The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive and Negative Factors Confer Phase-Specific Circadian Regulation of Transcription in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
The circadian clock exerts a major influence on transcriptional regulation in plants and other organisms. We have previously identified a motif called the evening element (EE) that is overrepresented in the promoters of evening-phased genes. Here, we demonstrate that multimerized EEs are necessary and sufficient to confer evening-phased circadian regulation. Although flanking sequences are not required for EE function, they can modulate EE activity. One flanking sequence, taken from the PSEUDORESPONSE REGULATOR 9 promoter, itself confers dawn-phased rhythms and has allowed us to define a new clock promoter motif (the morning element [ME]). Scanning mutagenesis reveals that both activators and repressors of gene expression act through the ME and EE. Although our experiments confirm that CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) are likely to act as repressors via the EE, they also show that they have an unexpected positive effect on EE-mediated gene expression as well. We have identified a clock-regulated activity in plant extracts that binds specifically to the EE and has a phase consistent with it being an activator of expression through the EE. This activity is reduced in CCA1/LHY null plants, suggesting it may itself be part of a circadian feedback loop and perhaps explaining the reduction in EE activity in these double mutant plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA microarray analyses of circadian timing: the genomic basis of biological time
Duffield, G. E. (2003) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.01082.x · Cited by 234
Cited by
Covington, M. F., Maloof, J. N., Straume, M., Kay, S. A., & Harmer, S. L. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r130 · Cited by 747
Self-citationAltered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids
Ni, Z., Kim, E.-D., Ha, M., Lackey, E., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Sun, Q., & Chen, Z. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07523 · Cited by 677
The clock gene circuit in Arabidopsis includes a repressilator with additional feedback loops
Pokhilko, A., Fernández, A. P., Edwards, K. D., Southern, M. M., Halliday, K. J., & Millar, A. J. (2012) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2012.6 · Cited by 409
Circadian Clock and Photoperiodic Flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS Is a Hub for Signal Integration
Shim, J. S., Kubota, A., & Imaizumi, T. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01327 · Cited by 359
Interplay of Circadian Clocks and Metabolic Rhythms
Wijnen, H., & Young, M. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090603 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Harmer, S. L., & Kay, S. A.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-27
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1926-1940
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2154518257
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive and Negative Factors Confer Phase-Specific Circadian Regulation of Transcription in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.105.033035
- The paper
- Harmer, S. L., & Kay, S. A. (2005). Positive and Negative Factors Confer Phase-Specific Circadian Regulation of Transcription in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.033035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.