The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening
Open accessAbstract
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a model plant for studying fleshy fruit development. Several genetic and molecular approaches have been developed to increase our knowledge about the physiological basis of fruit growth, but very few data are yet available at the proteomic level. The main stages of fruit development were first determined through the dynamics of fruit diameter and pericarp cell number. Then, total proteins were extracted from pericarp tissue at six relevant developmental stages and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Protein patterns were markedly different between stages. Proteins showing major variations were monitored. We identified 90 of 1,791 well-resolved spots either by matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization time-of-flight peptide mass fingerprinting or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry sequencing and expressed sequence tag database searching. Clustered correlation analysis results pointed out groups of proteins with similar expression profiles during fruit development. In young fruit, spots linked to amino acid metabolism or protein synthesis were mainly expressed during the cell division stage and down-regulated later. Some spots linked to cell division processes could be identified. During the cell expansion phase, spots linked to photosynthesis and proteins linked to cell wall formation transiently increased. In contrast, the major part of the spots related to C compounds and carbohydrate metabolism or oxidative processes were up-regulated during fruit development, showing an increase in spot intensity during development and maximal abundance in mature fruit. This was also the case for spots linked to stress responses and fruit senescence. We discuss protein variations, taking into account their potential role during fruit growth and comparing our results with already known variations at mRNA and metabolite-profiling levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., & Yates, J. R. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2 · Cited by 6,484
Neuhoff, V., Arold, N., Taube, D., & Ehrhardt, W. (1988) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.1150090603 · Cited by 2,676
Genetic Regulation of Fruit Development and Ripening
Giovannoni, J. J. (2004) · THE PLANT CELL ONLINE · doi:10.1105/tpc.019158 · Cited by 1,427
The Roles Of Heat Shock Proteins In Plants
Vierling, E. (1991) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.42.1.579 · Cited by 1,319
Fruits: A Developmental Perspective.
Gillaspy, G., Ben-David, H., & Gruissem, W. (1993) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.5.10.1439 · Cited by 1,198
M OLECULAR B IOLOGY OF F RUIT M ATURATION AND R IPENING
Giovannoni, J. (2001) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.725 · Cited by 930
Cell wall metabolism in fruit softening and quality and its manipulation in transgenic plants
Brummell, D. A., & Harpster, M. H. (2001) · Plant Cell Walls · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0668-2_18 · Cited by 874
Metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology
Fernie, A. R., Trethewey, R. N., Krotzky, A. J., & Willmitzer, L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1451 · Cited by 844
Invertases. Primary Structures, Functions, and Roles in Plant Development and Sucrose Partitioning
Sturm, A. (1999) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.121.1.1 · Cited by 777
Small heat shock proteins and stress tolerance in plants
Sun, W., Van Montagu, M., & Verbruggen, N. (2002) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression · doi:10.1016/s0167-4781(02)00417-7 · Cited by 639
Cited by
Gilbert, L., Alhagdow, M., Nunes‐Nesi, A., Quemener, B., Guillon, F., Bouchet, B., Faurobert, M., Gouble, B., Page, D., Garcia, V., et al. (2009) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03972.x · Cited by 232
Self-citationPost‐harvest proteomics and food security
Pedreschi, R., Lurie, S., Hertog, M., Nicolaï, B., Mes, J., & Woltering, E. (2013) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.201200387 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Faurobert, M., Mihr, C., Bertin, N., Pawlowski, T., Negroni, L., Sommerer, N., & Causse, M.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-05
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1327-1346
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2130611752
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 20.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.106.092817
- The paper
- Faurobert, M., Mihr, C., Bertin, N., Pawlowski, T., Negroni, L., Sommerer, N., & Causse, M. (2007). Major Proteome Variations Associated with Cherry Tomato Pericarp Development and Ripening. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.092817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.