Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blue Light Receptors and Signal Transduction

Open access
Lin, Chentao·2002·The Plant Cell

Abstract

Functions of Blue Light Receptors in Phototropism, Photomorphogenesis, and Photoperiodic Flowering. Solid arrows depict light, and dashed arrows depict signal transduction of photoreceptors. Cryptochromes share sequence similarity to the DNA repair enzyme photolyase but have no DNA repair activity. Cryptochromes and DNA photolyases share similarities not only in amino acid sequences but also in chromophore composition and in the light-dependent nature of their respective biochemical activities. Cryptochromes appear to be evolutionarily derived from gene duplication events of ancestral photolyase genes, because many organisms, including Arabidopsis and Drosophila, are known to have both cryptochromes and photolyases, functioning as photoreceptors and DNA repair enzymes, respectively (Cashmore et al., 1999). Cryptochromes, which were historically defined by their action spectra, are photolyase-like blue light receptors (Gressel, 1979; Briggs and Huala, 1999; Cashmore et al., 1999; Lin, 2000b). Most organisms examined to date have more than one cryptochrome, and different cryptochromes of the same organism often mediate related light responses. No biochemical activity has been demonstrated for a cryptochrome, but the expression of a cryptochrome gene may be regulated by light via different mechanisms from transcription to degradation. DNA photolyases are ∼55 to 65 kD flavoproteins widely found in microbes including bacteria, Archaea, and yeast (Sancar, 1994). Photolyases catalyze blue/UV-A light–dependent repair of DNA damage resulting from exposure to high-energy short-wavelength (<350 nm) UV light (UV-B and UV-C). There are two types of structurally related DNA photolyases, one (called photolyase) that repairs cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and another (called 6-4 photolyase) that repairs pyrimidine-pyrimidine 6-4 photoproducts (Sancar, 1994, 2000). A phylogenetic analysis indicated that plant cryptochromes are more closely related to the photolyases than to the 6-4 photolyases, whereas animal cryptochromes are more closely related to 6-4 photolyases than to the photolyase (Cashmore et al., 1999). Therefore, it appears that plant cryptochromes and animal cryptochromes arose from independent gene duplications of their respective ancestral photolyase genes. Most plant cryptochromes are 70- to 80-kD proteins with two recognizable domains, an amino terminal PHR (for photolyase-related) domain that shares sequence homology with photolyases and a carboxyl terminal domain that has no strong sequence similarity to known protein domains (Cashmore et al., 1999; Mockler and Lin, unpublished data). Photolyase contains two chromophores, a light-harvesting chromophore, which is either a folate (methenyltetrahydrofolate) or a deazaflavin, and a catalytic chromophore that is flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). Almost all residues known to be important for chromophore binding in photolyase are conserved in cryptochromes, whereas residues of photolyases that are critical for the binding of DNA lesions and the catalysis of DNA repair are not equally conserved in cryptochromes (Ahmad and Cashmore, 1993; Todo et al., 1996; Imaizumi et al., 2000). The chromophore composition of cryptochromes has been investigated using recombinant cryptochrome purified from heterologous expression systems. The full-length Arabidopsis CRY1 expressed and purified from insect cells non-covalently binds a stoichiometric amount of FAD (Lin et al., 1995b). The PHR domain of Arabidopsis CRY1 expressed as a fusion protein to maltose binding protein (CRY1N-MBP) and purified from Escherichia coli also contained non-covalently bound FAD, indicating that the PHR domain is indeed the chromophore binding domain of cryptochrome. In addition, the CRY1N-MBP recombinant protein purified from E. coli contains the light-harvesting chromophore found in many photolyases (Sancar, et al., with the that cryptochromes are no photolyase activity in different in and expression of cryptochromes not the E. coli (Lin et al., et al., et al., 1996; Imaizumi et al., et al., 2000). Cryptochromes have been found in and Cashmore, 1993; 1993; et al., et al., and Cashmore, 1996; Imaizumi et al., et al., and Imaizumi et al., Imaizumi et al., and et al., Most plant Arabidopsis has two cryptochrome genes, CRY1 and (Ahmad and Cashmore, 1993; et al., 1996; et al., and and have cryptochrome genes, and et al., and have and two cryptochrome genes, respectively and Imaizumi et al., The amino acid sequences of CRY1 or and are more to their Arabidopsis than to that the gene duplication resulting in CRY1 and the of and et al., et al., 2000). Most plant cryptochromes a in to the PHR and the domain has been found to be critical to the of Arabidopsis and (Ahmad et al., et al., and Lin, unpublished data). the domains of different cryptochromes in from amino in amino and amino in Arabidopsis CRY1 and to no in the of and of the The PHR gene to a DNA photolyase but it found to have no DNA repair activity

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.000646

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 132 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Lin, C.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2002-05
Volume
14
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
S207-S225
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2163630793
Cited by
367
References
132
FWCI
33.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blue Light Receptors and Signal Transduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.000646
The paper
Lin, C. (2002). Blue Light Receptors and Signal Transduction. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.000646

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.