The DOI matches its Crossref record; 392 of the 392 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 207 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Quantum sensing
Open accessAbstract
Quantum technologies are increasingly driving the field of precision metrology. While current techniques for sensing and recording time rely on classical devices, quantum sensors exploit quantum systems to reach unprecedented levels of precision. The working part of the sensor contains one or a few qubits, and resources like quantum entanglement are chosen and tailored to maximize sensitivity. This review introduces quantum sensing from the perspective of working experimentalists, with specific sensor implementations, concepts and methods, and recent developments.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review introduces quantum sensing as the use of quantum systems, coherence, or entanglement to measure physical quantities, focusing on qubit-based sensors and practical protocols. It synthesizes definitions, experimental platforms, sensing sequences, sensitivity limits, noise spectroscopy, adaptive methods, and entanglement-enhanced approaches.
Key findings
- Quantum sensing is defined by three uses: a quantum object to measure a quantity, quantum coherence for measurement, and entanglement to improve sensitivity beyond classical limits; a useful quantum sensor needs discrete levels, initialization/readout, coherent manipulation, and coupling to a signal \(V(t)\).
- The basic protocol is initialization, interaction with the signal, readout, and estimation; Ramsey and Rabi measurements illustrate static and resonant detection, while slope detection operates at \(p_0=0.5\) and variance detection at \(p_0=0\) or \(1\). Sensitivity improves with larger coupling \(\gamma\) and longer decoherence/relaxation time \(T_\chi\), with optimum sensing time near \(t \approx T_\chi\).
- Reported sensitivities include atomic vapor magnetometers at \(100\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) approaching \(<10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), SQUIDs down to \(10\ \mathrm{aT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), trapped ions at \(4.6\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), NV ensembles currently limited to \(\sim 1\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\), and superconducting qubit magnetic sensing at \(3.3\ \mathrm{pT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) at 10 MHz.
- Advanced methods include multipulse AC sensing with CP/PDD sequences, noise spectroscopy via filter functions and relaxometry, adaptive phase estimation achieving dynamic range scaling \(DR \propto T\), and entangled GHZ/N00N/squeezed states that can reach Heisenberg-limited sensitivity but often lose their advantage due to increased decoherence.
Methods
- This is a review article, not a primary experimental or theoretical study; it synthesizes principles, methods, and concepts of quantum sensing from an experimentalist’s viewpoint.
- It surveys implementations including neutral atoms, trapped ions, Rydberg atoms, atomic clocks, solid-state spins, superconducting circuits, elementary particle qubits, single electron transistors, optomechanics, and photons.
- The main analysis uses Hamiltonian formalism, Ramsey/Rabi examples, filter functions, the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, and summary tables of sensor implementations and symbols.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: the review mostly considers qubits, does not cover implementations in specific detail, excludes atomic clocks and photon-based sensors, and treats theory only up to the point needed to introduce key concepts.
- Paper-stated: entanglement-enhanced sensing is limited because GHZ states suffer faster decoherence, and N00N states are fragile and have small dynamic range.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it reports no primary data, and its numerical sensitivities are drawn from cited prior work; many equations appear as “formula-not-decoded” in the supplied text, so exact expressions cannot be verified from this text alone.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 207 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“The focus on two-level systems (1) is not a severe restriction because many properties of more complex quantum systems can be modeled through a qubit sensor (Goldstein et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Goldstein et al. , 2010
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Alkali atoms are suitable sensing qubits fulfilling the above definitions (Kitching et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kitching et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Trapped atoms have been employed to detect and image magnetic fields at the microscale, by replicating Larmor precession spectroscopy on a trapped Bose-Einstein condensate (Vengalattore et al. , 2007) and by direct driving of spin-flip transitions by microwave currents (Ockeloen et al. , 2013) or thermal radiofrequency noise in samples (Fortagh et al. , 2002; Jones et al. , 2003).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vengalattore et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Ockeloen et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Fortagh et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most advanced applications employ the quantized motional levels as sensing qubits for electric fields and forces.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Recently, Rydberg states have become accessible in atomic vapour cells (K¨ ubler et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kübler et al., 2010
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Electrical field noise is a severe source of decoherence for ion traps and superconducting quantum processors (Labaziewicz et al. , 2008) and a key limiting factor in ultrasensitive force microscopy (Kuehn et al. , 2006; Tao and Degen, 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuehn et al., 2006
- Not checked yetcites Tao and Degen, 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Section V, we will see that the sensitivity scales as”
- Also stated in: § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4 · plain
“where γ is the above transduction parameter and T χ is a decoherence or relaxation time that reflects the immunity of the quantum sensor against noise.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § B. Quantum sensors · p. 4 · plain
In the paper
“This is owing to the surprising fact that relaxation and coherence times of spins in atomic vapors can be pushed to the second to minute range (Balabas et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Balabas et al. , 2010
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their use in practical applications, however, has proven difficult.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the simplest implementation, a thermal vapor of atoms serves as a quantum sensor for magnetic fields (Budker and Romalis, 2007; Kominis et al. , 2003).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Budker and Romalis, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Kominis et al. , 2003
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 91
- Probably not a substantial claim. 101
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Freely falling atoms have enabled the development of atomic gravimeters (Kasevich and Chu, 1992; Peters et al. , 1999) and gyrometers (Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kasevich and Chu, 1992
- Not checked yetcites Peters et al. , 1999
- Not checked yetcites Gustavson et al. , 1997, 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These long relaxation and coherence times are achieved by coating cell walls to preserve the atomic spin upon collisions, and by operating in the spin exchange relaxation-free ('SERF') regime of high atomic density and zero magnetic field.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The sensor has a predicted sensitivity of 500 nV / m / √ Hz or 1 yN / √ Hz for the force acting on the ion (Biercuk et al. , 2010; Maiwald et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Biercuk et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Maiwald et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reduced velocity spread of cold atoms enabled sensing with longer interrogation times using spatially confined atoms, freely falling along specific trajectories in vacuum or trapped.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The most advanced application of vapor cells is arguably the detection of neural activity (Jensen et al. , 2016; Livanov et al. , 1978), which has found use in magnetoencephalography (Xia et al. , 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jensen et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Livanov et al. , 1978
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Vapor cells have been miniaturized to few mm 3 small volumes (Shah et al. , 2007) and have been used to demonstrate entanglement-enhanced sensing (Fernholz et al. , 2008; Wasilewski et al. , 2010).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shah et al. , 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sensing with cold atoms has found application in solid state physics by elucidating current transport in microscopic conductors (Aigner et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aigner et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, operation of ion traps in close proximity to surfaces remains a major challenge.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Rydberg atoms - atoms in highly excited electronic states - are remarkable quantum sensors for electric fields for a similar reason as trapped ions: In a classical picture, the loosely confined electron in a highly excited orbit is easily displaced by electric fields. In a quantum picture, its motional states are coupled by strong electric dipole transitions and experience strong Stark shifts (Her”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al., 1986
- Not checked yetcites Osterwalder and Merkt, 1999
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In order to optimize the sensitivity, γ should be large (for example, by choice of an appropriate physical realization of the sensor) and the decoherence time T χ must be made as long as possible.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Practically all sensing demonstrations have focused on single ions, which, in terms of absolute sensitivity, cannot compete with ensemble sensors such as atomic vapors.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of the earliest quantum sensors have been based on ensembles of nuclear spins.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among all solid state spins, NV centers in diamond have received by far the most attention for sensing purposes.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the above protocol is generic and simple, it is sufficient to describe most sensing experiments.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Variance detection is especially important for detecting ac signals when their synchronization with the sensing protocol is not possible (Section VI.C.4), or when the signal represents a noise source (Section VII).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a technically less demanding application, NV centers in a magnetic field gradient have been employed as spectrum analyzer for high frequency microwave signals (Chipaux et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chipaux et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the most advanced implementation, nuclear spin precession is read out by an atomic magnetometer, which is equally used for compensation of the Zeeman shift (Kornack et al. , 2005).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kornack et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, mechanical detection of single paramagnetic defects in silica (Rugar et al. , 2004) and real-time monitoring of few-spin fluctuations (Budakian et al. , 2005) have been demonstrated.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rugar et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Budakian et al., 2005
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As a consequence, even the most advanced devices are currently limited to ∼ 1 pT / √ Hz (Wolf et al. , 2015) and operate several orders of magnitude above the theory limit.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wolf et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Optical readout was shown with single organic molecules (Wrachtrup et al. , 1993a,b), optically active quantum dots (Atature et al. , 2007; Kroutvar et al. , 2004; Vamivakas et al. , 2010), and defect centers in crystalline materials including diamond (Gruber et al. , 1997) and silicon carbide (Christle et al. , 2015; Widmann et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wrachtrup et al., 1993a,b
- Not checked yetcites Atature et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Gruber et al., 1997
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More recently, NMR sensor probes have been developed for in-situ and dynamical field mapping in clinical MRI systems (Zanche et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zanche et al., 2008
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Electrical readout has been demonstrated with phosphorus dopants in silicon (Morello et al. , 2010) and electrostatically-defined semiconductor quantum dots (Elzerman et al. , 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Morello et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Elzerman et al., 2004
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although these advantages are partially offset by a reduced coherence time ( T 2 < 1 ms at room temperature, as compared to T 2 > 1 s for vapor cells), the predicted sensitivity of diamond magnetometers (250 aT / √ Hz / cm -3 / 2 ) (Taylor et al. , 2008) or gyroscopes (10 -5 rad / s / √ Hz / mm 3 / 2 ) (Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012; Ledbetter et al. , 2012) would be competitive with their”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taylor et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Ajoy and Cappellaro, 2012
- Not checked yetcites Ledbetter et al., 2012
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most prominently, this line of research has enabled imaging of magnetic organelles in magnetotactic bacteria (Le Sage et al. , 2013) and microscopic magnetic inclusions in meteorites (Fu et al. , 2014), as well as contrast-agent-based magnetic resonance microscopy (Steinert et al. , 2013).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Le Sage et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Fu et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Steinert et al., 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, classical continuous-wave absorption and transmission spectroscopy can be considered as an averaged variety of this protocol.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also, the time evolution can be replaced by a spatial evolution to describe a classical interferometer.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Much excitement has recently been sparked by ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy centers (NV centers) - electronic spin defects in diamond that can be optically initialized and read out.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These experiments reached a sensitivity of 5 · 10 -7 rad / s / √ Hz, which is comparable to compact implementations of atomic interferometers and optical Sagnac interferometers.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kornack et al., 2005
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, efficient fluorescence detection of large NV ensembles is difficult, while absorptive and dispersive schemes are not easily implemented (Clevenson et al. , 2015; Jensen et al. , 2014; Le Sage et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clevenson et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Jensen et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Le Sage et al., 2012
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the sensitivity of these devices (10 pT / √ Hz) (Lenz, 1990) is inferior to their atomic counterparts, they have found broad use in geology, archaeology and space missions thanks to their simplicity and robustness.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lenz, 1990
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Noise spectroscopy relies on the systematic analysis of decoherence and relaxation under different control sequences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We notice that variance detection improves only ∝ T 1 / 4 with the integration time, while slope detection improves ∝ T 1 / 2 .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The decay time T χ , also known as the decoherence time or relaxation time depending on the noise process, is an important figure-of-merit of the qubit, as it sets the maximum possible evolution time t available for sensing.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Often, the multipulse sequence cannot be synchronized with the signal or the phase α cannot be controlled. Then, incoherent averaging leads to phase cancellation, 〈 φ 〉 = 0.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the underlying noise processes may be very complex, χ ( t ) can often be approximated by a simple power law,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For variance detection, where ideally p 0 = 0, the projection noise would in principle be arbitrarily low. In any realistic experiment, however, decoherence will shift the fringe minimum to a finite value of p (see below), where Eq. (25) holds up to a constant factor.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The readout is projective.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because continuous sampling no longer relies on quantum state lifetimes, the Fourier-limited resolution can be extended to arbitrary values and is only limited by total experiment duration T , and ultimately the control hardware.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the widespread inefficiency of quantum state readout, classical readout noise is often the dominating source of error.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, variance detection profits more from a long coherence time T χ than slope detection (but is, in turn, more vulnerable to decoherence).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For large pulse numbers n , the sinc term becomes very peaked and the filter bandwidth ∆ f ≈ 1 / ( nτ ) = 1 /t (full width at half maximum) becomes very narrow.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the amplitude V pk is not fixed, but slowly fluctuating between different measurements, the variance 〈 φ 2 〉 must be integrated over the probability distribution of V pk .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A particularly important situation is a Gaussian amplitude fluctuation with an rms amplitude V rms . In this case, the resonant time response of the transition probability is”
- Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
“where I 0 is the modified Bessel function of the first kind.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § 5. AC signals with random phase and random amplitude · p. 22 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The multipulse sequence is subdivided into two equal sensing periods of duration t a = t/ 2 that are separated by an incremented free evolution period t 1 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, good knowledge of the noise spectrum can help the adoption of suitable sensing protocols (like dynamical decoupling or quantum error correction schemes) to maximize the sensitivity of the quantum sensor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, the pass-band frequency can be selected via the interpulse delay τ , while the filter width can be adjusted via the number of pulses n = t/τ (up to a maximum value of n ≈ T 2 /τ ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For white noise, the dephasing is Markovian and χ ( t ) = Γ t , where Γ is the decay rate. For Lorentzian noise centered at zero frequency the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) 3 . For a generic 1 /f -like decay, where the noise falls of ∝ ω a (with a around unity), the decoherence function is χ ( t ) = (Γ t ) a +1 (Cywinski et al. , 2008; Medford et al. , 2012) with a logarithmic correct”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cywinski et al. , 2008
- Not checked yetcites Medford et al. , 2012
- Not checked yetcites Dial et al. , 2013
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An imperfect initialization leads to a similar reduction in the observed probability δp obs as with decoherence,”
- Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
“Contrary to the case of decoherence, this reduction does not depend on the sensing time t .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 3. Errors due to initialization and qubit manipulations · p. 15 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that the scaling of the QCRB with the number of copies, N -1 / 2 , is a consequence of the additivity of the quantum Fisher information for tensor states ρ ⊗ N . This is the well-known standard quantum limit (SQL).”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the number of measurements N is equal to T/ ( t + t m ), where T is the total available measurement time and t m is the extra time needed to initialize, manipulate and readout the sensor.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
“where χ ( t ) is the associated decay function or decoherence function that was already discussed in the context of sensitivity (Section V).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
In the paper
“where C = 1 / √ 1 + R 2 ≈ 1 / √ 1 + 4 κ is an overall readout efficiency parameter (Taylor et al. , 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taylor et al., 2008
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resonance order k can also be used to select the pass-band frequency, however, because k = 1 provides the strongest peak transmission, most reported experiments used this resonance.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A suitable basis are Walsh dynamical decoupling sequences (Hayes et al. , 2011), which apply a π pulse every time the corresponding Walsh function (Walsh, 1923) flips its sign.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites Walsh, 1923
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Noise spectroscopy is an important tool in quantum sensing, as it can provide much insight into both external signals and the intrinsic noise of the quantum sensor.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This defines for any multipulse sequence a weighting function W ( f ac , α ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To go beyond the SQL, one then needs to use entangled states (see Section IX) in particular, simply using correlated POVMs is not sufficient.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kotler et al. , 2011, have shown that both quadratures of a signal can be recovered, allowing one to perform lock-in detection of the signal.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kotler et al. , 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum sensing, most frequency estimation schemes are based on dynamical decoupling sequences.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C ≤ 1 describes the reduction of the signal-to-noise ratio compared to an ideal readout ( C = 1), see Fig. 4.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The resolution can be further enhanced by long-lived auxiliary memory qubits (see Section X) and resolution improvements by two-to-three orders of magnitude over dynamical decoupling spectroscopy have been demonstrated (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pfender et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and the peak transmission at f ac = k/ 2 τ is W 2 = 2 / ( kπ ) 2 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conversely, if C is independent of t m - for example, because the sensor is operated in the single-shot regime or because readout resets the sensor t m should be made as short as possible.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quite generally, χ ( t ) can be identified with an rms phase accumulated during time t ,”
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
“according to the expression for variance detection, Eq. (20).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § 1. Decoherence function χ ( t ) · p. 25 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To further specify the SNR, the change in probability δp can be related to the change in signal δV as δp = δV q | ∂ q V p ( t ) | ∝ ( γtδV ) q , with q = 1 for slope detection and q = 2 for variance detection (see Fig. 3).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“where V rms = V pk / √ 2 is the rms amplitude of the signal and W 2 ( f ac ) is the average over α = 0 . . . 2 π of the weighting functions,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Relaxation can also be analyzed in the presence of a resonant drive field. This method is known as 'spin locking' in magnetic resonance (Slichter, 1996).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Slichter, 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All three protocols can be considered variations of the phase estimation scheme depicted in Fig. 12(a).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral (Biercuk et al. , 2011; de Sousa, 2009)”
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
“where G V ( t ) is the autocorrelation function of V ( t ) (Eq. 81).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Biercuk et al. , 2011
- Not checked yetcites de Sousa, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dynamic range is then given by the maximum allowed signal divided by the minimum detectable signal,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The scheme was originally put forward by Shor, 1994, in the seminal proposal of a quantum algorithm for prime factorization and has been interpreted by Kitaev, 1995, as a phase estimation algorithm.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shor, 1994 source
- Not checked yetcites Kitaev, 1995
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is possible because the controlledU gate does not change the eigenvector ψ , so that it can be re-used as often as required.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the frequency domain the decay function can be expressed as”
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
“where | Y ( ω ) | 2 is the so-called fi lter function of y ( t ), defined by the finite-time Fourier transform”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 2. Filter function Y ( ω ) · p. 25 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since S V ( ω ) is often dominated by low-frequency noise, S V || (0) is typically much larger than S V ⊥ ( ω 0 ) and the high-frequency contribution can often be neglected.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The joint probability distribution of all measurements is obtained from the product”
- Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
“from which the most likely value of φ is picked as the final result (Nusran et al. , 2012; Waldherr et al. , 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nusran et al., 2012
- Not checked yetcites Waldherr et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 3. Non-adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scaling is sometimes referred to as another instance of the Heisenberg limit, because it can be regarded as a 1 /T scaling of sensitivity at a fixed V max .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While quantum phase estimation based on the QFT can be performed with polynomial time effort, the algorithm requires two-qubit gates, which are difficult to implement experimentally, and the creation of fragile entangled states.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The aim of relaxometry is to connect the spectral density S V ( ω ) of a noise signal V ( t ) to the relaxation rate Γ in first-order kinetics, χ ( t ) = Γ t .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“T ∗ 2 relaxometry probes the transition rate between the superposition states |±〉 = ( | 0 〉 ± e -iω 0 t | 1 〉 ) / √ 2. This corresponds to the free induction decay observed in a Ramsey experiment”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the presence of the resonant field the degeneracy between |±〉 is lifted and the states are separated by the energy ℏ ω 1 , where ω 1 ≪ ω 0 is the Rabi frequency of the drive field.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the filter function is dominated by the first harmonic ( k = 1) the frequency corresponding to a certain τ is 1 / (2 τ ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The QFT is thus replaced by measurement and classical feedback, which can be performed using a single qubit sensor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This problem can be generalized to estimating the phase shift φ imparted by passage through an interferometer or exposure to an external field.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the algorithm scales linearly with the number of applications of ˆ U which in turn is proportional to the total measurement time T .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because T 1 can be very long, very high sensitivities are in principle possible, assuming that the resonance is not skewed by low-frequency noise.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key idea of adaptive phase estimation is to first measure the least significant bit of φ , represented by the lowest qubit in Fig. 12(b). In the measurement of the next significant bit, this value is subtracted from the applied phase.”
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
“This procedure is then repeated in ascending order of the bits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensitivity of the measurement, on the other hand, is proportional to the slope of the Ramsey fringe and reaches its optimum when t ≈ T ∗ 2 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, since dressed state relaxometry does not require sweeping a static control field for adjusting the probe frequency, it is more versatile than standard T 1 relaxometry.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The implementation by Bonato, C. et al. , 2016, for example, scaled the number of resources N m linearly according to”
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
“with typical values of G = 5 and F = 2.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bonato, C. et al., 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § 2. Adaptive phase estimation · p. 31 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The maximum allowed signal is then set by the shortest sensing time, V max = π/ ( γt 0 ), while the smallest detectable signal is determined by the longest sensing time, V min ≈ 2 / ( γC √ t M T ).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because a phase flip does not require energy, the spectral density is probed at zero frequency.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For a very large detuning the effective frequency becomes similar to the detuning ω eff ≈ ∆ ω , and the drive field only enters as a scaling factor for the spectral density.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because T ∝ t M due to the exponentially growing interrogation times, the dynamic range of the improved protocol scales as”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The QFT recovers the phase φ from the Fourier series (109) and places the register in state”
- Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
“A measurement of the register directly yields a digital representation of the phase φ .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Quantum phase estimation · p. 30 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In quantum sensing, phase tagging by back-action is replaced by the exposure of each qubit to an external field for a time 2 m t 0 (or passage through an interferometer of length 2 m l 0 ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Quantum phase estimation is the core component of Shor's algorithm, where it is used to compute discrete logarithms with polynomial time effort (Shor, 1994).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shor, 1994 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For large cycle numbers, Y n c ,τ c ( ω ) presents sharp peaks at multiples of the inverse cycle time τ -1 c , and it can be approximated by a series of δ functions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although other scheduling is possible, this choice allows for an intuitive interpretation: subsequent measurements estimate subsequent digits of a binary expansion of the signal.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the filter function plays the role of a transfer function, and the decay of coherence is captured by the overlap with the noise spectrum S V ( ω ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scaling is obvious from an order-of-magnitude estimate: adding an additional measurement step increases both precision and measurement duration t by a factor of two, such that precision scales linearly with total acquisition time T .”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In practical implementations (Higgins et al. , 2007), the measurement of each digit is repeated multiple times or performed on multiple parallel qubits.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Higgins et al., 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adaptive estimation is technically more demanding since real-time feedback is involved, which often requires dedicated hardware (such as field-programmable gate arrays or a central processing unit) for the fast decision making.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They have been used not only for sensing but also for enhanced lithography (Boto et al. , 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boto et al., 2000
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The proposals of Shor (Shor, 1994), Kitaev (Kitaev, 1995) and Griffiths (Griffiths and Niu, 1996) were followed by a decade where research towards Heisenberglimited measurements has focused mostly on the use of entangled states, such as the N00N state (see Section IX).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shor, 1994 source
- Not checked yetcites Kitaev, 1995
- Not checked yetcites Griffiths and Niu, 1996
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, the interrogation time also needs to be reduced by a factor M and no net advantage in sensitivity can be obtained.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One of the most impressive application of squeezed states of light (Ligo Collaboration', 2011; Schnabel et al. , 2010; Walls, 1983) has been the sensitivity enhancement of the LIGO gravitational wave detector (Collaboration, 2013), obtained by injecting vacuum squeezed states in the interferometer.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ligo Collaboration', 2011
- Not checked yetcites Schnabel et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Walls, 1983
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of the above variants of phase estimation achieve a DR ∝ T scaling of the dynamic range.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Shortly after, both variants have been translated into protocols for spin-based quantum sensing (Said et al. , 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Said et al., 2011
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, squeezed states (Caves, 1981; Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993; Wineland et al. , 1992) have been proposed early on to achieve the Heisenberg limit and thanks to experimental advances have recently shown exceptional sensitivity (Hosten et al. , 2016a).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Caves, 1981
- Not checked yetcites Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993
- Not checked yetcites Wineland et al., 1992
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similar to GHZ states, N00N states have been conceived to improve interferometry (Lee et al. , 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee et al., 2002
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Optimal densities have been calculated both for atomic vapor magnetometers (Budker and Romalis, 2007) and ensembles of NV centers (Taylor et al. , 2008; Wolf et al. , 2015).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Budker and Romalis, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Taylor et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Wolf et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This allows using an M -times shorter interrogation time or achieving an improvement of the sensitivity (calculated from the QCRB) by a factor √ M .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, too, acquisition time scales with the significance of the bit measured to achieve the Heisenberg limit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The standard quantum limit can be overcome by using quantum-enhanced sensing strategies to reach a more fundamental limit where the uncertainty σ p (Eq. ( 25)) scales as 1 /M .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensitivity is then expressed per unit volume ( ∝ meters -3 / 2 ).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Still, 'N00N' states are very fragile (Bohmann et al. , 2015) and they are afflicted by a small dynamic range.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bohmann et al., 2015
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Experimentally, Bayesian estimation is usually simple to implement because no real-time feedback is needed and the phase estimation can be performed a posteriori .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Squeezed states are promising for quantum-limited sensing as they can reach sensitivity beyond the standard quantum limit.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, the √ M advantage in sensitivity is usually compensated by the GHZ state's increased decoherence rate (Huelga et al. , 1997), which is an issue common to most entangled states.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huelga et al., 1997
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The experiment has subsequently been extended to a nonadaptive version (Higgins et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Higgins et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Weak measurements have been more generally proposed to enhance sensing protocols (), but their ultimate usefulness is still under debate ().”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using an M -particle interferometer, one can prepare an entangled Fock state,”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Entanglement-enhanced sensing has been pioneered with atomic systems, especially atomic clocks (Giovannetti et al. , 2004; Leibfried et al. , 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Giovannetti et al., 2004
- Not checked yetcites Leibfried et al., 2004
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As a final remark, we note that a similar performance - 1 /T scaling and an increased dynamic range - may be achieved by weak measurement protocols, which continuously track the evolution of the phase over the sensing sequence (Kohlhaas et al. , 2015; Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kohlhaas et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Shiga and Takeuchi, 2012
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Achieving the Heisenberg limit requires reducing the variance of a chosen quantum observable at the expenses of the uncertainty of a conjugated observable.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This limit is also known as the Heisenberg limit .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To understand the benefits that an entangled state can bring to quantum sensing, the simplest example is given by Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Squeezed states of light have been introduced by Caves, 1981, as a mean to reduce noise in interferometry experiments.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Caves, 1981
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They differ, however, by a constant offset.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sensing scheme is similar to a Ramsey protocol, however, if M qubit probes are available, the preparation and readout pulses are replaced by entangling operations (Fig. 13).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This has led to the quest for different entangled states that could be more resilient to decoherence.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They were first introduced by Yurke, 1986, in the context of neutron Mach-Zender interferometry as the fermionic 'response' to the squeezed states proposed by Caves, 1981, for Heisenberg metrology.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yurke, 1986
- Not checked yetcites Caves, 1981
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In parallel, state squeezing is routinely applied in optical systems, such as optical interferometers (Ligo Collaboration', 2011).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ligo Collaboration', 2011
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Quantum phase estimation by the QFT, finally, requires many entangled qubits.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Apart from an obvious gain in readout sensitivity, multiple qubits allow for the implementation of second-generation quantum techniques, including entanglement and state squeezing, which provide a true 'quantum' advantage that cannot be realized with classical sensors.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Comparing this result with what obtained in Sec. IV.C, we see that the oscillation frequency of the signal is enhanced by a factor M by preparing a GHZ state, while the shot noise is unchanged, since we still measure only one qubit.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While this is difficult to obtain for large qubit numbers, recent advances show great promise (Hume et al. , 2013; Zhang et al. , 2012) (see also next section on alternative detection methods).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hume et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2012
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, imperfections in this measurement limits the sensitivity, since achieving the Heisenberg limit requires single-particle state detection.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Spin squeezing can be also implemented in qubit systems (Auccaise et al. , 2015; Bennett et al. , 2013; Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009; Sinha et al. , 2003) following the original proposal by Kitagawa and Ueda, 1993.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Auccaise et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Bennett et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Cappellaro and Lukin, 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to dynamical decoupling schemes, qubit protection covers the entire noise spectrum and is not limited to low-frequency noise.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since QEC works independently of noise frequency, distinct operators for the signal and noise interactions are required.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In this scheme, which has recently been implemented with NV centers (Unden et al. , 2016), the qubit sensor detects a signal along one axis ( e.g. , a phase) while being protected against noise along a different axis ( e.g. , against bit flip).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Unden et al. , 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The metrology squeezing parameter, proposed by Wineland et al. , 1992, is then”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wineland et al., 1992
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, the code | 0 〉 L = | 000 〉 and | 1 〉 L = | 111 〉 can correct against a single qubit flip error.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, from the commutation relationship for the collective angular momentum, ∆ J α ∆ J β ≥ |〈 J γ 〉| , one can naturally define a squeezing parameter”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Retrieval uses the same two c-NOT gates in reverse order.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, during the free evolution (step 3) an enhanced phase can be acquired, similar to what happens for entangled states.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most common sensing protocols with squeezed states forgo step 4, and directly measure the population difference between the state | 0 〉 and | 1 〉 .”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To quantify the advantage of squeezed states in sensing, it is advantageous to directly relate squeezing to the improved sensitivity.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Early demonstrations of spin squeezing were obtained by entangling trapped ions via their shared motional modes (Meyer et al. , 2001), using repulsive interactions in a Bose-Einstein condensate (Esteve et al. , 2008), or partial projection by measurement (Appel et al. , 2009).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Meyer et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Esteve et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Appel et al., 2009
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The degree of spin squeezing can be measured by several parameters.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A first example includes correlation spectroscopy, where two sensing periods are interrupted by a waiting time t 1 (Laraoui and Meriles, 2013; Rosskopf et al. , 2016; Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Laraoui and Meriles, 2013
- Not checked yetcites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A different strategy is to follow more closely the sensing protocol for entangled states, and refocus the squeezing (reintroducing step 4) before readout (Davis et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davis et al., 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These recent results hint at the potential of QEC for sensing which has just about begun to being explored.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Squeezed states are then characterized by a reduced uncertainty in one observable at the expense of another observable.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For the example of an electron-nuclear qubit pair, c-NOT gates have been implemented both by selective pulses (Pfender et al. , 2016; Rosskopf et al. , 2016) and using coherent rotations (Zaiser et al. , 2016).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pfender et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Rosskopf et al. , 2016
- Not checked yetcites Zaiser et al. , 2016
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, quantum error correction suppresses noise according to spatial symmetry, and not according to frequency.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The simplest code is the 3-qubit repetition code, which corrects against one-axis noise with depth one (that is, it can correct up to one error acting on one qubit).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the description of squeezed states is simplified by the use of a single collective angular-momentum variable.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both cases, coupling of the quantum system to the detection apparatus is inefficient, often because strong coupling would destroy the very quantum state used in the metrology task.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this context, a simple quantum sensing scheme, following the procedure in Sec. IV.C, could be constructed by replacing step 2 with the preparation of a squeezed state, so that | ψ 0 〉 is a squeezed state.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Metrology schemes often require single qubit readout or the measurement of complex, many-body observables.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While for typical states the uncertainty in the two observables is on the same order, it is possible to redistribute the fluctuations in the two conjugate observables.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, quantum sensing has the potential to fundamentally transform our measurement capabilities, enabling higher sensitivity and precision, new measurement types, and covering atomic up to macroscopic length scales.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
- Rests on an assumption: Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
- Rests on an assumption: NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, these allow operation of the sensor over a wide signal frequency range, can be adjusted to maximize sensitivity and dynamic range, and allow discrimination of different types of signals by symmetry or vector orientation.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A better understanding of decoherence in a particular implementation of a quantum system can help the adoption of strategies to protect the qubit, and guide the engineering and materials development.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vice versa, quantum sensing has become an important resource for quantum technologies as it provides much insight into the 'environment' of qubits, especially through decoherence spectroscopy.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While many experiments so far made use of single qubit sensors, strategies to implement entangled multi-qubit sensors with enhanced capabilities and higher sensitivity are just beginning to be explored.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The border region between quantum sensing and quantum simulation, in addition, is becoming a fertile playground for emulating and detecting many-body physics phenomena.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Over the last decade, and especially in the last few years, a comprehensive toolset has been established that can be applied to any type of quantum sensor.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.
“More recently, quantum sensing has become a distinct and rapidly growing branch of research within the area of quantum science and technology, with the most common platforms being spin qubits, trapped ions and flux qubits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications.
“However, since quantum sensors according to definitions I and II are often close to applications, we will mostly focus on these definitions and discuss them extensively in this review.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In most situations the coupling between a quantum sensor and an external parameter is either linear or quadratic.
“In most situations the coupling is either linear ( q = 1) or quadratic ( q = 2).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Charged systems, like trapped ions, are sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems mainly respond to magnetic fields.
“Charged systems, like trapped ions, will be sensitive to electrical fields, while spin-based systems will mainly respond to magnetic fields.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian H = H0 + HV(t) + Hcontrol(t).
“For the following discussion, we will assume that the quantum sensor can be described by the generic Hamiltonian”
The authors state this as an assumption.
H0 is known and Hcontrol(t) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.
“We will assume that ˆ H 0 is known and that ˆ H control ( t ) can be deliberately chosen so as to manipulate or tune the sensor in a controlled way.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The signal is weak.
“When the signal is weak (which is assumed here) ˆ H V ( t ) adds a small perturbation to ˆ H 0 .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The initialization basis {|0〉,|1〉} and the readout basis {|0'〉,|1'〉} are the same and U_b = U_a†.
“For simplicity we assume that the initialization basis {| 0 〉 , | 1 〉} and the readout basis {| 0 ′ 〉 , | 1 ′ 〉} are the same and that ˆ U b = ˆ U † a , but this is not required.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The readout is projective.
“We assume that the readout is projective, although more general positive-operator-valuedmeasure (POVM) measurements may be possible (Nielsen and Chuang, 2000).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
β = 1.
“Since β is a constant of time, we will assume β = 1 in the following for reasons of simplicity.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones in Section VI.
“In this Section VI, we will assume that the signal is composed of one or a few harmonic tones and our goal will be to determine the signal's amplitude, frequency, phase or overall waveform.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t.
“To illustrate this, we assume that the AC signal goes through exactly one period of oscillation during the sensing time t .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t_s for the Allan variance.
“Assuming that the sensor is sampled over time at constant intervals t s yielding the signal x j = x ( t j ) = x ( jt s ), the Allan variance is defined as”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased for the Cramér-Rao bound.
“Assuming that the estimation procedure is asymptotically locally unbiased, ∆ V N obeys the so-called Cram´ er-Rao bound”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A projective measurement in the σ_x basis is performed for the Fisher information.
“If we assume to perform a projective measurement in the σ x basis, {|±〉} = { 1 √ 2 ( | 0 〉±| 1 〉 ), giving the outcome probabilities p ( x ± | V ) = 〈±| ρ ( V ) |±〉 , the Fisher information is”
The authors state this as an assumption.
t_m ≪ t for the exact optimum solution in slope detection.
“Assuming t m ≪ t , we can find an exact optimum solution with respect to t .”
The paper relies on this without support.
Signals are static and deterministic in the earlier sections.
“So far we have implicitly assumed that signals are static and deterministic.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The stochastic signal V(t) is Gaussian.
“For the following analysis we will assume that the stochastic signal V ( t ) is Gaussian.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The autocorrelation function of V(t) decays on a time scale t_c shorter than the sensing time t, such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.
“decays on a time scale t c that is shorter than the sensing time t , such that successive averaging measurements are not correlated.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise is Gaussian and stationary.
“Under the assumption of a Gaussian, stationary noise, the loss of coherence can be captured by an exponential decay of the transition probability with time t ,”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The control sequence has a modulation function y(t).
“Assuming the control sequence has a modulation function y ( t ) (see Section VI.C), the decay function is determined by the correlation integral”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise process is approximately Markovian.
“The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.
“The basic assumptions are that the noise process is approximately Markovian and that the noise strength is weak, such that first-order perturbation theory is valid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate.
“Since the noise strength is typically much weaker than the noise fluctuation rate, the correction steps can be performed at a much slower rate compared to dynamical decoupling.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use and are the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.
“In fact, quantum sensors based on SQUID magnetometers and atomic vapors are already in everyday use, and have installed themselves as the most sensitive magnetic field detectors currently available.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.
“Likewise, atomic clocks have become the ultimate standard in time keeping and frequency generation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.
“Notably, NV centers in diamond have started conquering many applications in nanoscale imaging due to their small size.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These include quantum sensors which can detect and measure physical phenomena at the quantum level and quantum communication systems which can securely transmit information over long distances [37].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Quantum sensors can detect and sense phenomena at unprecedented sensitivity levels, opening up new possibilities for surveillance and security (Degen et al., 2017).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quantum sensors operate by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to improve their sensitivity and accuracy (Dowling, 2003; Degen et al., 2017; Jaeger, 2018).”
From Quantum technology for development framework as a tool for science diplomacy (2023) · cites this paper as Degen et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“More generally, quantum technologies, such as quantum sensing, [243] might enhance the quality of imaging data of biomolecular structures (see e. g.Ref. [244]) and, therefore, improve the quality of the data on which further classical or quantum computations would be based.”
From Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology** (2023) · cites this paper as [243]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Continuous sampling cites the wrong figure panel
MinorThe text points to Fig. 8(b) for continuous sampling, but the caption labels panel (b) as the correlation sequence and panel (c) as continuous sampling.
“A second approach is the continuous sampling of a signal, illustrated in Fig. 8(b).”
“(b) Correlation sequence. Two multipulse sequences are interrupted by an incremented delay time t 1 . Because the multipulse sequences are phase sensitive, the total phase accumulated after the second multipulse sequence oscillates with f ac t 1 . The maximum t 1 is limited by the relaxation time T 1 , rather than the typically short decoherence time T 2 . (c) Continouous sampling.”
Single-ion clock record conflicts with listed uncertainties
MinorThe passage says single-ion clocks hold the accuracy record, but its listed uncertainty for the strontium ensemble clock is smaller than that for the single-ion ytterbium clock. On the passage's own comparison, the ensemble clock is more accurate.
“Single-ion atomic clocks currently detain the record for the most accurate optical clocks”
“with uncertainties of 2 . 1 × 10 18 for a 87 Sr ensemble clock (Nicholson et al. , 2015) and 3 . 2 × 10 18 for a single a single trapped 171 Yb (Huntemann et al. , 2016).”
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,450
The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism
Abragam, A., & Hebel, L. C. (1961) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1937646 · Cited by 15,999
Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring
Shor, P. W. (2002) · Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700 · Cited by 8,713
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K., & Tao, T. (2006) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.20124 · Cited by 7,036
Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments
Carr, H. Y., & Purcell, E. M. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.94.630 · Cited by 6,445
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J., & Marquardt, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 · Cited by 5,501
Hahn, E. L. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.80.580 · Cited by 5,089
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory
Shor, P. W. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r2493 · Cited by 4,479
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics
Wallraff, A., Schuster, D. I., Blais, A., Frunzio, L., Huang, R. S., Majer, J., Kumar, S., Girvin, S. M., & Schoelkopf, R. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02851 · Cited by 3,796
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104149 · Cited by 3,160
Statistics of atomic frequency standards
Allan, D. W. (1966) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1966.4634 · Cited by 2,692
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 · Cited by 2,440
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386
Quantum Measurement and Control
Wiseman, H. M., & Milburn, G. J. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813948 · Cited by 2,280
Clarke, J. L., & Wilhelm, F. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07128 · Cited by 2,129
Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond
Maze, J. R., Stanwix, P. L., Hodges, J. S., Hong, S., Taylor, J. M., Cappellaro, P., Jiang, L., Dutt, M. V. G., Togan, E., Zibrov, A. S., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07279 · Cited by 2,010
Self-citationNanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions
Balasubramanian, G., Chan, I. Y., Kolesov, R. L., Al-Hmoud, M. M. A., Tisler, J., Shin, C. S., Kim, C., Wójcik, A. K., Hemmer, P., Krueger, A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07278 · Cited by 2,007
High-sensitivity diamond magnetometer with nanoscale resolution
Taylor, J. M., Cappellaro, P., Childress, L., Jiang, L., Budker, D., Hemmer, P., Yacoby, A., Walsworth, R. L., & Lukin, M. D. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1075 · Cited by 1,978
Self-citationQuantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator
O’Connell, A. D., Hofheinz, M., Ansmann, M., Bialczak, R. C., Lenander, M., Lucero, E. A., Neeley, M., Sank, D., Wang, H., Weides, M. P., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08967 · Cited by 1,968
Walls, D. F. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/306141a0 · Cited by 1,965
Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell
Kucsko, G., Maurer, P. C., Yao, N. Y., Kubo, M., Noh, H. J., Lo, P. K., Park, H., & Lukin, M. D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12373 · Cited by 1,961
Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond
Balasubramanian, G., Neumann, P., Twitchen, D. J., Markham, M., Kolesov, R. L., Mizuochi, N., Isoya, J., Achard, J., Beck, J., Tisler, J., et al. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2420 · Cited by 1,954
Budker, D., & Romalis, M. V. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys566 · Cited by 1,923
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
Slichter, C. P. (1978) · Springer series in solid-state sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12784-1 · Cited by 1,921
Observation of Squeezed States Generated by Four-Wave Mixing in an Optical Cavity
Slusher, R. E., Hollberg, L. W., Yurke, B., Mertz, J. C., & Valley, J. F. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2409 · Cited by 1,916
Scanning Confocal Optical Microscopy and Magnetic Resonance on Single Defect Centers
Gruber, A., Dräbenstedt, A., Tietz, C., Fleury, L., Wrachtrup, J., & von Borczyskowski, C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5321.2012 · Cited by 1,833
Kitagawa, M., & Ueda, M. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.5138 · Cited by 1,770
Single-shot read-out of an individual electron spin in a quantum dot
Elzerman, J. M., Hanson, R., van Beveren, L. H. W., Witkamp, B., Vandersypen, L. M. K., & Kouwenhoven, L. P. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02693 · Cited by 1,685
Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy
Rugar, D., Budakian, R., Mamin, H. J., & Chui, B. W. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02658 · Cited by 1,661
Quantum estimation for quantum technology
PARIS, M. G. A. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749909004839 · Cited by 1,632
A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer
Kominis, I. K., Kornack, T. W., Allred, J. C., & Romalis, M. V. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01484 · Cited by 1,631
Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit
Vion, D., Aassime, A., Cottet, A., Joyez, P., Pothier, H., Urbina, C., Esteve, D., & Devoret, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069372 · Cited by 1,624
Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,617
Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor
Martin, J., Akerman, N., Ulbricht, G., Lohmann, T., Smet, J. H., von Klitzing, K., & Yacoby, A. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys781 · Cited by 1,609
Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: nanoscale sensors for physics and biology.
Schirhagl, R., Chang, K., Loretz, M., & Degen, C. (2014) · Annual review of physical chemistry (Print) · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103659 · Cited by 1,598
Self-citationQuantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer ProblemPreprint
Kitaev, A. Y. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/lipics.isaac.2021.31 · Cited by 1,574
A Test of a New Type of Stellar Interferometer on Sirius
Brown, R. H., & Twiss, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/1781046a0 · Cited by 1,562
A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice
Bakr, W., Gillen, J. I., Peng, A., Fölling, S., & Greiner, M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08482 · Cited by 1,511
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,509
Quantum Interferometric Optical Lithography: Exploiting Entanglement to Beat the Diffraction Limit
Boto, A. N., Kok, P., Abrams, D. S., Braunstein, S. L., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.2733 · Cited by 1,494
Frequency Ratio of Al+and Hg+Single-Ion Optical Clocks; Metrology at the 17th Decimal Place
Rosenband, T., Hume, D. B., Schmidt, P. O., Chou, C. W., Brusch, A., Lorini, L., Oskay, W. H., Drullinger, R. E., Fortier, T. M., Stalnaker, J. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154622 · Cited by 1,450
Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond
Rondin, L., Tetienne, J., Hingant, T., Roch, J.-F., Maletinsky, P., & Jacques, V. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056503 · Cited by 1,387
Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins
Dolde, F., Fedder, H., Doherty, M. W., Nöbauer, T., Rempp, F., Balasubramanian, G., Wolf, T., Reinhard, F., Hollenberg, L. C. L., Jelezko, F., et al. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1969 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citationEnhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light
Aasi, J., Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.177 · Cited by 1,204
Optimal frequency measurements with maximally correlated states
Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Wineland, D. J., & Heinzen, D. J. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r4649 · Cited by 1,167
Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., & Heinzen, D. J. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.67 · Cited by 1,162
Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy
Wineland, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., Itano, W. M., Moore, F. L., & Heinzen, D. J. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.46.r6797 · Cited by 1,135
Quantum State Tomography via Compressed Sensing
Gross, D., Liu, Y.-K., Flammia, S. T., Becker, S., & Eisert, J. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.150401 · Cited by 1,133
Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator
(2010) · Journal Club for Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.36471/jccm_april_2010_01 · Cited by 1,128
14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence
Monz, T., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Chwalla, M., Nigg, D., Coish, W. A., Harlander, M., Hänsel, W., Hennrich, M., & Blatt, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.130506 · Cited by 1,110
Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications
Natarajan, C. M., Tanner, M. G., & Hadfield, R. H. (2012) · Superconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0953-2048/25/6/063001 · Cited by 1,076
An optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the 10−18 level
Bloom, B. J., Nicholson, T. L., Williams, J. R., Campbell, S. L., Bishof, M., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Bromley, S. L., & Ye, J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12941 · Cited by 1,073
The single-electron transistor
Kastner, M. A. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.849 · Cited by 1,048
A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution
Chaste, J., Eichler, A., Moser, J., Ceballos, G., Rurali, R., & Bachtold, A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.42 · Cited by 1,036
Rabi Oscillations in a Large Josephson-Junction Qubit
Martinis, J. M., Nam, S. W., Aumentado, J., & Urbina, C. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.117901 · Cited by 1,008
Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement
Huelga, S. F., Macchiavello, C., Pellizzari, T., Ekert, A. K., Plenio, M. B., & Cirac, J. I. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.3865 · Cited by 999
A Closed Set of Normal Orthogonal Functions
Walsh, J. L. (1923) · American Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/2387224 · Cited by 980
Optically programmable electron spin memory using semiconductor quantum dots
Kroutvar, M., Ducommun, Y., Heiss, D., Max Bichler, A., Schuh, D., Abstreiter, G., & Finley, J. J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03008 · Cited by 966
Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms
Peters, A., Chung, K. Y., & Chu, S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23655 · Cited by 940
A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M., Adams, C., Adhikari, R., Affeldt, C., Allen, B., et al. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2083 · Cited by 921
Ultrahigh sensitivity magnetic field and magnetization measurements with an atomic magnetometer
Dang, H. B., Maloof, A. C., & Romalis, M. V. (2010) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3491215 · Cited by 891
Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit
Bylander, J., Gustavsson, S., Yan, F., Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Fitch, G., Cory, D. G., Nakamura, Y., Tsai, J. S., & Oliver, W. D. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1994 · Cited by 888
Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology
Riedel, M. F., Böhi, P., Li, Y., Hänsch, T. W., Sinatra, A., & Treutlein, P. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08988 · Cited by 887
Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination
Lloyd, S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1160627 · Cited by 872
Interferometric detection of optical phase shifts at the Heisenberg limit
Holland, M., & Burnett, K. R. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1355 · Cited by 864
Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances
Sedlacek, J. A., Schwettmann, A., Kübler, H., Löw, R., Pfau, T., & Shaffer, J. P. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2423 · Cited by 862
Characterization and application of single fluorescent nanodiamonds as cellular biomarkers
Fu, C.-C., Lee, H.-Y., Chen, K., Lim, T., Wu, H.-Y., Lin, P.-K., Wei, P., Tsao, P.-H., Chang, H., & Fann, W. S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605409104 · Cited by 856
Takamoto, M., Hong, F.-L., Higashi, R., & Katori, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03541 · Cited by 853
Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830
A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier
Macklin, C., O’Brien, K. P., Hover, D. J., Schwartz, M. E., Bolkhovsky, V., Zhang, X., Oliver, W. D., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8525 · Cited by 826
An Atomic Clock with 10 –18 Instability
Hinkley, N., Sherman, J. A., Phillips, N. B., Schioppo, M., Lemke, N. D., Beloy, K., Pizzocaro, M., Oates, C. W., & Ludlow, A. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240420 · Cited by 817
Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state
Leibfried, D., Knill, E., Seidelin, S., Britton, J., Blakestad, R. B., Chiaverini, J., Hume, D. B., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04251 · Cited by 805
High-Precision Nanoscale Temperature Sensing Using Single Defects in Diamond
Neumann, P., Jakobi, I., Dolde, F., Burk, C., Reuter, R., Waldherr, G., Honert, J., Wolf, T., Brunner, A., Shim, J. H., et al. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl401216y · Cited by 796
Precision Rotation Measurements with an Atom Interferometer Gyroscope
Gustavson, T. L., Bouyer, P., & Kasevich, M. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2046 · Cited by 791
Single-shot readout of an electron spin in silicon
Morello, A., Pla, J. J., Zwanenburg, F. A., Chan, K. W., Tan, K. Y., Huebl, H., Möttönen, M., Nugroho, C., Yang, C., van Donkelaar, J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09392 · Cited by 781
Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty
Nicholson, T. L., Campbell, S. L., Hutson, R. B., Marti, G. E., Bloom, B. J., McNally, R. L., Zhang, W., Barrett, M. D., Safronova, M. S., Strouse, G. F., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7896 · Cited by 780
Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose–Einstein condensate
Estève, J., Gross, C., Weller, A., Giovanazzi, S., & Oberthaler, M. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07332 · Cited by 779
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy on a (5-Nanometer) 3 Sample Volume
Staudacher, T., Shi, F., Pezzagna, S., Meijer, J., Du, J., Meriles, C. A., Reinhard, F., & Wrachtrup, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231675 · Cited by 757
Self-citationThe Radio-Frequency Single-Electron Transistor (RF-SET): A Fast and Ultrasensitive Electrometer
Schoelkopf, R. J., Wahlgren, P., Kozhevnikov, A. A., Delsing, P., & Prober, D. E. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5367.1238 · Cited by 755
Nanoscale Nuclear Magnetic Resonance with a Nitrogen-Vacancy Spin Sensor
Mamin, H. J., Kim, M., Sherwood, M., Rettner, C. T., Ohno, K., Awschalom, D. D., & Rugar, D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231540 · Cited by 755
Lenz, J. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.56910 · Cited by 755
New, compensated Carr-Purcell sequences
Gullion, T., Baker, D. B., & Conradi, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) · doi:10.1016/0022-2364(90)90331-3 · Cited by 746
Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons
Nagata, T., Okamoto, R., O'Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138007 · Cited by 735
Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1996) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · Cited by 732
Optical magnetic imaging of living cells
Sage, D. L., Arai, K., Glenn, D. R., DeVience, S. J., Pham, L., Rahn-Lee, L., Lukin, M. D., Yacoby, A., Komeili, A., & Walsworth, R. L. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12072 · Cited by 731
A robust scanning diamond sensor for nanoscale imaging with single nitrogen-vacancy centres
Maletinsky, P., Hong, S., Grinolds, M. S., Hausmann, B., Lukin, M. D., Walsworth, R. L., Loncar, M., & Yacoby, A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.50 · Cited by 729
Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging
Brida, G., Genovese, M., & Berchera, I. R. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.29 · Cited by 720
Kimmich, R., & Anoardo, E. (2004) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2004.03.002 · Cited by 697
A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer
Krause, A. G., Winger, M., Blasius, T. D., Lin, Q., & Painter, O. J. (2012) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.245 · Cited by 685
Neutron spin echo: A new concept in polarized thermal neutron techniques
Mezei, F. (1972) · Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei · doi:10.1007/bf01394523 · Cited by 678
Single-Ion Atomic Clock with 3 × 10 − 18 Systematic Uncertainty
Huntemann, N., Sanner, C., Lipphardt, B., Tamm, C., & Peik, E. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.063001 · Cited by 677
Decoherence in a superconducting quantum bit circuit
Ithier, G., Collin, E., Joyez, P., Meeson, P. J., Vion, D., Esteve, D., Chiarello, F., Shnirman, A., Makhlin, Y., Schriefl, J., et al. (2005) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.134519 · Cited by 673
Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature
Widmann, M., Lee, S., Rendler, T., Són, N. T., Fedder, H., Paik, S., Yang, L., Zhao, N., Yang, S., Booker, I. D., et al. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4145 · Cited by 670
Toward Heisenberg-Limited Spectroscopy with Multiparticle Entangled States
Leibfried, D., Barrett, M. D., Schaetz, T., Britton, J., Chiaverini, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Langer, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097576 · Cited by 670
Quantum Illumination with Gaussian States
Tan, S.-H., Erkmen, B. I., Giovannetti, V., Guha, S., Lloyd, S., Maccone, L., Pirandola, S., & Shapiro, J. H. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.253601 · Cited by 668
Quantum measurement and orientation tracking of fluorescent nanodiamonds inside living cells
McGuinness, L. P., Yan, Y., Stacey, A. D., Simpson, D., Hall, L. T., Maclaurin, D., Prawer, S., Mulvaney, P. A., Wrachtrup, J., Caruso, F., et al. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.64 · Cited by 668
Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic device
Muhonen, J. T., Dehollain, J. P., Laucht, A., Hudson, F. E., Kalra, R., Sekiguchi, T., Itoh, K. M., Jamieson, D. N., McCallum, J. C., Dzurak, A. S., et al. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.211 · Cited by 663
Two-Photon Diffraction and Quantum Lithography
D’Angelo, M., Chekhova, M. V., & Shih, Y. H. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.013602 · Cited by 661
Nobel Lecture: Controlling photons in a box and exploring the quantum to classical boundary
Haroche, S. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1083 · Cited by 659
Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable Josephson metamaterial
Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Irwin, K. D., Hilton, G. C., Vale, L. R., & Lehnert, K. W. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1090 · Cited by 657
Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory
Biercuk, M. J., Uys, H., VanDevender, A. P., Shiga, N., Itano, W. M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07951 · Cited by 654
Spectroscopy Using Quantum Logic
Schmidt, P. O., Rosenband, T., Langer, C., Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., & Wineland, D. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114375 · Cited by 643
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
E.R., A. (1979) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/0022-2860(79)80357-9 · Cited by 643
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628
Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity
Gleyzes, S., Kuhr, S., Guerlin, C., Bernu, J., Deléglise, S., Hoff, U. B., Brune, M., Raimond, J. M., & Haroche, S. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05589 · Cited by 625
Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems
Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., Bollinger, J. J., Gilligan, J. M., Heinzen, D. J., Moore, F. L., Raizen, M. G., & Wineland, D. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3554 · Cited by 613
Magnetometry with nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond
Rondin, L., Tetienne, J., Hingant, T., Roch, J.-F., Maletinsky, P., & Jacques, V. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 612
Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications
Fagaly, R. L. (2006) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.2354545 · Cited by 597
Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth's gravitational field
Несвижевский, В. В., Börner, H. G., Petukhov, A. K., Abele, H., Baeßler, S., Rueß, F. J., Stöferle, T., Westphal, A., Gagarski, A. M., Petrov, G. A., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415297a · Cited by 589
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Dynamical Decoupling
Khodjasteh, K., & Lidar, D. A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.180501 · Cited by 580
Measurement of the gravitational acceleration of an atom with a light-pulse atom interferometer
Kasevich, M. A., & Chu, S. (1992) · Applied Physics B · doi:10.1007/bf00325375 · Cited by 572
Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen-vacancy centers for magnetometry applications
Acosta, V. M., Bauch, E., Ledbetter, M. P., Santori, C., Fu, K. C., Barclay, P. E., Beausoleil, R. G., Linget, H., Roch, J.-F., Treussart, F., et al. (2009) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.115202 · Cited by 570
Quantum nondemolition measurement of the photon number via the optical Kerr effect
Imoto, N., Haus, H. A., & Yamamoto, Y. (1985) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.32.2287 · Cited by 567
Nuclear Spin Gyroscope Based on an Atomic Comagnetometer
Kornack, T. W., Ghosh, R. K., & Romalis, M. V. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.230801 · Cited by 566
How to enhance dephasing time in superconducting qubits
Cywiński, Ł., Lutchyn, R. M., Nave, C. P., & Sarma, S. D. (2008) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.174509 · Cited by 566
Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit
Taylor, M. A., Janoušek, J., Daria, V. R., Knittel, J., Hage, B., Bachor, H., & Bowen, W. P. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.346 · Cited by 565
De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555
Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions
Bohnet, J. G., Sawyer, B. C., Britton, J. W., Wall, M. L., Rey, A. M., Foss-Feig, M., & Bollinger, J. J. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9958 · Cited by 546
Implementation of Cavity Squeezing of a Collective Atomic Spin
Leroux, I. D., Schleier-Smith, M., & Vuletić, V. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.073602 · Cited by 542
Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms
Hosten, O., Engelsen, N. J., Krishnakumar, R., & Kasevich, M. A. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16176 · Cited by 541
Nuclear magnetic resonance detection and spectroscopy of single proteins using quantum logic
Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O., Urbach, E., de Leon, N. P., Choi, S., Greve, K. D., Evans, R. E., Gertner, R. S., Bersin, E. A., Müller, C., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8022 · Cited by 536
Jing, Y. (2011) · Cited by 528
Quantum Noise in Mesoscopic Physics
(2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0089-5 · Cited by 526
Spin Squeezed Atoms: A Macroscopic Entangled Ensemble Created by Light
Hald, J., Sørensen, J. L., Schori, C., & Polzik, E. S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.1319 · Cited by 524
Isolated electron spins in silicon carbide with millisecond coherence times
Christle, D. J., Falk, A. L., Andrich, P., Klimov, P. V., Ul‐Hassan, J., Són, N. T., Janzén, E., Ohshima, T., & Awschalom, D. D. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4144 · Cited by 518
Scanning magnetic field microscope with a diamond single-spin sensor
Degen, C. L. (2008) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2943282 · Cited by 505
Self-citationSubpicotesla Diamond Magnetometry
Wolf, T., Neumann, P., Nakamura, K., Sumiya, H., Ohshima, T., Isoya, J., & Wrachtrup, J. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.041001 · Cited by 498
Entanglement and Extreme Spin Squeezing
Sørensen, A. S., & Mølmer, K. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4431 · Cited by 495
Nanoscale magnetic resonance imaging
Degen, C. L., Poggio, M., Mamin, H. J., Rettner, C. T., & Rugar, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812068106 · Cited by 493
Self-citationPhase-preserving amplification near the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator
Bergeal, N., Schackert, F., Metcalfe, M., Vijay, R., Manucharyan, V., Frunzio, L., Prober, D. E., Schoelkopf, R. J., Girvin, S. M., & Devoret, M. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09035 · Cited by 475
Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer ProblemPreprint
Kitaev, A. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 472
Rotation sensing with a dual atom-interferometer Sagnac gyroscope
Gustavson, T. L., Landragin, A., & Kasevich, M. A. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/12/311 · Cited by 468
Optical detection of radio waves through a nanomechanical transducer
Bagci, T., Simonsen, A., Schmid, S., Villanueva, L. G., Zeuthen, E., Appel, J., Taylor, J. M., Sørensen, A. S., Usami, K., Schließer, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13029 · Cited by 466
Strong coupling, energy splitting, and level crossings: A classical perspective
Novotný, L. (2010) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.3471177 · Cited by 466
Spin-polarized muons in condensed matter physics
Blundell, S. J. (1999) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/001075199181521 · Cited by 455
Magnetoencephalography with an atomic magnetometer
Xia, H., Baranga, A. B.-A., Hoffman, D., & Romalis, M. V. (2006) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2392722 · Cited by 454
Electronic Properties and Metrology Applications of the Diamond NV − Center under Pressure
Doherty, M. W., Struzhkin, V. V., Simpson, D., McGuinness, L. P., Meng, Y., Stacey, A. D., Karle, T. J., Hemley, R. J., Manson, N. B., Hollenberg, L. C. L., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.047601 · Cited by 453
A quantum Rosetta stone for interferometry
Lee, H., Kok, P., & Dowling, J. P. (2002) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/0950034021000011536 · Cited by 452
Seeing a single photon without destroying it
Nogues, G., Rauschenbeutel, A., Osnaghi, S., Brune, M., Raimond, J. M., & Haroche, S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22275 · Cited by 443
Minimum mean-squared error of estimates in quantum statistics
Helstrom, C. W. (1967) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/0375-9601(67)90366-0 · Cited by 441
A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range
Eom, B. H., Day, P. K., LeDuc, H. G., & Zmuidzinas, J. S. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2356 · Cited by 439
Semiclassical Fourier Transform for Quantum Computation
Griffiths, R. B., & Niu, C.-S. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.3228 · Cited by 431
Quantum Noise Limited and Entanglement-Assisted Magnetometry
Wasilewski, W., Jensen, K., Krauter, H., Renema, J. J., Balabas, M. V., & Polzik, E. S. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.133601 · Cited by 428
A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity
Vasyukov, D., Anahory, Y., Embon, L., Halbertal, D., Cuppens, J., Neeman, L., Finkler, A., Segev, Y., Myasoedov, Y., Rappaport, M. L., et al. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.169 · Cited by 422
Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabricated vapour cell
Shah, V., Knappe, S. A., Schwindt, P. D. D., & Kitching, J. E. (2007) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.201 · Cited by 417
Ion-trap measurements of electric-field noise near surfaces
Brownnutt, M., Kumph, M., Rabl, P., & Blatt, R. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1419 · Cited by 413
Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit
Appel, J., Windpassinger, P., Oblak, D., Hoff, U. B., Kjærgaard, N., & Polzik, E. S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901550106 · Cited by 413
Fluorescence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of single spins in diamond
Toyli, D. M., Casas, C. F. D. L., Christle, D. J., Dobrovitski, V. V., & Awschalom, D. D. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1306825110 · Cited by 411
Single-protein spin resonance spectroscopy under ambient conditions
Shi, F., Zhang, Q., Wang, P., Sun, H., Wang, J., Rong, X., Chen, M., Ju, C., Reinhard, F., Chen, H., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2253 · Cited by 408
Self-citationExperimental Realization of Quantum Illumination
Lopaeva, E. D., Berchera, I. R., Degiovanni, I. P., Olivares, S., Brida, G., & Genovese, M. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.153603 · Cited by 405
Ultrasensitive force detection with a nanotube mechanical resonator
Moser, J., Güttinger, J., Eichler, A., Esplandiu, M. J., Liu, D. E., Dykman, M. I., & Bachtold, A. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.97 · Cited by 404
μSR studies of the vortex state in type-II superconductors
Sonier, J. E., Brewer, J. H., & Kiefl, R. F. (2000) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.72.769 · Cited by 394
Decoherence of Flux Qubits due to 1/f Flux Noise
Yoshihara, F., Harrabi, K., Niskanen, A. O., Nakamura, Y., & Tsai, J.-S. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.167001 · Cited by 394
Using Entanglement Against Noise in Quantum Metrology
Demkowicz-Dobrzański, R., & Maccone, L. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.250801 · Cited by 389
Atom based RF electric field sensing
Fan, H., Kumar, S., Sedlacek, J. A., Kübler, H., Karimkashi, S., & Shaffer, J. P. (2015) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/48/20/202001 · Cited by 387
Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy
Schnabel, R., Mavalvala, N., McClelland, D. E., & Lam, P. K. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1122 · Cited by 387
Observation of Quantum Jumps in a Superconducting Artificial Atom
Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.110502 · Cited by 377
Colloquium: Protecting quantum information against environmental noise
Suter, D., & Álvarez, G. A. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.041001 · Cited by 370
Repetitive Readout of a Single Electronic Spin via Quantum Logic with Nuclear Spin Ancillae
Jiang, L., Hodges, J. S., Maze, J. R., Maurer, P. C., Taylor, J. M., Cory, D. G., Hemmer, P., Walsworth, R. L., Yacoby, A., Zibrov, A. S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176496 · Cited by 354
Charge Noise Spectroscopy Using Coherent Exchange Oscillations in a Singlet-Triplet Qubit
Dial, O., Shulman, M., Harvey, S. P., Bluhm, H., Umansky, V., & Yacoby, A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.146804 · Cited by 353
Submillihertz magnetic spectroscopy performed with a nanoscale quantum sensor
Schmitt, S., Gefen, T., Stürner, F. M., Unden, T., Wolff, G., Müller, C., Scheuer, J., Naydenov, B., Markham, M., Pezzagna, S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam5532 · Cited by 348
Optical detection of magnetic resonance in a single molecule
Wrachtrup, J., von Borczyskowski, C., Bernard, J., Orrit, M., & Brown, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363244a0 · Cited by 347
States of an Ensemble of Two-Level Atoms with Reduced Quantum Uncertainty
Schleier-Smith, M., Leroux, I. D., & Vuletić, V. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.073604 · Cited by 344
Magnetic Sensitivity Beyond the Projection Noise Limit by Spin Squeezing
Sewell, R. J., Koschorreck, M., Napolitano, M., Dubost, B., Behbood, N., & Mitchell, M. W. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.253605 · Cited by 332
Magnetic spin imaging under ambient conditions with sub-cellular resolution
Steinert, S., Ziem, F., Hall, L. T., Zappe, A., Schweikert, M., Götz, N. S., Aird, A., Balasubramanian, G., Hollenberg, L. C. L., & Wrachtrup, J. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2588 · Cited by 332
Spin-Exchange Shift and Narrowing of Magnetic Resonance Lines in Optically Pumped Alkali Vapors
Happer, W., & Tang, H. (1973) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.31.273 · Cited by 332
Kitching, J. E., Knappe, S. A., & Donley, E. A. (2011) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2011.2157679 · Cited by 332
Generalized Uncertainty Relations: Theory, Examples, and Lorentz Invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1995) · Cited by 331
Charge Echo in a Cooper-Pair Box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., Yamamoto, T., & Tsai, J. S. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.047901 · Cited by 322
Scanning Single-Electron Transistor Microscopy: Imaging Individual Charges
Yoo, M. J., Fulton, T. A., Hess, H. F., Willett, R. L., Dunkleberger, L. N., Chichester, R. J., Pfeiffer, L. N., & West, K. W. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5312.579 · Cited by 321
Improved Quantum Metrology Using Quantum Error Correction
Dür, W., Skotiniotis, M., Fröwis, F., & Kraus, B. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.080801 · Cited by 319
Quantum sensing with arbitrary frequency resolution
Boss, J. M., Cujia, K. S., Zopes, J., & Degen, C. L. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7009 · Cited by 316
Self-citationNew Test of Local Lorentz Invariance Using a Ne 21 − Rb − K Comagnetometer
Smiciklas, M., Brown, J. M., Cheuk, L. W., Smullin, S., & Romalis, M. V. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.171604 · Cited by 315
Measuring the Spectrum of Colored Noise by Dynamical Decoupling
Álvarez, G. A., & Suter, D. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.230501 · Cited by 312
Phonon-Induced Spin-Spin Interactions in Diamond Nanostructures: Application to Spin Squeezing
Bennett, S. D., Yao, N. Y., Otterbach, J., Zoller, P., Rabl, P., & Lukin, M. D. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.156402 · Cited by 301
Experimental Demonstration of Entanglement-Enhanced Rotation Angle Estimation Using Trapped Ions
Meyer, V., Rowe, M. A., Kielpinski, D., Sackett, C. A., Itano, W. M., Monroe, C. R., & Wineland, D. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5870 · Cited by 298
Broadband magnetometry and temperature sensing with a light-trapping diamond waveguide
Clevenson, H., Trusheim, M. E., Teale, C., Schröder, T., Braje, D., & Englund, D. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3291 · Cited by 296
Quantum Error Correction for Metrology
Kessler, E. M., Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O., & Lukin, M. D. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.150802 · Cited by 290
Quantum Noise in the Josephson Charge Qubit
Astafiev, O. V., Pashkin, Y. A., Nakamura, Y., Yamamoto, T., & Tsai, J. S. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.267007 · Cited by 288
(2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846380 · Cited by 286
Nanoscale NMR spectroscopy and imaging of multiple nuclear species
DeVience, S. J., Pham, L., Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A. O., Bar‐Gill, N., Belthangady, C., Casola, F., Corbett, M., Zhang, H., Lukin, M. D., et al. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.313 · Cited by 277
Polarized Alkali-Metal Vapor with Minute-Long Transverse Spin-Relaxation Time
Balabas, M. V., Karaulanov, T. S., Ledbetter, M. P., & Budker, D. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.070801 · Cited by 273
Manifestation of Berry’s topological phase in neutron spin rotation
Bitter, T., & Dubbers, D. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.251 · Cited by 264
Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier
Hatridge, M., Vijay, R., Slichter, D. H., Clarke, J. L., & Siddiqi, I. A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.134501 · Cited by 263
Magnetic Field Sensing Beyond the Standard Quantum Limit Using 10-Spin NOON States
Jones, J. A., Karlen, S. D., Fitzsimons, J., Ardavan, A., Benjamin, S. C., Briggs, G. A. D., & Morton, J. J. L. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170730 · Cited by 263
Quantum-mechanical limitations in macroscopic experiments and modern experimental technique
Braginskii, V. B., & Vorontsov, Y. I. (1975) · Soviet Physics Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu1975v017n05abeh004362 · Cited by 258
Spectroscopy of Surface-Induced Noise Using Shallow Spins in Diamond
Romach, Y., Müller, C., Unden, T., Rogers, L. J., Isoda, T., Itoh, K. M., Markham, M., Stacey, A. D., Meijer, J., Pezzagna, S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.017601 · Cited by 256
Entangled Fock states for robust quantum optical metrology, imaging, and sensing
Huver, S. D., Wildfeuer, C. F., & Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.063828 · Cited by 255
Approaching the Heisenberg Limit without Single-Particle Detection
Davis, E. J., Bentsen, G. S., & Schleier-Smith, M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.053601 · Cited by 252
Quantum enhanced estimation of a multidimensional field
Baumgratz, T., & Datta, A. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.030801 · Cited by 249
Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a completely unknown optical phase
Xiang, G., Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2010) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.268 · Cited by 248
High-Resolution Magnetometry with a Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate
Vengalattore, M., Higbie, J., Leslie, S. R., Guzman, J., Sadler, L. E., & Stamper-Kurn, D. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.200801 · Cited by 245
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Livanov, M., 1978, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 238, 253
- van der Sar, T., 2015, Nat. Commun., 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
“antum sensing. Quantum technology has advantages for some kinds of sensing. Quantum systems can sense weak forces with better sensitivity and higher spatial resolution than other sensing technologies [19]; thus quantum sensing could have relatively near-term high-impact applications, to medicine for example. Quantum c…”
BackgroundUltrastrong coupling between light and matter
Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., Liberato, S. D., Savasta, S., & Nori, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-018-0006-2 · Cited by 1,507
Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges
Bruzewicz, C. D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, R., & Sage, J. M. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5088164 · Cited by 1,483
Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry
Barry, J. F., Schloss, J. M., Bauch, E., Turner, M. J., Hart, C., Pham, L., & Walsworth, R. L. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015004 · Cited by 1,333
Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins
Awschalom, D. D., Hanson, R., Wrachtrup, J., & Zhou, B. B. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0232-2 · Cited by 1,096
Metadata
- Authors
- Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F., & Cappellaro, P.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2017-07-25
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W3037447387
- Semantic Scholar
- e5e8fa8ecb175c8a587703a423bb88a6e8efaf58
- Cited by
- 4,045
- References
- 392
- Citations by year
- 2026: 601 · 2025: 827 · 2024: 641 · 2023: 473 · 2022: 425 · 2021: 378 · 2020: 307 · 2019: 236 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 25
- FWCI
- 113.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission (611143)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RE 3606/1-1)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-11-1-0400, W911NF-15-1-0548)
- National Science Foundation (PHY0551153, PHY1415345)
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH-03 16-1)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (200021_137520, NCCR QSIT)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- quantum sensing, quantum sensors, precision metrology, qubits, quantum entanglement, quantum-enhanced sensitivity, timekeeping, sensor implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review