The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Analysis of the Receptor-Like Kinase Family in Arabidopsis and Rice[W]
Open accessAbstract
Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) belong to the large RLK/Pelle gene family, and it is known that the Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains >600 such members, which play important roles in plant growth, development, and defense responses. Surprisingly, we found that rice (Oryza sativa) has nearly twice as many RLK/Pelle members as Arabidopsis does, and it is not simply a consequence of a larger predicted gene number in rice. From the inferred phylogeny of all Arabidopsis and rice RLK/Pelle members, we estimated that the common ancestor of Arabidopsis and rice had >440 RLK/Pelles and that large-scale expansions of certain RLK/Pelle members and fusions of novel domains have occurred in both the Arabidopsis and rice lineages since their divergence. In addition, the extracellular domains have higher nonsynonymous substitution rates than the intracellular domains, consistent with the role of extracellular domains in sensing diverse signals. The lineage-specific expansions in Arabidopsis can be attributed to both tandem and large-scale duplications, whereas tandem duplication seems to be the major mechanism for recent expansions in rice. Interestingly, although the RLKs that are involved in development seem to have rarely been duplicated after the Arabidopsis–rice split, those that are involved in defense/disease resistance apparently have undergone many duplication events. These findings led us to hypothesize that most of the recent expansions of the RLK/Pelle family have involved defense/resistance-related genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Nam, K. H., & Li, J. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00814-0 · Cited by 1,217
A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy.
Sanderson, M. J. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731 · Cited by 1,156 · cited 2×
“The relative Ks distribution peaks at 0.15 to 0.2 in Arabidopsis, suggesting a large-scale event 22.5 to 30 million years ago (based on the divergence time of 150million years ago between monocot and dicot; Sanderson, 1997; Wikstrom et al., 2001; Chaw et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form
Doebley, J., & Lukens, L. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.7.1075 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Kim, T.-W., Guan, S., Sun, Y., Deng, Z., Tang, W., Shang, J.-X., Sun, Y., Burlingame, A. L., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1970 · Cited by 693
Chitin-Induced Dimerization Activates a Plant Immune Receptor
Liu, T., Liu, Z., Song, C., Hu, Y., Han, Z., She, J., Fan, F., Wang, J., Jin, C., Chang, J., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1218867 · Cited by 680
Lipo-chitooligosaccharide Signaling in Endosymbiotic Plant-Microbe Interactions
Gough, C., & Cullimore, J. (2011) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-01-11-0019 · Cited by 254
The Arabidopsis genome: A foundation for plant research
Bevan, M., & Walsh, S. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3723405 · Cited by 153
Li, L., & Weigel, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-020620-114826 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiu, S.-H., Karlowski, W. M., Pan, R., Tzeng, Y.-H., Mayer, K. F. X., & Li, W.-H.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1220-1234
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2143406588
- Cited by
- 1,139
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.