The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subcellular Localization and Speciation of Nickel in Hyperaccumulator and Non-Accumulator Thlaspi Species
Open accessAbstract
The ability of Thlaspi goesingense Hálácsy to hyperaccumulate Ni appears to be governed by its extraordinary degree of Ni tolerance. However, the physiological basis of this tolerance mechanism is unknown. We have investigated the role of vacuolar compartmentalization and chelation in this Ni tolerance. A direct comparison of Ni contents of vacuoles from leaves of T. goesingense and from the non-tolerant non-accumulator Thlaspi arvense L. showed that the hyperaccumulator accumulates approximately 2-fold more Ni in the vacuole than the non-accumulator under Ni exposure conditions that were non-toxic to both species. Using x-ray absorption spectroscopy we have been able to determine the likely identity of the compounds involved in chelating Ni within the leaf tissues of the hyperaccumulator and non-accumulator. This revealed that the majority of leaf Ni in the hyperaccumulator was associated with the cell wall, with the remaining Ni being associated with citrate and His, which we interpret as being localized primarily in the vacuolar and cytoplasm, respectively. This distribution of Ni was remarkably similar to that obtained by cell fractionation, supporting the hypothesis that in the hyperaccumulator, intracellular Ni is predominantly localized in the vacuole as a Ni-organic acid complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sundberg, R. J., & Martin, R. B. (1974) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60290a003 · Cited by 1,147
[16] Isolation of subcellular organelles
Storrie, B., & Amadden, E. (1990) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(90)82018-w · Cited by 555
Cited by
Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting
Rascio, N., & Navari-Izzo, F. (2011) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.016 · Cited by 2,012
Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land
Yan, A., Wang, Y., Tan, S. N., Mohd Yusof, M. L., Ghosh, S., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00359 · Cited by 1,644
Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis
Clemens, S. (2001) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s004250000458 · Cited by 1,417
Metal hyperaccumulation in plants
Krämer, U. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112156 · Cited by 1,284
A long way ahead: understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation
Clemens, S., Palmgren, M. G., & Krämer, U. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02295-1 · Cited by 1,265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Krämer, U., Pickering, I. J., Prince, R. C., Raskin, I., & Salt, D. E.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1343-1354
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2114131175
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subcellular Localization and Speciation of Nickel in Hyperaccumulator and Non-Accumulator Thlaspi Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.122.4.1343
- The paper
- Krämer, U., Pickering, I. J., Prince, R. C., Raskin, I., & Salt, D. E. (2000). Subcellular Localization and Speciation of Nickel in Hyperaccumulator and Non-Accumulator Thlaspi Species. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.122.4.1343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.