for typical states the uncertainty in the two observables is on the same order, it is possible to redistribute the fluctuations in the two conjugate observables.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, quantum sensing has the potential to fundamentally transform our measurement capabilities, enabling higher sensitivity and precision, new measurement types, and covering atomic up to macroscopic length scales.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
- Rests on an assumption: Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
- Rests on an assumption: NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, these allow operation of the sensor over a wide signal frequency range, can be adjusted to maximize sensitivity and dynamic range, and allow discrimination of different types of signals by symmetry or vector orientation.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A better understanding of decoherence in a particular implementation of a quantum system can help the adoption of strategies to protect the qubit, and guide the engineering and materials development.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vice versa, quantum sensing has become an important resource for quantum technologies as it provides much insight into the 'environment' of qubits, especially through decoherence spectroscopy.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While many experiments so far made use of single qubit sensors, strategies to implement entangled multi-qubit sensors with enhanced capabilities and higher sensitivity are just beginning to be explored.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The border region between quantum sensing and quantum simulation, in addition, is becoming a fertile playground for emulating and detecting many-body physics phenomena.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Over the last decade, and especially in the last few years, a comprehensive toolset has been established that can be applied to any type of quantum sensor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.
“More recently, quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within the area of quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications.
“However, since quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications, we will mostly focus on these definitions and discuss them extensively in this review.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In most situations the coupling between a quantum sensor and an external parameter is either linear or quadratic.
“In most situations the coupling is either linear ( q = 1) or quadratic ( q = 2).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Charged systems, like trapped ions, are sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems mainly respond to magnetic fields.
“Charged systems, like trapped ions, will be sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems will mainly respond to magnetic fields.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian H = H0 + HV(t) + Hcontrol(t).
“For the following discussion, we will assume that the quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian”
The authors state this as an assumption.
H0 is known and Hcontrol(t) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.
“We will assume that ˆ H 0 is known and that ˆ H control ( t ) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The signal is weak.
“When the signal is weak (which is assumed here) ˆ H V ( t ) adds a small perturbation to ˆ H 0 .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The initialization basis {|0〉,|1〉} and the readout basis {|0'〉,|1'〉} are the same and U_b = U_a†.
“For simplicity we assume that the initialization basis {| 0 〉 , | 1 〉} and the readout basis {| 0 ′ 〉 , | 1 ′ 〉} are the same and that ˆ U b = ˆ U † a , but this is not required.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The readout is projective.
“We assume that the readout is projective, although more general positive-operator-valuedmeasure (POVM) measurements may be possible (Nielsen and Chuang, 2000).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
β = 1.
“Since β is a constant of time, we will assume β = 1 in the following for reasons of simplicity.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones in Section VI.
“In this Section VI, we will assume that the signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones and our goal will be to determine the signal's amplitude, frequency, phase or overall waveform.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t.
“To illustrate this, we assume that the AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t_s for the Allan variance.
“Assuming that the sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t s yielding the signal x j = x ( t j ) = x ( jt s ), the Allan variance is defined as”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
“Assuming that the estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased, ∆ V N obeys the so-called Cram´ er-Rao bound”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A projective measurement in the σ_x basis is performed for the Fisher information.
“If we assume to perform a projective measurement in the σ x basis, {|±〉} = { 1 √ 2 ( | 0 〉±| 1 〉 ), giving the outcome probabilities p ( x ± | V ) = 〈±| ρ ( V ) |±〉 , the Fisher information is”
The authors state this as an assumption.
t_m ≪ t for the exact optimum solution in slope detection.
“Assuming t m ≪ t , we can find an exact optimum solution with respect to t .”
The paper relies on this without support.
Signals are static and deterministic in the earlier sections.
“So far we have implicitly assumed that signals are static and deterministic.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The stochastic signal V(t) is Gaussian.
“For the following analysis we will assume that the stochastic signal V ( t ) is Gaussian.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The autocorrelation function of V(t) decays on a time scale t_c shorter than the sensing time t, such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.
“decays on a time scale t c that is shorter than the sensing time t , such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
“Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
“Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise process is approximately Markovian.
“The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.
“The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate.
“Since the noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate, the correction steps can be performed at a much slower rate compared to dynamical decoupling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
“In fact, quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use, and have installed themselves as the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
“Likewise, atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
“Notably, NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These include quantum sensors which can detect and measure physical phenomena at the quantum level and quantum communication systems which can securely transmit information over long distances [37].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Quantum sensors can detect and sense phenomena at unprecedented sensitivity levels, opening up new possibilities for surveillance and security (Degen et al., 2017).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quantum sensors operate by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to improve their sensitivity and accuracy (Dowling, 2003; Degen et al., 2017; Jaeger, 2018).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“More generally, quantum technologies, such as quantum sensing, [243] might enhance the quality of imaging data of biomolecular structures (see e. g.Ref. [244]) and, therefore, improve the quality of the data on which further classical or quantum computations would be based.”
From Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology** (2023) · cites this paper as [243]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Continuous sampling cites the wrong figure panel
MinorThe text points to Fig. 8(b) for continuous sampling, but the caption labels panel (b) as the correlation sequence and panel (c) as continuous sampling.
“A second approach is the continuous sampling of a signal, illustrated in Fig. 8(b).”
“(b) Correlation sequence. Two multipulse sequences are interrupted by an incremented delay time t 1 . Because the multipulse sequences are phase sensitive, the total phase accumulated after the second multipulse sequence oscillates with f ac t 1 . The maximum t 1 is limited by the relaxation time T 1 , rather than the typically short decoherence time T 2 . (c) Continouous sampling.”
Single-ion clock record conflicts with listed uncertainties
MinorThe passage says single-ion clocks hold the accuracy record, but its listed uncertainty for the strontium ensemble clock is smaller than that for the single-ion ytterbium clock. On the passage's own comparison, the ensemble clock is more accurate.
“Single-ion atomic clocks currently detain the record for the most accurate optical clocks”
“with uncertainties of 2 . 1 × 10 18 for a 87 Sr ensemble clock (Nicholson et al. , 2015) and 3 . 2 × 10 18 for a single a single trapped 171 Yb (Huntemann et al. , 2016).”
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism
Abragam, A., & Hebel, L. C. (1961) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1937646 · Cited by 15,999
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K., & Tao, T. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20124 · Cited by 7,036
Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments
Carr, H. Y., & Purcell, E. M. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.94.630 · Cited by 6,445
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J., & Marquardt, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 · Cited by 5,501
Hahn, E. L. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.80.580 · Cited by 5,089
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Livanov, M., 1978, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 238, 253
- van der Sar, T., 2015, Nat. Commun., 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,007
Semiconductor Quantum Dots for Integrated Quantum Photonics
Hepp, S., Jetter, M., Portalupi, S. L., & Michler, P. (2019) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.201900020 · Cited by 92
Colloquium : Cavity-enhanced quantum network nodes
Reiserer, A. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.041003 · Cited by 100
Extending the coherence of spin defects in hBN enables advanced qubit control and quantum sensing
Rizzato, R., Schalk, M., Mohr, S., Hermann, J. C., Leibold, J. P., Bruckmaier, F., Salvitti, G., Qian, C., Ji, P., Astakhov, G. V., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40473-w · Cited by 88
Quantum-enhanced sensing on optical transitions through finite-range interactions
Franke, J., Muleady, S. R., Kaubruegger, R., Kranzl, F., Blatt, R., Rey, A. M., Joshi, M. K., & Roos, C. F. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06472-z · Cited by 97
Advances in Silicon Quantum Photonics
Adcock, J. C., Bao, J., Chi, Y., Chen, X., Bacco, D., Gong, Q., Oxenløwe, L. K., Wang, J., & Ding, Y. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2020.3025737 · Cited by 93
AI-Driven Inverse Design of Materials: Past, Present, and Future
Han, X., Wang, X.-D., 徐, M.-Y. 孟. X., Zhen, F., 姚, B.-W. 博. Y., Guo, P.-J., Gao, Z.-F., & Lu, Z.-Y. (2025) · Chinese Physics Letters · doi:10.1088/0256-307x/42/2/027403 · Cited by 95
Optimal measurements for quantum multiparameter estimation with general states
Yang, J., Pang, S., Zhou, Y., & Jordan, A. N. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.032104 · Cited by 86
Niethammer, M., Widmann, M., Rendler, T., Morioka, N., Chen, Y.-C., Stöhr, R., Hassan, J. U., Onoda, S., Ohshima, T., Lee, S.-Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13545-z · Cited by 86
Accurate Lindblad-form master equation for weakly damped quantum systems across all regimes
McCauley, G. P., Cruikshank, B., Bondar, D. I., & Jacobs, K. A. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00299-6 · Cited by 86
Tunable Cr 4+ Molecular Color Centers
Laorenza, D. W., Kairalapova, A., Bayliss, S. L., Goldzak, T., Greene, S. M., Weiss, L. R., Deb, P., Mintun, P. J., Collins, K. A., Awschalom, D. D., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c10145 · Cited by 89
Millimetre-scale magnetocardiography of living rats with thoracotomy
Arai, K., Kuwahata, A., Nishitani, D., Fujisaki, I., Matsuki, R., Nishio, Y., Xin, Z., Cao, X., Hatano, Y., Onoda, S., et al. (2022) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00978-0 · Cited by 85
Nonreciprocal Enhancement of Remote Entanglement between Nonidentical Mechanical Oscillators
Jiao, Y., Liu, J., Li, Y., Yang, R., Kuang, L., & Jing, H. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.064008 · Cited by 88
Pal, S., Bhattacharya, M., Lee, S.-S., & Chakraborty, C. (2024) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-023-00765-4 · Cited by 103
Ancilla-Free Quantum Error Correction Codes for Quantum Metrology
Layden, D., Zhou, S., Cappellaro, P., & Jiang, L. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.040502 · Cited by 95
Self-citationNickel(II) Metal Complexes as Optically Addressable Qubit Candidates
Wojnar, M. K., Laorenza, D. W., Schaller, R. D., & Freedman, D. E. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c06909 · Cited by 84
Survey of Promising Technologies for Quantum Drones and Networks
Kumar, A., Bhatia, S., Kaushik, K., Gandhi, S. M., Devi, S. G., Pacheco, D. A. D. J., & Mashat, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3109816 · Cited by 90
Zheng, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Sun, F.-X., He, Q., Yan, P., & Yuan, H. Y. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0152543 · Cited by 95
The quantum internet: A synergy of quantum information technologies and 6G networks
Rozenman, G. G., Kundu, N. K., Liu, R., Zhang, L., Maslennikov, A., Reches, Y., & Youm, H. Y. (2023) · IET Quantum Communication · doi:10.1049/qtc2.12069 · Cited by 89
Variational quantum algorithm for estimating the quantum Fisher information
Beckey, J. L., Cerezo, M., Sone, A., & Coles, P. J. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013083 · Cited by 95
Diamond Integrated Quantum Nanophotonics: Spins, Photons and Phonons
Shandilya, P. K., Flågan, S., Carvalho, N. C., Zohari, E., Kavatamane, V. K., Losby, J. E., & Barclay, P. E. (2022) · Journal of Lightwave Technology · doi:10.1109/jlt.2022.3210466 · Cited by 89
Review—Quantum Biosensors: Principles and Applications in Medical Diagnostics
Das, S., Mazumdar, H., Khondakar, K. R., Mishra, Y. K., & Kaushik, A. K. (2024) · ECS Sensors Plus · doi:10.1149/2754-2726/ad47e2 · Cited by 83
Mu, Z., Zargaleh, S. A., von Bardeleben, H. J., Fröch, J. E., Nonahal, M., Cai, H., Yang, X., Yang, J., Li, X., Aharonovich, I., et al. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02342 · Cited by 82
Heterodyne sensing of microwaves with a quantum sensor
Meinel, J., Vorobyov, V., Yavkin, B. V., Dasari, D., Sumiya, H., Onoda, S., Isoya, J., & Wrachtrup, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22714-y · Cited by 82
Integrated Photonics for Quantum Communications and Metrology
Labonté, L., Alibart, O., D’Auria, V., Doutre, F., Etesse, J., Sauder, G., Martin, A., Picholle, É., & Tanzilli, S. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.010101 · Cited by 92
Using and reusing coherence to realize quantum processes
Díaz, M. G., Fang, K., Wang, X., Rosati, M., Skotiniotis, M., Calsamiglia, J., & Winter, A. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-10-19-100 · Cited by 94
Castelletto, S., Inam, F. A., Sato, S., & Boretti, A. A. (2020) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.11.61 · Cited by 85
Quantum interference of currents in an atomtronic SQUID
Ryu, C., Samson, E. C., & Boshier, M. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17185-6 · Cited by 83
Spin and Phonon Design in Modular Arrays of Molecular Qubits
Yu, C.-J., von Kugelgen, S., Krzyaniak, M. D., Ji, W., Dichtel, W. R., Wasielewski, M. R., & Freedman, D. E. (2020) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03718 · Cited by 81
Global Sensing and Its Impact for Quantum Many-Body Probes with Criticality
Montenegro, V., Mishra, U., & Bayat, A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.200501 · Cited by 86
Simulating quantum materials with digital quantum computers
Oftelie, L. B., Urbánek, M., Metcalf, M., Carter, J. T., Kemper, A. F., & de Jong, W. A. (2021) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac1ca6 · Cited by 83
Yan, G. Q., Li, S., Lu, H., Huang, M., Xiao, Y., Wernert, L., Brock, J. A., Fullerton, E. E., Chen, H., Wang, H., et al. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202200327 · Cited by 82
Continuous-variable multipartite entanglement in an integrated microcomb
Jia, X., Zhai, C., Zhu, X., You, C., Cao, Y., Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., Fu, Z., Mao, J., Dai, T., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08602-1 · Cited by 93
Górecki, W., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., Wiseman, H. M., & Berry, D. W. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.030501 · Cited by 89
Quantum Sensing with a Single-Qubit Pseudo-Hermitian System
Chu, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, H., & Cai, J. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.020501 · Cited by 80
Enhancing Spin Coherence in Optically Addressable Molecular Qubits through Host-Matrix Control
Bayliss, S. L., Deb, P., Laorenza, D. W., Onizhuk, M., Galli, G., Freedman, D. E., & Awschalom, D. D. (2022) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031028 · Cited by 87
Zhu, J., Li, Y., Lin, X., Han, Y., & Wu, K. (2024) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-024-01922-z · Cited by 84
NISQ Computers: A Path to Quantum Supremacy
AbuGhanem, M., & Eleuch, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3432330 · Cited by 94
Nanoscale diamond quantum sensors for many-body physics
Rovny, J., Gopalakrishnan, S., Jayich, A. C. B., Maletinsky, P., Demler, E., & de Leon, N. P. (2024) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00775-4 · Cited by 80
Abe, E., & Sasaki, K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5011231 · Cited by 80
Quantum Computing Circuits and Devices
Humble, T. S., Thapliyal, H., Muñoz‐Coreas, E., Mohiyaddin, F. A., & Bennink, R. S. (2019) · IEEE Design and Test · doi:10.1109/mdat.2019.2907130 · Cited by 85
Optomechanical interface between telecom photons and spin quantum memory
Shandilya, P. K., Lake, D. P., Mitchell, M. J., Сукачев, Д. Д., & Barclay, P. E. (2021) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01364-3 · Cited by 86
New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a Floquet quantum detector
Bloch, I. M., Ronen, G., Shaham, R., Katz, O., Tomer Volansky, A., & Katz, O. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8919 · Cited by 79
Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride
Gong, R., He, G., Gao, X., Ju, P., Liu, Z., Ye, B., Henriksen, E. A., Li, T., & Zu, C. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39115-y · Cited by 82
Alzar, C. L. G. (2019) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/1.5120348 · Cited by 84
Quantum Interferometer Combining Squeezing and Parametric Amplification
Zuo, X., Yan, Z., Feng, Y., Ma, J., Jia, X., Xie, C., & Peng, K. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.173602 · Cited by 81
Out-of-distribution generalization for learning quantum dynamics
Caro, M. C., Huang, H.-Y., Ezzell, N., Gibbs, J., Sornborger, A. T., Cincio, Ł., Coles, P. J., & Holmes, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39381-w · Cited by 102
Practical figures of merit and thresholds for entanglement distribution in quantum networks
Khatri, S., Matyas, C. T., Siddiqui, A. U., & Dowling, J. P. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.023032 · Cited by 80
Yu, M., Liu, Y., Yang, P., Gong, M., Cao, Q., Zhang, S., Liu, H., Heyl, M., Ozawa, T., Goldman, N., et al. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00547-x · Cited by 76
Progression in Quantum Sensing/Bio-Sensing Technologies for Healthcare
Chugh, V., Basu, A., Kaushik, A. K., & Basu, A. K. (2023) · ECS Sensors Plus · doi:10.1149/2754-2726/acc190 · Cited by 76
Quantum-Limited Loss Sensing: Multiparameter Estimation and Bures Distance between Loss Channels
Nair, R. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.230801 · Cited by 83
Atomic-scale quantum sensing based on the ultrafast coherence of an H 2 molecule in an STM cavity
Wang, L., Xia, Y., & Ho, W. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn9220 · Cited by 75
Spin-active defects in hexagonal boron nitride
Liu, W., Guo, N., Yu, S., Meng, Y., Li, Z., Yang, Y.-Z., Wang, Z., Zeng, X., Xie, L.-K., Li, Q., et al. (2022) · Materials for Quantum Technology · doi:10.1088/2633-4356/ac7e9f · Cited by 75
Rydberg atom electric field sensing for metrology, communication and hybrid quantum systems
Zhang, H., Ma, Y., Liao, K.-Y., Yang, W., Liu, Z., 丁冬生, Yan, H., Li, W., & Zhang, L. (2024) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2024.03.032 · Cited by 75
Searching for an exotic spin-dependent interaction with a single electron-spin quantum sensor
Rong, X., Wang, M., Geng, J., Qin, X., Guo, M., Jiao, M., Xie, Y., Wang, P., Huang, P., Shi, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03152-9 · Cited by 75
Nanoscale covariance magnetometry with diamond quantum sensors
Rovny, J., Yuan, Z., Fitzpatrick, M., Abdalla, A. I., Futamura, L., Fox, C., Cambria, M. C., Kolkowitz, S., & de Leon, N. P. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade9858 · Cited by 74
Quantum-enhanced metrology with large Fock states
Deng, X., Li, S., Chen, Z.-J., Ni, Z., Cai, Y., Mai, J., Zhang, L., Zheng, P., Yu, H., Zou, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02619-5 · Cited by 88
Retrieving Ideal Precision in Noisy Quantum Optical Metrology
Bai, K., Peng, Z., Luo, H., & An, J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.040402 · Cited by 73
Molecular qubits based on photogenerated spin-correlated radical pairs for quantum sensing
Mani, T. (2022) · Chemical Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0084072 · Cited by 73
Speed limits and locality in many-body quantum dynamics
Chen, C.-F., Lucas, A., & Yin, C. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acfaae · Cited by 104
Label‐Free Optical Single‐Molecule Micro‐ and Nanosensors
Subramanian, S., Wu, H., Constant, T., Xavier, J., & Vollmer, F. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801246 · Cited by 77
Magnetic Imaging with Spin Defects in Hexagonal Boron Nitride
Kumar, P., Fabre, F., Durand, A., Clua-Provost, T., Li, J., Edgar, J. H., Rougemaille, N., Coraux, J., Marie, X., Renucci, P., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.l061002 · Cited by 72
Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based read-out for tweezer clocks
Finkelstein, R., Tsai, R. B.-S., Sun, X., Scholl, P., Direkci, S., Gefen, T., Choi, J., Shaw, A. L., & Endres, M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08005-8 · Cited by 94
Spectrally Stable Defect Qubits with no Inversion Symmetry for Robust Spin-To-Photon Interface
Udvarhelyi, P., Nagy, R., Kaiser, F., Lee, S.-Y., Wrachtrup, J., & Gali, A. (2019) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.11.044022 · Cited by 72
Critical Response of a Quantum van der Pol Oscillator
Dutta, S., & Cooper, N. R. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.250401 · Cited by 73
Quantum Limits to Incoherent Imaging are Achieved by Linear Interferometry
Lupo, C., Huang, Z., & Kok, P. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.080503 · Cited by 73
Robust entanglement preparation against noise by controlling spatial indistinguishability
Nosrati, F., Castellini, A., Compagno, G., & Franco, R. L. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0271-7 · Cited by 71
Learning Many-Body Hamiltonians with Heisenberg-Limited Scaling
Huang, H.-Y., Tong, Y., Fang, D., & Su, Y. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.200403 · Cited by 108
Operator Growth in Open Quantum Systems
Schuster, T., & Yao, N. Y. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.160402 · Cited by 81
Continuous Sensing and Parameter Estimation with the Boundary Time Crystal
Cabot, A., Carollo, F., & Lesanovsky, I. (2024) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.050801 · Cited by 71
Observation of loss-enhanced magneto-optical effect
Ruan, Y.-P., Tang, J.-S., Li, Z., Wu, H., Zhou, W., Xiao, L., Chen, J., Ge, S., Hu, W., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01592-y · Cited by 71
Chen, B., Hou, X., Ge, F., Zhang, X., Ji, Y., Li, H., Qian, P., Wang, Y., Xu, N., & Du, J. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03377 · Cited by 70
Surface NMR using quantum sensors in diamond
Liu, K., Henning, A., Heindl, M. W., Allert, R. D., Bartl, J. D., Sharp, I. D., Rizzato, R., & Bucher, D. B. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2111607119 · Cited by 70
Fundamental limits to frequency estimation: a comprehensive microscopic perspective
Haase, J. F., Smirne, A., Kołodyński, J., Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Huelga, S. F. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aab67f · Cited by 70
Measuring the internal temperature of a levitated nanoparticle in high vacuum
Hebestreit, E., Reimann, R., Frimmer, M., & Novotný, L. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.043803 · Cited by 74
Cavity-enhanced microwave readout of a solid-state spin sensor
Eisenach, E. R., Barry, J. F., O’Keeffe, M. F., Schloss, J. M., Steinecker, M., Englund, D., & Braje, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21256-7 · Cited by 69
Optical selection and sorting of nanoparticles according to quantum mechanical properties
Fujiwara, H., Yamauchi, K., Wada, T., Ishihara, H., & Sasaki, K. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd9551 · Cited by 69
Overcoming detection loss and noise in squeezing-based optical sensing
Frascella, G., Agne, S., Khalili, F. Y., & Chekhova, M. V. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00407-0 · Cited by 78
Advances in nano- and microscale NMR spectroscopy using diamond quantum sensors
Allert, R. D., Briegel, K. D., & Bucher, D. (2022) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d2cc01546c · Cited by 69
Smith, K. C., Crane, E., Wiebe, N., & Girvin, S. M. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020315 · Cited by 78
Seo, H., Ma, H., Govoni, M., & Galli, G. (2017) · Physical Review Materials · doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.1.075002 · Cited by 72
A quantum spectrum analyzer enhanced by a nuclear spin memory
Rosskopf, T., Zopes, J., Boss, J. M., & Degen, C. L. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0030-6 · Cited by 69
Self-citationFuture quantum workforce: Competences, requirements, and forecasts
Greinert, F., Müller, R., Bitzenbauer, P., Ubben, M. S., & Weber, K.-A. (2023) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.010137 · Cited by 68
Tight Bounds on the Simultaneous Estimation of Incompatible Parameters
Sidhu, J. S., Ouyang, Y., Campbell, E. T., & Kok, P. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011028 · Cited by 72
Asymptotic Theory of Quantum Channel Estimation
Zhou, S., & Jiang, L. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010343 · Cited by 80
Transverse Spin Dynamics in the Anisotropic Heisenberg Model Realized with Ultracold Atoms
Jepsen, N., Ho, W. W., Amato-Grill, J., Dimitrova, I., Demler, E., & Ketterle, W. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041054 · Cited by 68
Quantum Ranging with Gaussian Entanglement
Zhuang, Q. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.240501 · Cited by 70
Systematic comparison of various oxidation treatments on diamond surface
Li, C., Zhang, X., Oliveira, E. F., Puthirath, A. B., Neupane, M. R., Weil, J. D., Birdwell, A. G., Ivanov, T., Kong, S., Gray, T., et al. (2021) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.050 · Cited by 68
Jia, F.-D., Liu, X., Mei, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Lin, Z.-Q., Dong, H.-Y., Zhang, J., Xie, F., & Zhong, Z.-P. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.063113 · Cited by 68
Fundamental Sensitivity Limits for Non-Hermitian Quantum Sensors
Ding, W., Wang, X., & Chen, S. (2023) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.160801 · Cited by 68
Observation of current whirlpools in graphene at room temperature
Palm, M. L., Ding, C., Huxter, W. S., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., & Degen, C. L. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adj2167 · Cited by 68
Self-citationStable organic radical qubits and their applications in quantum information science
Zhou, A.-M., Sun, Z., & Sun, L. (2024) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100662 · Cited by 71
Bernardi, E., Nelz, R., Sonuşen, S., & Neu, E. (2018) · Publications of the UdS (Saarland University) · doi:10.22028/d291-27477 · Cited by 68
Suppression of the Bias Error Induced by Magnetic Noise in a Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free Gyroscope
Fan, W., Quan, W., Liu, F., Li, X., & Liu, G. (2019) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2929505 · Cited by 67
A machine learning approach to Bayesian parameter estimation
Nolan, S. P., Smerzi, A., & Pezzè, L. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00497-w · Cited by 67
Noisy Quantum Metrology Enhanced by Continuous Nondemolition Measurement
Rossi, M. A. C., Albarelli, F., Tamascelli, D., & Genoni, M. G. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.200505 · Cited by 69
Optimal probes for global quantum thermometry
Mok, W.-K., Bharti, K., Kwek, L. C., & Bayat, A. (2021) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00572-w · Cited by 67
Continuous-Frequency Microwave Heterodyne Detection in an Atomic Vapor Cell
Liu, X.-H., Liao, K.-Y., Zhang, Z.-X., Tu, H.-T., Wu, B., Li, Z., Zheng, S.-Y., Li, H.-H., Huang, W., Yan, H., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.054003 · Cited by 67
Minimum error probability of quantum illumination
Palma, G. D., & Borregaard, J. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.012101 · Cited by 70
Spectral Addressability in a Modular Two Qubit System
von Kugelgen, S., Krzyaniak, M. D., Gu, M., Puggioni, D., Rondinelli, J. M., Wasielewski, M. R., & Freedman, D. E. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c02417 · Cited by 66
Demonstration of diamond nuclear spin gyroscope
Jarmola, A., Lourette, S., Acosta, V. M., Birdwell, A. G., Blümler, P., Budker, D., Ivanov, T., & Malinovsky, V. S. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl3840 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-07-25
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W3037447387
- Semantic Scholar
- e5e8fa8ecb175c8a587703a423bb88a6e8efaf58
- Cited by
- 4,045
- References
- 392
- Citations by year
- 2026: 601 · 2025: 827 · 2024: 641 · 2023: 473 · 2022: 425 · 2021: 378 · 2020: 307 · 2019: 236 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 25
- FWCI
- 113.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (611143)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RE 3606/1-1)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-11-1-0400, W911NF-15-1-0548)
- National Science Foundation (PHY0551153, PHY1415345)
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-03 16-1)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (200021_137520, NCCR QSIT)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum sensing, quantum sensors, precision metrology, qubits, quantum entanglement, quantum-enhanced sensitivity, timekeeping, sensor implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review