The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visualizing mRNA expression in plant protoplasts: factors influencing efficient mRNA uptake and translation.
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we demonstrate that RNA sequences present upstream and downstream of a reporter gene coding region play an important role in determining the amount of protein produced from an mRNA. A translational enhancer, omega, derived from tobacco mosaic virus, when present at the 5'-end of beta-glucuronidase mRNA increased the efficiency of translation 16-fold to 18-fold in electroporated tobacco or carrot protoplasts, and threefold to 11-fold in maize or rice protoplasts. The presence of omega did not alter the half-life of the mRNA in vivo. We also demonstrate for the first time that a minimum polyadenylated tail length of 25 adenylate residues is sufficient to substantially increase the expression and half-life of the reporter mRNA in plants. When in vitro-produced mRNAs were synthesized such that extra sequence was added to the 3'-end of the poly(A) tail, however, the final level of expression was decreased up to 80%. Omega, the translational enhancer, and a poly(A) tail function independently of each other; their combined effect on translation, when both are present in an mRNA, is the multiplication of their individual effects. Histochemical analysis for the presence of beta-glucuronidase in tobacco established that virtually all viable cells receive mRNA during electroporation. Video image analysis of tobacco protoplasts electroporated with luciferase mRNA demonstrated that there is a wide range in the level of expression of this marker. Carrier RNA, when present during electroporation, had only a modest effect on increasing mRNA uptake. Reporter mRNA expression in electroporated protoplasts was directly proportional to the input mRNA up to at least 30 micrograms/ml.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kozak, M. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2 · Cited by 4,741
Edmonds, M., Vaughan, M. H., & Nakazato, H. (1971) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.68.6.1336 · Cited by 510
Cited by
Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants
Chiu, W.-L., Niwa, Y., Zeng, W., Hirano, T., Kobayashi, H., & Sheen, J. (1996) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00483-9 · Cited by 1,364
The cap and poly(A) tail function synergistically to regulate mRNA translational efficiency.
Gallie, D. R. (1991) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.5.11.2108 · Cited by 868
Self-citationDo the poly(A) tail and 3’ untranslated region control mRNA translation?
Jackson, R. J., & Standart, N. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90235-7 · Cited by 590
Concordant Regulation of Translation and mRNA Abundance for Hundreds of Targets of a Human microRNA
Hendrickson, D. G., Hogan, D. J., McCullough, H. L., Myers, J. W., Herschlag, D., Ferrell, J. E., & Brown, P. O. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000238 · Cited by 418
Imaging of light emission from the expression of luciferases in living cells and organisms: a review
Greer, L. F., & Szalay, A. A. (2002) · Luminescence · doi:10.1002/bio.676 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallie, D. R., Lucas, W. J., & Walbot, V
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-311
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2131951833
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.