PreprintCited by 868RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA modifications and cancer

The cap and poly(A) tail function synergistically to regulate mRNA translational efficiency.

Open access
Gallie, D R·1991·Genes & Development

Abstract

The cap structure and the poly(A) tail are important regulatory determinants in establishing the translational efficiency of a messenger RNA. Although the mechanism by which either determinant functions remains poorly characterized, the interaction between the poly(A) tail-poly(A)-binding protein complex and events occurring at the 5' terminus during translation initiation has been an intriguing possibility. In this report, the mutual dependence of the cap and the poly(A) tail was studied. Poly(A)+ and poly(A)- luciferase (Luc) mRNAs generated in vitro containing or lacking a cap were translated in vivo in tobacco protoplasts, Chinese hamster ovary cells, and yeast following delivery by electroporation. The poly(A) tail-mediated regulation of translational efficiency was wholly dependent on the cap for function. Moreover, cap function was enhanced over an order of magnitude by the presence of a poly(A) tail. The relative differences in stability between the mRNAs could not account for the synergism. The synergism between the cap and poly(A) tail was not observed in yeast cells in which active translation had been disrupted. In addition, the synergism was not observed in in vitro translation lysates. These data demonstrate that the cap and the poly(A) tail are interdependent for optimal function in vivo and suggest that communication between the two regulatory determinants may be important in establishing efficient translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.5.11.2108

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 5′-capping promotes pre-mRNA splicing.

    “Screening mRNA against exonuclease activity, promoting pre-mRNA splicing, and functioning as binding site of eIF4F heterodimeric translation initiation complex are all important functions of 5′-capping (Izaurralde et al. 1994; Gallie 1991).”

    From Modifications of mRNA vaccine structural elements for improving mRNA stability and translation efficiency (2022) · cites this paper as Gallie 1991

    The paper’s opening discussion and Discussion section address the cap’s roles in translation and mRNA stability, not pre-mRNA splicing. Searches for splicing and for cap-dependent removal of introns found no passage stating that capping promotes splicing; a splicing study appears only in the References. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The poly(A) tail plays an important role in maintaining mRNA stability and translation efficiency.

    “The poly(A) tail plays an important role in maintaining mRNA stability and translation efficiency.116”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [116]

  • 5′-capping functions as binding site of eIF4F heterodimeric translation initiation complex.

    “Screening mRNA against exonuclease activity, promoting pre-mRNA splicing, and functioning as binding site of eIF4F heterodimeric translation initiation complex are all important functions of 5′-capping (Izaurralde et al. 1994; Gallie 1991).”
  • 5′-capping screens mRNA against exonuclease activity.

    “Screening mRNA against exonuclease activity, promoting pre-mRNA splicing, and functioning as binding site of eIF4F heterodimeric translation initiation complex are all important functions of 5′-capping (Izaurralde et al. 1994; Gallie 1991).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallie, D. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Gallie, D R
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
1991-11
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
2108-2116
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2095950646
Cited by
868
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
mRNA cap, poly(A) tail, translation efficiency, poly(A)-binding protein, 5' cap, mRNA stability, translation initiation, mRNA translation regulation, in vivo translation, tobacco protoplasts, CHO cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Cricetinae, Kinetics, Luciferases, Plants, Toxic, Plasmids, Poly A, Protoplasts, RNA Caps, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nicotiana, Protein Biosynthesis, CHO Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review