The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants
Open accessAbstract
Ancient duplication events and a high rate of retention of extant pairs of duplicate genes have contributed to an abundance of duplicate genes in plant genomes. These duplicates have contributed to the evolution of novel functions, such as the production of floral structures, induction of disease resistance, and adaptation to stress. Additionally, recent whole-genome duplications that have occurred in the lineages of several domesticated crop species, including wheat (Triticum aestivum), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), and soybean (Glycine max), have contributed to important agronomic traits, such as grain quality, fruit shape, and flowering time. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms and impacts of gene duplication will be important to future studies of plants in general and of agronomically important crops in particular. In this review, we survey the current knowledge about gene duplication, including gene duplication mechanisms, the potential fates of duplicate genes, models explaining duplicate gene retention, the properties that distinguish duplicate from singleton genes, and the evolutionary impact of gene duplication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Kitano, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1471 · Cited by 2,278
Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2482 · Cited by 1,281
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
The evolutionary origin of orphan genes
Tautz, D., & Domazet-Lošo, T. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3053 · Cited by 764
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution
paper, A. L. O. A. A. T. A. A. A. T. E. O. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06936 · Cited by 719
Cited by
Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants
Cheng, F., Wu, J., Cai, X., Liang, J., Freeling, M., & Wang, X. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7 · Cited by 398
Abhinandan, K., Skori, L., Stanic, M., Hickerson, N. M. N., Jamshed, M., & Samuel, M. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00734 · Cited by 252
Low number of fixed somatic mutations in a long-lived oak tree
Schmid-Siegert, E., Sarkar, N., Iseli, C., Calderon, S., Gouhier-Darimont, C., Chrast, J., Cattaneo, P., Schütz, F., Farinelli, L., Pagni, M., et al. (2017) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-017-0066-9 · Cited by 161
Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR‐RLK genes across plant evolution
Kileeg, Z., Haldar, A., Khan, H., Qamar, A., & Mott, G. A. (2023) · Plant Direct · doi:10.1002/pld3.556 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Panchy, N., Lehti-Shiu, M., & Shiu, S.-H.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-06-10
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2294-2316
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2474525766
- Cited by
- 1,757
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 90.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
